Module 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 174
About This Presentation
Title:

Module 1

Description:

Module 1 Welcome – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 175
Provided by: Softwa50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Module 1


1
Module 1
  • Welcome

2
Overview
  • Introductions
  • Administrative
  • Course Objectives
  • Course Schedule
  • Style of Course
  • Course Materials

3
Administrative
  • Breaks
  • Sign-In Sheet

4
Targeted Audience
  • Mix of project personnel with variable levels of
    experience in KSC development projects
  • Prerequisites
  • Project management or systems engineering
    experience (at least one year)
  • Assumptions
  • Prior knowledge of risk or risk management is not
    required

5
Course Objectives
  • Understand the concepts and principles of
    Continuous Risk Management and how to apply them
  • Develop basic risk management skills for each
    component of Continuous Risk Management
  • Be aware of key methods and tools
  • Understand how CRM could be tailored to a project
  • Be able to differentiate between Risks and
    Problems

6
Module 2
  • Introduction

7
Overview
  • Agency Risk Management (RM) Requirements
  • Risk Definitions
  • RM/Project Management Relationship
  • Risk Management Benefits
  • Continuous Risk Management (CRM) Process
  • CRM Process Application
  • Risk Management Planning/Documentation
  • Who Performs Continuous Risk Management?

8
Agency Risk Management Requirements
  • Risk Management Documentation
  • NPD 7120.4, Program/Project Management, describes
    the management systems for program/project
    formulation, implementation, and evaluation
  • NPG 7120.5, NASA Program and Project Management
    Processes and Requirements, dictates basic risk
    management requirements
  • NPG 8000.4, Risk Management Procedures and
    Guidelines, provides additional information for
    applying risk management to programs and projects
    as required by NPG 7120.5
  • Procurement Notice (PN) 97-58, Risk Management

9
Agency Risk Management Requirements
  • Fundamental Risk Management Requirements
  • Program and project decisions shall be made on
    the basis of an orderly risk management effort
  • Risk management includes identification,
    assessment, mitigation, and disposition of risk
    throughout the project formulation, approval,
    implementation, and disposal phases
  • Project/Program Manager (PM) has the overall
    responsibility for the implementation of risk
    management, ensuring an integrated, coherent risk
    management approach throughout the project

10
Agency Risk Management Requirements
  • Fundamental Risk Management Requirements
  • Risk management planning will be developed during
    the project/program formulation phase, included
    in project/program plans, and executed during the
    implementation phase
  • Programs and projects will develop and maintain
    prioritized risk lists
  • Programs and projects must develop and clearly
    communicate success criteria to all levels of
    the program and project to define the scope of
    the effort and to guide risk decisions

11
Agency Risk Management Requirements
  • Fundamental Risk Management Requirements
  • Programs and projects must define, within the
    constraints imposed upon them (e.g., budget,
    schedule), what level of risk (i.e., acceptable
    risk) is reasonable for the program/ project
    to accept while still achieving mission success
  • Primary risks (i.e., risks having high
    probability and high impact/severity) must be
    classified, with acceptance rationale documented
    and concurred with by the Governing Program
    Management Council (GPMC)

12
Risk Definitions
  • Risk is the combination of the probability
    (qualitative or quantitative) that a program or
    project will experience an undesired event (cost
    overrun, schedule slip, safety mishap, security
    compromise) and the consequences (impact) of the
    undesired event, were it to occur.
  • NPG 8000.4

13
Risk Definitions
Risk involves the impact of the event should it
occur.
14
Some Perspectives on Risk
  • Risk will always be present in programs and
    projects
  • Not all risk can be avoided
  • Management and stakeholders must be active
    participants in the mission risk acceptance
    process
  • Risks are different from problems

15
Goal of Risk Management
  • Achieving Mission Success
  • Provide program/project managers principles and
    practices for decision making
  • Search out, identify, and manage risk
  • Keep safety paramount
  • Deliver a quality product on time and within cost

16
Success Criteria Emphasis
  • Program/project teams must develop clear Success
    Criteria during the formulation phase
  • Success criteria must be clearly communicated to
    all levels of the program and project to define
    scope of the effort and to guide risk decisions
  • Success criteria need to be developed at system,
    subsystem, and component level to define trade
    space and support risk decisions
  • Success criteria will continue to evolve
    throughout the life cycle of the project

17
Risk Management/Project Management Relationship
Project Management
18
Risk Management Benefits
  • Early identification of potential risks
  • Facilitates setting priorities
  • Increases chance of project success
  • Enables more efficient use of resources
  • Promote teamwork by involving personnel in all
    levels of the project
  • Information for tradeoffs is based on priorities
    and quantified assessments
  • Identify hidden risks

19
Everybody Wants to Understand Risk
20
Continuous Risk Management Process
  • Continuous Risk Management (CRM) is a structured,
    formalized management practice with processes,
    methods, and tools for managing risks in a
    project
  • It provides a disciplined environment for
    proactive decision making to
  • Assessment (continual) of what could go wrong
    (risks)
  • Determination of which risks are most important
    to deal with
  • Implementation of mitigation strategies to deal
    with those risks
  • Assured, measured effectiveness of the
    implemented mitigation strategies

21
Continuous Risk Management Process
22
CRM Process Components
  • Identify
  • Search for and locate risks before they become
    problems
  • Analyze
  • Convert risk data into useable information for
    determining priorities and making decisions
  • Plan
  • Translate risk information into planning
    decisions and mitigating actions (both present
    and future), and implement those actions

