ECON 101 Tutorial: Week 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

ECON 101 Tutorial: Week 3

Description:

ECON 101 Tutorial: Week 3. Shane Murphy. ... for each unit of the good sold, ... The deadweight loss of a tax is the area of the triangle between the supply and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: acuk
Category:
Tags: econ | supply | tutorial | unit | week

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECON 101 Tutorial: Week 3


1
ECON 101 Tutorial Week 3
  • Shane Murphy
  • s.murphy5_at_lancaster.ac.uk
  • Office Hours Monday 300-400 LUMS C86

2
Outline
  • Roll Call
  • Problems
  • Discussion

3
Chapter 7 Exercise 7
  • Why might we want to think about market price as
    the outcome of a bargaining model?
  • Market price is really an outcome of the
    bargaining model. Suppliers are offering goods to
    consumers at different prices and consumers have
    to make decisions about whether the prices they
    are offered represents a net economic benefit to
    them. There is an interaction between suppliers
    and consumers, therefore, which can be seen as a
    bargaining process an agreed outcome between
    two interested and competing economic agents. For
    example suppliers respond to the decisions made
    by consumers if too few people buy their
    product then they will be forced to take action
    to improve the product offering, lower the price
    or even drop out of the market altogether.

4
Chapter 8 Exercise 2
  • The government has decided that the free market
    price of tobacco is too low.
  • Suppose the government imposes a binding price
    floor in the tobacco market. Use a diagram to
    show the effect on the price and quantity. Is
    there a shortage or surplus? What does the market
    outcome depend on?
  • Tobacco producers complain that he price floor
    has reduced their total revenue. Is this
    possible? Why?
  • In response to producers complaints, the
    government agrees to purchase all of the surplus
    tobacco at the price floor. Compared to the basic
    price floor, who benefits from this new policy?
    Who loses?

5
Chapter 8 Exercise 2
  • The government has decided that the free market
    price of tobacco is too low.
  • Suppose the government imposes a binding price
    floor in the tobacco market. Use a diagram to
    show the effect on the price and quantity. Is
    there a shortage or surplus? What does the market
    outcome depend on?

The imposition of a binding price floor in the
tobacco market is shown. In the absence of the
price floor, the price would be P1 and the
quantity would be Q1. With the floor set at Pf,
which is greater than P1, the quantity demanded
is Q2, while quantity supplied is Q3, so there is
a surplus of cheese in the amount Q3 Q2.
6
Chapter 8 Exercise 2
  • The government has decided that the free market
    price of tobacco is too low.
  • Tobacco producers complain that he price floor
    has reduced their total revenue. Is this
    possible? Why?
  • The tobacco producers complaint that their total
    revenue has declined is correct if demand is
    price elastic. With price elastic demand, the
    percentage decline in quantity would exceed the
    percentage rise in price, so total revenue would
    decline.

7
Chapter 8 Exercise 2
  • The government has decided that the free market
    price of tobacco is too low.
  • In response to producers complaints, the
    government agrees to purchase all of the surplus
    tobacco at the price floor. Compared to the basic
    price floor, who benefits from this new policy?
    Who loses?
  • If the government purchases all the surplus
    tobacco at the price floor, producers benefit and
    taxpayers lose. Producers would produce quantity
    Q3 of tobacco, and their total revenue would
    increase substantially. But consumers would buy
    only quantity Q2 of tobacco, so they are in the
    same position as before. Taxpayers lose because
    they would be financing the purchase of the
    surplus tobacco through higher taxes.

8
Chapter 9 Exercise 6
  • Suppose that the government subsidizes a good
    for each unit of the good sold, the government
    pays 2 to the buyer. How does the subsidy affect
    CS, PS, TR, TS? Is the a DL?

9
Chapter 9 Exercise 6
  • Suppose that the government subsidizes a good
    for each unit of the good sold, the government
    pays 2 to the buyer. How does the subsidy affect
    CS, PS, TR, TS? Is the a DL?

