Pr - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Pr

Description:

Title: Pr sentation PowerPoint Author: lever de rideau Last modified by: Daniel D. Skwire, FSA Created Date: 3/16/2006 4:24:45 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: leve74
Learn more at: http://actuaries.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pr


1
(No Transcript)
2
Experience Trends
for Income Protection
International Congress of Actuaries Paris,
France June 1, 2006
3
Experience Trends for Income Protection

Panelists Daniel Skwire Milliman, Inc.
(U.S.A.) dan.skwire_at_milliman.com Edward
Fabrizio General Reinsurance Life Australia
Ltd efabrizio_at_genre.com Denis Garand Denis
Garand and Associates (Canada) denis_at_garandnet.net

4
Experience Trends in the United
States (Individual Disability Insurance)
Daniel D. Skwire, FSA Principal and Consulting
Actuary Milliman, Inc.
5
1985 Commissioners Individual Disability A
Table(1985 CIDA)
  • Most recent published table for individual
    disability
  • Experience from 1970s and early 1980s
  • Required table for some reserve calculations
  • Expected basis for recent intercompany study

6
Characteristics of 1985 CIDA
  • Sex-distinct
  • Not smoker-distinct
  • Four occupation classes
  • Class 1 Executive and Professional
  • Class 2 Clerical and Office
  • Class 3 Light manual duties
  • Class 4 Heavy manual duties
  • Accident, sickness, and combined causes

7
Society of ActuariesIndividual Disability
Experience Committee (IDEC)1990-1999
Intercompany Study
  • Twelve contributing companies
  • About 64 of total inforce premium
  • Incidence Study Claims incurred 1990-1999
  • Claim Termination Study Claims paid 1990-1999
  • Results show Actual-to-Expected (A/E) Ratios
    relative to 1985 CIDA

8
1990 1999 IDEC Study
9
1990 1999 IDEC Study
10
1990 1999 IDEC Study
11
1990 1999 IDEC Study
12
1990 1999 IDEC Study
13
1990 1999 IDEC StudyClaim Incidence
RatesNon-Medical Occupations (ranked by exposure)
Occupation A/E Ratio
Executives Managers 61
Lawyers 63
Other Sales 65
Accountants 62
Engineers 57
Insurance Sales 101
Stockbrokers 142
Teachers 57
Other Occupations 64
Total Non-Medical Occupations 64
14
1990 1999 IDEC StudyClaim Incidence
RatesMedical Occupations (ranked by exposure)
Occupation A/E Ratio
Physicians Surgeons 87
Dentists 62
Psychologists 53
Nurses 100
Pharmacists 51
Chiropractors 139
Veterinarians 60
Podiatrists 73
Other Medical Occupations 80
Total Medical Occupations 88
15
1990 1999 IDEC StudyClaim Termination Rates
  • 1985 CIDA known to have outdated claim
    termination rates
  • Regulators adopted 1985 CIDC table as temporary
    measure
  • 1985 CIDC consists of adjustments to 1985 CIDA
  • Age of Claim Adjustment
  • Months 1-6 36-44
  • Months 7-12 50-75
  • Months 13-18 80-102
  • Months 19-24 105-120
  • Year 3 137
  • Year 4 120
  • Year 5 120
  • Year 6 100
  • IDEC Study measures experience relative to 1985
    CIDA

16
1990 1999 IDEC Study
17
1990 1999 IDEC Study
18
1990 1999 IDEC Study
19
1990-1999 IDEC StudyKey Conclusions
  • Medical occupations have distinct experience from
    Class 1
  • Lifetime benefit periods have poor experience
  • Incidence trends are favorable in aggregate, with
    lots of variation
  • Claim termination rates are generally lower (less
    favorable) than those in 1985 CIDA