23
CRM Process Components
  • Track
  • Monitor risk indicators and mitigation actions
  • Control
  • Correct risk mitigation plans deviations and
    decide on future actions
  • Communicate and Document
  • Provide information to project on risk activities
    and current/future risks, and emerging risks

24
Relationship Among CRM Functions
  • Throughout the project life cycle, risk
    components evolve
  • Continuously
  • Concurrently
  • Iteratively

25
Risk Management Data Flow
Statements of risk
Project goals
Context
Resources
and constraints
Impact
Probability
Statements of risk
Timeframe
Individual
Context
Classification
uncertainties
Rank
Classification
Class 1
Class 2
Risk
Risk
Identify
Analyze
Plan
Risk
Risk
Risk
Class 3
Master list
of risks
Risk
Risk
List of risks
Project
Group/team
Top
uncertainties
data
N
Statement of risk
Decisions
Context
Status reports
replan
Impact
Probability
close
risks
invoke
Timeframe
mitigation
contingency
Classification
plans
Resources
continue
Rank
tracking
Plan Approach
Statements of risk
Context
Statements of Risk
Track
Control
Impact
Plan
Action plans
Probability
Context
Impact
Timeframe
Probability
Classification
Timeframe
Rank
Classification
Plan Approach
Project
Rank
Risk mitigation
Project
Status
Plan Approach
plan measure
data
data
Status
Control Decision
26
Continuous Risk Management Application
27
When Should CRM be done?
28
RM Planning/Documentation
  • Risk Management planning early in the project
    life cycle (i.e., formulation) is required per
    NPG 7120.5 (Section 4.3.2a) NPG 8000.4
  • Options
  • Stand-Alone Risk Management Plan (Medium-to-Large
    Projects)
  • Risk Management Section in Project Plan (Smaller
    Projects)

29
Risk Management Plan Details
  • Purpose
  • Documents the risk management practice
    (processes, methods, and tools) to be used for a
    specific project
  • Contents
  • Introduction/Overview
  • Project organization, roles, responsibilities
  • Practice details (e.g., how risks are identified)
  • Risk management milestones (e.g., quarterly risk
    list reviews)
  • Risk information documentation (e.g., database)
  • De-scope options
  • Available Information
  • SET/YA-B, conjunction with SHIA/QA-C, has
    established risk management and project plan
    templates, and can offer consulting and guidance
    during plan development

30
Relationship to Everyday Practice
  • Learning
  • Continuous Risk Management is similar to
    incorporating
  • any new habit
  • into your daily life.

31
Core Risk Management Team
32
Who Performs Continuous Risk Management?
  • Everyone!

33
Module 3
  • Identify

Control
Identify
Track
Communicate Document
Analyze
Plan
34
Overview
  • Identification activities
  • Capturing statements of risk
  • Capturing the context of a risk
  • Identification methods and tools
  • Brainstorming
  • Questionnaires and checklists
  • Personal knowledge/experience
  • RM/SMA analysis tools (FMEA, FTA, PRA)
  • Lessons Learned

35
Recording Data on the Risk Information Sheet
  • Risk Information Sheet
  • Fields to be Completed in Identification Phase
  • ID
  • Date Identified
  • Risk statement
  • Origin
  • Risk Context

36
Capturing Statements of Risk
  • Purpose
  • Arrive at a concise description of risk, which
    can be understood by everyone and acted upon
  • Description
  • Involves considering and recording the condition
    that is causing concern for a potential loss to
    the project, followed by a brief description of
    the potential consequences of this condition

37
Components of a Risk Statement
there is a possibility that
Given the

Consequence
will occur
Condition
Risk Statement
  • Condition A single phrase that identifies
    possible future problems, and describes current
    key circumstances and situations that are causing
    concern, doubt, anxiety, or uncertainty
  • Consequence A single phrase or sentence that
    describes the key, negative outcome(s) of the
    current conditions

38
Elements of a Good Risk Statement
  • Consider these questions when looking at a risk
    statement
  • Is it clear and concise?
  • Will most project members understand it?
  • Is there a clear condition or source of concern?
  • If a consequence is provided, is it clear?
  • Is there only ONE condition, followed by one (or
    more) consequence?

39
Example Risk Statements
  • Good or bad risk statements?
  • Object Oriented Development (OOD)!
  • The staff will need time and training to learn
    object oriented development.
  • This is the first time that the software staff
    will use OOD the staff may have a lower than
    expected productivity rate and schedules may slip
    because of the associated learning curve.

40
Capturing the Context of a Risk
  • Purpose
  • Provide enough additional information about the
    risk to ensure that the original intent of the
    risk can be understood by other personnel,
    particularly after time has passed
  • Description
  • Capture additional information regarding the
    circumstances, events, and interrelationships not
    described in the statement of risk

41
Context of a Risk Statement
  • An effective context captures the what, when,
    where, how, and why of the risk by describing the
    circumstances, contributing factors, and related
    issues (background and additional information
    that are NOT in the risk statement)

42
Elements of Good Context
  • Consider these questions when looking at the
    context
  • Can you identify which risk statement this
    context is associated with?
  • Is it clear what the source or cause of the risk
    is?
  • Is it clear what the impact might be?
  • Would you know who to assign the risk to for
    mitigation? Would they (the person responsible
    for risk mitigation) know what to do?
  • Would you be able to tell if the risk has gone
    away?

