Title: FY08 Tactical Plan Status Report for Network Infrastructure Upgrades
1FY08 Tactical Plan Status Report forNetwork
Infrastructure Upgrades
- Rick Finnegan
- April 22, 2008
2FY08 Tactical Plan for Network Infrastructure
Upgrades
- Relevant Strategic Plan
- Core Networking Strategic Plan FY2008 v1
- Tactical Plan Leader Rick Finnegan
- Organizational Unit home
- LSC-CNCS-NET
- Tactical Plan Goals
- Maintain network infrastructure capacity well
ahead of current use and projected near term
requirements - Network infrastructure should be maintained at
the forward end of established network technology - Reliability of network infrastructure and
services should be maximized - Wireless network support should be fully
integrated in the general network infrastructure - The network architecture should provide for
varying levels of access needs for attached
systems
3Activities Summary FTEs
Level 0 Activity UPGRADES of FY Complete of FY Complete 50
Personnel Usage (FTEs)
Allocation Allocation Actual YTD Actual YTD Current
Tactical Plan Level 1 Activity FTE-yrs FTE-mos FTE-yrs (Ave/mo.) FTE-mos Consumed YTD FY08 Forecast
Upgrades
Customer 0.85 10.2 0.50 3.00 30 70
Core 0.20 2.40 0.17 1.00 42 100
Wireless 0.15 1.80 0.22 1.30 72 120
Firewall 0.30 3.60 0.07 0.40 11 25
WISM 0.20 2.40 0.20 1.20 50 100
DNS-DHCP 0.25 3.00 0.12 0.70 23 70
Total 1.95 23.40 1.28 7.60 32
4Activities Summary MS (Internal Funding)
Level 0 Activity UPGRADES UPGRADES of FY Complete of FY Complete 50
Operating Equipment MS Operating Equipment MS Operating Equipment MS CD Internal Funding CD Internal Funding
Operations MS Operations MS Operations MS Operations MS Operations MS Equipment MS Equipment MS Equipment MS Equipment MS
Tactical Plan Level 1 Activity FY Obligation Budget YTD Obligations RIPS YTD Obligations RIPS Spent Current FY08 Forecast FY Obligation Budget YTD Obligations RIPS Spent Current FY08 Forecast
Upgrades 263 67 67 25 100 132 46.4 35 100
Customer 0 0 0 --- 0 0 0
Core 0 0 0 --- 0 0 0
Wireless 0 0 0 --- 0 0 0
Firewall 0 0 0 --- 0 0 0
WISM 0 0 0 --- 0 0 0
DNS-DHCP 0 0 0 --- 0 0 0
Total 263 67 67 25 100 132 46.4 35 100
5Project Activity Network Upgrades Customer
- Projects related to Customers
- Deliverables
- These are planned upgrades to customer networks
- When throughout the year
- Acceptance criteria is the customers accepting
and planning for the upgrades - Recipients are Network Customers
- Key Milestones
- Switch and routers to be upgraded
- Individual upgrades planned throughout the year
- Impact is low if the date is not met
- Issues and Risks (specific to this activity,
includes budget impact) - Issues are that customers may have to endure
minor outages - Risks are the network gear will be end of life or
outages may occur
6Project Activity Network Upgrades Core
- Projects related to Core Networks
- Deliverables
- These are planned upgrades to core networks
- When throughout the year
- Acceptance criteria is the successful completion
of the upgrades - Recipients are all networking Customers
- Key Milestones
- Switch and routers to be upgraded
- When planned throughout the year
- Impact is low if the date is not met
- Issues and Risks (specific to this activity,
includes budget impact) - Issues are that customers may have to endure
minor outages - Risks are the network gear will be end of life
7Project Activity Network Upgrades Wireless
- Brief Description Installation of additional
access points - Deliverables
- Planned installs of new Access Points for
additional coverage in Fixed Target, DO CDF - Actual progress is on schedule
- Acceptance criteria is the users testing the new
Access Points - Recipients are the customers using the new Access
Points - Key Milestones
- What is it implementing new access points
- When The plan is 15 of 30 for the first half of
the year, actual is 14 - Impact is low and is felt by users needing
additional coverage - Metrics (see the next page for a chart of
progress) - Issues and Risks
- Risks are that customers will continue to have no
coverage until new planned Access Points are
installed
8Project Activity Network Upgrades Wireless
- Metrics for new access points to improve
coverage.
