Title: Lymphomas: The Basics
1Lymphomas The Basics
- Brad Kahl, MD
- Assistant Professor of Medicine
- Director, UW Lymphoma Service
2Lymphomas NHL vs Hodgkins
- EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Biology
- Classification
- Approach to the Patient
3Hodgkins Disease
- Epidemiology
- 14 of malignant lymphomas
- 0.5 of all malignancies
- approximately 8000 new cases/yr in US
- approximately 1500 deaths/yr
- over past 30 years
- age adjusted incidence rates declined appreciably
- mortality rates declined substantially
4Hodgkins Disease
- Epidemiology
- men gt women
- whites gt blacks gt Asians
- no clear risk factors, several implicated
- EBV (pathogen or passenger)
- HIV
- woodworking, farming
- rare familial aggregations
5NHL Epidemiology
- Most common hematologic malignancy
- 60,000 new cases annually
- 6th leading cause of cancer death
- incidence rising
- overall incidence up by 73 since 1973
- epidemic
- 2nd most rapidly rising malignancy
6NHL Epidemiology
- Why the increase?
- Increase noted mostly in farming states
- MN 1, WI 7 NHL incidence
- possible role of herbicides, insecticides, etc.
- Other environmental factors?
7NHL Epidemiology
- Other risk factors
- immunodeficiency states
- AIDS, post-transplant, genetic
- autoimmune diseases
- Sjogrens
- Sprue
- infections
- H. pylori, EBV, HHV-8
8Epidemiology
- SEER 5 year survival data
- NHL Hodgkins
- 1974-76 47.2 71.1
- 1977-79 48.1 73.0
- 1980-82 51.1 74.3
- 1983-90 52.0 78.9
9 Hodgkins Disease
- Epidemiology
- BIOLOGY
- Classification
- Approach to the Patient
10Hodgkins Disease
- Background
- first described in 1832 by Dr. Thomas Hodgkin
- characterized by the presence of Reed-Sternberg
cells - multinucleated giant cells
- described by Sternberg in 1898 and Reed in 1902
- classified as an infectious disease until 1950s
11Reed-Sternberg Cell
12Hodgkin Biology
- RS is a crippled germinal center B cell
- does not have normal B cell surface antigens
- micromanipulation of single RS followed by PCR
demonstrates clonally rearranged, but non
functional immunoglobulin genes - somatic mutations result in stop codon (no sIg)
- no apoptotic death malignant transformation
- unclear how this occurs ? EBV
- unclear how cells end up with RS phenotype
13 Hodgkins Disease
- Epidemiology
- Biology
- CLASSIFICATION
- APPROACH TO THE PATIENT
14Hodgkin Lymphoma Classification
- Classic Hodgkins Disease
- nodular sclerosis
- mixed cellularity
- lymphocyte depleted (very rare)
- classical lymphocyte rich
- HRS cells CD30 and CD15 positive
- nodular lymphocyte predominant
- HRS cells (LH cells) have B cell markers
- CD 20 and surface Immunoglobulin
15Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma
16Nodular Sclerosing Hodgkin Lymphoma
17Approach to the Patient
- Hodgkins Disease
- approach dictated mainly by where the disease is
located rather (results of staging) than the
exact histologic subtype - NHL
- approach is dictated mainly by the histologic
subtype rather than the results of staging
18Hodgkins Disease
- Approach to the Patient
- staging evaluation
- H P
- CBC, diff, plts
- ESR, LDH, albumin, LFTs, Cr
- CT scans chest/abd/pelvis
- bone marrow evaluation
- PET or gallium scan
- lymphangiogram or laparotomy
19Ann Arbor Staging System
- Stage I single lymph node region (I) or single
extralymphatic organ or site (IE) - Stage II gt 2 lymph node regions on same side of
diaphragm (II) or with limited, contiguous
extra lymphatic tissue involvement (IIE) - Stage III both sides of diaphragm involved, may
include spleen (IIIS) or local tissue
involvement (IIIE) - Stage IV multiple/disseminated foci involved
with gt 1 extralymphatic organs (i.e. bone
marrow) - (A) or (B) designates absence/presence of B
symptoms
20Ann Arbor Staging System for Hodgkin's Disease
and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Stage I Stage II
Stage III Stage IV
Reprinted with permission. Adapted from Skarin.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Atlas of Diagnostic
Oncology. 1991.
