A Wise Death Glenn Braddock - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

A Wise Death Glenn Braddock

Description:

A Wise Death Glenn Braddock Socrates message for Evenus: wish him well and bid him farewell, and tell him, if he is wise, to follow me as soon as possible . – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: rpi88
Learn more at: https://www.rpi.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Wise Death Glenn Braddock


1
A Wise DeathGlenn Braddock
  • Socrates message for Evenus wish him well and
    bid him farewell, and tell him, if he is wise, to
    follow me as soon as possible.
  • the aim of those who practice philosophy in the
    proper manner is to practice for dying and
    death. (Plato, Phaedo)

2
Death and Wisdom
  • Two assumptions about wisdom
  • A wise person is not unnecessarily bothered,
    worried, or harmed
  • A wise person leads, or at least attempts to
    lead, a good and valuable life
  • Some things that make life worth living
  • Projects and goals
  • Relationships with others
  • Commitments, passions
  • A wise death?
  • What does a wise person think about death?
  • How does a wise person organize his or her life
    and attitudes given the fact that he or she will
    die?
  • Death and the two assumptions If its possible
    to eliminate or reduce the harm of death, can a
    person do so and still live a worthwhile life?

3
Death in this discussion
  • The end of a persons existence
  • My death for me, your death for you
  • Not the dying process

4
Epicurus and the insignificance of death
  • Get used to believing that death is nothing to
    us. For all good and bad consists in
    sense-experience, and death is the privation of
    sense-experience.
  • So death, the most frightening of bad things, is
    nothing to us since when we exist, death is not
    yet present, and when death is present, then we
    do not exist. Therefore it is relevant neither
    to the living nor to the dead, since it does not
    affect the former, and the latter do not exist.
    (Letter to Menoeceus)

5
An objection to Epicurus argument
  • Experiencing pain or the removal of pleasure are
    not the only ways to be harmed
  • Can also have desires that go unsatisfied and
    interests that are thwarted
  • Usually when interests are thwarted, we
    experience unpleasant feelings, but the feelings
    do not make the event bad
  • For the natural view is that the discovery of
    betrayal makes us unhappy because it is bad to be
    betrayed not that betrayal is bad because its
    discovery makes us unhappy (Nagel, Death)
  • Interest-thwarting account of deaths badness is
    consistent with our common intuitions about the
    comparative badness of actual deaths

6
The Epicurean timing challenge
  • when we exist, death is not yet present, and
    when death is present, then we do not exist
  • So when is the subject harmed by the thwarting of
    his or her interests?
  • Some possibilities
  • There is no determinate time (Nagel)
  • After death The dead have some kind of reality
    even though they dont exist (Yourgrau)
  • During life when the person acquires the
    interests that will be defeated by death
    (Pitcher, Feinberg)

7
What all of this suggests about the harm of death
  • There is no universal answer to the question
    Does death harm the person who dies?
  • It depends on whether or not the persons
    interests are thwarted by death
  • Our interests are largely in our own control we
    can make our own plans, set our own goals, adjust
    our own desires
  • So we have some control over whether we will be
    harmed by our own deaths
  • Should a wise person adjust his or her interests
    to eliminate or reduce the harm of death?

8
Problems with becoming Epicurean
  • The goal of the Epicurean life the health of
    the body and the freedom of the soul from
    disturbance (Epicurus, Letter to Men.)
  • To secure tranquility, limit yourself to natural
    desires for necessary things relatively easy to
    satisfy
  • The purest security is that which comes from a
    quiet life and withdrawal from the many
    (Diogenes Laertius, Principle Doctrines)
  • There is no need for things which involve
    struggle (Diogenes Laertius)
  • So becoming Epicurean involves avoiding
  • Difficult, long-term projects
  • Unnecessary entanglements in personal
    relationships
  • Commitments and passions
  • If you adjust your life in this way, you protect
    yourself from the harm of death but at the cost
    of living an empty life

9
Epicurean vs. Stoic attitude adjustment
  • Epicurean Reduce your desires to those whose
    satisfaction are well within your control most
    basic needs
  • Stoic Want only what actually happens calmly
    accept fate.