43
Example Context (1)
  • Risk Statement
  • This is the first time that the software staff
    will use Object Oriented Development (OOD) the
    staff may have a lower-than-expected productivity
    rate and schedules may slip because of the
    associated learning curve.
  • Risk context
  • Its a typical NASA project new concepts
    without training.
  • Is this an example of good or bad context?

44
Example Context (2)
  • Risk Statement
  • This is the first time that the software staff
    will use OOD the staff may have a lower than
    expected productivity rate and schedules may slip
    because of the associated learning curve.
  • Risk Context
  • Object oriented development is a very different
    approach that requires special training. There
    will be a learning curve until the staff is up to
    speed. The time and resources must be built in
    for this or the schedule and budget will overrun.

45
Risks are Not Problems (1)
  • Risk
  • A future event
  • A potential problem
  • Has a level of uncertainty (gt0 and lt100 chance
    of occurrence)
  • Problem
  • Is happening now
  • Must be dealt with immediately
  • No uncertainty (its occurring now)

46
Risks are Not Problems (2)
  • Risks are anticipated problems
  • Example Delivery of Class S parts on schedule
    is questionable
  • A Problem is a Risk that has occurred
  • Example Class S parts have not been delivered
  • Problems may create new risks
  • Change in design, increased testing
  • Schedule slip, screening cost

47
Brainstorming
  • Purpose
  • Group method for generating ideas
  • Description
  • Participants verbally identify ideas as they
    think of them, thus providing the opportunity for
    participants to build upon or spring off of ideas
    presented by others

48
Risk Statement Identification Tools --
Taxonomy-Based Questionnaire (TBQ)
  • Taxonomy The classification of something in an
    ordered system that indicates natural
    relationships division into ordered groups or
    categories
  • TBQs are questionnaires organized according to
    the taxonomy of a particular body of knowledge
  • TBQs provide a structured approach for
    identifying risks associated with a project
  • CRM Guidebook (pp. 471-493)

49
Additional Risk Identification Methods
  • Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
  • Fault Tree Analysis
  • Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)
  • Lessons Learned (http//llis.nasa.gov)
  • Various Other Checklists

50
Risk Identification Data Flow
Identify
Capture statement
of risk
Capture context of
risk
51
Risk Information Sheet(After the Identification
Phase)
  • Risk Information Sheet (RIS)
  • after the CRM Identify phase

52
Identification Phase Summary
  • Good risk statements
  • Contain ONLY one condition
  • Contain at least one consequence
  • Are clear and concise
  • Good context
  • Provides further information not in the risk
    statement
  • Ensures that the original intent of the risk can
    be understood by other personnel, even after time
    has passed
  • Communication is an integral part of risk
    identification

53
Module 4
  • Analyze

Control
Identify
Track
Communicate Document
Analyze
Plan
54
Overview
  • Analysis activities
  • Evaluating attributes of risk
  • Classifying risks
  • Prioritizing risks

55
Recording Data on the Risk Information Sheet
  • Risk Information Sheet
  • Fields to be Completed in Analysis Phase
  • Priority
  • Probability
  • Impact
  • Timeframe
  • Class

56
Evaluating Attributes of Risk
  • Purpose
  • To gain a better understanding of the risk by
    determining the expected impact, probability, and
    timeframe of the risk
  • Description
  • Involves establishing values for
  • Impact the loss or effect on the project if the
    risk occurs
  • Probability the likelihood the risk will occur
  • Timeframe the period when you must take action
    to mitigate the risk (NOT when the risk will
    occur)

57
Levels of Analysis
58
Tri-Level Attribute Evaluation Example
  • Each attribute has one of three values
  • Impact catastrophic, critical, marginal
  • Probability very likely, probable, improbable
  • Timeframe near-term, mid-term, far-term
  • Risk Exposure

Probability
Improbable
Probable
Very Likely
Catastrophic
Critical
Impact
Marginal
59
Example Probability Definitions
  • A risk is very likely if there is a gt70
    probability that it will occur
  • A risk is probable if there is a 30-70
    probability that it will occur
  • A risk is improbable if there is a lt30
    probability that it will occur

60
Example NASA Safety Impact Definitions
  • Catastrophic (Class I)
  • Loss of entire system
  • Loss of human life
  • Permanent human disability
  • Critical (Class II)
  • Major system damage
  • Severe injury
  • Temporary disability
  • Marginal (Class III)
  • Minor system damage
  • Minor injury (e.g., scratch)
  • Negligible (Class IV)
  • No system damage
  • No injury (possibly some aggravation)

61
Example Impact Definitions
Catastrophic
Critical
Marginal
Schedule
gt 20
10 20
0 10
Slip
Cost
gt 15
5 15
0 5
Overrun
System is
Major
Data lost
Technical
lost
function
lost
62
Example Timeframe Definitions
  • A risk has a near-term timeframe if the project
    must take mitigation action in the next 90 days
  • A risk has a mid-term timeframe if the project
    must take mitigation action in the next 90-180
    days
  • A risk has a far-term timeframe if the project
    does not need to take mitigation action within
    the next 180 days

63
Standardized Agency 5x5 Risk Matrix
64
Definition of a Primary Risk
  • NPG 8000.4 defined a Primary Risk as those
    undesirable events (risks) having both high
    probability and high impact/severity
  • Characterization of a Primary Risk as
    Acceptable shall be supported by rationale,
    with concurrence of the Governing Program
    Management Council (GPMC), that all reasonable
    mitigation options (within cost, schedule, and
    technical constraints) have been instituted

