Investigating an Outbreak - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Investigating an Outbreak

Description:

Title: Principles of Epidemiology CORE 5520 (32:832:520) Author: Janet Huang Last modified by: Created Date: 6/11/2002 12:59:18 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:357
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: JanetH171
Learn more at: http://www.bibalex.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Investigating an Outbreak


1
Investigating an Outbreak
  • Principles of Epidemiology
  • Lecture 8
  • Dona Schneider, PhD, MPH, FACE

2
What is an outbreak?
  • An epidemic or an outbreak exists when there are
    more cases of a particular disease than expected
    in a given area, or among a specific group of
    people, over a particular period of time.

3
Endemic vs. Epidemic
No. of Cases of a Disease
Epidemic
Endemic
Time
4
Why investigate outbreaks or epidemics?
  • Control and prevention
  • Severity and risk to others
  • Research opportunities to gain additional
    knowledge
  • Training opportunities
  • Program considerations
  • Public, political, or legal concerns

5
Step 1 Verify the outbreak
  • Determine whether there is an outbreak an
    excess number of cases from what would be
    expected
  • Establish a case definition
  • Non-ambiguous
  • Clinical / diagnostic verification
  • Person / place / time descriptions
  • Identify and count cases of illness

6
Step 2 Plot an Epidemic Curve
  • Graph of the number of cases (y-axis) by their
    date or time of onset (x-axis)
  • Interpreting an epidemic curve
  • Overall pattern increase, peak, decrease
  • Type of epidemic?
  • Incubation period?
  • Outliers
  • Unrelated?
  • Early or late exposure?
  • Index case? Secondary cases?

7
Vector-borne Disease
  • Starts slowly
  • Time between the first case and the peak is
    comparable to the incubation period.
  • Slow tail

8
Point Source Transmission
  • This is the most common form of transmission in
    food-borne disease, in which a large population
    is exposed for a short period of time.

9
Continuing Common Source or Intermittent Exposure
  • In this case, there are several peaks, and the
    incubation period cannot be identified.

10
Salmonellosis in passengers on a flight from
London to the United States, by time of onset,
March 13--14, 1984
Source Investigating an Outbreak, CDC
11
Legionnaires' DiseaseBy date of onset,
Philadelphia, July 1-August 18, 1976
Source Investigating an Outbreak, CDC
12
Foodborne Outbreak (Propagated)
Source CDC, unpublished data, 1978
13
Step 3 Calculate attack rates
  • Attack rate (ill / ill well) x 100 during a
    time period
  • If there is an obvious commonality for the
    outbreak, calculate attack rates based on
    exposure status (a community picnic)
  • If there is no obvious commonality for the
    outbreak, calculate attack rates based on
    specific demographic variables (hepatitis cases
    in a community)

14
Step 4 Determine the source of the epidemic
  • If there is an obvious commonality for the
    outbreak, identify the most likely cause and
    investigate the source to prevent future
    outbreaks
  • If there is no obvious commonality for the
    outbreak, plot the geographic distribution of
    cases by residence/ work/school/location and seek
    common exposures

15
Step 5 Recommend control measures
  • Control of present outbreak
  • Prevention of future similar outbreaks

16
The vast majority of outbreaks are food-borne
17
Foodborne Disease Outbreak
  • An incident in which (1) two or more persons
    experience a similar illness after ingestion of a
    common food, and (2) epidemiologic analysis
    implicates the food as the source of the illness
  • Intoxication ingestion of foods with
  • Toxicants found in tissues of certain plants
    (Jimpson Weed) and animals (seal liver)
  • Metabolic products (toxins) formed and excreted
    by microorganisms while they multiply (botulinum
    toxin)
  • Poisonous substances introduced during
    production, processing, transportation or storage
    (chemicals, pesticides)

18
Foodborne Disease Outbreak (cont.)
  • Infections Caused by the entrance of pathogenic
    microorganisms into the body and the reaction of
    the body tissues to their presence or to toxins
    they generate within the body
  • Rule of thumb but not law
  • Intoxicants are rapid onset, no fever
  • Toxins in the stomach produce vomiting
  • Toxins in the intestines produce diarrhea
  • Infections produce fever

