Dr%20Deepak%20Kejariwal%20Consultant%20Physician - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Dr%20Deepak%20Kejariwal%20Consultant%20Physician

Description:

... endoscopy or day ... IBD services should ensure that inpatient IBD care provided by the IBD nurse is appropriately ... PowerPoint Presentation Author: – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Kaj97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr%20Deepak%20Kejariwal%20Consultant%20Physician


1
Inpatient care and inpatient experience of adults
with ulcerative colitis in the UK
2
Introduction to the IBD programmeImproving the
care of people with IBD
  • Five elements, 20122014
  • Inpatient care (1 Jan 31 Dec 2013)
  • Assesses the treatment that a patient receives
    when admitted to hospital. Each hospital
    participating in the audit collects information
    on the first 50 patients admitted with ulcerative
    colitis in 2013.
  • Inpatient experience (1 Jan 2013 31 Jan 2014)
  • Assesses the quality of patient care. Each
    patient included in the inpatient care audit is
    given a questionnaire when they leave hospital.
    They can comment on the care that they received
    and how this made them feel.
  • Biological therapy audit (continuous audit)
  • Collects information about treatment, delivery,
    disease activity and quality of life in patients
    who are prescribed infliximab or adalimumab for
    IBD.

3
Introduction to the IBD programmeImproving the
care of people with IBD
  • Five elements, 20122014
  • Organisational audit and quality improvement tool
    IBDQIP (1 Feb 31 March 2014)
  • A web-based self-assessment that enables
    hospitals to measure their organisation of care
    compared with national service standards. The
    tool identifies areas for improvement and
    facilitates change.
  • Quality improvement peer support visits
  • A series of visits where hospitals are paired up
    and meet to compare results and identify methods
    for improving the quality of care for patients.
    The IBD programme team supports the clinical
    teams to share best practice and explore new ways
    of working.

4
Methodology
  • Prospective patient identification
  • Ulcerative colitis (UC)
  • Reduced dataset
  • Up to 50 audited admissions per site

Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
Patients admitted for treatment or surgery for UC (including newly diagnosed patients) Primary reason for admission was not for treatment of UC
Patients any age A day case (for an infusion, endoscopy or day surgery procedure)
Patients admitted for longer than 24 hours If the patient stayed overnight but was discharged within 24 hours of admission
Multiple admissions included
5
Participation in inpatient care
  • 1 January 2013 1 December 2013
  • 95 (154/162) adult trusts/ health boards that
    were eligible to take part
  • 190 hospital sites took part
  • 4359 patients/admissions were audited
  • 28 Ulcerative Colitis admissions at University
    Hospital of North Durham

6
Key indicators for inpatient care
Key indicators round 4 National results UHND results
Mortality death during admission 0.85 (37/4359) 0 (0/28)
Previous admission in the past 2 years (among emergency and planned admissions for active UC and restricted to first admission only) 31 (854/2778) 21 (3/14)
Active UC admissions and no UC medication on admission (excludes new diagnoses) 11 (352/3065) 7 (1/14)
Seen by IBD nurse (among emergency admissions) 49 (1657/3410) 40 (8/20)
Stool samples sent for SSC and CDT (among emergency admissions where the patient had diarrhoea) SSC 80 (2060/2565) CDT 76 (1940/2565) SSC 94 (16/17) CDT 82 (14/17)
7
Key indicators for inpatient care
Key indicators round 4 National results UHND results
Positive stool sample SSC 3 (57/2060) CDT 4 (79/1940) SSC 13 (2/16) CDT 21 (3/14)
Nutritional screening during admissiona 82 (3566/4359) 100 (28/28)
Seen by a dietitian during admissiona 40 (1449/3635) 93 (25/27)
Prophylactic heparin prescribed (excluding elective surgical admission) 90 (3560/3952) 95 (20/21)
Ciclosporin/anti-TNFa prescribed following failure to respond to corticosteroids Ciclosporin 22 (268/1226) Anti-TNFa 42 (519/1226) Ciclosporin 25 (2/8) Anti-TNFa 13 (1/8)
a Excludes from the denominator admissions that
were not applicable to the question
8
Key indicators for inpatient care
Key indicators round 4 National results Your site results
Response to ciclosporin/anti-TNFa treatmenta Ciclosporin 73 (195/268) Anti-TNFa 84 (437/519) Ciclosporin 50 (1/2) Anti-TNFa 100 (1/1)
Surgery during admission among non-elective surgical admissions 12 (442/3784) 38 (8/21)
Bone protection prescribed when discharged home on steroids 74 (2553/3448) 70 (14/20)
Medication(s) not started or increased in the clinic appointment prior to admission. Includes 5-ASA, steroid, topical or immunosuppressant therapy (among admissions where the patient had active UC at their last clinic appointment and were not admitted to hospital) 42 (556/1329) 50 (4/8)
a Response to treatment is defined as not having
had surgery and not having died during admission
9
Patients who had surgery
  • 8 patients who had surgery
  • 2 patients were semi-elective proctectomy (wrong
    coding)
  • 2 failed ciclosporin
  • 1 prev Aza pancreatitis, on MMF for sarcoidosis-
    so appropriate
  • 1- not discussed in MDT
  • 2 notes not available

10
Case 1- Not discussed in MDT
  • Admitted Apr 2013 (on Monday)
  • Bloody Diarrhoea 16times a day and abd pain,
    raised CRP Diag- IBD. Plan- stool culture and
    AXR
  • D3- Hb-7- Transfused 2 units
  • D4- FS- Colitis. Started on IV Hydrocortisone by
    gastro
  • D6- Hb 7- transfused 3 units
  • D8- ? Ciclosporin.
  • D9- D/w Gastro. Felt inappropriate as CT showed ?
    Splenic abscess

