Title: Distance Learning Benchmarking
1Distance Learning Benchmarking
- A North Texas Community College Consortium
Project
2NTCCC
- It was founded in 1989 by the University of North
Texas and a number of community colleges in the
area - The Consortium has 28 member institutions
- The office is located on the University of North
Texas campus
3NTCCC - Mission
- To provide high quality, low cost, easily
accessible professional development opportunities
for community college administrators, faculty,
and staff. - To further institutional planning, institutional
research, and institutional effectiveness.
4Institutional Research Committee
- Projects addressing the research needs of all
member colleges - Workshops concentrating on accreditation issues
- Benchmarking projects that would help colleges in
the institutional effectiveness process - Involved in the Consortium strategic planning
5Distance Learning Survey Project
- It started as a request from the faculty and
administrators of the member colleges - Input was gathered regarding the needs of the
distance learning departments in terms of
data/benchmarking - The 1997 Principles of Good Practice (THECB)
required that educational effectiveness of
distance learning programs is compatible with
that done for on-campus courses
6Distance Learning Survey Project
- With THECB and SACS more and more interested in
distance learning, the need of a benchmarking
tool became more evident - In 2001 a subcommittee started the development of
an instrument that will gather information about
enrollment, technology, methods of delivery,
faculty training, and methods of assessment of
distance education
7Enrollment in Distance Learning
- The number of distance learning courses offered
increased 236 and the headcount 279 - In comparison, the headcount of students enrolled
increased only 20 - The highest increase is observed for interactive
video courses (500) with an increase in
enrollment of 2685 - The lowest increase was in TV course offerings
(69) and increase in enrollment of 146
8Has the institution invested significantly in the
following during the past three years?
- Infrastructure wiring (T1 lines etc)
- Classroom wiring
- Computers with Internet Access
- Computers in the library
- Computers in learning laboratories
- Computers in faculty offices Laptop computers for
faculty use - LCDs and other classroom computer equipment
- Other
9Has the institution invested significantly in the
following during the past three years?
- The least amount of money was spent for faculty
laptop computers, classroom wiring, and computers
in faculty offices - Everybody invests in computers with Internet
access (100) and LCDs and other classroom
equipment (96)
10What is the number one concern at your
institution regarding funding for
telecommunications needs related to distance
learning?
- Concerns include that TIF funding might not be
continuing in the state and that the operational
budget will not be adequate to maintain the
current level of technology - Internet course creation, enhancement, and
upgrade funding. - Network keeping up with college growth
- Staff support, compatibility longevity
- Equipment Replacement/Maintenance
- Cost of technology
11Faculty
- 65 of the total faculty teaching distance
learning are full-time - The number of faculty teaching only distance
learning doubled between the administrations of
the survey (from 13 to 27) - 27 of the colleges always compensate the faculty
for developing a distance learning course - 64 of the colleges sometimes compensate the
faculty for developing a distance learning course
and 9 never compensate
12Faculty
- 36 of the colleges do not have a minimum number
of students that have to be registered in
distance learning classes - The range of minimum number of students necessary
to enroll in an Internet class varies from 1
student to 15 and maximum between 25 and 100 - The range of minimum number of students necessary
to enroll in a TV class varies from 1 student to
30 and maximum between 22 and 300
13Faculty
- The range of minimum number of students necessary
to enroll in a two-way interactive video class
varies from 10 students to 15 and maximum between
22 and 50 - The minimum/maximum number of students allowed in
TV classes is higher, maybe because the faculty
are more comfortable teaching them
14Faculty What are the primary unresolved issues
for faculty at your institution who teach
distance learning courses?
- Faculty
- Compensation for continuous enrollment courses
- Training requirements to become certified DL
instructor. - Reliability of equipment, salary course load
- Compensation for training, course creation,
course supervision and mentoring. - Faculty willing to develop courses for the core
areas - Number of hours spent communicating with students
15Faculty What are the primary unresolved issues
for faculty at your institution who teach
distance learning courses?
- Faculty
- Underestimating the time to prepare to teach
online - Intellectual property ownership
- How to determine "office hours" calculation for
faculty teaching internet courses - Too many students in a class
16Faculty What are the primary unresolved issues
for faculty at your institution who teach
distance learning courses?
- System
- Reliability of the infrastructure/ continuity of
the instructional environment - Hardware failures
- Provision of technology to instructors so that
they can teach the courses - Provision of technology to students so that they
can take the course online
17Faculty What are the primary unresolved issues
for faculty at your institution who teach
distance learning courses?
- Students
- Textbook issues
- Deadline problems with students (getting homework
and tests back in time to meet institutional
deadlines) - Evaluation
- Evaluation of distance instruction is at the
beginning
18Faculty
- All colleges have a training program for DL
faculty, with 55 of faculty considering the
program excellent and 45 fairly good
19Budget
- The budget allocation, when done, decreased from
2001 to 2002 - Colleges with smaller enrollment tend to allocate
more dollars/student in distance learning - The amount per student varies from 1200 to 1.5
- The median value for the amount allocated is
around 40/student
20Support System - Counseling
- 25 offer counseling on-campus only
- 36 offer counseling via distance only
- 36 offer counseling both on-campus and via
distance
21Support System - Advising
- 9 offer advising on-campus only
- 36 offer advising via distance only
- 55 offer advising both on-campus and via
distance
22Support System Testing for remediation
- 45 offer testing for remediation on-campus only
- 27 offer testing for remediation via distance
only - 27 offer testing for remediation both on-campus
and via distance
23Support System Testing for course
- 9 offer testing for course on-campus only
- 55 offer testing for course via distance only
- 36 offer testing for course both on-campus and
via distance
24Support System Library Resources
- 0 offer library resources on-campus only
- 55 offer library resources via distance only
- 45 offer library resources both on-campus and
via distance
25Support System Tutoring
- 55 offer tutoring on-campus only
- 27 offer tutoring via distance only
- 18 offer tutoring both on-campus and via
distance
26Evaluation How often is the evaluation of
distance learning courses done by the faculty?
- 18 once a year
- 9 once a term
- 55 every time a course is offered
- 18 less than once a year
27Evaluation How often is the evaluation of
distance learning courses done by the students?
- 18 once a year
- 27 once a term
- 55 every time a course is offered
- 0 less than once a year
28Retention
Fall 2001 (median) Fall 2002 (median) Fall 2003 (median)
For all courses 77 72 63
For only distance learning courses 71 72 63
29Conclusions
- Only 11 colleges submitted the survey both times
- Smaller colleges increased their distance
learning offerings/ enrollment the most - Smaller colleges allocated more money for the
development of distance learning - The retention of students in distance learning
courses followed the on-campus courses - Unresolved issues are still unresolved after one
year
30Lessons Learned
- It is time consuming to collect all data required
by the survey - Needs collaboration between IR and DL offices
- Because sometimes the survey was forwarded to DL
office it was never submitted - There are not significant changes from one year
to the next, so an yearly administration is not
meaningful