21Modified Ann Arbor Staging
- E designation for extranodal disease
- B symptoms
- recurrent drenching night sweats during previous
month - unexplained, persistent, or recurrent fever with
temps above 38 C during the previous month - unexplained weight loss of more than 10 of the
body weight during the previous 6 months - Criteria for bulk
- 10 cm nodal mass
- mediastinal mass gt 1/3 thorax diameter
22(No Transcript)
23Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Treatment
- approach depends upon stage, prognostic factors,
and co-morbidities - Stage I-II
- consider XRT, chemotherapy, or combined therapy
- Bulky stage I-II
- combined modality therapy
- Stage III-IV
- ABVD x 6-8 cycles gold standard
24Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Adverse prognostic features for stage I II
(EORTC data) - more than 3 nodal sites
- bulky adenopathy
- ESR gt 50
- B symptoms
- invasion into critical organs
- male
- age gt 40
- MC or LD subtype
- should probably not receive XRT alone if any of
the above present (excessive relapse rate)
25Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Independent adverse prognostic factors
- advanced stage (III-IV)
- male sex
- age gt 45
- albumin lt 4 gm/dl
- HgB lt 10.5 mg/dl
- stage IV disease
- WBC count gt 15,000/mm3
- lymphocyte count lt 600/mm3
- (Hasenclever et al, NEJM 339,1506-15141998)
26Hodgkins Disease
- Role for Stem Cell Transplantation
- clinical trials show benefit for patients who
receive high dose chemotherapy followed by SCT
for patients who have relapsed after initial
therapy or for patients are primary refractory
27Hodgkins Disease
- Results of Treatment
- stage 5 year overall survival
- I 90
- II 90
- III 80
- IV 65
28Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Late Complications
- depends upon treatment modality utilized
- XRT vs. MOPP vs. ABVD vs. CMT
- issues depends upon the age of patient
- relative risks higher in younger patients
- absolute risks higher in older patients
- major focus of current clinical trials to to
maintain high cure rate while minimizing late
complication - shorter courses of chemotherapy with lower
radiation doses in smaller fields - elimination of radiotherapy
29Hodgkins future directions
- Limited stage and good prognosis advanced stage
- cure rate high
- current goal is to minimize late complications
- trials looking at CMT with less chemotherapy and
less radiation - Advanced stage
- cure rate around 50-70
- trial comparing ABVD to Stanford V
- Clinical Trials
30 NHL
- Epidemiology
- BIOLOGY
- Classification
- Approach to the Patient
31Lymphoma Biology
- Indolent vs. Aggressive NHL
- key principle in understanding biology, and
approach to the patient - Indolent incurable
- Aggressive curable
- WHY?
- Chromosomal Abnormalities in NHL
- frequent chromosomal translocations into Ig gene
loci - t(814), t(28), t(822) Burkitts
- t(1418) follicular NHL
32Lymphoma Biology
- Aggressive NHL
- short natural history (patients die within months
if untreated) - disease of rapid cellular proliferation
- Indolent NHL
- long natural history (patients can live for many
years untreated) - disease of slow cellular accumulation
33 NHL
- Epidemiology
- Biology
- CLASSIFICATION
- Approach to the Patient
34NHL Classification
- Historically- a mess
- 1940s Gail and Mallory
- 1950s Rappaport
- 1970s Lukes-Collins
- 1970s Kiel
- 1982 Working
- 1994 REAL
- 1999 WHO
35(No Transcript)
36NHL Classification
- Key Points
- cell size small cell vs. large cell
- nodal architecture follicular vs. diffuse
- Principle
- More aggressive diffuse, large cell
- More indolent follicular, small cell
37NHL Classification
- Terminology (refers to natural history)
- low grade indolent
- intermediate grade aggressive
- high grade aggressive
- Principle
- indolent slow growing, incurable
- aggressive rapidly growing, curable
38 NHL
- Epidemiology
- Biology
- Classification
- APPROACH TO THE PATIENT
39NHL Approach to the Patient
- Approach dictated mainly by histology
- reliable hematopathology crucial
- Approach also influenced by
- stage
- prognostic factors
- co-morbidities
40NHL Approach to the Patient
- Staging evaluation
- History and PE
- Routine blood work
- CBC, diff, plts, electrolytes, BUN, Cr, LFTs,
uric acid, LDH, B2M - CT scans chest/abd/pelvis
- Bone marrow evaluation
- Other studies as indicated (lumbar puncture,
gallium, etc)
41(No Transcript)
42NHL Approach to the Patient
- Indolent NHL typical scenario
- patient presents with painless adenopathy
- otherwise asymptomatic
- follicular small cell histology
- average age 59
- usually stage III-IV at diagnosis
43(No Transcript)
44(No Transcript)
45NHL Approach to the Patient
- Indolent NHL guiding treatment principle
- early treatment does not prolong overall survival
- When to treat?
