The ISA for Physics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The ISA for Physics

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Last modified by: JONES Created Date: 1/1/1601 12:00:00 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: couk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The ISA for Physics


1
The ISA for Physics
  • What you need to revise

2
Know your experiment
  • Know the type of equipment you used and why you
    chose it .
  • Know the name of each piece of the equipment and
    what it does (measures - if applicable).
  • Know the sensitivity of the equipment that
    should have been evident in the way you wrote
    results in the table.
  • Know why you chose the number of readings to take.

3
Terminology
  • Make sure you KNOW all of the words to describe
    variables etc.
  • Remember it is the independent variable that you
    change by a regular amount (and usually plot on
    the x-axis)
  • Remember it is the dependent variable that you
    measure as it changes in response to the changes
    in the independent variable (usually plotted on
    the y-axis).
  • The control variables are kept constant to make
    the results valid.

4
Why are control variables kept constant?
  • If that variable had changed as well as the
    independent variable the dependent variable would
    have responded to that change too making the
    experiment invalid. Do not simply say to make
    it a fair test if asked to explain why control
    variables are kept constant expand on the idea
    and say it would affect the dependent variable.

5
  • If you are asked what you were trying to find
    out or the purpose of your investigation.
    they want to know what you decided to
    investigate.
  • They want you to describe how you decided on
    varying your independent variable and observing
    the effect this has on the dependent variable
  • They want a brief description of the fair test
    you carried out

6
Minimising errors
  • A good experimenter checks the equipment is
    reliable before beginning she looks for zero
    error on instruments and calibration errors and
    uses instruments of a suitable precision.

7
Minimising errors
  • Zero errors can sometimes be adjusted manually
    otherwise they can be noted and deducted from all
    readings. A column of actual readings should be
    recorded and then a column of readings corrected
    for zero error should be drawn.

8
Minimising errors
  • Calibration errors are a bigger problem.
  • They can mean that all of the results are out by
    a percentage because two fixed points have not
    been fixed correctly.
  • You can spot drastic calibration errors by
    checking meters against each other but you
    dont know the whole batch may be wrong!
  • If you were doing an important research project
    you would check the meters against standard
    resistors etc. to see whether they were properly
    calibrated.

9
Minimising errors
  • Using instruments with sensitive scales (small
    divisions more significant figures) give
    results with more precision.
  • This will not make your results more reliable or
    accurate (valid) just more precise.

10
Minimising errors
  • Any possible causes of errors spotted while
    carrying out the experiment (sparking, heating,
    fluctuations in the meters) are noted.
  • A repeat set of readings is taken to check the
    reliability of the first set any that differ
    widely on repeating must be checked again.

11
How can you tell if your readings are reliable?
  • When repeated the results are virtually the same
    giving you an average that barely differs from
    either set.
  • When plotted a smooth curve or straight line is
    obtained no obvious anomalies they make a
    pattern.

12
Is reliable the same as accurate?
  • NO!!!
  • If there is a problem with the accuracy of your
    measuring instruments and/or an error in how you
    are using the equipment you will get repeatable
    data that is wrong.

13
Conclusion
  • State the findings in terms of how the
    independent variable affected the dependent one.
  • Refer to the graph shape to describe the
    relationship and make a conclusion from that.
  • Does it go through the origin?
  • Is it the same in negative bias as forward bias?
  • Does it indicate direct proportionality?
  • If you can use numbers do so!

14
Evaluation
  • Are your results valid for ALL components or only
    true for the one you did?
  • In order to make a more general conclusion how
    many others would you have to test?
  • Would you expect all of the results to be
    identical?
  • What tolerance would you allow?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com