19
Types of Foodborne Contamination
  • Physical
  • Glass, metal fragments, tacks, dirt, bone, etc.
  • Chemical
  • Pesticides, cleaning compounds, poisonous metals,
    additives and preservatives
  • Biological
  • Bacteria, viruses, fungi, yeast, molds,
    parasites, poisonous fish and plants, insect and
    rodents

20
Bacterial Requirements
  • Food Most bacteria require what is known as
    potentially hazardous food
  • Milk or milk products, eggs, meat, poultry, fish,
    shellfish, crustaceans, raw seed sprouts, heat
    treated vegetables and vegetable products
    (fruits?)
  • Generally high protein, moist foods

21
Bacterial Requirements (cont.)
  • Water Bacteria require moisture to thrive
  • The water activity (Aw) is the amount of water
    available in food
  • The lowest Aw at which bacteria will grow is 0.85
  • Most potentially hazardous foods have a water
    activity of 0.97 to 0.99
  • pH Best growth at neutral or slightly acidic pH
  • Potentially hazardous foods have a pH of 4.6 7.0

22
Bacterial Requirements (cont.)
  • Temperature The danger zone for potentially
    hazardous foods is 45 to 140 degrees Fahrenheit
  • This is the zone where most bacterial growth
    occurs
  • Time Potentially hazardous foods must not be
    allowed to remain in the danger zone for more
    than 4 hours
  • Oxygen Some bacteria require oxygen while
    others are anaerobic and others are facultative

23
Major Causes of Foodborne Disease
  • Improper cooling of foods
  • Improper cooking of foods
  • Improper reheating of foods
  • Improper holding temperature of foods
  • Cross contamination
  • Infected food handlers, poor employee hygiene

24
Temperature and Bacteria Control
0 F
250 240
Canning temperatures for low-acid vegetables,
meat, and poultry in pressure canner
Canning temperatures for fruits, tomatoes, and
pickles in waterbath canner
212
Water boils
Most bacteria destroyed
165
No growth, but survival of some bacteria
140
DANGER ZONE
Some bacterial growth many bacteria survive
125 120
Hottest temperature hands can stand
Extreme DANGER ZONE. Rapid growth of bacteria and
production of poisons by some bacteria
98.6
Body temperature ideal for bacterial growth
60
Some growth of food poisoning bacteria may occur
45
40
Slow growth of some bacteria that cause spoilage
32
Water freezes
Growth of bacteria is stopped, but bacteria level
before freezing remains constant and not reduced
0
Keep frozen foods in this range
- 20
Source Keeping Food Safe to Eat, USDA
25
Bacterial Growth Curve
Stationary Phase
Log Phase
Number of Cells
Decline Phase
Lag Phase
Time
26
Effect of Temperature in Salmonella Growth
Number of Salmonella per gram
50oF (10o C)
95oF (35o C)
44oF (6.7o C)
42oF (5.5o C)
4
5
3
2
1
Days
27
Incubation Periods
2-4 hours Staphylococcus aureus Cooked ham, meat, eggs, sauces and gravies
12 hours Clostridium perfringens Cooked meats, gravy
12-36 hours Salmonella Meat, poultry, eggs
12-36 hours Clostridium botulinum Canned foods, smoked fish
12 hours Vibrio parahemolyticus Raw fish, shellfish
24-48 hours Shigella Contaminated by carrier, not foodborne
Fever
28
National Data on Etiology of Foodborne Illness
Agent
Bacteria (40 agents) 68.7
Salmonella 25.0
Staph. aureus 12.7
Clostridium perfringens 10.0
Clostridium botulinum 9.5
Viral (11 agents) 9.4
Parasites (31 agents) 0.5
Fungal (16 agents) 1.8
Plants (36 agents) -
Fish (28 agents) 12.3
Chemicals (28 agents) 7.3
29
Investigating an Epidemic Oswego, NY

