Teacher%20Collaboration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Teacher%20Collaboration

Description:

to Support Teacher Professional Development Sponsored by Teachers for a New Era AERA ~ Denver ~ 5/4/10 Ivan Cheng icheng_at_csun.edu – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:183
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: IvanC158
Learn more at: http://www.csun.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teacher%20Collaboration


1
Using Collaborative Inquiry with Student
Teachersto Support Teacher Professional
DevelopmentSponsored by Teachers for a New Era
AERA Denver 5/4/10
Ivan Cheng icheng_at_csun.edu
2
The Problem
  • Algebra success rate is low in the district
  • Only 6 of 828 Algebra 1 students at one high
    school scored Proficient or above in on the
    California Standards Test (CST)
  • Two thirds of those who fail Algebra in 8th or
    9th grade fail to graduate on time

3
The Solution
  • To improve their mathematics instruction,
    teachers must be able to analyze what they and
    their students are doing and consider how those
    actions are affecting students learning.

NCTM Principles and Standards, p. 18
4
The Solution
  • Teachers learn well just as students do
    by studying, doing, and reflecting
    by collaborating with other teachers
    by looking closely at students and their work
    and by sharing what they see.

by collaborating with other teachers
Darling-Hammond (1999), p. 12
5
Theoretical Framework
  • Learning environment needed to support generative
    change (Darling-Hammond, et al. 2009 Ball, 2002
    Swafford, et al. 1999 Chapin, 1994 Little,
    1993 Lave Wenger, 1991)
  • Practical inquiry around student thinking similar
    to CGI (Carpenter, et al. 2000 Franke, et al.
    2001 Carpenter, et al., 1999)

6
Theory of Change
  • Traditional Model

Professional Development
Teacher Learning
Student Achievement
7
Theory of Change
  • Student Centered Model

Collaborative Inquiry
Student Achievement
8
Theory of Change
  • Student Centered Model

Professional Development
Collaborative Inquiry
Student Achievement
Teacher Learning
9
The Intervention
  • Student Improvement Through Teacher Empowerment
    (SITTE)
  • Utilize teachers classrooms as laboratories
    for daily practical inquiry
  • Collaborative inquiry based on the Cognitively
    Guided Instruction (CGI) model
  • The Responsive Teaching Cycle (RTC)

(SITTE)
10
Responsive Teaching Cycle (RTC)
  • Daily collaboration around evidence of student
    learning
  • Focus on getting through to students rather than
    getting through a book

Explore Establish Experiment Examine
Student Learning
11
The Study
  • Participants
  • 4 Teachers
    (9 sections of Algebra 1, almost
    all with past failure in math)
  • 5 Student Teachers
    (theater arts, food science, political science,
    engineering, math)

12
The Study
  • Research questions
  • Impact on teachers decisions practice
  • Impact on students performance
  • Data
  • Lesson activities (Hiebert et al., 2003)
  • Online reflections emails
  • Meeting notes

13
The PACT Framework
Planning
  • Four tasks Planning, Instructing, Assessing,
    Reflecting ( attention to Academic Language)
  • Similar to National Board process
  • Artifacts and commentaries, including video of
    teaching
  • Valid and reliable assessment
    scorers calibrated

14
The Planning Task
  • Balanced focus Connections between procedures,
    concepts, reasoning
  • Access to content Sequencing of tasks,
    structured supports for learning
  • Meaningful assessments Aligned with
    opportunities to engage in mathematics rich
    problems to elicit levels of understanding

15
Impact on Teachers
  • Basic skills developed in context, not in
    isolation
  • Multiple representations used to provide
    meaningful connections
  • Critical thinking promoted through patterns and
    explorations
  • Focused on teaching tools instead of teaching
    topics

16
Impact on Teachers
17
Impact on Teachers
  • Noe wants to get an A in his Algebra 1 class. He
    has decided that the first thing he needs to do
    to get an A in his math class is to attend class
    every day. Each day that Noe comes to class he
    earns 5 points.
  • 1. Answer the questions below
  • If Noe comes to class for 2 days, how many points
    does he have?
  • If Noe comes to class for 8 days, how many points
    does he have?
  • If Noe comes to class for 12 days, how many
    points does he have?
  • If Noe comes to class for 15 days, how many
    points does he have?
  • If Noe comes to class for 18 days, how many
    points does he have?
  • 2. Describe what you did to get your answers for
    ae.
  • 3. Complete the table below
  • 4. Choose a letter to represent the number of
    days that Noe attends school. Use that letter to
    write an expression that represents the
    number of points that Noe earns when he attends
    class.
  • 5. Draw a graph on the back.
  • 6. If Noe went to school for 132 days, how many
    points will he earn?
  • 7. If Noe earned 55 points, how many days did he
    attend class?

18
Impact on Students
  • The installation cost and monthly monitoring
    fee of a security system are listed below for two
    companies.
  • Ace Systems charges 327 for installation and
    204 per month for monitoring the system.
  • Zero Entry charges 535 for installation and 188
    per month for monitoring the system.
  • Write a variable expression for the total cost of
    a security system installed and monitored by Ace
    Systems. Write a variable expression for the
    total cost of a security system installed and
    monitored by Zero Entry. Define the variable.
  • Mrs. Clark will sign a contract to have a
    security system installed and monitored for 12
    months. Calculate the total cost each company
    will charge for this service. Show all your
    work.
  • If Mrs. Clark signs a contract to have a security
    system installed and monitored for 18 months,
    which company has a lower total cost? Provide an
    explanation or show all your work.

19
Impact on Students
  • Overall ( Correct) Mult. Choice (
    Correct) Constructed Resp. (4 Max.)

20
Limitations
  • Participants were not randomly selected (though
    the students were)
  • The role of the facilitator was not examined
  • Constructed response items were scored by the
    teachers themselves
  • Mathematics learning of teachers, MKT, and tacit
    beliefs were not assessed

21
Implications
  • Students benefit from the collaboration of their
    teachers
  • Teacher learning can occur when educational
    settings are structured to focus on student
    learning
  • Student teachers can gain experience enacting the
    practices that are promoted in their pre-service
    courses

22
Thank YouAERA ConferenceDenver 5/4/10
Ivan Cheng icheng_at_csun.edu
23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com