65
Risk Matrix Application
66
Example Impact Level Definitions
Impact Rating Safety Technical/ Performance Cost Schedule Programmatic
5 Catastrophic, may cause death or permanently disabling injury Cannot meet minimum success criteria gt15 Over Run Unrecoverable Project delay Forces project cancellation review
4 Critical, may cause severe injury or occupational illness Major impact to full mission success gt10 Over run Major slip in key milestone Major impact to budget, schedule, or mission success
3 Moderate, may cause injury or occupational illness Loss of system, With work-arounds, moderate impact on full mission success gt5 Over run Minor slip in need date Moderate impact to budget, schedule, or technical success of mission
2 Negligible, no adverse affect to personal safety or health Loss of redundancy or functional degradation, Minor impact to full mission success Reserves eroded Meet need date with no margin Can be covered by reserves, leaves no contingency for other Risks, minor impact to technical success
1 Meets safety requirements Component degrades, minor impact to full mission success Minimal - Begins to erode reserves Minimal - Begins to erode margins Minimal budget, schedule, or technical impact to project
67
Example Probability Rating Definitions
Probability Rating Probability of Occurrence(cost schedule ) Probability of Occurrence (performance) Safety Probability of Occurrence
5 81 gt99 51 gt99 10-6 gt_ P
4 61 80 31 50 10-3 gt_ P gt_ 10-6
3 41 60 15 30 10-2 gt_ P gt_ 10-3
2 21 40 5 14 10-1 gt_ P gt_ 10-2
1 0lt 20 0lt 4 10-6 P gt 10-1 gt_ P
68
Classifying Risks
  • Purpose
  • Look at a set of risks and how those risks relate
    to each other within a given structure
  • Efficiently sort through large amounts of data
  • Description
  • Involves grouping risks based on shared
    characteristics. The groups or classes show
    relationships among the risks
  • Example classifications
  • Safety Management
  • Cost Environmental
  • Schedule Security (plus IT Security)
  • Technical Performance Political

69
Prioritizing Risks
  • Purpose
  • Sort through a large amount of risks and
    determine which are most important
  • Separate out which risks should be dealt with
    first (the vital few risks) when allocating
    resources
  • Description
  • Involves partitioning risks or groups of risks
    based on the Pareto vital few sense and ranking
    risks or sets of risks based upon a criterion or
    set of criteria
  • Prioritization should utilize the projects
    success criteria
  • Prioritization should yield the projects
    Primary Risks

70
Two Step Risk Prioritization
List of risks
Order the Top N risks
Prioritized Ordered Master List of
Top N RISKS
Master list
of risks
Select the top or N risks

Top 10 Top 20
71
Risk Prioritization Using Multivoting
  • Multivoting is a technique for prioritizing a
    subset of items from a larger set (usually
    one-third of the items on a list)
  • Each evaluator in a group gets a certain number
    of votes (e.g., 3) to use for risk prioritization
  • Each evaluator then assigns a number between 1
    and 3 (i.e., the number of votes they have) to
    the risks they feel are most important (e.g., a
    3 is a higher priority risk than a 1)
  • Totals for each risk are tallied highest
    priority risks are those with the most points

72
Multivoting Example
Example Risk order of criticality 5
participants H B A C J 12 risks 3 weighted
votes (1 2 3)
73
Risk Prioritization Using a Risk Assessment Code
(RAC)
  • The use of Risk Assessment Code (RAC) is an
    additional, qualitative method for prioritizing
    risks
  • The RAC is a tool used to express comparative
    risks in all categories by evaluating both the
    potential severity of a condition and the
    probability of its occurrence
  • RACs can be utilized to determine a projects
    Primary Risks (i.e., those risks with both a
    high probability and a high impact) e.g., those
    risks with a RAC of 1 or 2
  • RACs can be assigned in a tailored manner to meet
    the needs or complexity of a program or project

74
Risk Assessment Code (RAC)Project Example
Likelihood Estimate
Impact/Severity
High risk
Medium
Low
  • RACs are assigned a number based on the risk
    exposure (product of probability times impact),
    with each attribute level having a score from 1
    to 5 in this risk matrix
  • For this example, the RED (High Risk) risks
    having a value of 15-25 would be classified as
    Primary Risks

75
Risk Analysis Data Flow (1)
  • Evaluate
  • Impact (I)
  • Probability (P)
  • Timeframe (T)
  • Classify
  • Identify duplicates
  • Consolidate risks to sets
  • Prioritize
  • Identify Pareto top N
  • Rank top N
  • Determine RAC

Risk I P T Risk a M M F Risk b M L
N Risk c L H N . . .
Consolidate risks
Risk I P T Risk set A H M F
----- ----- Risk b M L N Risk c
L H N . . .
Sort by evaluation results
Risk I P T Risk n H H
N Risk s H M N Risk set A H M F
----- ----- Risk c L H N
Top N 1. 2. 3. . . .
Rank order the Pareto top N
Pareto top N
RAC
76
Risk Analysis Data Flow (2)
Statement of risk
Context
77
Sample Risk Management Data Flow
78
Risk Information Sheet after Analyze Phase
  • Risk Information Sheet (RIS)
  • after the CRM Analyze phase

79
Analyze Phase Summary (1)
  • Evaluate risks at a level that is sufficient to
    determine the relative importance
  • Select attribute definitions (e.g., catastrophic
    impact, RAC 1) that make sense for your project
    document these in the project Risk Management
    Plan
  • Classify risks to help the project understand the
    risks
  • Group related risks into sets to help build more
    cost-effective mitigation plans