10
Living with Fate
  • Epictetus
  • Do not seek to have events happen as you want
    them, but instead to want them as they do happen,
    and your life will go well (The Handbook)
  • Marcus Aurelius
  • To love only what happens, what was destined. No
    greater harmony (Meditations)
  • So this is how a thoughtful person should await
    death not with indifference, not with
    impatience, not with disdain, but simply viewing
    it as one of the things that happens to us
    (Meditations)

11
Problems with becoming Stoic
  • Fatalism and helplessness
  • Epictetus The most important aspect of piety
    towards the gods is certainly both to have
    correct beliefs about them, as beings that
    arrange the universe well and justly, and to set
    yourself to obey them and acquiesce in everything
    that happens and to follow it willingly, as
    something brought to completion by the best
    judgment (Handbook)
  • Coldness, lack of caring and real commitment?
  • Epictetus If you kiss your child or your wife,
    say that you are kissing a human being for when
    it dies you will not be upset (Handbook)
  • Marcus Aurelius Blot out your imagination. Turn
    your desire to stone. Quench your appetites.
    Keep your mind centered on itself (Meditations)

12
Common mistake in Epicureanism and Stoicism
  • Focus on complete invulnerability
  • Tendency to lead to self-centeredness, coldness,
    lack of commitment, lack of worthwhile interests
  • Steven Luper To completely eliminate deaths
    sting, we require an analgesic so powerful that
    it would numb us to life (Invulnerability)

13
Seneca On the Shortness of Life
  • It is not that we have a short time to live, but
    that we waste a lot of it. Life is long enough,
    and a sufficiently generous amount has been given
    to us for the highest achievements if it were all
    well invested. But when it is wasted in heedless
    luxury and spent on no good activity, we are
    forced at last by deaths final constraint to
    realize that it has passed away before we knew it
    was passing. So it is we are not given a short
    life but we make it short, and we are not
    ill-supplied but wasteful of it.

14
Seneca, On the Shortness of Life, continued
  • But one man is gripped by insatiable greed,
    another by a laborious dedication to useless
    tasks,another sluggish with idleness
  • Many pursue no fixed goal, but are tossed about
    in ever-changing designs by fickleness which is
    shifting, inconstant and never satisfied with
    itself. Some have no aims at all for their
    lifes course, but death takes them unawares as
    they yawn languidly
  • Call to mind when you ever had a fixed purpose
    how few days have passed as you had planned when
    you were ever at your own disposal what work you
    have achieved in such a long life
  • You are living as if destined to live forever
    your own frailty never occurs to you
  • No one keeps death in view, no one refrains from
    hopes that look far ahead

15
Stoicism about death without fatalism and
without goal of invulnerability?
  • Stoics emphasize living in accordance with
    nature often passive acceptance of fate
  • But might interpret this more loosely, as
    understanding, accepting, and adjusting to
    reality
  • Senecas argument (here) is not that we should
    prepare ourselves for death at any moment, but
    that we should prepare ourselves for death when
    it is likely to come normal life expectancy
  • Objection A mans sense of his own experience
    does not embody this idea of a natural limit.
    His existence defines for him an essentially
    open-ended possible future If there is no limit
    to the amount of life it would be good to have,
    then it may be that a bad end is in store for us
    all (Nagel, Death)
  • Possible reply what counts as a harm or
    misfortune is constrained by the way the world
    actually works, not by metaphysical possibility

16
Some Seneca-inspired advice on facing death
  • Keep death in view
  • Not morbid fascination with the event of dying
  • Not obsessive thinking about, accepting, and
    making yourself invulnerable to the fact that
    death might come at any moment
  • Rather, accept that you are mortal, that you will
    change as you age, and that your life is likely
    to last a certain number of years
  • Dont waste time on ? (Seneca idleness,
    pleasure-seeking, too much concern about what
    others think of you, etc.)

17
Seneca advice, continued
  • Have a plan. Adjust your projects to
  • The likely length of your life
  • The likely structure of your life -- aging
  • Your own abilities
  • Life is long enough, and a sufficiently generous
    amount has been given to us for the highest
    achievements

18
Summary
  • Epicurean argument for harmlessness of death does
    not work because we can be harmed by unsatisfied
    desires and defeated interests, not just by
    unpleasant experiences
  • Since we have some control over our interests, we
    have some control over whether we will be harmed
    by our own deaths
  • Living a worthwhile life requires taking the
    risks that go along with engaging in projects,
    making commitments, having relationships. So the
    wise person will not seek invulnerability to
    death
  • But the wise person can accept the reality of
    mortality and arrange his/her attitudes and goals
    accordingly, to minimize the possibility that
    death will thwart interests

19
Questions about science, personal death, and the
annihilation of humanity
  • Should we attempt to extend the normal human life
    span?
  • Would the end of the human species be a bad
    thing?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com