Title: Cooperation and Reciprocal Altruism
1Cooperation and Reciprocal Altruism
- Definitions
- Iterated prisoners dilemma
- Examples
- Food sharing
- Alliance formation
- Egg trading
- Predator inspection
- Social grooming
2Evolution of cooperation
- Mutualism
- Kin selection
- By-product mutualism
- as a consequence of behaving selfishly, the donor
inadvertantly benefits the recipient. - Example cleaner wrasse selfishly consume
ectoparasites of larger fish. The large fish
cooperates by not eating the cleaner fish. - Cleaner wrasse have mimics that cheat!
- Reciprocal altruism
3Reciprocal Altruism
- the trading of altruistic acts in which the
benefit is larger than the cost so that over time
participants enjoy a net gain. - Delay between donation cost and receipt of
benefit separates mutualism from reciprocal
altruism. - Delay allows for the possibility of cheating,
thus cheaters must be detected and excluded - A sufficient number of interactions must occur to
provide a net benefit to participants. Note that
in many instances, the net benefit will increase
with the number of exchanges. Thus, a large
number of interactions favors reciprocity.
4The prisoners dilemma
Two suspected criminals are jailed separately and
encouraged to provide evidence that the other was
involved in the crime
- PD is defined by T gt R gt P gt S and R gt (T S) /
2 - ESS for single round of the game always defect!
5The Iterated Prisoners Dilemma
- Iterating this game allows for cheating - the key
distinction between mutualism and reciprocity - Iteration permits complicated strategies, e.g.
one player can perform CDCDCCCD while another
might do CCCCCCCC, etc. - TFT (cooperate on the first move and thereafter
mimic your opponent) is the best strategy because - Outscored all other strategies in computer
tournament (Axelrod) - Is an ESS if the probability of future encounter,
w, meets these criteria - w gt (T - R)/(T - P) and w gt (T - R)/(R - S)
- Obtain these inequalities by applying 1, w, w2,
w3,... to successive future payoffs and noting
that w w2 w3 ... 1/(1 - w)
6Beyond tit-for-tat
- Once TFT evolves, can other strategies invade?
- Subsequent work indicates that other trajectories
may occur, e.g. TFT-gt Generous TFT-gt Pavlov-gt
cooperation (Nowak Sigmund) - If mistakes are made, Generous-tit-for-tat does
better than TFT (GTFT cooperates after opponent
cooperates but also after opponent defects with
some probability) - Pavlov - win-stay, lose-shift does better than
TFT because it corrects occasional mistakes and
exploits unconditional cooperators.
7Vampire bat food sharing
8Costs and benefits of food sharing
9Survival gain of food sharing
10Chimpanzee food sharing
11Cotton-top tamarin food sharing
12Alliance formation
- Baboons
- Vervet monkeys
- Bottlenose dolphins
13Egg-trading in polychaetes and bass
14Predator inspection in fish
15Predator inspection - mirror expt
But, same result is seen in The absence of any
predator! Suggests that fish tend to school.
Fish with parallel mirror approached closer than
fish with oblique mirror
16Social grooming in antelope
Females
Males
17Implications for human behavior
- Friendship formation
- non-kin directed altruism
- gift exchange ceremonies
- Emotion evolution
- Gratitude
- guilt and reparative altruism
- Justice
- moralistic aggression
- revenge
- Reciprocal network size
- cartel formation
- dialects