Variations in Map-Reading Performance Efficiency - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Variations in Map-Reading Performance Efficiency

Description:

Measure the performance efficiency of participants as they engage in map-reading tasks that require the processing of ... in cognitive experiments This ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: rlb64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Variations in Map-Reading Performance Efficiency


1
Variations in Map-Reading Performance Efficiency
  • Rick Bunch, University of North Carolina
    Greensboro
  • Robert Earl Lloyd, University of South Carolina

2
Purpose and Problem
  • Measure the performance efficiency of
    participants as they engage in map-reading tasks
    that require the processing of geographic
    information
  • To identify the relationships between top-down
    and bottom-up processes related to searching and
    recalling geographic information

3
Performance
  • Accuracy and reaction times are frequently used
    as measures of success (performance efficiency)
    in cognitive experiments
  • This study examine three factors that could
    influence performance gender, memory, and brain
    asymmetry

4
Task
  • Data Gather Steps
  • Measure second and fourth digits
  • Bem Sex Role Inventory
  • Spatial Working Memory Span Test (Computerized
    version of the Corsi Block Task)
  • Verbal Working Memory Span Test
  • Experiment
  • Participants were randomly presented with state
    names for the 48 contiguous states of the U.S.
    and asked to identify each state on an unlabeled
    map

5
Variables
Independent Explanation
2D/4D Ratio Recorded in millimeters
Gender Femininity, Masculinity, Undifferentiated, Androgynous
Spatial Working Memory Average of highest recalled objects for each round
Verbal Working Memory Average of highest recalled letters for each round
Area Area of each state
Population Population of each state
Distance Participants home state to state
6
Selected Results
F 5.8, P gt F 0.016
F 17.3, P gt F 0.000
F 15.5, P gt F 0.000
F 0.6, P gt F 0.446
7
Conclusions
  • Gender revealed interesting differences
  • Participants with high spatial AND Verbal scores
    had better performance
  • 2D/4D ratio had mixed results
  • Area of the state and distance from home state
    impacted performance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com