Outcomes or Objectives: What - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Outcomes or Objectives: What

Description:

Ginni May Facilitator, Sacramento City College Marie Boyd Chaffey College Aimee Myers Sierra College Michelle Pilati Rio Hondo College – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: MarieB166
Learn more at: https://www.asccc.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Outcomes or Objectives: What


1
Outcomes or Objectives Whats the Diff?
  • Ginni May Facilitator, Sacramento City College
  • Marie Boyd Chaffey College
  • Aimee Myers Sierra College
  • Michelle Pilati Rio Hondo College

2
Overview
  • Whats the big deal?
  • Says who?
  • Title 5
  • ASCCC
  • ACCJC
  • How are/should objectives and outcomes be
    related?
  • Positions, considerations, and models
  • Where should SLOs live?

3
You say tomAtoes And I say tOmatoes
  • Outcomes or Objectives?
  • Is there a difference?
  • Does it matter?
  • Can we call the whole thing off?
  • Lets review what we know and what we dont know

4
Title 5 55002 (a)(3) and (b)(3)
  • Both degree applicable and non-degree applicable
    courses require course outlines of record (CORs).
  • CORs must include
  • Unit value
  • Expected number of contact hours as a whole
  • Pre-req, co-reqs, advisories
  • Catalog description
  • OBJECTIVES
  • Content
  • Should include examples of reading, writing and
    other outside-of-class assignments
  • Instructional methodology
  • Methods of evaluation

5
So, what IS an objective?
  • ASCCCs Course Outline of Record A Curriculum
    Reference Guide

6
Objectives
  • Stated in terms of what students will be able to
    do.
  • Clearly connect to achievement of the course
    goals.
  • Concise but complete ten objectives might be too
    many one is not enough.

7
Objectives
  • Use verbs showing active learning.
  • Theory, principles, and concepts must be
    adequately covered.
  • Skills and applications are used to reinforce and
    develop concepts.
  • Each objective should be broad in scope, not too
    detailed, narrow, or specific.

8
So why are we even talking about outcomes?
9
ACCJC STANDARDS
  • 21 references to learning outcomes in the new
    Standards.
  • Among them STANDARD I.B.2
  • The institution defines and assesses student
    learning outcomes for all instructional programs
    and student and learning support services.
  • ACCJC does not tell us how to define.

10
ACCJC STANDARDS
  • STANDARD I.B.5
  • The institution assesses accomplishment of its
    mission through program review and evaluation of
    goals and objectives, student learning outcomes,
    and student achievement. Quantitative and
    qualitative data are disaggregated for analysis
    by program type and mode of delivery.
  • Again, ACCJC does not tell us how to assess. It
    does tell us, however, we must disaggregate and
    analyze.

11
Title 5 vs ACCJC Standards
  • Title 5 states that OBJECTIVES must be a
    component of the COR 55002(a)(3).
  • ACCJC requires OUTCOMES II.A.3 officially
    approved and current course outlines that include
    student learning outcomes. In every class section
    students receive a course syllabus that includes
    learning outcomes from the institutions
    officially approved course.
  • We also must do things with those outcomesGood
    things. ?

12
Title 5 vs ACCJC Standards
  • Neither dictates the relationship between the
    two.
  • So, what is the relationship?

13
ASCCC Positions Publishing SLOs
  • Spring 2009 (09.10)
  • Whereas, Curriculum and student success are areas
    where ASCCC has professional responsibility
  • Whereas, Approximately 50 of the CCCs that
    responded to surveys about placing SLOs in the
    COR reported their decision not to include SLOs
    on the COR, while other colleges either did not
    respond or have not decided and

14
ASCCC Positions Publishing SLOs
  • Whereas, Housing SLOs in some other public domain
    entity can still allow students, community
    members, and accrediting agencies to review and
    track progress of SLOs at community colleges
  • Resolved, That ASCCC encourage local senates to
    publish SLOs in any appropriate public domain
    entity such as the COR, database, webpage, etc.

15
Local Considerations
  • Relationship between Standing Committees that
    handle curriculum and outcomes (SLOs)
  • Relationship between SLOs and the Course Outline
    of Record
  • Processes - Cycles on Campus
  • Curriculum Review
  • SLO Assessment
  • Program Review

16
Chaffey College Model
  • Objectives are the nuts and bolts of a subject.
  • Outcomes are what we expect students to be able
    to do with the nuts and bolts in terms of
    Knowledge Skills and Abilities (KSAs).
  • While objectives are what students will learn,
  • outcomes demonstrate the specific observable
  • and measurable product of that learning the
  • higher order application of knowledge and
    skills.

17
Chaffey College Model
  • Course SLOs have always been separated from
    course objectives.
  • Course SLOs are crafted differently than course
    objectives which rely on Blooms Taxonomy.
  • Course SLOs are limited to 3-5 statements
    objectives can be up to 20 items

18
Chaffey College Model
  • Course SLOs are housed on an addendum and do not
    appear on the word report of the COR in
    Curricunet.
  • Course SLOs are scaffolded, aligning with program
    SLOs and the institutions Core Competencies.
  • Folding SLOs into the curriculum process in this
    limited way guarantees sustained, substantive
    and collegial dialog about student outcomes
    required in Standard I.B.1.

