Habitat selection models to account for seasonal persistence in radio telemetry data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Habitat selection models to account for seasonal persistence in radio telemetry data

Description:

Habitat selection models to account for seasonal persistence in radio telemetry data Megan C. Dailey* Alix I. Gitelman Fred L. Ramsey Steve Starcevich – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:134
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: NSU88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Habitat selection models to account for seasonal persistence in radio telemetry data


1
Habitat selection models to account for seasonal
persistence in radio telemetry data
  • Megan C. Dailey
  • Alix I. Gitelman
  • Fred L. Ramsey
  • Steve Starcevich
  • Department of Statistics, Colorado State
    University
  • Department of Statistics, Oregon State University
  • Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife






2
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
  • Year long radio-telemetry study (Steve
    Starcevich)
  • 2 headwater streams of the John Day River in
    eastern Oregon
  • 26 trout were tracked weekly from stream side
  • Roberts Creek F 17
  • Rail Creek F 9
  • Winter, Spring, Summer (2000-2001)
  • S3

3
Study Area Headwaters of the John Day River
4
Habitat association
  • Habitat inventory of entire creek once per season
  • Channel unit type
  • Structural association of pools
  • Total area of each habitat type
  • For this analysis
  • H 3 habitat classes
  • In-stream-large-wood pool (ILW)
  • Other pool (OP)
  • Fast water (FW)
  • Habitat availability total area of habitat in
    creek

5
Goals of habitat analysis
  • Incorporate
  • multiple seasons
  • multiple streams
  • Other covariates
  • Investigate Use vs. Availability

6
Radio telemetry data
  • Sequences of observed habitat use

7
Independent Multinomial Selections Model (IMS)
  • (McCracken, Manly, Vander Heyden, JABES 1998)
  • Product multinomial likelihood with multinomial
    logit parameterization

8
IMS Model 3 Assumptions
  • 1. Repeat sightings of same animal represent
    independent habitat selections
  • 2. Habitat selections of different animals
    are independent
  • 3. All animals have identical multinomial
    habitat selection probabilities

9
Evidence of persistence
10
Persist percentage
84.6
63.0
76.2
80.4
63.8
50.0
11
Persistence Model
  • (Ramsey Usner, Biometrics 2003)
  • One parameter extension of the IMS model to relax
    assumption of independent sightings
  • H-state Markov chain (H of habitat types)
  • Persistence parameter

12
Persistence likelihood
  • One-step transition probabilities
  • Likelihood

number of moves from habitat h to habitat h
13
Bayesian extensions
  • Reformulation of the original non-seasonal
    persistence model into Bayesian framework
  • Non-seasonal persistence / Seasonal HSPs
  • Seasonal persistence / Non-seasonal HSPs
  • Seasonal persistence / Seasonal HSPs

14
Multinomial logit parameterization
  • Habitat Selection Probability (HSP)
  • Multinomial logit parameterization

s 1, , S h 1, , H i 1, , F
T reference season R reference habitat
15
Seasonal persistence
  • Seasonal one-step transition probabilities

16
III. Seasonal persistence / Non-seasonal HSPs
Likelihood
17
IV. Seasonal persistence / Seasonal HSPs
Likelihood Priors for all models
18
Estimated persistence parametersRoberts Creek
19
Estimated persistence parametersRail Creek
20
Estimated habitat selection probabilitiesRoberts
Creek
21
Selection Probability Ratio/Area RatioRail Creek
22
BIC comparison
MODEL Persistence HSP BIC Roberts BIC Rail
I NS NS 742.6 482.2
II NS seasonal 751.2 479.4
III seasonal NS 711.6 467.8
IV seasonal seasonal 717.0 469.2
BIC -2log(likelihood) plog(n)
23
Conclusions
  • Relaxes assumption of independent sightings
  • Biological meaningfulness of the persistence
    parameter
  • Provides a single model for the estimation of
    seasonal persistence parameters and other
    estimates of interest (HSP, (SPR/Arat)), along
    with their respective uncertainty intervals
  • Allows for seasonal comparisons and the
    incorporation of multiple study areas (streams)
  • Allows for use of other covariates by changing
    the parameterization of the multinomial logit

24
Affiliations and funding
FUNDING/DISCLAIMER The work reported here was
developed under the STAR Research Assistance
Agreement CR-829095 awarded by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Colorado
State University. This presentation has not been
formally reviewed by EPA.  The views expressed
here are solely those of the authors and STARMAP,
the Program they represent. EPA does not endorse
any products or commercial services mentioned in
this presentation. Megans research is also
partially supported by the PRIMES National
Science Foundation Grant DGE-0221595003.
CR-829095
25
THANK YOU
26
V. Multiple stream persistence
Likelihood
number of moves from habitat h to habitat h in
season s in stream c
27
Markov chain persistence
  • One-step Transition Probability Matrix

where
28
Persistence example
  • h 1 -gt IMS
  • h lt 1 -gt greater chance of remaining in
    previous habitat

? 1 1 2 3
1 0.2 0.3 0.5
2 0.2 0.3 0.5
3 0.2 0.3 0.5

? 0.5 1 2 3
1 0.60 0.15 .25
2 0.10 0.65 .25
3 0.10 0.15 0.75
29
Estimate of Use vs. availability
  • Selection Probability Ratio (SPR)
  • SPR/(Area Ratio) for Use vs. Availability

30
Persistence vs. IMS
31
Estimated persistence parameters
32
stuff
  • BIC -2mean(llik100110000) - plog(17)
  • model IV. p 7 in basemodelROB and
  • model III. p 5 in seaspersonlyROB

33
Priors
  • Multinomial logit parameters
  • Non-seasonal persistence
  • Seasonal persistence
  • Hierarchical seasonal persistence

Beta(a,b)
34
(No Transcript)
35
Evidence of persistenceRoberts Creek
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com