Monitoring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Monitoring

Description:

Monitoring & Evaluation of Livingwell Workshop at Annual Conference Workshop Structure Part 1: Presentation GHK and this study Challenges facing us Two possible ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: Fras54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Monitoring


1
Monitoring Evaluation of Livingwell
  • Workshop at Annual Conference

2
Workshop Structure
  • Part 1 Presentation
  • GHK and this study
  • Challenges facing us
  • Two possible approaches
  • The one we used
  • Part 2 Group Discussion

3
Who are GHK? What are we doing?
  • GHK
  • Employee-owned research firm
  • Multi-disciplinary work in most policy areas
  • Specialism in evaluation
  • Local
  • Livingwell Project
  • WMRA
  • Quarterly monitoring
  • Ongoing evaluation
  • Of projects, but at regional level

4
Inherent Challenges
  • All the usual evaluation challenges, plus
  • Diversity of projects
  • target groups
  • desired outcomes
  • interventions
  • contexts
  • capacity at project level
  • The need to add it up to regional level
  • Inputs () are easyoutputs more
    problematicoutcomes the real challenge

5
One Possible Response Our Approach
  • Possible Response
  • Decide what a wellbeing is
  • Give projects a tool to measure it
  • Advantage can add this up easily (compare
    approaches??)
  • Disadvantage ignores complexity / reality
  • Our Approach
  • From the project up (not programme down)
  • Based on individual project plans
  • Guidance and support to projects self-evaluation
  • Backed by some external evaluation

6
Basis of Approach Theories of Change
Rationale for intervention (problem /
opportunity and most appropriate response -
identified)
Inputs (what you have)
Impact (wider societal change)
Activities (what you do)
Outcomes (the effect this has)
Do this for each project, then add-up each
element ...
7
Applying this Model
  • Project ME plans
  • Project-level theory of change
  • Specific quarterly / annual indicators
  • Common tools for common outcomes, e.g.
    Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale
  • Common outcomes at theme level
  • But not a blanket approach (e.g. adults with
    learning difficulties / low project capacity)
  • Where does this leave us?
  • Allows aggregation, but retains flexibility
  • Makes our job more complex, but more like the
    real world!

8
Final Reflections
  • Needs different skills
  • More collaborative
  • More facilitative
  • Understand constraints facing practitioners
  • Requires a balance between
  • Adding things up (quantitative)
  • Explaining and learning (qualitative)
  • Overall, a sound approach - given challenges
    outlined at start

9
Thank-you for Listening
  • Questions Group Discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com