RESEARCH ETHICS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

RESEARCH ETHICS

Description:

RESEARCH ETHICS Dr Natasha Whiteman Department of Media and Communication University of Leicester new9_at_le.ac.uk Things to consider before and during research Harm ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Natas201
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RESEARCH ETHICS


1
RESEARCH ETHICS
  • Dr Natasha Whiteman
  • Department of Media and Communication
  • University of Leicester
  • new9_at_le.ac.uk

2
Today
  • Why do we care about research ethics?
  • Key ethical principles in research
  • Implications of ethics for your own work.

3
What do we mean by research ethics?
  • Ethics ethical principles as applied to the
    activity of research
  • Risk i.e. risks of research activity to
    safeguard the safety of yourself and others
  • Legal frameworks and codes of practice
  • Relevant to ALL researchers across the
    sciences, social sciences and humanities.

4
Why behave ethically?
  • As researchers we have a responsibility to behave
    ethically (to be fair to not cause harm to
    others.. etc)
  • To protect the rights of individuals, communities
    and environments involved in research
  • To assure favourable climate of public trust for
    continued research
  • To meet public demands for accountability and
    legal codes of responsible behaviour

5
Ethics in a changing academic context
  • Contemporary codes of research ethics emerge from
    ethical frameworks developed to protect human
    subjects in biomedical research.
  • Increasing bureaucratisation and
    institutionalisation of research ethics in the
    social sciences
  • Move away from the expert authority of individual
    researcher
  • Introduction of ethics committees in UK higher
    education institutions, similar to Institutional
    Review Boards in the US
  • Increasing surveillance of research activity

6
perverse consequences of ethical regulation
(Dingwall, 2008, 5)
7
What this means for you
  • Faculties and Departments are required to
    develop robust procedures for ensuring the
    ethical integrity of all student research (PGCE,
    MA, research degrees),all student research
    involving human participants being reviewed prior
    to the beginning of data collection and the
    results of student ethics reviews being reported
    to the Faculty Research Ethics Committee.
    http//www.ioe.ac.uk/about/documents/About_Policie
    s/Researchethics.pdf

8
Ethics and the Process of Research
Data analysis
Sampling
Research question
Dissemination
Data collection
Literature reviewing
Data Management
Writing
9
To whom are we ethically responsible as
researchers?
  • Our participants
  • Our sponsors
  • The University
  • The general public
  • Ourselves

10
Key terminology relating to research ethics
  • Human Subject
  • Informed consent
  • Right to Withdraw
  • Confidentiality and Anonymity
  • Disclosure

11
Human participants
  • Faculties and Departments are required to
    develop robust procedures for ensuring the
    ethical integrity of all student research (PGCE,
    MA, research degrees), all student research
    involving human participants being reviewed prior
    to the beginning of data collection and the
    results of student ethics reviews being reported
    to the Faculty Research Ethics Committee.
    http//www.ioe.ac.uk/about/documents/About_Policie
    s/Researchethics.pdf

12
  • The voluntary consent of the human subject is
    absolutely essential. This means that the person
    involved should have legal capacity to give
    consent should be so situated as to be able to
    exercise free power of choice, without the
    intervention of any element of force, fraud,
    deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior
    form of constraint or coercion and should have
    sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the
    elements of the subject matter involved, as to
    enable him to make an understanding and
    enlightened decision. This latter element
    requires that, before the acceptance of an
    affirmative decision by the experimental subject,
    there should be made known to him the nature,
    duration, and purpose of the experiment the
    method and means by which it is to be conducted
    all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be
    expected and the effects upon his health or
    person, which may possibly come from his
    participation in the experiment.
  • The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the
    quality of the consent rests upon each individual
    who initiates, directs or engages in the
    experiment. It is a personal duty and
    responsibility which may not be delegated to
    another with impunity. (1947 Nuremberg Code.)

13
What is a human subject?What is the
difference between a subject and an object?
14
Human Subjects
  • a living individual about whom an investigator
    conducting research obtains
  • data through intervention or interaction with the
    individual, or
  • Identifiable private information (US Department
    of Health and Human services)
  • Human participants (or subjects) are defined
    as including living human beings, human beings
    who have recently died (cadavers, human remains
    and body parts), embryos and foetuses, human
    tissue and bodily fluids, and human data and
    records (such as, but not restricted to medical,
    genetic, financial, personnel, criminal or
    administrative records and test results including
    scholastic achievements). (ESRC, 2005, 7)

15
Informed Consent
  • Informed consent refers to the idea that
    research participants should always be provided
    with enough information to make an informed
    decision about whether or not they want to take
    part in your study.
  • Consent to take part in a research project should
    be voluntary, informed and obtained without duress

16
Voluntary Informed Consent
  • The Right to Withdraw
  • Participants have the right to withdraw from the
    project including after the data has been
    collected
  • They should be informed of this right
  • Any attempt to convince a participant not to
    withdraw should be carefully considered to ensure
    that no coercion or duress is being used
  • The possibility of a withdrawal after data
    collection should be considered in the planning
    stage to ensure that such an occurrence would not
    have a serious detrimental effect on the project

17
Voluntary Informed Consent
  • Questions to consider
  • Is the participant competent to make their own
    decision regarding participation?
  • Are the participants free to choose to
    participate or not to participate?
  • Have the participants sufficient information to
    make this decision?
  • Do the participants fully understand this
    information?

