Title: PROPERTY D SLIDES
1PROPERTY D SLIDES
2Tuesday March 25 Music (to Accompany
Ray)Barry Manilow Summer of 78 (1996)
- Annual NCAA Sweet 16 Contest (Marc Madness)
- High Score from Section D Gets Free Dinner
- Electronic Forms on Course Page
- E-Mail entry to me by 430 Thursday
- (OR) Hard Copy Forms Here Today Thursday
- Can hand-in to me at break or after class.
- Can deliver to me or to my assistant Michelle by
430 Thursday. -
3ELEMENTS OF ADVERSE POSSESSION
- Our Sequence
- Actual Use (contd)
- Open Notorious
- Exclusive
- Continuous
- Adverse/Hostile
- Panel Responsibilities
- Rev. Prob. 5A (3/27)
- In-Class Yellowstone
- Critique Arches
4Actual Use DQ5.06Bell Floating House
Shifting Outhouse
- Evidence of Actual Use?
- Cultivation, Improvements, Enclosure (
Residence)? - Activity Like Owners of Similar Property?
- Fit Purposes of AP/Actual?
5Actual Use DQ5.06Bell Floating House
Shifting Outhouse
- Evidence of Actual Use?
- Cultivation, Improvements, Enclosure (
Residence) - No Cultivation or Enclosure
- Improvements Sauna, Woodsheds, Moving Outhouse
- Residence Not Really Lives on Houseboat
- Activity Like Os of Similar Property? Tricky.
- Fit Purposes of AP/Actual? Notice v.
Labor/Connection
6Actual Use DQ5.06Bell Floating House
Shifting Outhouse
- Washington S.Ct. Decides Case on Exclusive
- Doesnt Rule on Actual Use
- BUT Could Easily Have Held Insufficient Evidence
- Qs on Actual Use Element?
7LOGISTICS Review Problems 5A, 5D, 5E
- Old Short Exam Problems One AP Element Each
- Ill Give You a Slide w Some Guiding Qs at End of
the Classwork on the Relevant Element - Treat Individual States Law as Persuasive
Authority - Students on Responsible Panel
- Prepare Strongest Arguments on Both Sides of
Guiding Qs - Stick to the Element in Q
8LOGISTICS Review Problems 5A, 5D, 5E
- Old Short Exam Problems One AP Element Each
- Well Do at the Start of the Class for which the
Problem is Assigned - Four Students Will be Assigned to Represent Each
Party - Ill Put Up Slide With Assignments By 735 so You
Can Do Extra Prep - I will primarily work with the assigned lawyers,
so keep hands down until I ask for more general
input - Critiquing Panel
- Critique the Lawyers Arguments Not the
Underlying Law - Stick to the Element in Q
9Review Problem 5A Actual Use Element
(3/27)In-Class Arguments Yellowstone
Critique Arches
- Arguments/Missing Facts?
- Cultivation, Improvements, Enclosure
- Enclosure Separately
- All Three Together
- Activity Like Owner of Similar Property?
- Activity Meet Purposes of AP/Actual Use?