19
  • Core Competencies
  • 1. Communication
  • 2. Critical Thinking and Information
    Competency
  • 3. Community/Global Awareness and
    Responsibility
  • 5. Personal, Academic, and Career
    Development
  • Program SLOs
  • 1. Demonstrate familiarity with major
    concepts, theoretical perspectives, empirical
    findings, and historical trends.
  • 2. Understand and apply basic research
    methods including research design, data analysis
    and interpretation.
  • 3. Show insight into ones own and others
    behavior and mental processes and apply effective
    strategies for self-
  • management and self-improvement.
  • 4. Recognize, understand and respect the
    complexity of socio-cultural and international
    diversity.
  • 5. Respect and use critical and creative
    thinking, skeptical inquiry and the scientific
    approach.
  • COURSE SLOs
  • Upon successful completion students will be able
    to identify the major theoretical perspectives in
    Psychology.
  • Upon successful completion students will be able
    to identify the major theoretical perspectives in
    Psychology.

20
Chaffey College Model Objectives
  • Course Objectives for PSYCH 1 (aligned with C-ID
    PST 100 Introduction to Psychology)
  • A. Gain mastery of major concepts, theoretical
    perspectives, research methods, core empirical
    findings and historic trends in psychology.
  • B. Contrast and compare scientific and
    non-scientific views on the nature and origins of
    behavior.
  • C. Contrast and compare major theoretical
    perspectives of psychology (e.g., behavioral,
    biological, cognitive, evolutionary, humanistic,
    psychodynamic and socio-cultural).
  • D. Gain mastery of the following nine general
    domains (1) biological basis of behavior and
    mental processes, (2) sensation and perception,
    (3) learning and memory, (4) cognition,
    consciousness, (5) individual differences,
    psychometrics, personality, (6) social processes
    (including those related to socio-cultural and
    international dimensions), (7) developmental
    changes in behavior and mental processes that
    occur during a lifespan, (8) psychological
    disorders, and (9) emotion and motivation.
  • E. Describe various activities of psychologists
    (both experimental and clinical).
  • F. Describe and demonstrate an understanding of
    applied areas of psychology (e.g., clinical,
    counseling, forensic, community, organizational,
    school, health)
  • G. Think scientifically about behavior including
    ones own behavior and draw a distinction between
    scientific and non-scientific methods of
    understanding and analysis.
  • H. Think scientifically about behavior including
    ones own behavior.
  • I. Recognize and understand the impact of
    diversity on psychological research, theory and
    application, including (but not limited to) age,
    race, ethnicity, culture, gender, socio-economic
    status, disability and sexual orientation.
  • J. Understand and analyze the ethics involved
    within the field of psychology (both experimental
    clinical).
  • K. Apply course material to everyday life
    experience.
  • L. Characterize psychology as a discipline and a
    science.
  • M. Understand and analyze the causes, functions
    and mechanisms of behavior in animals and humans.
  • N. Critically think about concepts and issues
    within the field of psychology.

21
Chaffey College Model PSYCH 1 SLOs
  • Upon the successful completion of PSYCH 1 (grade
    C or higher), students will
  • identify the major theoretical perspectives in
    psychology.
  • differentiate between major research methods in
    psychology.
  • identify and explain the major parts and
    functions of the brain and central nervous
    system.

22
Sacramento City College Model
  • Los Rios Community College District has their own
    curriculum management system call SOCRATES.
  • It houses all Course and Program Outlines of
    Record (CORs and PORs).
  • Each COR and POR template has a section labeled
    Learning Outcomes and Objectives.

23
Sacramento City College Model
  • Learning Outcomes and Objectives
  • Upon completion of this course, the student will
    be able to
  • compose effective college-level essays using a
    variety of rhetorical strategies and applying
    appropriate citations and formatting standards.
  • research, evaluate, and synthesize sources to
    support a thesis.
  • critically analyze, compare, and evaluate various
    complex works.
  • apply the conventions of standard written
    English, employing a variety of sentence
    structures and college-level diction.

24
Sierra College Model
  • Objectives are small steps that lead toward a
    goal, for instance the discrete course content
    that faculty cover within a discipline.
  • Objectives are usually more numerous and create a
    framework for the overarching student learning
    outcomes which address synthesizing, evaluating
    and analyzing many of the objectives.

25
Sierra College Model
  • Student learning outcomes (SLOs) are the specific
    observable or measurable results that are
    expected subsequent to a learning experience.
  • http//www.sierracollege.edu/slo/_resources/img/do
    cs/Assessment-Guidebook-10-5-14.pdf

26
So, where should SLOs live?
27
  • Page 2 How do course SLOs relate to learning
    objectives?
  • Most of the confusion about the difference
    between SLOs and learning objectives lies in the
    term objectives. Generally, objectives specify
    discrete steps taken within an educational
    program to achieve an outcome. They are the
    means, not the ends. So the course objectives
    specified by the California public college
    systems Academic Senate, for example, are
    defined as follows Objectives are the key
    elements which must be taught each time the
    course is taught.1 Course SLOs are the intended
    learning outcomes objectives are the things that
    must be taught/covered in order to achieve those
    learning outcomes. Sometimes, these things are
    very close often, they are quite distinct.
  • 1. The Course Outline of Record A Curriculum
    Reference Guide, adopted Spring 2008 by the
    Academic Senate for California
  • Community Colleges.

28
What Happens When Course Objectives are
Considered the Same as Course SLOs?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com