On April 19, 1940, the local health officer in
the village of Lycoming, Oswego County, New York,
reported the occurrence of an outbreak of acute
gastrointestinal illness to the District Health
Officer in Syracuse.  Dr. A. M. Rubin,
epidemiologist-in-training, was assigned to
conduct an investigation.
When Dr. Rubin arrived in the field, he learned
from the health officer that all persons known to
be ill had attended a church supper the previous
evening, April 18.  Family members who had not
attended the church supper had not become ill. 
Accordingly, the investigation was focused on the
circumstances related to the supper.
Source CDC
30
Interviews regarding the presence of symptoms,
including the day and hour of onset, and the food
consumed at the church supper, were completed on
75 of the 80 persons known to have been present. 
A total of 46 persons who had experienced
gastrointestinal illness were identified. Q
Is this an Epidemic? Endemic for the region?
Due to seasonal variation? Due to random
variation?
31
  • Select the correct case definition
  • and find the error in the others
  • All participants in the Oswego church supper held
    in the basement of the church in Lycoming, Oswego
    County, New York, on April 18, 1940, between 600
    PM and 1100 PM whether they attended church or
    not whether they participated in food
    preparation, transport, or distribution or not
    whether they ate or not.
  • Persons who developed acute gastrointestinal
    symptoms within 72 hours of eating supper on
    April 18, 1940, and who were among attendees of
    the Lycoming, Oswego Church supper.
  • Church members who developed acute
    gastrointestinal symptoms within 72 hours of the
    church supper held in Lycoming, Oswego on April
    18, 1940.

32
  • Select the correct case definition
  • and find the error in the others
  • All participants in the Oswego church supper held
    in the basement of the church in Lycoming, Oswego
    County, New York, on April 18, 1940, between 600
    PM and 1100 PM whether they attended church or
    not whether they participated in food
    preparation, transport, or distribution or not
    whether they ate or not.
  • Persons who developed acute gastrointestinal
    symptoms within 72 hours of eating supper on
    April 18, 1940, and who were among attendees of
    the Lycoming, Oswego Church supper.
  • Church members who developed acute
    gastrointestinal symptoms within 72 hours of the
    church supper held in Lycoming, Oswego on April
    18, 1940.

33
  • Select the correct case definition
  • and find the error in the others
  • All participants in the Oswego church supper held
    in the basement of the church in Lycoming, Oswego
    County, New York, on April 18, 1940, between 600
    PM and 1100 PM whether they attended church or
    not whether they participated in food
    preparation, transport, or distribution or not
    whether they ate or not. Missing definition of
    sickness
  • Persons who developed acute gastrointestinal
    symptoms within 72 hours of eating supper on
    April 18, 1940, and who were among attendees of
    the Lycoming, Oswego Church supper. CORRECT
  • Church members who developed acute
    gastrointestinal symptoms within 72 hours of the
    church supper held in Lycoming, Oswego on April
    18, 1940. Did not specify that they went to the
    dinner

