Rogerian Argument

1
Rogerian Argument

• Taken from the principles of psychologist Carl
  Rogers

2
Origins of this principle

• Based on Carl Rogers theory that people
  involved in disputes should not respond to each
  other until they fully and fairly state the other
  persons position.

3
4 Parts of the Rogerian Argument

• 1. Introduction
• 2. Contexts
• 3. Writers position
• 4. Benefits to opponent

4
1. Introduction

• Lets meet in the middle.

• The writer describes an issue well enough to show
  that he/she fully understands and respects the
  alternative position.

5
2. Contexts

• You may be right sometimes

• The writer describes cases/contexts in which the
  alternative position may be legitimate.

6
3. Writers Position

• This is why my position is right.

• The writer states her/his position and presents
  circumstances in which it is valid. This is where
  the writer supports her/his views with evidence.

7
4. Benefits to Opponent

• See what you might gain by agreeing
• with me?

• The writer explains to the opponent how he/she
  would benefit from adopting the writers position.

8
Summation

• Rogerian arguments steer clear of incendiary and
  stereotypical language.
• They emphasize how both sides of the argument
  might benefit by working together.
• They advocate a win-win outcome.