10ELEMENTS OF ADVERSE POSSESSION
- Our Sequence
- Actual Use
- Open Notorious
- Exclusive
- Continuous
- Adverse/Hostile
- Panel Responsibilities
- Primary Biscayne
- Review Problem 5B
- (for Deans Fellow)
11Open Notorious Background Important
Distinction
- Actual Knowledge (Fact Q) Person in Q is Aware
of Relevant Fact v. - Notice (Legal Q) Under the Circumstances, Person
in Q Should Be Aware of Relevant Fact - Ignorance of Law is No Excuse People Have
Sufficient Notice of What Law Is (Even if no
Actual Knowledge) - You Are Supposed to Be Monitoring Your Own
Property, so if Activity is Deemed Open
Notorious, You Will Be Treated as Having Notice
of the AP Claim
12Adverse Possession Open Notorious Overview
- 1. Focus Visibility/Notoriety to OO Checking
Property - Common Test Use Visible to one on Surface of
Property - Florida Version Sufficient to put a person of
Ordinary Prudence on Notice -
13Adverse Possession Open Notorious Overview
14Adverse Possession Open Notorious Overview
- 1. Focus Visibility/Notoriety to OO Checking
Property - Common Test Use Visible to one on Surface of
Property - Not Concerned with Visibility by Neighbors
- Common Error Concern re Sneaking or Hidden
from Street (v. on Surface) - See Casebook _at_ P119 Use should not be
surreptitious. - BUT even if APor acts surreptitiously (e.g.,
at night), still meet test if s/he leaves visible
evidence (improvement cultivation, etc.) -
15Adverse Possession Open Notorious Overview
- 1. Focus Visibility/Notoriety to OO Checking
Property - Common Test Use Visible to one on Surface of
Property - Many States also allow
- Reputation Evidence OR--
- Availability of Info in Public Records
-
16BISCAYNE DQs 5.07-5.09
SUNRISE AT ADAMS KEY
17DQ5.07 (Biscayne)Open Notorious AP Purposes
Purposes of AP Role of Particular Element
Repose
Punish Sleeping OO
Reward Beneficial Use/Labor
Protect Connection/ Investment
18DQ5.07 (Biscayne)Open Notorious AP Purposes
Purposes of AP Role of Particular Element
Repose
Punish Sleeping OO Enough Notice to Show that OO Who Misses is Truly Asleep
Reward Beneficial Use/Labor
Protect Connection/ Investment
19Adverse Possession Open Notorious Overview
- Easy Qs/Hard Qs
- Easy YES Hard to Lose on ON if Actual Use
- Hard Qs
- Marengo Caves
- Boundary Disputes Small Overlap (e.g., 2 feet)
20Open Notorious Hard QsBiscayne DQ5.08
Marengo Caves (P119-20)
- Describe Facts
- Why Was Use of Caves not Open Notorious?
21Open Notorious Hard QsBiscayne DQ5.08
Marengo Caves (P119-20)
- Upshot of Result
- Normal ON
- Q of notice not actual knowledge
- Comes from responsibility to monitor land
- Marengo
- Seems to require actual knowledge for underground
AP. - Means normal responsibility to monitor surface
doesnt apply underground - Pros Cons of Result?
22Open Notorious Hard QsBiscayne DQ5.08
Marengo Caves (P119-20)
- Case Means Normal Responsibility to Monitor
Surface Doesnt Apply Underground - Facts Missing from Note in Textbook
- APor had Given Tours of Caves for 46 Years
(Well-Known Big Signs) - OO had Taken Tour of Caves Himself
- Modern Commentators Suggest Result is Wrong
- Hard to See What More APor Could Do
- On Test, Can Treat as Non-Binding Authority
23Adverse Possession Open Notorious Overview
- Easy Qs/Hard Qs
- Easy YES Hard to Lose on ON if Actual Use
- Hard Qs
- Marengo Caves
- Boundary Disputes Small Overlap (e.g., 2 feet)
(Well Come Back to) - Issues re Notice v. Knowledge Similar to
Underground - See Review Problem 5B (Short Problem for DF)
- See Review Problem 5H (Opinion/Dissent for Your
Review)
24Biscayne DQ5.07 Open Notorious Evidence
- Lutz Garden of Great Depression
- Pretty Easy Case Lots Visible
- Crops w Boundary Logs, Shack, Garage
- Plus Reputation Evidence
- Bell Floating House Shifting Outhouse
- Existence of Small Buildings Unrelated to OO
- Moving Outhouse Might Help for Periods Hes in
Residence in Houseboat
25Biscayne DQ5.07 Open Notorious EvidenceRay
Creepy Summers in Empty Resort
- Court Constant Conspicuous Use
- Evidence Relied On?
26Biscayne DQ5.07 Open Notorious EvidenceRay
Creepy Summers in Empty Resort
- Court Constant Conspicuous Use
- Evidence Relied On?