80
Analyze Phase Summary (2)
  • Prioritize to determine which risks should be
    dealt with first when allocating resources
  • Prioritize the risks based on the criteria for
    what is most important to the project
  • Communication is central to
  • Defining project evaluation definitions
  • Evaluating risks
  • Selecting a project classification scheme
  • Classifying risks
  • Defining prioritization criteria
  • Identifying and prioritizing the Top N risks

81
Module 5
  • Plan

Control
Identify
Track
Communicate Document
Analyze
Plan
82
Overview
  • Risk Planning activities
  • Assigning responsibility
  • Determining risk mitigation approach
  • Defining scope and actions
  • Mitigating a set of related risks

83
What Is Risk Planning?
  • Risk planning is the function of deciding what,
    if anything, should be done with a risk
  • Risk planning answers the questions
  • Who does planning?
  • Is it my risk? (responsibility)
  • What can I do? (approach)
  • How much and what should I do? (scope and actions)

84
Recording Data on the Risk Information Sheet
  • Risk Information Sheet
  • Fields to be Completed in Risk Planning Function
  • Assigned to
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Contingency Plan and Trigger

85
Risk Planning Decision Flowchart
86
Project Considerations Regarding Risk Planning
  • What are the risk attributes?
  • Is it a Primary Risk?
  • What is currently important to the project,
    management, customer, or user?
  • Are there critical milestones the project is
    currently is facing?
  • What limits or constraints do the project,
    organization, or manager have?
  • What resources are available for mitigation?
  • How does the risk fit into the overall project
    issues and concerns? When is the best time to
    address or mitigate a risk?

87
Assigning Responsibility for Risk Planning
  • Purpose
  • Ensure that no risks are ignored
  • Make effective use of expertise and knowledge
    within the project when planning for risk
    mitigation
  • Ensure that risks are being managed by those with
    the appropriate abilities, knowledge, and
    authority to commit resources for mitigation
  • Description
  • Involves reviewing the risk(s) and determining
    who is best able to deal with the risk(s)

88
Determining Risk Planning Approach
  • Purpose
  • Ensure you know enough to make an informed
    decision
  • Pick an appropriate approach for effective
    management of the risk(s)
  • Establish measurable mitigation goals that
    provide a target for evaluating success and
    direction during the development of action plans
  • Description
  • Involves reviewing the risk(s) and determining
    the best approach to take

89
Risk Planning Approaches
90
Contingency Planning
  • Not all risk mitigation strategies can or should
    be carried out immediately, for example
  • There may not be sufficient funding at this time
  • Other circumstance (available personnel) may not
    be right
  • Risk may be low probability, catastrophic impact
    with an expensive mitigation strategy
  • Current strategy might not be working
  • May need to develop a contingency risk mitigation
    strategy (to be used as Plan B if Plan A fails)
  • Contingency risk mitigation strategy plans are
    held in reserve until specific trigger conditions
    are true or certain events occur
  • Watch for the conditions and events!

91
Defining Scope and Actions for Risk Mitigation
Strategies
  • Purpose
  • Take a balanced approach in developing effective
    actions to mitigate risks
  • Description
  • Involves reviewing the risk(s) and determining
    the appropriate level of mitigation to take and
    the goal of the mitigation

92
Determining Risk Mitigation Goals and Success
Measures
  • There is a need to set realistic, measurable (or
    verifiable) goals for mitigating individual
    risks
  • Avoid changes to scheduled milestones
  • Eliminate change requests unsupported by funding
    to implement the change
  • Define mitigation success criteria it is
    important to know when youve succeeded or failed
    in mitigating risks
  • All current change requests implemented by
    DD/MM/YY, with no change to scheduled milestones

93
Discussion -- Risk Mitigation Goals and Success
Measures
  • Risk 7
  • Science requirements have substantial TBDs late
    completion of TBDs likely, with reduction in
    adequate testing time, possible science
    application software failure, incorrect science
    data being captured, hardware damage if incorrect
    safety limits were provided, extensive rework and
    substantial cost overruns, mission failure if
    problems not found before system is in operation
  • What risk mitigation goals and success measures
    would you look for?

94
Risk Planning Data Flow
Strategies Actions Triggers

Consequences may be added
to the risk statement if not
already documented
95
Risk Information Sheet(After the Risk Planning
Phase)
  • Risk Information Sheet (RIS)
  • after the CRM Risk Planning phase

96
Risk Information Sheet(After the Risk Planning
Phase)
  • Risk Information Sheet (RIS)
  • after the CRM Risk Planning phase

97
Risk Planning Phase Summary (1)
  • The result of risk planning is a documented
    decision about what should be done with each risk
  • The risk planning approach, as well as the
    mitigation strategy-related details are
    documented on the Risk Information Sheet. The
    risk planning approaches and their related risk
    planning documentation are
  • Research (Research Planning)
  • Accept (Acceptance Rationale)
  • Watch (Tracking Requirements)
  • Mitigate (Mitigation Strategy, Actions,
    Completion Dates, Triggers, Contingency
    Strategies)

98
Risk Planning Phase Summary (2)
  • Mitigate unacceptable risks to the project
  • You cant mitigate all risks but you need to
    understand which risks you are taking
  • Watch the risks that you cant currently mitigate
    and dont want to accept
  • Unassigned tasks tend to fall through the cracks
  • Dont over plan documentation of mitigation
    strategy actions on the Risk Information Sheet is
    sufficient for almost all identified project risks

99
Module 6
  • Track

Control
Identify
Track
Communicate Document
Analyze
Plan
100
Overview
  • Tracking activities
  • Acquiring Data
  • Compiling and Evaluating Data
  • Reporting Status (planning, risks)

