3D%20Shape%20Inference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

3D%20Shape%20Inference

Description:

3D Shape Inference Computer Vision No.2-1 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: KoNi152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 3D%20Shape%20Inference


1
3D Shape Inference
  • Computer Vision
  • No.2-1

2
Pinhole Camera Model
the camera center
Principal axis
3
Perspective Projection
the camera center
the optical axis
the image plane
4
Orthographic Projection
the camera center
the optical axis
the image plane
5
Weak Perspective Projection
the camera center
the optical axis
the image plane
6
Para Perspective Projection
the camera center
the optical axis
the image plane
7
Orthographic Projection
the camera center
the optical axis
the image plane
8
Obtain a 3D Information form Line Drawing
  • Given
  • Line drawing(2D)
  • Find
  • 3D object that projects to given lines
  • Find
  • How do you think its a cube, not a painted
    pancake?

9
Line Labeling
  • Significance
  • Provides 3D interpretation(within limits)
  • Illustrates successful(but incomplete)approach
  • Introduces constraints satisfaction
  • Pioneers
  • Roberts(1976)
  • Guzman(1969)
  • HuffmanClows (1971)
  • Waltz (1972)

10
Outline
  • Types of lines
  • types of vertices
  • Junction Dictionary
  • Labeling by constraint propagation
  • Discussion

11
Line Types
12
Labeling a Line Drawing
Easy to label lines for this solid ?Now invert
this in order to understand shape
13
(No Transcript)
14
Enumerating Possible Line Labeling without
Constraints
  • 9 lines
  • 4 labels each

?4x4x4x4x4x4x4x4x4 250,000 possibilities
We want just one reality must reduce
surplus possibilities ?Need constraints (by 3D
relationship)
15
Vertex Types
  • Divide junctions into categories

Need some constraints to reduce junction types
16
Restrictions
  • No shadows, no cracks
  • Non-singular views
  • At most three faces meet at vertex

17
Fewer Vertex Types
18
Vertex Labeling
  • Three planes divide space into octants
  • Trihedral vertex
  • at intersection of 3 planes
  • Enumerate all possibilities
  • (Some full, some empty)

19
Enumerating Possible Vertex Labeling(1)
0or8octants full--no vertex 2,4,6 octants
full singular view 7octants full 1FORK 5octants
full 2L,1ARROW
20
Enumeration(2)
  • 3octants full
  • upper behind L
  • right above L
  • left above L
  • straight above ARROW
  • straight below FORK

21
Enumeration(3)
1octant--Seven viewing octants supply
22
HuffmanClows Junction Dictionary
  • Any other arrangements cannot arise
  • Have reduced configuration from 144 to 12

23
Constraints on Labeling
  • Without constraints-- 250,000possibilities
  • Consider constraints

?3x3x3x6x6x6x5 29,000possibilities
  • We can reduce more by
  • coherency/consistency along line.

24
Labeling by Constraint Propagation
  • Waltz filtering
  • By coherence rule, line label constrains
    neighbors
  • Propagate constraint through common vertex
  • Usually begin on boundary
  • May need to backtrack

25
Example of Labeling
26
Ambiguity
  • Line drawing can have multiple labelings

27
Necker Reversal(1)
  • Wire-frame cube
  • Human perception flips from one to the other
  • (After Necker 1832,Swiss naturalist)

28
Necker Reversal(2)
29
(No Transcript)
30
Impossible Objects
  • No consistent labeling
  • But some do have a consistent labeling
  • Whats wrong here?

31
Limitations of Line Labeling
  • Only qualitativeonly gets topology
  • Something wrong

32
Summary(1)
Preliminary 3D analysis of shape 1. Identify 3D
constraint 2. Determine how constraint affects
images 3. Develop algorithm to exploit
constraint --gt General method for 3D
vision Toolconstraint propagation/satisfaction
33
Summary(2)
Problems 1. Significant ambiguity possible 2.
Assumes perfect segmentation 3. Can be fooled
without quantitative analysis
34
Gradient Space
  • Computer Vision
  • No. 2-2

35
Gradient Space and Line Labeling
  • Last time line labeling by constraint
    propagation
  • Use gradient space to represent surface
    orientation

36
Review of Line Labeling
  • Problem
  • Given a line drawing, label all the lines with
    one of 4 symbols
  • convex edge
  • - concave edge
  • ?? occluding edges
  • Approach
  • Narrow down the number of possible labels with
    a vertex catalog

37
Surface Normal
  • Normal of a plane
  • Rewrite

38
Surface Gradient
  • Gradient of surface is
  • Gradient of plane

39
Surface Gradient
40
Relationship of Normal to Gradient
Normal Vector
41
Polyhedron in Gradient Space
42
Vector on a Surface
  • Suppose vector on surface with
    gradient
  • Under orthography, vector in scene projects to
  • is surface normal vector, so

43
Vector on Two Surfaces
  • Suppose vector on boundary between
    two surfaces
  • Surfaces have gradients and
  • If , then

44
Ordering of Points Along Gradient Line
Perpendicular to Connect Edge
If connect edge ST convex, then points on
gradient space maintain same order (left-right)
as A and Bi in image If ST concave, then order
switches
45
How does this gradient space stuff help us to
label lines?

L is a connect edge (vector on two
surface) Assume orthography Line in gradient
space connecting R1 and R2 must be perpendicular
to line L
46
Line Labeling using Gradient Space
  • 1. Assign arbitrary gradient (0,0) to A
  • 2. Consider B lines 1,2 may be connect
    edges or may be occluding
    edges
  • 3. Suppose line 1 a connect edge
  • 4. Suppose line 2 a connect edge, then
    (line AB) (line 2)
    impossible. So line 2 occluding.

47
Line Labeling using Gradient Space
  • 5. Suppose lines 3 and 4 are connect edges
  • 6. and so forth can get multiple interpretations

48
Another Payoff Detect Inconsistencies
L1
L2
49
Summary
  • Can use gradient space to
  • represent surface orientation
  • detect inconsistent line labels
  • constraint labeled line drawings
  • establish line labels without the vertex catalog

50
References
  • M.B. Clowes, On seeing things, Artificial
    Intelligence, Vol.2, pp.79-116, 1971
  • D.A. Huffman, Impossible objects as nonsense
    sentences, Machine Intelligence, Vol.6,
    pp.295-323, 1971
  • A.K.Mackworth, On reading sketch maps, 5th
    IJCAI, pp.598-606, 1977
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com