27Biscayne DQ5.07 Open Notorious EvidenceRay
Creepy Summers in Empty Resort
- Court Constant Conspicuous Use
- Evidence Relied On Lots!!
- Visible on Surface Residence No Trespass
Signs Bars, Shutters, Padlocks on Cottage
General Maintenance Comparison to Rest of
Community - Less Obvious (all forms of Public Record)
Payment of Taxes Insurance Enforcement ag.
Trespassers Voting Address
28Biscayne DQ5.07 Open Notorious EvidenceRay
Creepy Summers in Empty Resort
- Lower court found element of continuity not
met thrust was that one month/year insufficient - Court of Appeals discussion of evidence really
encompasses actual open notorious
continuous. Implicitly saying - Incorrect to focus on one month a year for
continuous. - Ps use met Actual ON because of range of
visible and other evidence present all year
round.
29Biscayne DQ5.09 Open Notorious EvidenceE.
13th St. Coalition of Squatters
- No Real Discussion of Element in Case
- Problem Sometimes Use Apparent, Sometimes Not
- Could Characterize Problem 2 Ways
- Not Open Notorious
- Not Continuous
30Biscayne DQ5.09 Open Notorious EvidenceE.
13th St. Coalition of Squatters
- Sometimes Use is Apparent, Sometimes Not
- Could Address as ON or as Continuous
- cf. Ray on Gaps in Time Maybe View as
- Summer Use Normal Use (Continuity Q)
- Evidence of Use Even When Gone (ON Q)
- Qs on Open Notorious Element?
31ELEMENTS OF ADVERSE POSSESSION
- Our Sequence
- Actual Use
- Open Notorious
- Exclusive
- Continuous
- Adverse/Hostile
- Panel Responsibilities
- Primary Redwood
- Rev. Prob. 5D (3/31)
- In-Class Redwood
- Critique Shenandoah
32Adverse Possession Exclusive Overview
- Focus Use by Others Beside APor.
- Two Issues (Well Do Separately)
- Less Common Issue Also use by other third
parties (non-owners) - More Common Issue Also use by OO
33Exclusive (Use by Other 3d Parties)Overview
- Need to behave like O vis-à-vis public
- If you look no diff from public, no good
- FL use of land by public in way that suggests
public right defeats exclusivity of individual
APor - BUT Penn. case (S121) some limited trespasses by
public OK if APor behaving like O - Small group working together can jointly AP land
- BUT if large enough group, looks liked public
again, so no good. Sanchez (cited at P121).
34REDWOOD DQ 5.11-5.12
REDWOODS FERNS
35Exclusive (Use by Other 3d Parties)Redwood
DQ5.11 Bell
- Bell Floating House Shifting Outhouse
- What Was Evidence of Others Use?
- Why Did Court Say Bell Loses?
36Exclusive (Use by Other 3d Parties)Redwood
DQ5.11 Bell
- Bell quoting Wood (S116)
- Exclusive dominion over land is the essence of
possession, and it can exist in unused land if
others have been excluded therefrom. A fence is
the usual means relied upon to exclude strangers
and establish the dominion and control
characteristic of ownership. - As much about Actual as Exclusive
- Fence not only way to achieve
- Can physically chase away
- Can grant permission/accept money for use
37Exclusive (Use by Other 3d Parties)Overview
Purposes of AP Role of Particular Element
Repose
Punish Sleeping OO
Reward Beneficial Use/Labor Worth Rewarding if Acting Along w Other 3d Parties?
Protect Connection/ Investment Enough Interest to Protect if Acting Along w Other 3d Parties?