101
What do We Mean by Tracking?
  • Tracking
  • A process for watched and mitigated risks where
    related data are acquired, compiled, analyzed,
    and reported
  • Risks can be tracked individually or in sets

102
Recording Data on the Risk Information Sheet
  • Risk Information Sheet
  • Fields to be Completed or Updated in the Tracking
    Function
  • Priority
  • Probability
  • Impact
  • Timeframe
  • Status
  • Status Date

103
Tracking Risks and Mitigation Strategies
  • Tracking risk mitigation strategies will indicate
  • Whether the mitigation strategy is being executed
    correctly
  • If risk mitigation is on schedule (including
    action items)
  • Tracking individual risk attributes will indicate
  • Mitigation strategy effectiveness
  • Is the impact/probability reduced?

104
Risk Metrics
  • Risk Metrics are used to
  • Measure attributes of a risk
  • Impact, probability, and timeframe
  • Other risk- or project-specific attributes
  • Provide meaningful information to enable more
    informed control decisions
  • Assess the impact or success of a mitigation
    strategy
  • Identify new risks (if indicated by the risk
    metrics)

105
Acquiring Data
  • Purpose
  • To collect tracking data for a given risk
  • Description
  • A process that includes all of the steps
    associated with collecting information about and
    updating the values of risk measures and status
    indicators for watched and mitigated risks

106
Considerations When Acquiring Data
  • Status information is only as good as its
    accuracy and timeliness
  • Stale data are more dangerous to decision makers
    than no data at all
  • When a group of indicators is required, all of
    the data must be acquired from the same time
    period
  • Collect just the data needed to track the
    projects risks. Collect only what you need and
    use what you collect

107
Data Acquisition (Metrics Examples)
  • Requirements
  • Ambiguity Weak Phrases and/or Optional Language
  • Measure of Completeness TBD TBA TBR
  • Design and Implementation
  • Structure/Architecture Complexity and Size
  • Testing
  • Problem Reporting Tracking Open, Closed,
    Severity
  • Defect Density
  • Process
  • Schedule Effort, Completion Rates
  • Budget

108
Compiling and Evaluating Data
  • Purpose
  • Organize and understand the relevant tracking
    data for a given risk
  • Description
  • A process in which data for a given risk is
    combined, calculated, organized, and interpreted
    for the tracking of a risk and its associated
    mitigation strategy

109
Triggers/Thresholds
  • A value of an indicator that specifies the level
    at which an action, such as implementing a
    contingency plan, may need to be taken
  • Triggers and thresholds are generally used to
  • Provide early warning of an impending critical
    event
  • Indicate the need to implement a contingency plan
    to preempt a problem
  • Request immediate attention for a risk
  • Triggers and thresholds are effective if
  • They do not trip unnecessarily
  • They are easy to calculate and report

110
Example Use of Triggers
Over budget
acceptable
Within Budget
Under budget
Risk 100Project resources (personnel number and
availability) and schedules were underestimated
schedule slips, cost overruns, reduction in
adequacy of development processes (especially
testing time adequacy) likely.
111
Process (Metrics Example)
  • Risk 6 Project software schedule and resources
    were underestimated schedule slips, reduction in
    adequate testing time
  • Data to be collected
  • Effort per activity
  • Trigger
  • Exceeds expected percentages

112
Process Metrics Example(Effort per Life Cycle
Phase)
Actual/Projected Effort
Test
18
Req/Design
Test
Req/Design
30
33
34
Current Status
Development
48
Development
37
Risk - Decrease in Testing projected
113
Reporting Data
  • Purpose
  • Communicate risk status reports to support
    effective decision making (inputs for the
    Control function)
  • Description
  • A process in which status information about risks
    and mitigation strategies is communicated to
    decision makers and team members

114
Reporting Considerations
  • What information needs to be reported?
  • What presentation formats best present the
    analyzed data?
  • Does the information and the format of the report
    provide the basis needed by decision makers?

115
Sample Risk Management Data Flow
116
Standardized Agency 5x5 Risk Matrix
117
Top Risk List and Risk Matrix Example
118
Risk Focus Chart Example
119
Stoplight / Fever Chart
Condition/Change
Risk ID
Risk Statement
Assigned To
Planning Approach
Remaining Milestones
Comments
Yellow
14
Contracting different test facility insufficient
testing, damage. Science reqt substantial TBDs
late completion, incomplete testing, wrong
data. SW schedule and resources under estimated
schedule slips, cost overruns.
Green
7
Red
6

120
Reporting Schedule
  • Reports are generally delivered as part of
    routine project management activities
  • Weekly status meetings
  • Monthly project meetings
  • The frequency of reporting depends on
  • The reporting requirements for each risk or risk
    set
  • The manner in which the report will be used
  • Exception reporting may be necessary

121
Risk Tracking Data Flow
122
Tracking Phase Summary
  • Tracking reports communicate information required
    for effective control decisions
  • Tracking information and reports can include
    quantitative indicator data as well as more
    subjective information (e.g., recommendations)
  • Tracking information is not limited to formal
    reporting mechanisms
  • Informal reporting of risk-related information by
    all project personnel can aid decision making
  • Risk tracking should be integrated with standard
    management practices risk management should be
    tailored for a project

123
Module 7
  • Control

Control
Identify
Communicate Document
Track
Analyze
Plan
124
Control Overview
  • Control activities
  • Evaluate tracking results
  • Decide on course of action
  • Execute control actions

