Title: Migrant workers and Abortion Violation of rights in Malaysia
1Migrant workers and Abortion Violation of rights
in Malaysia
by Dr SP Choong Co-chair Reproductive Advocacy
Alliance Malaysia SC Member Asia Safe Abortion
Partnership. UN Office of Human Rights - Global
Seminar on Human Rights of Migrant Workers. 27
to 28 September 2015 , Shangrila Hotel, Bangkok.
228th September. International Day of Action for
Access to Safe Abortion. Save women's lives!
3Points to Raise
- Workers Rights to Reproductive Health services
- Rights of Association - Romantically
- Discriminatory application of Abortion law.
- Inhuman treatment by Enforcement agents.
- Authorities reluctance to address Abortion Stigma
despite permissive law.
4On October 13th 2014.Nirmala became the first
woman to be charged for abortion in a registered
clinic
5Shocking to medical circles
- Because under penal code section 312
- Abortion became Legal in Malaysia since 1989.
- The Penal Code Amendment Act (1989) allows a
medical practitioner registered under the 1971
Medical Act to terminate the pregnancy of a
woman (i.e. to cause a miscarriage in legal
language) under a wide range of conditions which
are considered permissive by international
standards (WHO). - meaning all medical doctors practicing legally
in this country.
6Legal under what conditions?
- 1. Doctors Opinion if such medical practitioner
is of the opinion, formed in good faith. - 2. Assessment of Risks the continuance of the
pregnancy would involve - Risk to the life of the pregnant woman or
- Risk of injury to the mental and physical health
of the pregnant woman - Risk being greater than if the pregnancy were
terminated - Quote Section 312, Penal Code in . MOH guide,
MMA Medical Ethics
7BUT - How action was taken against Nirmala
- Misapplication of penal code section 315
criminalizing an act done to prevent a child
from being born alive or to cause it to die after
birth - In Malaysia, it has been only applied to
terminations when the fetus is viable after 24
weeks gestation. (also UK practice) - An attempt by DPP to apply this to early
pregnancies allowed by section 312.
8Immediate NGO efforts to alert Authorities
- Working behind the scenes
- Arranged meeting with contacts in Medical
Associations, Ministry of Health, Attorney
Generals office. - Discussing misapplication of law.
- No action taken to withdraw case.
- Bureaucrats must not lose face?
9Migrant workers in Malaysia.Overview
- My clinic experience in providing reproductive
health services for women migrant workers. - In multinational as operators in electronics,
garments etc - In domestic work.
- Coming from Indonesian, Vietnam, Nepal, Cambodia
and Myanmar.
10Reproductive health problems.
- Regulations for migrant workers include annual
health checks, regulated by Ministry of Health. - Infectious diseases a top priority but pregnancy
is an essential bar. - Contract terms include not having romantic
relationships - Pregnant workers either seek abortion or are
dismissed and sent home to continue pregnancy.
11Figures and Causes - reality
- Mostly young women are under 25yrs - thus would
be sexually active. - No provision for FP advice and services.
- In an open reproductive health clinic in Penang
30 are migrant workers seeking abortions
(about 60 a month). - Many prefer to keep their jobs than keep
pregnancy. - Problem of timing of annual medical checks w
Pregnancy tests.
12Nirmalas story An unprecedented case
- Nirmala a young a Nepali migrant worker came to
Penang tp work in Sony in late 2013. - Paid agent 1000 USD to get work permitand job for
3 years- salary approx 300 USD/month. - Got pregnant in October 2014, seeked and under
went abortion by GP when 6 weeks pregnant. - When procedure was completed an MOH inspector
decided to make police report and arranged
sensational media raid and arrest.
13Demeaning process in between
- High profile arrest made in factory floor where
she had to change into prison garb. - Placed in Police lockup for 1 month awaiting
interpreter - Accompanied by Hindi interpreter (not Nepali) but
judge allowed hearing. - Distressed and confused she pleaded guilty.
- Sentence to 12 months jail.
14NGOs take court action.
- After 3 months in Jail, NGO reps visited jail.
- Discovery, she didnt understand the charge read
to her in court. - Also there was no legal counsel present.
- Sony HR officer agreed with verdict.
- Embassy informed but nothing done.
- Appeal to High Court, declared mistrial, Nirmala
released on Bail.
15First woman to be charged and convicted of
illegal abortion.
16Prolonged prosecution case
- New trial proceeds.
- Although now not guilty, Sony refuses to take her
back. - No letter of dismissal given.
- Trial proceeds on bimonthly hearings.
- All witnesses called except doctor who did
procedure. - Unable to prove abortipn took place - finally
doctorr was called.
17Closure - Eight months later
18Doctors testimony
- Defence used WHO definition of Health.
- Not only free from sickness
- Complete state of physician, mental, social and
psychological health. - Also linking mental health potential suicide
- Section 315 allows abortion to save life of
mother even if applied to all pregnancies.
19Problems of of Penal Code Abortion STIGMA
- General public, health providers, enforcement
agencies the media and NGOs - low awareness of
significance 1989 Penal Code Amendments. - Amendment in parliament in 1989 - very low key.
- Media and politicians continue to misrepresent
legal status. - Medical and Nursing school side step abortion
issue. - MMC ethical guidelines published in 1988 before
the 1989 amendment has not been updated since.
20Problems of Migrant Workers regulations
- Romantic relationships can be included in
contract. - Refusal of a basic right of association.
- Reproductive health not addressed.
- Abortion law not recognized.
- Premature expulsion of migrant workers benefit
the agencies? - Inhuman treatment of workers by authorities.
21A happy ending?