38Exclusive (Use by OO)Overview
- More Common Issue Use by OO
- Focus/Relevant Evidence What did OO do on
claimed land during AP period
39Exclusive (Use by OO)Overview
Purposes of AP Role of Particular Element
Repose
Punish Sleeping OO
Reward Beneficial Use/Labor
Protect Connection/ Investment
40Exclusive (Use by OO)Overview
Purposes of AP Role of Particular Element
Repose
Punish Sleeping OO OO not sleeping if using claimed land
Reward Beneficial Use/Labor
Protect Connection/ Investment
41Exclusive (Use by OO)Overview Easy Qs
- Easy Cases YES No use at all by OO duiring
relevant period (Lutz Ray Bell) - Easy Cases NO
- If court treats as literal, any knowing use by OO
defeats AP - NY Case (S121) 3 Weeks Storage of Construction
Materials Defeats Exclusivity - Note re Lawyering
- Note re Strong Anti-AP Approach
42Adverse Possession Exclusive (Use by OO) Hard Qs
- Use by OO, but Not as Owner
- OO unaware of own interest
- OO acting with permission of APor.
- Short/Partial/Ineffective Assertions of OO Rts
43Adverse Possession Exclusive (Use by OO) Hard Qs
- Use by OO, but Not as Owner
- Short/Partial/Ineffective Assertions of OO Rts
- Significance of ineffective attempts to bar
entry? - Usually insufficient if dont exclude APor for
significant period of time - Arguably true in E 13th St.
44Adverse Possession Exclusive (Use by OO) Hard Qs
- Use by OO, but Not as Owner
- Short/Partial/Ineffective Assertions of OO Rts
- Significance of ineffective attempts to bar
entry? - Should limited acts by OO be enough?
- Use of road on edge of 100 acre lot (Rev Prob 5C)
- See Miller in Note on S121 overhanging eaves
allowed owner to keep just area under eaves, not
whole lot. Could suggest as solution for other
cases with small OO use.
45Review Problem 5D Exclusive Element
(3/31)In-Class Arguments Redwood Critique
Shenandoah
- Arguments/Missing Info?
- If jurisdiction accepts literal argument, D wins.
Assume it doesnt - Which facts in the problem (other than the
passing of time) are helpful for each side? Be
prepared to respond to other sides claims. - Discuss whether a court should consider what D
has done enough in light of the policies
implicated by this element. - Identify possible additional facts or legal rules
(that are not inconsistent with what Ive told
you) that might affect the outcome?
46Redwood DQ5.12Exclusive Penn. Statute 5530(B)
- No entry upon real property shall toll the
running of the period of limitation specified 21
years, unless a possessory action shall be
commenced therefor within one year after entry. - What does toll mean here?
- Effect of this provision?
- Purpose of this provision? Good idea?
- Qs on Exclusivity
47ELEMENTS OF ADVERSE POSSESSION
- Our Sequence
- Actual Use
- Open Notorious
- Exclusive
- Continuous
- Adverse/Hostile
- Panel Responsibilities
- Primary Shenandoah
- Rev. Prob. 5E (4/1)
- In-Class Biscayne
- Critique Yellowstone
48Adverse Possession Continuous Overview
- Focus Time Used Without Interruption
- Again Two Issues (Well Do Separately)
- (1) What constitutes sufficient interruption to
stop clock? - (a) Interruptions by OO (we cover under
Exclusive) - (b) Interruptions by APor
- Legal test often as in Ray
- Use like an ordinary owner of similar property
- (2) Tacking When can you add the time of
successive Os or APors to get to SoL (well look
at later)
49Continuous Overview
Purposes of AP Role of Particular Element
Repose
Punish Sleeping OO
Reward Beneficial Use/Labor
Protect Connection/ Investment
50Continuous Overview
Purposes of AP Role of Particular Element
Repose Enough Time to Merit Repose
Punish Sleeping OO Constant Notice OO who Misses Must Be Asleep
Reward Beneficial Use/Labor Labor More Likely Beneficial if Activity Continuous, Not Sporadic
Protect Connection/ Investment Connections More Likely Strong if Activity Continuous, Not Sporadic
51Continuous Overview Easy Qs, Hard Qs
- Easy Cases YES No Interruptions in Use at All
- Easy Cases NO Significant Interruption(s)
Different from Ordinary User - Harder Cases
- Regular seasonal interruptions See Ray Rev
Prob 5F - Irregular interruptions emergencies etc. See
Rev Prob 5E