18
Working with Children
  • Legal aspects
  • Children defined as anyone under 18 years of age
  • One key ethical question
  • From Whom do we obtain consent?
  • Child consent
  • Parental consent
  • Gatekeeper consent

19
Consent from Children
  • In line with article 12 of the United Nations
    Convention on the Rights of the Child, which
    requires that children who are capable of forming
    their own views should be granted the right to
    express them freely in all matters affecting
    them, commensurate with their age and maturity,
    it is expected that efforts should be made to
    obtain informed consent from children involved in
    any research
  • Research Concerning Children and Young People,
    http//www2.le.ac.uk/institution/committees/resear
    ch-ethics/research-concerning-children-and-young-p
    eople-guidelines

20
When Might Informed Consent Not Be Appropriate?
  • Observation in public places
  • Research necessitating deception
  • Covert research
  • Using data in the public domain

21
Confidentiality and Anonymity
  • Confidentiality exists when only the researchers
    are aware of the participants identities and
    have promised not to reveal those identities to
    anyone else
  • Anonymity means that there is no way individual
    participants can be identified from any of the
    data or information collected from them in the
    research

22
Vidich and Bensmans Springdale , New York
(1958)
  • Sociological study of social/political life in a
    small town Springdale (pseudonym)
  • Researchers ensured participants that their
    anonymity/privacy would be maintained.
  • Publication of Small Town in Mass Society (1958)
    resulted in anger/hostility because
  • it was easy for those living in Springdale to
    identify anonymised participants
  • inhabitants were insulted by the researchers
    characterisations of the town and its people
  • RESULT Refusal to co-operate with any social
    scientists in the future, no possibility of
    follow-up.

23
Data Protection Act (1998)
  • Relates to the processing of personal data
    (information) about individuals
  • Collecting data only collect data that there is
    a legitimate research reason for collecting
    fair and for a specified purpose
  • Handling data - Process and store data about
    individuals only with their consent
  • Informedconsent why collecting data? for what
    purpose? how will it be stored? who will have
    access? will it be published?
  • Disclosure - Do not disclose personal data about
    identified individuals to other people without
    their permission
  • Personal data on individuals should not be stored
    or archived any longer than is necessary for
    legitimate research reasons

24
Disclosure
  • On occasions a researcher may unexpectedly
    observe illegal behaviour or behaviour that is
    likely to be harmful to the participants or
    others
  • In these cases, the researcher must consider
    carefully whether to disclose this information to
    the appropriate authorities
  • In so far as possible, researchers should inform
    participants and/or their guardians of their
    intention to disclose and the reasons for this

25
ETHICAL CODES OF PRACTICE
26
  • Commitment to a Code of Ethics will ensure that
    all research is conducted according to the
    following concerns
  • To respect the autonomy of individuals
  • To avoid causing harm
  • To treat people fairly
  • To act with integrity
  • To use resources as beneficially as possible

http//www.ioe.ac.uk/about/documents/About_Policie
s/Researchethics.pdf
27
Ethics guidelines
  • British Sociological Association Statement of
    Ethical Practice (2002)
  • British Educational Research Association Ethical
    guidelines for educational research (2004)

28
Carolyn Ellis The Ethnographic I
29
  • How did reading this make you feel? Why?
  • What ethical issues does this reading raise?
  • Is this writing ethical?

30
IMPLICATIONS FOR YOUR WORK
31
What ethical issues might arise in your research?
  • Informed consent
  • Research relationships
  • Power dynamics in relationship between researcher
    and researched
  • Insider research (including conflict of
    interest/values)
  • Research topic/population
  • Sensitive topics
  • Vulnerable groups
  • Research Methods
  • Negotiating access (gatekeepers)
  • Covert observation/deception
  • Intrusive interventions
  • Risk of harm to participants (including stress,
    anxiety or humiliation)
  • Data collection, archiving and management
  • Confidentiality and data protection

32
TO FINISH
33
Things to consider before and during research
  • Your own motivations
  • Eg how could your links to sponsors, personal
    convictions or career aspirations produce
    conflicts of interest?
  • Consent
  • Do you have informed consent?
  • Necessary elements information understanding
    voluntariness competence of potential
    participants actual consent.
  • Confidentiality
  • Who has access to your data? How will it be
    stored? What will happen after research is
    completed? How are you going to inform your
    informants of confidentiality

34
Things to consider before and during research
  • Harm
  • Could your research cause physical,
    psychological, cultural, financial, legal or
    environmental damage? How easily can participants
    withdraw from the research after it begins? Have
    similar studies been done before?
  • Dissemination and feedback
  • Are results available and comprehensible to
    participants? Could they be misinterpreted or
    misused? Who owns the results? You? Your
    sponsor?
  • Cultural awareness
  • Have you considered the personality, rights,
    beliefs and ethical views of your researched
    individuals/communities?
  • Would you wish to be treated as you are treating
    your research participants?

35
  • Dr Natasha Whiteman
  • new9_at_le.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com