34
Incidence of Cases of Diarrhea Among People
Attending Lycoming,Oswego Church Supper, June 1940
35
The supper was held in the basement of the
village church.  Foods were contributed by
numerous members of the congregation.  The supper
began at 600 PM and continued until 1100 PM. 
Food was spread out upon a table and consumed
over a period of several hours.
36
Church Supper Menu
Main Dishes Baked ham Spinach Mashed potatoes Cabbage salad Fruit Salad
Side Dishes Jello Rolls Brown Bread
Desserts Cakes Vanilla Ice Cream Chocolate Ice Cream
Beverages Milk Coffee Water
37
Which menu item(s) is the potential culprit? To
find out, calculate attack rates. The foods that
have the greatest difference in attack rates may
be the foods that were responsible for the
illness.
38
Attack Rates by Items Served Church Supper,
Oswego, New York April 1940
Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item
Ill Well Total Attack rate () Ill Well Total Attack rate
Baked ham 29 17 46 17 12 29
Spinach 26 17 43 20 12 32
Mashed potato 23 14 37 23 14 37
Cabbage salad 18 10 28 28 19 47
Jello 16 7 23 30 22 52
Rolls 21 16 37 25 13 38
Brown bread 18 9 27 28 20 48
Milk 2 2 4 44 27 71
Coffee 19 12 31 27 17 44
Water 13 11 24 33 18 51
Cakes 27 13 40 19 16 35
Ice cream (van) 43 11 54 3 18 21
Ice cream (choc) 25 22 47 20 7 27
Fruit salad 4 2 6 42 27 69
39
Attack Rates by Items Served Church Supper,
Oswego, New York April 1940
Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item
Ill Well Total Attack rate () Ill Well Total Attack rate
Baked ham 29 17 46 63 17 12 29 59
Spinach 26 17 43 60 20 12 32 62
Mashed potato 23 14 37 62 23 14 37 62
Cabbage salad 18 10 28 64 28 19 47 60
Jello 16 7 23 70 30 22 52 58
Rolls 21 16 37 57 25 13 38 66
Brown bread 18 9 27 67 28 20 48 58
Milk 2 2 4 50 44 27 71 62
Coffee 19 12 31 61 27 17 44 61
Water 13 11 24 54 33 18 51 65
Cakes 27 13 40 67 19 16 35 54
Ice cream (van) 43 11 54 80 3 18 21 14
Ice cream (choc) 25 22 47 53 20 7 27 74
Fruit salad 4 2 6 67 42 27 69 61
40
Attack Rates by Items Served Church Supper,
Oswego, New York April 1940
Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who ate specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item Number of persons who did not eat specified item
Ill Well Total Attack rate () Ill Well Total Attack rate
Baked ham 29 17 46 63 17 12 29 59
Spinach 26 17 43 60 20 12 32 62
Mashed potato 23 14 37 62 23 14 37 62
Cabbage salad 18 10 28 64 28 19 47 60
Jello 16 7 23 70 30 22 52 58
Rolls 21 16 37 57 25 13 38 66
Brown bread 18 9 27 67 28 20 48 58
Milk 2 2 4 50 44 27 71 62
Coffee 19 12 31 61 27 17 44 61
Water 13 11 24 54 33 18 51 65
Cakes 27 13 40 67 19 16 35 54
Ice cream (van) 43 11 54 80 3 18 21 14
Ice cream (choc) 25 22 47 53 20 7 27 74
Fruit salad 4 2 6 67 42 27 69 61
Highlighted row indicates largest difference
between attack rates
41
Attack Rate by Consumption of Vanilla Ice Cream,
Oswego, New York April 1940
Ill Well Total Attack Rate ()
Ate vanilla ice cream? Yes 43 11 54 79.6
Ate vanilla ice cream? No 3 18 21 14.3
Ate vanilla ice cream? Total 46 29 75 61.3
  • The relative risk is calculated as 79.6/14.3 or
    5.6
  • The relative risk indicates that persons who ate
    vanilla ice cream were 5.6 times more likely to
    become ill than those who did not eat vanilla ice
    cream

42
Conclusion
  • An attack of gastroenteritis occurred following a
    church supper at Lycoming
  • The cause of the outbreak was most likely
    contaminated vanilla ice cream

43
Surveillance
  • Ongoing systematic collection, collation,
    analysis and interpretation of data and the
    dissemination of information to those who need to
    know in order that action may be taken.
  • World Health Organization

44
Purposes of Public Health Surveillance
  • Estimate magnitude of the problem
  • Determine geographic distribution of illnesses
  • Portraying the natural history of disease
  • Detect epidemic / Define a problem
  • Generate hypotheses and stimulate research
  • Evaluate control measures
  • Monitor changes in infectious agents
  • Detect changes in health practice
  • Facilitate planning

CDC
45
Passive Surveillance
  • Physicians, laboratories, and hospitals are given
    forms to complete and submit with the expectation
    that they will report all of the cases of
    reportable disease that come to their attention
  • Advantages Inexpensive
  • Disadvantages Data are provided by busy health
    professionals. Thus, the data are more likely to
    be incomplete and underestimate the presence of
    disease in the population

46
Active Surveillance
  • Involves regular periodic collection of case
    reports by telephone or personal visits to the
    reporting individuals to obtain the data
  • Advantages More accurate because it is
    conducted by individuals specifically employed to
    carry out the responsibility
  • Disadvantages Expensive

47
Sentinel Surveillance
  • Monitoring of key health events, through sentinel
    sites, events, providers, vectors/animals
  • Case report indicates a failure of the health
    care system or indicates that special problems
    are emerging
  • Advantages Very inexpensive
  • Disadvantages Applicable only for a select
    group of diseases

48
Some Surveillance Programs
  • National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
  • http//www.cdc.gov/epo/dphsi/nndsshis.htm
  • Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)
  • http//www.cdc.gov
  • Cancer Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result
    (SEER)
  • http//www.seer.cancer.gov/

49
  • Good surveillance does not necessarily ensure
    the making of right decisions, but it reduces the
    chances of wrong ones.
  • Alexander D. Langmuir
  • NEJM 1963268182-191
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com