20
Australia NZ Disability Income Experience
Edward Fabrizio Deputy General Manager and Chief
Actuary General Reinsurance Life Australia Ltd
21
Australian NZ Market
  • Benefit is a monthly annuity style benefit whilst
    person remains disabled
  • Benefit based on income at time of underwriting
    (generally to max of 75 replacement) and is
    taxable
  • Majority (90) is annual renewal business (age
    rated based on age at renewal)
  • Non-guaranteed rates
  • Full offset if person earns income whilst
    disabled
  • Agreed Value and Indemnity benefits are available

22
Australian NZ Market
  • Most common deferment periods are 30 and 90 day
  • Benefit period is generally to Age 65, but 2 and
    5 year periods also common for blue collar
    workers
  • Many extras added
  • Hospital benefit (pays benefit whilst in hospital
    during deferment period)
  • Rehabilitation benefits
  • Payment of minimum benefit period on certain
    accidents / illnesses

23
IAD 89-93 Standard Table
  • Experience Reports for Australia and New Zealand
    are done on basis of comparing actual results to
    a standard table IAD89-93
  • IAD89-93 developed by the IAAust based on the
    Australian disability income experience for this
    period
  • Incidence rates graduated by age/sex and 4
    occupation classes
  • Termination rates based on of the US CIDA85
    termination rate tables

24
IAD 89-93 Standard Table
  • 4 Occupation classes
  • A Professional and white collar
  • B Other sedentary (light manual technical)
  • C Light Manual (qualified trades persons)
  • D Moderate to Heavy Manual

25
Australian Experience
  • WARNING
  • Experience results presented for Australia are
    preliminary only at this stage and are still
    going through a checking process which may alter
    the final results

26
Australia Latest Experience
Experience Trends Claim cost in first 3 years
of claim 1 mth deferment
27
Australia Latest Experience
Incidence Experience - Males
28
Australia Latest Experience
Incidence Experience - Females
29
Australia Latest Experience
Occupation Relativities
30
Australia Latest Experience
Amount vs Number of Claims
Preliminary results for continuing companies
only Ratio of A/E amounts versus A/E number for
Incidence of Claim
Occ Class MALE FEMALE
A 108 108
B 104 104
C 109 112
D 113 117
31
Australia Latest Experience
Termination Rates
Preliminary results for continuing companies
only Ratio of A/E Number of Terminations
Occ Class MALE MALE FEMALE FEMALE
95-98 98-01 95-98 98-01
A 81 81 77 80
B 73 77 72 74
C 84 88 77 77
D 88 84 72 64
32
Australia Latest Experience
Termination Rates Male Occ A 1 mth deferment
33
Australia Latest Experience
Termination Rates Female Occ A 1 mth deferment
34
Australia Latest Experience
Termination Rates
Preliminary results for continuing companies
only Actual Termination Rates of Claim by
duration of claim
35
Australia Latest Experience
Amount vs Number of Terminations
Preliminary results for continuing companies
only Ratio of A/E amounts versus A/E number for
Termination Rates of Claim
Occ Class MALE FEMALE
A 96 98
B 95 95
C 95 95
D 93 97
36
Australia Latest Experience
Variation in Experience by Company
Preliminary results
37
Summary for Australia
  • Experience has improved significantly
  • Driven by lower incidence experience (although
    there are concerns over quality of data used in
    the investigation)
  • Termination rates during first year of claim
    continue to deteriorate, however, this is being
    compensated by better termination rates at later
    durations
  • Incidence and termination rates by amounts are
    worse than by number (total claims cost by
    amounts about 15 higher than by number), need to
    be careful in setting pricing and reserving
    assumptions especially for reinsurers on a
    surplus basis

38
New Zealand Latest experience
  • Incidence Rate Experience

39
New Zealand Latest experience
  • Termination Rate Experience

40
New Zealand Latest experience
  • Claim Duration Experience

Ratio () of actual to expected claim length by
deferment period and investigation period
Ratio () of actual to expected claim length by
occupation class and investigation period
41
New Zealand Latest experience
  • Important feature of NZ Experience is the
    interaction with the government accident
    compensation scheme (ACC)
  • ACC provides benefit up to 80 of taxable salary
    (with maximum dollar cap) in event a person is
    injured and unable to work
  • Covers most forms of accidental injury (work and
    outside work) and can sometimes overlap with what
    would normally be considered a sickness

