Mergers and Acquisitions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Mergers and Acquisitions

Description:

Mergers and Acquisitions Dr. J.D. Han King s College, University of Western Ontario – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:617
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Han8158
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mergers and Acquisitions


1
Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Dr. J.D. Han
  • Kings College,
  • University of Western Ontario

2
Objectives
  • Learn the basic concepts
  • securities firms, investment banking,
    securities trading and brokerage, M A, etc.
  • Find an answer to puzzling questions such as,
  • Why are debts, as opposed to equities, getting
    more important in corporate financing?

3
I. Two Latest Hand-in-Hand Phenomena in Corporate
Financing
  • 1) Surge in Mergers and Acquisitions
  • (M A)
  • 2) LBO or An Increased Indebtedness(D/E ratio)
  • Debts have become more important in corporate
    financing.

4
II. Fundamental Driving Forces for the Two
Phenomena
  • Principal-Agent Problem Old Problem
  • -Information Asymmetry leads to
    Principal-Agent Problem in Equities
  • separation of ownership(principalsshareholde
    rs) and management(agentsmanagers)
  • Agent often works for his own best interests at
    the expense of the principals
  • -The more severe Moral Hazard problem.
  • An Increased Legality New Corporate Environment
    of Political Correctness
  • makes it virtually impossible to change
    management

5
III. Solutions to these Problems
  • We will explain that
  • An increase in M A combined with
  • An Increased Indebtedness
  • may resolve or reduce these problems
  • of Corporations.
  • How?

6
1. How does M A help solve Principal-Agent
Problem?
  • M A leads to a change to a new and better
    management and thus to an enhanced EFFINCIENCY
  • A just credible threat will wake up the existing
    stale management.

7
Target for M A Stale ManagementHow do you
know whether a firms management is stale?
  • Free Cash Flow (Theory) tells you.
  • by Michael C. Jensen at Harvard Business School
  • In his paper entitled Agency Cost of Free Cash
    Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers, American
    Economic Review (1986)

8
Free Cash Flows as a Litmus Test
  • He defines Free Cash Flows
  • Free Cash Flows
  • Cash Receipts - Cash Expenditures - Profitable
    (Constructive) Investment Opportunities
  • His Observation
  • FCFs are the likely object of the Managements
    abuse and a good indicator of the Principal-Agent
    Problem
  • - The larger the FCF of a firm, the more severe
    the Principal-Agent Problem.

9
Jensens FCF Theory in Reverse Gear
  • Dictum
  • The Larger the Free Cash Flow of a Firm, the
    More Severe the Principal-Agent Problem, and thus
    the Larger the Potential Benefits from M A and
    Corporate Restructuring
  • Prediction
  • We can also identify which firm is likely to be
    a target of M A.

10
2. How does a LBO or an Increased Indebtedness
enhance Corporate Efficiency?
  • 1) Debt contracts have a better monitoring
    through Restrictive Covenant and thus less moral
    hazards.
  • 2) Reduced Equities increase Managements portion
    of Profits
  • - Incentive-Compatible
  • It enhances Managements work efforts
  • - Recall the Dupont System

11
Numerical Example of an Increased Indebtedness
enhancing Managements RewardsRestructuring is
Leveraged Buyout (of Shareholders) by Management
  • Before Restructuring
  • Debt-Equity Ratio 0/1 0
  • Capital Profits
  • Equity 1 Shareholders share
  • 9,000 9,000
  • Equity 2 Managers share
  • 1,000 1,000
  • Total
  • 10,000 10,000
  • assume
  • interest rate 10
  • rate of returns on capital 100
  • After Restructuring
  • Debt Equity Ratio 9
  • Capital Profits
  • Debts Shareholders share
  • 9,000 900
  • Equity 2 Managers share
  • 1,000 9,100
  • Total
  • 10,000 10,000
  • Note Managers profit share has increased by
    810.

12
3. Two Structural Changes as Prerequisites for a
Surge of M A
  • Lowering Legal Barriers to M A
  • -Weakening of Anti-Trust Act(USA) or Competition
    Act(Canada)
  • Development of Financial Institutions, Market
    Debt Instruments
  • - Investment Banks, Securities Houses, Junk
    Bonds, (Debt-Equity) Swap, etc.

