Title: Stock Market Efficiency: Alternative Views
1Stock Market Efficiency Alternative Views
2Stock market efficiency alternative views
- Views of professional investors
- Whether stock markets appear to absorb all
relevant (public or private) information
(strong-form efficiency) - The behavioural-based arguments leading to a
belief in inefficiencies - The implications of the evidence for efficiency
for investors and corporate management
3Comment on the semi-strong efficiency evidence
- Despite the evidence of some work showing
departures from semi-strong efficiency, for
most investors most of the time the market may
be regarded as efficient - The evidence for semi-strong efficiency is
significant but not so overwhelming that there
is no hope of outperformance for the able and
dedicated - Publication bias
- Hundreds of researchers examining the data
- A lot of evidence of inefficiency that remains
hidden - Paradox in order for the market to remain
efficient there has to be a large body of
investors who believe it to be inefficient
4The views of some successful investors
- Peter Lynch
- Quantitative analysis taught me that the things I
saw happening at Fidelity couldnt really be
happening. I also found it difficult to integrate
the efficient market hypothesis It also was
obvious that the Wharton professors who believed
in quantum analysis and random walk werent doing
nearly as well as my new colleagues at Fidelity - John Neff
- Always on the lookout for out-of-favour,
overlooked or misunderstood stocks - He believes that the market tends to allow itself
to be swept along with fads, fashions and
flavours of the month. This leads to
overvaluation of those stocks regarded as
shooting stars, and to the undervaluation of
those which prevailing wisdom deems unexciting,
but which are fundamentally good stocks
5The views of some successful investors
- Benjamin Graham
- The prices of common stock are not carefully
thought out computations,but the resultants of a
welter of human reactions. The stock market is a
voting machine rather than a weighing machine - The processes by which the securities market
arrives at its appraisals are frequently
illogical and erroneous. These processes . . .
are not automatic or mechanical, but
psychological for they go on in the minds of
people who buy and sell. The mistakes of the
market are thus the mistakes of groups of masses
of individuals. Most of them can be traced to one
or more of three basic causes exaggeration,
oversimplification, or neglect
6The views of some successful investors
- Warren Buffett and Charles Munger
- Im convinced that there is much inefficiency in
the market . . . When the price of a stock can be
influenced by a herd on Wall Street with prices
set at the margin by the most emotional person,
or the greediest person, or the most depressed
person, it is hard to argue that the market
always prices rationally. In fact, market prices
are frequently nonsensical . . . There seems to
be some perverse human characteristic that likes
to make easy things difficult. The academic
world, if anything, has actually backed away from
the teaching of value investing over the last 30
years. Its likely to continue that way. Ships
will sail around the world but the Flat Earth
Society will flourish
7Strong-form tests
- It is possible to trade shares on the basis of
information not in the public domain and make
abnormal profits - Trading on inside knowledge is thought to be a
bad thing - Insider dealing is considered to be, besides
dealing for oneself either counselling or
procuring another individual to deal in the
securities or communicating knowledge to any
other person, while being aware that he or she
(or someone else) will deal in those securities - The term insider covers anyone with sensitive
information, not just a company director or
employee - Raise the level of information disclosure
- Prohibit certain individuals from dealing in the
companys shares for crucial time periods
8Behavioural finance
- Behavioural finance proponents argue that
investors frequently make systematic errors
and these errors can push the prices of shares
away from fundamental value for
considerable periods - Behavioural finance models offer plausible
reasoning for the phenomena we observe in the
pattern of share prices - They offer persuasive explanations for the
outperformance of low PER,high dividend yield
and low book-to-market ratio shares as well
as the poor performance of glamourshares - They also shed light on both return reversal and
momentum effects, stock market bubbles and
irrational pessimism
9The three lines of defence for EMH
1 Investors are rational and hence value
securities rationally 2 Even if some investors
are not rational, their irrationally
inspired trades of securities are random and
therefore the effects of their irrational
actions cancel each other out without
moving prices away from their efficient level 3
If the majority of investors are irrational in
similar ways and therefore have a tendency
to push security values away from the
efficient level this will be countered by
rational arbitrageurs who eliminate the
influence of the irrational traders on
prices
10Arbitrage
- Arbitrage is the act of exploiting price
differences on the same security or similar
securities by simultaneously selling the
overpriced security and buying the
underpriced security - Perfect arbitrage a profit without any risk at
all (and even without money) - To be effective the arbitrageur needs to be able
to purchase or sell a close-substitute
security - For example you discover that Unilevers shares
are undervalued - The risk of other fundamental factors influencing
the shares of Unilever and PG - The risk that the irrational investors push
irrationality to new heights - Risk arbitrage and risk-free arbitrage
11Some cognitive errors made by investors
- The combination of limited arbitrage and investor
sentiment pushing the market leads to
inefficient pricing - Both elements are necessary
- Overconfidence
- Representativenes
- Conservatism
- Narrow framing
- Ambiguity aversion
12Some cognitive errors made by investors
(continued)
- Positive feedback and extrapolative expectations
- Regret
- Confirmation bias
- Cognitive dissonance
- Availability bias
- Miscalculation of probabilities
- Anchoring
13Misconceptions about the efficient market
hypothesis
1 Any share portfolio will perform as well as or
better than a special trading rule
designed to outperform the market 2 There
should be fewer price fluctuations 3 Only a
minority of investors are actively trading, most
are passive, therefore efficiency cannot be
achieved
14Implications of the EMH for investors
1 For the vast majority of people public
information cannot be used to earn abnormal
returns 2 Investors need to press for a greater
volume of timely information 3 The perception
of a fair game market could be improved by
more constraints and deterrents placed on
insider dealers
15Implications of the EMH for companies
1 Focus on substance, not on short-term
appearance 2 The timing of security issues does
not have to be fine- tuned 3 Large
quantities of new shares can be sold without
moving the price 4 Signals from price
movements should be taken seriously
16Concluding comments
- Sophisticated stock markets are substantially
efficient - Question the assumption that all investors
respond in a similar manner to the same risk
and return factors and that these can be
easily identified - One way of outperforming the market might be to
select shares the attributes of which you
dislike less than the other investors - Another way is through luck
- Possessing superior analytical skills
- Through the discovery of a trading rule which
works - To be quicker than anyone else
- To become an insider
17Lecture review
- Strong-form efficiency
- Insider dealing
- Behavioural finance studies
- Implications of the EMH for investors
- Implications of the EMH for companies