- constitutional symptoms
- compromise of a vital organ by compression or
infiltration, particularly the bone marrow - bulky adenopathy
- rapid progression
- evidence of transformation
46NHL Approach to the Patient
- Indolent NHL typical scenario
- watchful waiting 2-4 years
- first remission length 3-4 years
- second remission 2-3 years
- third remission 1-2 years
- each subsequent remission shorter than prior
- median survival 8-12 years for FLSC
47NHL Approach to the Patient
- Indolent NHL treatment options
- watchful waiting
- radiation to involved fields
- single agent chemotherapy
- chlorambucil prednisone, fludarabine
- combination chemotherapy
- CVP, CF, FND, CHOP
- chemotherapy interferon
- chemotherapy monoclonal antibodies
- monoclonal antibodies
- radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies
- stem cell transplantation
48NHL Approach to the Patient
- Aggressive NHL typical scenario
- patients notes B symptoms of several weeks
duration - work-up reveals pathologic adenopathy
- histology diffuse large cell lymphoma
- about 50 patients stage I-II, 50 stage III-IV
- average age 64
- IPI score
49(No Transcript)
50(No Transcript)
51NHL Approach to the Patient
- Aggressive NHL treatment approach
- Stage I-II combined modality therapy
- CHOP chemotherapy x 3 IF radiotherapy
- cure rate around 70
- Stage III-IV (also bulky stage II)
- (R)CHOP chemotherapy x 6-8 cycles
- cure rate around 40
- (R)CHOP is the standard
52NHL Approach to the Patient
- International Prognostic Index
- Risk Factors (0-5)
- age gt 60
- two or more extranodal sites
- performance status gt 2
- elevated LDH
- stage III-IV
- Age adjusted IPI (0-3)
53CR and OS stratified by IPI
54NHL Approach to the Patient
- Is CHOP the best we can do?
- R-CHOP may be better
- National Trials opening looking at alternative
strategies in poor prognosis DLCL - age adjusted IPI gt 2
- CHOP vs. CHOP SCT
- Risk stratification is the current trend in NHL
- Sorting out role for stem cell transplantation
- Sorting out role for innovative combinations
55NHL Approach to the Patient
- Role for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
- Aggressive NHL
- clear benefit when used for aggressive NHL in
first relapse in appropriately selected patients - 1/3 of these patients can be cured by SCT
- Indolent NHL
- no indication that patients are cured
- no indication that OS is prolonged
56NHL future directions
- Indolent
- monoclonal antibodies (Rituximab)
- radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies
- chemotherapy combined with antibodies
- antibodies combined with immunomodulators
- Aggressive
- risk stratification
- CHOP vs. CHOP plus SCT
- chemotherapy plus antibodies
- Clinical Trials
57Summary
- NHL incidence increasing, Hodgkins decreasing
- Hodgkins cure rate quite high
- approach is dictated mainly by disease stage
- NHL cure rate mediocre
- approach is dictated mainly by histologic subtype
- indolent vs. aggressive
- indolent watchful waiting perfectly acceptable
for asymptomatic patients - aggressive require aggressive treatment ASAP to
achieve cure
58Lymphoma Clinic
- Multidisciplinary
- radiotherapy-Dr. Scott Tannehill
- hematopathology-Dr. Catherine Leith
- Emphasis on clinical trials
- formal testing of promising new therapies
- Every Wednesday
- Clinic phone 608-263-7022