Chapter%20Four:%20STATE%20COURTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter%20Four:%20STATE%20COURTS

Description:

Title: Chapter Four: STATE COURTS Author: kwilmot Last modified by: Wilmot Created Date: 9/10/2004 7:43:30 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:131
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: kwi89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter%20Four:%20STATE%20COURTS


1
Chapter FourSTATE COURTS
2
LEVELS of STATE COURTS
  • Trial courts of limited jurisdiction lower
    courts
  • Trial courts of general jurisdiction major trial
    courts
  • Intermediate courts of appeals
  • Courts of last resort state supreme courts

3
Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction
  • Trial courts of limited jurisdiction are created,
    controlled, and funded by city or county
    governments they are not part of the state
    judiciary.
  • These courts comprise 85 percent of all judicial
    bodies in the U.S.
  • The caseload of lower courts represents
    approximately two-thirds of all state court
    filings.
  • These courts are restricted in their
    jurisdiction. Their role focuses primarily on
    preliminary stages of felony cases, misdemeanor
    traffic cases, and small claims cases.
  • These courts are also called inferior
    courts, municipal courts, city courts, magistrate
    courts, or justice of the peace.

4
Trial Courts of General Jurisdiction
  • These major trial courts have the legal authority
    to decide all criminal and civil matters not
    delegated to the lower courts.
  • State constitutions or statutory law (or both)
    determine their jurisdiction.
  • Geographical jurisdiction is usually determined
    by political boundaries most often by counties.
  • Trial courts of general jurisdiction handle
    juvenile cases, misdemeanor and exclusive felony
    violations, DWI/DUI cases, and civil matters that
    are highlighted by domestic relations, estate,
    and personal injury issues.
  • These courts are also known as district,
    circuit, or superior courts.

5
Intermediate Courts of Appeals
  • Due to increasing criminal and civil case
    workloads, states created intermediate courts of
    appeals. Now, ICAs hear all properly filed
    appeals.
  • Most often, these courts (although they exist in
    only 39 states), handle both criminal and civil
    cases.
  • Usually, these courts employ three-judge panels
    for deciding cases.
  • Subsequent appeals are at the discretion of the
    higher court, however, for most litigants, the
    states intermediate appellate court is the final
    step for most.

6
Courts of Last Resort
  • Courts of last resort do not use judicial panels,
    instead, the entire judicial body participates in
    deciding each case
  • (en banc).
  • These courts have a limited amount of original
    jurisdiction in matters dealing with legal and
    judicial personnel.
  • The docket schedule is purely discretionary.
    They hear only those cases that tend to have
    broad legal and political significance.
  • Courts of last resort are the ultimate review
    board for matters involving interpretation of
    state law.

7
The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania
8
Characteristics of State Judicial Systems
  • Additional Features Include
  • Their resistance to strong organizational change.
  • Their ability to adapt to change.
  • Three Interdependent Features
  • Localism
  • Hierarchy
  • Emphasis on the right to appeal

9
QUESTION
  • How many Courts of Last Resort
  • does the States of Texas
  • and Oklahoma have?
  • What is the concept of a
  • Uniform Court System? Explain

10
Question
  • Is the premise of a
  • Unified Court System a good idea?
  • In other words,
  • would shifting judicial administration
  • from local control to centralized management
  • be a prudent goal?
  • Why or why not?
  • (be able to give several reasons for each)

11
Therapeutic Jurisprudence
  • Types of Specialized Courts
  • Drug courts (adult and juvenile)
  • Mental Health courts
  • Domestic Violence courts
  • Drunk driving courts
  • Reentry courts
  • Family courts
  • Five Essential Elements
  • Immediate intervention
  • Nonadversarial adjudication
  • Hands-on judicial involvement
  • Treatment programs with clear rules and
    structured goals.
  • A team approach with the courtroom workgroup.

12
Question
  • Explain the difference between
  • the crime control models view
  • and the due process models view
  • on the war on drugs with regards to
  • causation,
  • punishment, and equality.
  • Which model do you favor?

13
The War on Drugs
  • Due Process Model
  • Drug abuse is a disease and needs to be treated.
  • The solution is rehabilitation.
  • Drug policies influence minority groups unequally.
  • Crime Control Model
  • Drug abuse is caused by a breakdown of individual
    responsibility.
  • The solution is punishment and deterrence.
  • Drug policies should not be concerned with
    socioeconomic factors.

14
Questions
  • Does the War on drugs
  • determine the way cases are processed
  • and on the type of justice
  • that results?
  • How do Three Strikes Laws
  • Impact the judiciary?
  • (Ewing v. California, 2002)

15
Major Trial Courts
  • Since most criminal cases do not go to trial, the
    dominant issue is not guilt or innocence, but
    what?
  • Whereas federal courts hear a high percentage of
    white-collar and major drug distribution cases,
  • state courts decide primarily what type of crimes?

16
  • The Unified Judicial System
  • of Pennsylvania Video
  • http//www.aopc.org
  • (For the Public Link)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com