125
What is Control?
  • Control
  • A process in which decisions are made based on
    the data presented in the tracking reports
  • Risks can be controlled individually or in sets

126
What Is Effective Control?
  • Monitoring the quality of risk mitigation
    execution
  • Assessing the effectiveness of mitigation
    strategies
  • Assessing significant changes in risks and trends
  • Determining appropriate responses
  • Executing the plan of attack
  • Communicating the above information

127
Recording Data on the Risk Information Sheet
  • Risk Information Sheet
  • Fields to be Completed in Risk Control Function
  • Approval
  • Closing Date
  • Closing Rationale
  • Status

128
Evaluate Tracking Results
  • Purpose
  • Allows decision makers to identify significant
    changes in risks, to assess the effectiveness of
    mitigation strategies, and to accurately
    determine the best courses of action
  • Description
  • Uses tracking data to reassess project risks for
    trends, deviations, and anomalies

129
Metric Trend Analysis
  • The Risk Management Plan can document which
    project metrics to track
  • Trend and data analysis of project metrics can be
    used to identify new risks
  • Trends can be observed through the evaluation of
    successive reports
  • Persistent lateness in taking action
  • Oscillating priority values
  • Significant changes in the number of high impact
    risks or risks of a particular type

130
Trending Metrics Example
  • Given concerns about unstable or incomplete
    requirements, which metrics might be useful in
    controlling this risk area?
  • Risk 7 Science requirements have substantial
    TBDs late completion of TBDs likely, with
    reduction in adequate testing time, possible
    science application software failure, incorrect
    science data being captured, hardware damage if
    incorrect safety limits were provided, extensive
    rework and substantial cost overruns, mission
    failure if problems not found before system is
    operational
  • What data would you collect? What trends would
    you expect to see evolve?

131
Requirements Metrics (Sample Solution)
Completeness and Volatility Analysis
Total Number of Requirements
1000
900
800
700
600
Quantity
500
400
300
200
100
0
1Q94
2Q94
3Q94
4Q94
1Q95
2Q95
3Q95
Calendar Quarter
CRR Looks Good! (Stable)
Combination of BOTH views indicates risk area -
requirements are NOT YET stable
132
Decide on Course of Action
  • Purpose
  • Ensure that project risks continue to be managed
    effectively
  • Description
  • Uses tracking data to determine how to proceed
    with project risks
  • Close the risk
  • Continue tracking and executing the current
    mitigation strategies
  • Re-plan risk mitigation
  • Invoke an alternate mitigation strategy (e.g.,
    use a contingency plan)

133
Execute Control Actions
  • Purpose
  • Implement both the decision made about a risk and
    mitigation strategy as well as to ensure that all
    decisions are appropriately documented for future
    reference and historical record maintenance
  • Ensure approval and resources are allocated
  • Description
  • The process where control decisions are
    implemented

134
Risk Control Data Flow
  • Decisions
  • Replan
  • Close
  • Invoke contingency
  • Continue tracking
  • Status Reports
  • Risks
  • Mitigation plans

Control
evaluate
decide
Statement of Risk
execute
Context Impact Probability Timeframe Classificati
on Rank Plan Approach Status
Statement of Risk
Context Impact Probability Timeframe Classificati
on Rank Plan Approach Status
Project Data
135
Risk Information Sheet (After Tracking and
Control Phase)
136
Risk Control Phase Summary
  • Control Decisions are based on current
    information as well as experience, and are
    required to respond to changing conditions in
    watched and mitigated risks
  • Risk tracking and control should be integrated
    with standard project management practices risk
    management should be tailored for a project

137
Module 8
  • Communicate Document

Control
Communicate Document
Track
Analyze
Plan
138
Overview
  • What is communication?
  • Relationship to other CRM Process functions
  • Enablers to communication
  • Barriers to communication
  • Documentation of risks

139
Relationship To Other CRM Process Functions
140
Why Communicate Risks?
  • Makes risks, plans, actions, concerns, exchanges,
    forecast, and progress known
  • Ensures the visibility of risk information
  • To enable all project members to participate in
    defining and managing risks
  • Ensures understanding of risks and mitigation
    plans
  • Establishes an effective, ongoing dialog between
    the manager and the project team
  • Ensures appropriate attention is focused on
    issues and concerns

141
Why Document Risks?
  • In order to track and collect risk information
    internally and externally
  • Risks have a life cycle and eventually all risks
    go away
  • Probability or impact goes to zero
  • Risk becomes a problem
  • Documenting the life cycle of risks
  • Helps you learn what worked and didnt work
  • Should help you avoid similar difficulties
  • Provides the opportunity to help other projects
    learn from your experience (Input to Lessons
    Learned Database)

142
Risk Documentation Types
  • Risk Management Plan (NPG 7120.5B, NPG 8000.4)
  • Risk Implementation Plan
  • Risk Information Sheets ()
  • Prioritized Risk List (NPG 7120.5B)
  • Risk Profile
  • Risk Analysis Reports
  • Risk Mitigation Status Reports
  • Risk Databases ()
  • Spreadsheet Risk Tracking Logs
  • () Recommended for KSC risk management activities

143
Module 9
  • Implementing Continuous Risk Management

Control
Identify
Communicate Document
Track
Analyze
Plan
144
Overview
  • Frequently asked CRM implementation questions
  • When do I start?
  • Whos involved?
  • What do I need?
  • What should I choose?
  • What actions should I take?
  • Hints and Tips
  • Things to watch out for