42
New Zealand Latest experience
  • Paid ratio () by cause of claim and
    investigation period

Paid ratio by claim cause and occupation class in
2000-02
43
New Zealand Latest experience
  • Contribution of each component to total change in
    claim cost from 1997-99 to 2000-02

44
New Zealand Latest experience
  • Comparison of ratios () of actual to expected
    results in 2000-02 weighted by numbers and amounts

45
New Zealand Latest experience
Warning smoking hazardous to your health
  • Ratio () of actual to expected incidence for
    smokers over non-smokers in 2000-02

Ratio () of actual to expected claim cost for
smokers over non-smokers in 2000-02
46
New Zealand Latest experience
Agreed Value benefits versus Indemnity
47
New Zealand Latest experience
Self-employed versus Employed
48
New Zealand Latest experience
  • Variation in experience by company

Bubbles show claim cost
49
Summary for New Zealand
  • Experience has improved
  • Driven by increased termination rates
  • Difference between self-employed and employee can
    be an important rating variable is just as
    important as smoker status
  • Incidence and termination rates by amounts are
    worse than by number, need to be careful in
    setting pricing and reserving assumptions
    especially for reinsurers on a surplus basis
  • Experience varies greatly by company

50
Experience Trends in Canada
Denis Garand Denis Garand Associates
51
Fraser Garand 2000-2004 Study
  • Proprietary study
  • Financial and technical support from
  • Munich Re
  • Optimum Re
  • RGA Re
  • SCOR Re
  • Swiss Re

52
  • 13 companies
  • Small group market, average size 41 employees
  • 2,600,000 exposure from 2000 to 2004
  • 26,000 claims of which 18,000 terminate in first
    2 years
  • one province Quebec, overrepresented
  • These companies represent
  • 34 of the market, groups less than 1000
    employees

53
Demographic data
  • Female Male
  • Average age 39.7 40.1
  • Distribution in 40 60
  • Growth of portfolio higher in earlier years of
    the study
  • 72 119 day elimination period
  • 91 initial own occ definition

54
Fraser Garand 2000-2004 Table
  • 4 month elimination
  • Own Occupation
  • Benefit to age 65
  • Tables by 5 year age band and gender
  • Quebec,
  • Canada except Quebec

55
Incidence per 1000, study population
  • Canada 8.4
  • Canada, except Quebec 6.2
  • Quebec 15.1
  • SOA GLTD 1987 Basic 4 months expected
  • 4.6

56
Variation Actual /Expected (F-G)
  • By age (compare to SOA 87)
  • Younger female higher incidence
  • Older males lower incidence
  • By amount insured
  • Lower benefits higher incidence
  • Higher benefits lower incidence
  • By industry (50 to 150)

57
Variation Actual /Expected (F-G)
  • By region
  • Some provinces better (no control on industry)
  • By cause of disability
  • Variations by Mental and Nervous, Musculoskeletal
    and all other causes
  • By year of disability
  • 2000 highest, 2003 best
  • By participating company (70 to 125)

58
Termination study
  • 18,000 terminations within the first 24 months of
    duration.
  • Produced termination rates for duration 4-12
    months.
  • 159 versus SOA87 Basic 3 month
  • Analysis of claims duration to 24 months by three
    major causes of disability.
  • Substantial variation in termination rates.

59
Caveats
  • Study not adjusted for industry.
  • Short period of study was in a favourable
    economic cycle.
  • Termination study requires more data

60
Uses of study
  • Improve pricing for current environment (most
    companies operated on old data)
  • Adjust valuation reserves for key parameters of
    region and cause of disability.
  • Benchmark company versus industry
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com