10
Chapter 9 Exercise 9
  • Suppose the market is described by
  • Qs 2P Qd 300-P
  • Solve for the equilibrium price and quantity.
  • Suppose that a tax of T is placed on buyers so
    demand is Qd 300 (PT). Solve for the new
    equilibrium. What happens to the price receivd by
    sellers, the price paid by buyers, and the
    quantity?
  • Tax revenue is TxQ. Use your answer to part (b)
    to solve for tax revenue as a function of T.
    Graph the relationship for T between 0 and 300.
  • The deadweight loss of a tax is the area of the
    triangle between the supply and demand curves.
    Graph the relationship between DL and T between 0
    and 300.
  • The government now levies a tax on this good of
    200 per unit. Is this a good policy? Why or why
    not? Can you propose a better policy?

11
Chapter 9 Exercise 9
  • Suppose the market is described by
  • Qs 2P Qd 300-P
  • Solve for the equilibrium price and quantity.
  • Setting quantity supplied equal to quantity
    demanded gives 2P 300 P. Adding P to both
    sides of the equation gives 3P 300. Dividing
    both sides by 3 gives P 100, which is the
    equilibrium price. Plugging P 100 back into
    either equation for quantity demanded or supplied
    gives Q 200 as the equilibrium quantity.

12
Chapter 9 Exercise 9
  • Suppose the market is described by
  • Qs 2P Qd 300-P
  • Suppose that a tax of T is placed on buyers so
    demand is Qd 300 (PT). Solve for the new
    equilibrium. What happens to the price received
    by sellers, the price paid by buyers, and the
    quantity?
  • Now P is the price received by sellers and PT is
    the price paid by buyers. Equating quantity
    demanded to quantity supplied gives 2P 300 -
    (PT). Adding P to both sides of the equation
    gives 3P 300 T. Dividing both sides by 3
    gives P 100 - T/3. This is the price received
    by sellers, and is clearly less than before the
    tax was imposed. The buyers pay a price equal to
    the price received by sellers plus the tax (PT
    100 2T/3). The quantity sold is now Q 2P
    200 2T/3.

13
Chapter 9 Exercise 9
  • Suppose the market is described by
  • Qs 2P Qd 300-P
  • Tax revenue is TxQ. Use your answer to part (b)
    to solve for tax revenue as a function of T.
    Graph the relationship for T between 0 and 300.
  • Since tax revenue is equal to T x Q and Q 200 -
    2T/3, tax revenue equals 200T - 2T2/3. Tax
    revenue is zero at T 0 and at T 300.

14
Chapter 9 Exercise 9
  • Suppose the market is described by Qs 2P Qd
    300-P
  • The deadweight loss of a tax is the area of the
    triangle between the supply and demand curves.
    Graph the relationship between DL and T between 0
    and 300.
  • The area of the triangle (laid on its side) that
    represents the deadweight loss is 1/2 x base x
    height, where the base is the change in the
    price, which is the size of the tax (T) and the
    height is the amount of the decline in quantity
    (2T/3). So the deadweight loss equals 1/2 x T x
    2T/3 T2/3. This rises exponentially from 0
    (when T 0) to 45,000 when T 300.

15
Chapter 9 Exercise 9
  • Suppose the market is described by
  • Qs 2P Qd 300-P
  • The government now levies a tax on this good of
    200 per unit. Is this a good policy? Why or why
    not? Can you propose a better policy?
  • A tax of 200 per unit is a bad idea, because
    it's in a region in which tax revenue is
    declining. Tax revenue is calculated as 200T -
    2T2/3 2002 2/3(2002) 40,000 26,666
    13,333. The government could reduce the tax to
    150 per unit and get more tax revenue (15,000).
    The lower tax would also cause a smaller
    deadweight loss. The deadweight loss is
    calculated as T2/3 so when T is 200 the
    deadweight loss is 13,333 and when T is 150 the
    deadweight loss is only 7,500. A tax of 150 per
    unit is therefore a better policy.

16
Discussion
  • Is deadweight loss always bad?
  • How much should we concern ourselves with
    avoiding deadweight loss?
  • When is deadweight loss acceptable?
  • How can Santa be described as a deadweight loss?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com