- Issues Risks
- The risks are that if the new access points are
not installed we will continue to have areas with
not enough coverage.
9Project Activity Network Upgrades Firewall
- Brief Description Rolling out the yellow zone
to new subnets - Deliverables
- What is it moving user subnets to the yellow
zone - When The plan is based on soliciting volunteers
- Acceptance criteria is users being put behind the
transition tool and accepting traffic flows - Recipient is Customer subnets
- Key Milestones
- What is it number of subnets converted to the
yellow zone - When plan is dependent on soliciting new
customers - Impact is low this is a security concern and
not a functional requirement - URL Project Plan http//netweb/projects/firewall
.html - Metrics none at this time, the project is on
hold - Issues and Risks (specific to this activity,
includes budget impact) - The Risks are that we are not getting
groups/subnets to volunteer to move to the yellow
zone. This has slowed the progress of the
project, however, BSS has agreed to move to the
yellow zone.
10Project Activity Network Upgrades WISM
- Brief Description - wireless access point
upgrades to Wism - Deliverables
- Planned upgrades of Access Points from IOS to
WISM - Actual progress is ahead of schedule
- Acceptance criteria is the users testing the
converted Access Points - Recipient is the customers using the Access
Points - Key Milestones
- What is it the number of access points
converted - When planned vs actual 260 for the year, 240
are done at this point - Impact is medium Customers of unconverted
access points are still functioning but they do
no support the WISM blocking - URL Project Plan http//netweb/projects/wism.htm
l - Metrics (see the next page for a chart of
progress) - Issues and Risks
- Issues are that customers may not be willing to
take minor outages, this is the case currently
with the Accelerator Division
11Project Activity Network Upgrades Wireless
- Metrics for upgrades of access points from IOS to
WiSM
- Issues Risks
- Devices remaining to be converted are from the
Accelerator Division. The timing is dependant on
AD, there are no risks.
12Project Activity Network Upgrades DNS-DHCP
- Brief Description Upgrading DNS/DHCP software
- Deliverables
- What is it Upgrading DHCP/DNS to Linux and the
latest software also converting all systems to
standard builds to be taken over by central
server management. - When planned vs actual the current progress
is slightly ahead of the plan - Acceptance criteria is testing DHCP and DNS from
selected areas of the lab - Recipients are all Customers at the lab.
- Key Milestones
- What is it The number of servers converted
compared to the total, 13. - When planned vs actual The plan is to have
half the servers converted - Impact is high because the current software we
are running is unsupported - URL Project Plan http//netweb/projects/dns.html
- Metrics (see the next page for a chart of
progress)
13Project Activity DNS/DHCP Upgrade
- Metrics for DNS/DHCP Upgrade.
- Issues Risks
- The risks are that the current software is so old
that we can not receive support from the vendor.
14Tactical Plan Issues and Risks
- Action Items
- We need to stay focused on project upgrades even
though we have a reduction in FTEs. - Issues and Risks (includes overall budget impact)
- Reduction in staff could cause delays in
projects. - Fewer resources could cause delays in projects.
- There are no serious consequences for CD and
stakeholders - Fewer resources working on projects due to
operational activities - Estimated probability of occurring is medium.
- Estimated impact is that some projects could get
pushed in to next year. - Fall-back or Contingency plan is to add resources
to key projects from other parts of the
networking team.
15Tactical Plan Status Summary
- Status Summary
- FTEs for Operations are slightly below the
targets. This will be fixed with the new hire. - A reduction in staff for the first 6 months has
adversely affected the number of hours spent on
projects. - Fewer resources results in a higher percentage of
time spent on operations resulting in less
availability for projects.