145
When do I Start CRM?
Opportunity
Actions
Pre-contract activity
Include risk management provisions in the
solicitation and statement of work.
Major project milestones (e.g., contract award)
Prepare for a major project decision point, and
the need to increase knowledge about risks for
improved strategic planning.
Major project review
Prepare for standard reviews, such as design
reviews, functional tests.
Best time to start is at the beginning!
146
Whos Involved? (1)
Role/Description
Responsibilities and Tasks
Sponsor (e.g., senior mgr., VP, division chief)
  • Provide visible support and encouragement
  • Reward effective management of risks

Project manager (responsible for ultimate success
of project)
  • Provide resources and funding
  • Reward effective management of risks
  • Monitor progress

Champion (advocates new technology or process
within the project)
  • Publicize and promote CRM
  • Coordinate changes and improvements on
  • the project

Change agents (plan and implement changes in
organizations and projects
  • Assist with recommendations of plans
  • Evaluate existing and new tools

147
Whos Involved? (2)
Role/Description
Responsibilities and Tasks
Facilitators (trained in meeting skills, conflict
resolution, tools, etc., - act individually or as
a team)
  • Conduct training sessions
  • Provide CRM expertise
  • Provide consulting during evaluation of
  • progress
  • Encourage and support use of CRM within
  • their teams
  • Report risk information to project manager
  • Evaluate progress within their teams

Technical managers (e.g., team or functional
leads, such as software/hardware manager, test
mgr., etc.)
Project personnel (e.g., software or hardware
engineers, testers, etc.)
  • Add CRM activities to day-to-day
  • operations
  • Maintain open communication about risks

148
Core Risk Management Team
149
Core RM Team Key Responsibilities (1)
  • Reviews current and previous risk issues to
    validate, classify and group risks at the project
    level
  • Determines risk attributes (probability, impact,
    and timeframe) and reprioritizes risks as needed
  • Determines if addition information is needed
    (trade-studies or research)
  • Implements mitigation options (contingency plans,
    descope plans). Determines who is involved and
    assigns risk owner. Reassigns risks when
    necessary
  • Adjusts action planning (mitigation plans,
    mitigation time frames, etc)

150
Core RM Team Key Responsibilities (2)
  • Tracks, communicates and controls risks
  • Makes control decision recommendations (analyze,
    decide, execute) to PM for all risks
  • Makes recommendations to PM regarding CRM policy
    and the communication of risks
  • Makes recommendations to PM regarding risk
    closure and/or acceptance
  • Make recommendations to PM concerning allocations
    of resources to mitigate risks

151
You need . . . Organization Structure,
Internal/External Communication
Organization Structure
Internal Communication
External Communication
152
Risk Management Planning Documentation Options
  • Risk Management Plan
  • Guides project personnel through the tailored
    process, methods, and tools for managing their
    project risks
  • Recommended and preferred risk management
    planning documentation approach for KSC projects
  • Risk Management Implementation Plan
  • Guides project personnel (in the pre-formulation
    phase) regarding how they intend to bring risk
    management into the projects infrastructure and
    processes
  • Utilized primarily for extremely large
    programs/projects, where there is a need to
    establish sponsorship, resources, and
    infrastructure for the overall risk management
    approach
  • Development of a Risk Management Implementation
    Plan is not envisioned for KSC projects (Refer to
    Tab L Module 11 for an example plan)

153
Risk Management Plan Elements(NPG 8000.4,
Section 2.7.4)
  • Introduction/Overview of Risk Management process
  • Project Organization and Responsibilities
  • Risk Management activities and practices
    in detail
  • Budget, resources, and milestones for risk
    management activities and risk mitigation
  • Procedure for documenting risks
  • Assumptions
  • Technical Considerations
  • Constraints
  • De-Scope Options

154
Sample Risk Management Plan
  • KSCs Advanced Technology Development Center
    (ATDC) Risk Management Plan can serve as an
    example for your project to use
  • Take a few minutes to read the ATDC Risk
    Management Plan (After Module 11)

155
You need to . . . Utilize Established Project
Meetings
  • Weekly Team Meetings
  • Establish priority of teams risks
  • Assign responsibility for new risks
  • Review and approve mitigation strategies
  • Monthly Project Meetings
  • Presentation of the teams Top N risks (and
    mitigation strategies)
  • Decisions of appropriate risk mitigation actions
  • Determination regarding allocation of resources
    to implement risk mitigation strategies
  • NOTE The above are examples your project team
    should utilize existing meetings, NOT separate
    Risk Management meetings

156
You need a. . . Defined Process and Data Flow
Example
Periodic meetings
Individual activities
Analyze Classify risks Evaluate risks
Identify risks
Periodic meetings
Individual activities
157
You must choose your . . . Methods and
Tools
Control
Identify
Baseline Identification and Analysis
Brainstorming
Periodic Risk Reporting
 Project Profile Questions
Project Metrics
Risk Information Sheet
Short TBQ
Track
Taxonomy-Based Questionnaire (TBQ)
TBQ Interviews
Voluntary Reporting
  • Project Metrics
  • Failure Modes Effect Analysis (FMEA)
  • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

Analyze
  • Project Metrics
  • Statistical Process
  • Control (SPC)

Affinity Grouping
Plan
Baseline Identification and Analysis
 Binary Attribute Evaluation
Comparison Risk Ranking
Multivoting
 Pareto Top N
 Potential Top N
Taxonomy Classification
Risk Information Sheet
 Top 5
  • Tri-level Attribute Evalu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com