11
Key indicators for inpatient care
Key indicators round 4 National results UHND results
No steroid-sparing therapies tried for patients on steroids gt3 months (Q6.2.2 d) 22 (151/684) 33 (2/6)
No treatment provided for iron deficiency (Q6.3.3) 56 (783/1406) 57 (4/7)
12
Outcomes of treatment escalation in UC
13
Inpatient care audit recommendations
  1. All outpatients with UC should have their disease
    activity accurately assessed (eg using symptoms
    and faecal calprotectin), and treatment should be
    initiated or escalated in those with active
    disease. Early intervention may prevent
    admission.
  2. All patients with a new diagnosis of UC, those
    for whom the use of anti-TNFa is considered and
    those requiring additional information should be
    seen by an IBD nurse during admission.
  3. IBD services should ensure that inpatient IBD
    care provided by the IBD nurse is appropriately
    resourced in line with IBD Standard A1 (1.5
    whole-time equivalent nurse per 250,000
    population).
  4. All IBD patients admitted to hospital should be
    weighed and their nutritional needs assessed, in
    line with IBD Standard A10.
  5. Bone protection should be prescribed to all
    patients with UC who receive corticosteroids.

14
Inpatient care audit recommendations
  1. Heparin should be given to all patients for whom
    it is not contraindicated, to reduce the risk of
    thromboembolism.
  2. All patients on steroids for longer than 3 months
    should be considered for steroid-sparing agents
    such as azathioprine.
  3. Anaemia should be actively investigated, and the
    cause should be identified and treated
    appropriately.
  4. Further national audit in IBD should be
    commissioned.

15
Participation in inpatient experience
  • 1 January 2013 31 January 2014
  • 154/162 (95) trusts/health boards
  • 190 hospitals
  • 1687 questionnaires returned (1550 included in
    national analysis)
  • UHND 13 questionnaires returned

16
Key indicators for inpatient experience
Key indicators round 4 National results UHND results
Overall how would you rate the care you received? Excellent 47 (690/1475) Excellent 54 (7/13)
Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you? Yes, always 75 (1098/1470) Yes, always 77 (10/13)
Did the patient receive a visit from a specialist nurse? No 28 (417/1471) No 15 (2/13)
Was the patient visited by a dietitian? No 62 (915/1476) No 69 (9/13)
Were you ever in pain? Yes 78 (1154/1478) Yes 77 (10/13)
Do you think the hospital staff did everything the could to control your pain? Yes, definitely 66 (763/1148) Yes, definitely 90 (9/10)
17
Key indicators for inpatient experience
Key indicators round 4 National results UHND results
In your opinion how clean was the hospital room or ward you were in? Very clean 62 (914/1473) Very clean 77 (10/13)
How would you rate how well the doctors and nurses worked together? Excellent 40 (584/1472) Excellent 38 (5/13)
Did a member of staff tell you about any danger signals you should watch out for after you went home? No 33 (477/1466) No 54 (7/13)
Do you feel that you received enough information from the hospital on how to manage your condition after your discharge? Yes, definitely 47 (683/1454) Yes, definitely 83 (10/12)
Would you recommend this hospital to your family and friends? Yes, definitely 62 (910/1465) Yes, definitely 69 (9/13)
18
Patient experience across core domains of acute
inpatient care
19
Inpatient experience quotes
20
Inpatient experience quotes
21
Inpatient experience recommendations
  1. All UC inpatients should receive input from
    specialist multidisciplinary teams with
    experience of managing such complex disorders.
    This will maximise the opportunity for provision
    of consistent and coordinated care.
  2. Local IBD teams should consider whether the
    general nursing staff have sufficient awareness
    and knowledge of IBD, and initiate appropriate
    educational interventions and care pathways to
    support high-quality nursing. The routine
    involvement of specialist IBD nurses in the
    day-to-day care of IBD patients at ward level is
    seen as a potential driver to improve the overall
    experience of nursing care.
  3. All admitted patients with active UC require
    routine documentation of nutritional intake and
    weight. Nursing care plans should identify
    nutrition as a key element of day-to-day care.
    Food provided should be appropriate to patients
    dietary needs. Standard A5 of the IBD standards1
    states that access to a dietitian should be
    available to all IBD patients.

1 IBD Standards Group. Standards for the
healthcare of people who have inflammatory bowel
disease (IBD Standards), 2013 update.
www.ibdstandards.org.uk
22
Inpatient experience recommendations
  1. Ward medical and nursing teams should review
    their local policies and current practice with
    regard to the frequency and effectiveness of pain
    assessment and provision of analgesia.
  2. Discharge policies for IBD patients require local
    review to ensure that patients receive
    high-quality pre-discharge information regarding
    medication, self-care and follow-up plans. In
    particular, improvements are needed in the
    provision of information about potential drug
    side effects and the warning signs of which to be
    aware after discharge.

23
Your three key areas for local change
Local key area identified What action is needed to facilitate this change? Who will be responsible? How and when will you review this action?
1. Treatment of anaemia Write local treatment algorithm and circulate to MDT Consultant gastroenterologist and IBD nurse Sep 2014
2.
3.
24
Acknowledgements
  • Thank you to all the hospital-based staff who
    contributed towards case note retrieval and data
    collection, and distributed the inpatient
    experience questionnaires.
  • For further information, contact
  • ibd.audit_at_rcplondon.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com