CSS 506 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CSS 506

Description:

CSS 506 AQUA GROUP ACTION RESEARCH Introduction History and evolution Attributes Methodology Disciplines involved Strengths and weaknesses Two examples Thinking on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Laura728
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CSS 506


1
CSS 506
  • AQUA GROUP
  • ACTION RESEARCH

2
Introduction
  • History and evolution
  • Attributes
  • Methodology
  • Disciplines involved
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Two examples

3
Thinking on your feet
4
ACTION RESEARCH
  • Has always been linked with social change for
    social justice (McNiff and Whitehead, 2006).
  • Asks the question How can the situation be
    understood, and how can it be changed?

5
Action Research
  • John Collier Commissioner of Bureau of Indian
    Affairs in 1930s First to examine group work
    and explore ways to achieve better results.
  • Kurt Lewin 1940s People are more motivated to
    work when they are involved in the
    decision-making process. Coined phrase Action
    Research.
  • Began as an approach to management (and manager)
    development

6
Action Research
  • Stephen M. Corey (1950s)
  • The teacher had only one year experience Which
    she repeated for thirty years. (Corey, 1954)
  • Early work devoted to Education
  • -Action Research to Improve School Practices.
    Corey, Stephen, 1953. Teachers College, Columbia
    University, NY.
  • -Childrens Social Values. Foshay, A. and Kenneth
    D. Wann, 1954. Teachers College, Columbia
    University, NY.

7
Action Research
  • Donald ShÖn (1960s and 70s)
  • SchÖns central argument was that change was a
    fundamental feature of modern life and that it is
    necessary to develop social systems that could
    learn and adapt.
  • Used the term thinking on your feet.

8
Action Research Cycle of Steps
  • Observe
  • Reflect
  • Act
  • Evaluate
  • Modify

9
Action Research Cycle
10
Attributes of Action Research
  • Shared ownership of research projects
  • Community-based analysis of social problems
  • Orientation towards community action
  • Value-laden
  • Led by practitioners
  • Open-ended

11
Action Research
  • Goal of Action Research perceived functionality
    of chosen actions to produce desirable
    consequences for an organization.
  • Action Research facilitates the development of
    techniques on how to review, revise and redefine
    the effort in which we are a part.

12
Common Names for Action Research
  • Action Research
  • Action Science
  • Participatory Action Research
  • Collaborative Action Research
  • Advocacy Participatory Research
  • Transformative Emancipatory Research
  • Practice-Directed Research
  • Participatory Research
  • Participatory Inquiry

13
Context of Development
  • Aloof scientists, irrelevant research and
    disconnected practitioners.
  • Existence of obvious social problems and a desire
    to act/for action, but unsure how to act.
  • Recognize situational, non-discrete systems
    within systems and need for integrated approach
    and enduring resolution (unlike small scale
    biophysical systems).

14
Current Methodology
  • All are scientists/co-researchers
  • Connected practitioners and public
  • Complex problems requires lots of resources, not
    just experts.
  • Relevance stakeholder involvement,
    planning/collaboration incorporates desires or
    negotiated outcomes, reduces long-term conflict.
    More of an interdependent approach.

15
Methodologies
  • Two schools of Action Research both disassociate
    themselves with traditional research
  • Practice-directed Research
  • Emancipatory Action Research

16
Methodologies
Action Research is not defined by its methodology
but by the engagement of the participants.
  • Those driven by the researchers agenda to
    those driven by participants
  • Those motivated by goal attainment to those
    motivated by personal, organizational, or
    societal transformation
  • 1st-person research my research on my own
    actions, aimed at personal change
  • 2nd-person research our research on our group,
    aimed at improving the group
  • 3rd-person research scholarly research, aimed
    at theoretical generalization and large scale
    change.

17
Techniques
  • Interviews
  • Mapping
  • Participatory Planning
  • Conducting research, then taking action v. taking
    action and collecting data

18
Fields of Use
  • Education
  • Health Care
  • Community/Rural Development
  • Agriculture and Natural Resources
  • Geography
  • Architecture/Landscape Architecture
  • Planning

19
If small rural communities improve their
leadership systems, then these communities will
be able to take action on poverty reduction.
20
Examples in CSS Windward Islands Ecotourism
Development
  • Stakeholders included environmental groups,
    representatives of local governments, community
    organizations, womens and youth groups, farmers,
    private business owners
  • Two action researchers from Toronto were hired to
    facilitate process
  • A conference was organized on each island with
    the stakeholders
  • The outcome of these was a set of recommendations
    for carrying out nature tourism oriented projects
    at the local community level
  • Regular regional meetings were held for
    evaluations and to ensure that the process
    continued
  • Three of the four islands were relatively
    successful. The fourth was stifled by the local
    government who felt that power relationships were
    changing.

21
Strengths
  • User-friendly and accessible to professional
    practitioners and laypeople
  • Can improve and enhance quality of life for
    participants
  • Inclusive
  • Extends knowledge base
  • May alleviate interconnected problems
  • May transform power systems

22
Criticisms Methodologies
  • Rigor
  • Validity
  • Action Research is a poor reporter
  • Methodology in Action Research lags behind its
    development in practice
  • Inability to capture the richness of events the
    dynamics, encounters, emotions and shifts.
  • Double-challenge of time pressure for more
    real time discovery on the one hand, and
    long-term, evidence based learning on the
    other.
  • Nuances of cases are difficult to debate, learn
    from, generalize and diffuse.

23
Criticisms Approaches
  • Is participation always good?
  • Is participation always empowering?
  • Consultation Fatigue
  • Techniques may reinforce informal social
    structures that are potentially negative
  • Participation is rarely fully employed

24
Summary
  • Action Research is cyclical
  • Paradigm of Praxis?
  • Methodology(ies) continue to evolve

25
Walmart
  • Introductions
  • Decision Making Impact
  • How are you going to discover the impact that
    Walmart will have on your community? What are
    specific methods you will use to gain this
    information?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com