13
Who are the Big Players for M A?
  • Securities Firms
  • Banks M A Division of Investment Banking
    Department
  • For instance
  • - Morgan Stanley
  • - Goldman Sachs
  • - Salomon Smith Barney
  • - Merrill Lynch
  • - Donald Trump Drexel Burnham, Campeu Co., T.
    Boone Pickens (Mesa Petrolium)

14
Organization of Securities Firm
15
Glossaries
  • Investment Banking
  • -helps issue new securities in the primary
    market
  • - Merchant Banking
  • Securities Trading and Brokerage
  • - helping trade securities in the secondary
    market
  • - Dealer versus Broker
  • - Discount Brokerage versus Full Service
    Brokerage
  • Investment Dealer
  • -dealer is principal, not agent
  • - applicable for Bought Deal and Securities
    Dealer

16
4. Pros and Cons of M A 1) Pros Advocate for M
A
  • M A enhances Efficiency of Corporate Management
  • Natural Part of Globalization Trend
  • Strategy for Survival from International
    Competition
  • (evidence)
  • Share price of Target Firm goes up by 30-50
    before and after M A

17
2) Criticism of M A
  • (1) Zero Sum Game for the entire economy gains
    for shareholders come from someones loss
  • a) Government Loss of Tax Revenues in LBO
  • b) Wage Concessions after M A
  • c) Bond holders loss Increased leverage -
    Increased Default Risk - Decreased Bond Price
  • d) Consumers loss Increased monopoly power -
    Higher price
  • (2) Economic Frailty Increases
  • (3) M A could be costly A High Transactions
    Cost

18
(3) A Costly M A Shark Repellants
  • -Setting up costly barriers against M A
  • Green Mail
  • -bribe to a raider away
  • Scorch Earth
  • - make yourself unattractive
  • Poison Pills
  • - sell stock under market price in case of danger
  • Golden Parachute
  • - big severance package for leaving executives

19
IV. Canadian Context
  • M A will continue to increase
  • M A take on Globalization trends

20
Historical Canadian Mergers Acquisition
Announcements
1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0
210 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
Announcements
Value in Billions
Announcements
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1998
Source Crosbie Company Inc.
21
M A at Canadian Cross-Border
22
M A Resulting in Efficiency CanadianCases
23
(No Transcript)
24
3. Case Studies Case Study I) Excellent
Execution - Onex Corporation
  • Classic Study Case of M A
  • The Companys objective is to build value for its
    investors through the acquisition of
    underperforming businesses( with a large amount
    of Free Cash Flow) financed largely with debts
    borrowed from third party lenders.
  • Performances.
  • - Acquired Celestica for C750mm in October,
    1996 which now has a market value of C4.6
    billion.
  • - Onex announces a bid for Air Canada and
    Canadian Airlines during a time when the industry
    is struggling.

25
Case Study - Excellent Execution - Onex
Corporation
Stock Price Performance September 29, 1994 -
September 30, 1999
May 11/99 Onex purchases
Mar 25/99 Onex announces
American Buildings
30.00
C1.5bn Telecom Fund
Mar 11/99 Onex announces
with Telefonica
that it will sell 23
of its stake in Sky
Chefs to LSG
25.00
Jan 29/99 Onex announces
LCS Industries acquisition
Aug 24/99 Onex
20.00
announces bid
Nov 13/96 ProSource
for Air Canada
completes IPO of US48mm
and Canadian Airlines
15.00
Oct 1/96 Onex acquires
May 29/98 Onex sold
Celestica for C750mm
ProSource Inc. to
10.00
Oct 1/98 Onex
AmeriServe Food
announces
Distribution for
SoftBank acquisition
C123mm
5.00
09/29/1994
04/20/1995
11/07/1995
05/29/1996
12/16/1996
07/08/1997
01/27/1998
08/17/1998
03/09/1999
09/27/1999
Onex Corp Sub Vtg
26
Case Study 2) - Disastrous Execution - Extendicare
Stock Price Performance September 29, 1994 -
September 30, 1999
27
Case Study 3 - High Yield Debt - Rogers
Communications
Stock Price Performance September 29, 1994 -
September 30, 1999
Sep 9/99 Rogers repurchases
35.00
C1.3bn in debt
Nov 11/95 Rogers Cablesystems
July 12/99 Microsoft makes C600mm
announces two new high yield
investment in Rogers Aug 16/99 Completes
debt issues of US150mm and US125mm
sale of 33 interest of Rogers Cantel to
ATT Corp and BT PLC for C1.4bn
25.00
Jan 25/96 Issues
C75mm high yield debt
July 17/97 Two new high yield
debt issues of US330mm
15.00
and C165mm announced
May 21/98 Rogers sells local
Jan 16/96 Issues US100mm
telephone services to
high yield debt
Metronet for C1bn
5.00
09/29/1994
04/20/1995
11/07/1995
05/29/1996
12/16/1996
07/08/1997
01/27/1998
08/17/1998
03/09/1999
09/27/1999
Rogers Communications Inc Cl B
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com