The Quality of Arguments: Fallacies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

The Quality of Arguments: Fallacies

Description:

The Quality of Arguments: Fallacies Pei Lei: sarahpei7_at_gmail.com – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:177
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Robert2842
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Quality of Arguments: Fallacies


1
The Quality of ArgumentsFallacies
  • Pei Lei sarahpei7_at_gmail.com

2
Three Basic Fallacies
  • Problematic premise arguments that for any
    reason fail to fulfill the acceptability
    requirements.
  • Irrelevant reason an argument fails to minimally
    satisfy the criteria of relevance.
  • Hasty conclusions all evidence and links taken
    together fail to meet the test of sufficiency.

3
Basic Fallacy 1 Problematic Premise
  • Begging the question
  • Fallacy of incompatibility

4
Problematic Premise
  • Free speech is good for the society because it is
    conducive to the interests of the community.
  • Begging the Question

5
Basic Fallacy 1 Problematic Premise
  • Green-card holder should get voting rights. They
    live in this country so they should have their
    voting rights to protect their interest. However,
    this wouldnt harm the citizens interests,
    because the statistics shows not many of
    immigrants really get involved in their local
    affairs like voting for community leaders.
  • Fallacy of incompatibility

6
Basic Fallacy 2Irrelevant Reason
  • Argument ad hominem
  • Straw person fallacy
  • Red herring
  • Poisoning the well
  • Guilt by association
  • Appeal to fear
  • Appeal to popularity
  • Appeal to tradition

7
Irrelevant Reason
  • Examples
  • Fallacious Attacking a candidate for President
    of the debate club for failing a math
    examination.
  • Not fallacious Attacking a candidate for the
    Ministry of Health for cheating on medical exams.
  • Ad Hominem

8
Irrelevant Reason
  • Example Someone opposing the death penalty
    argues that the death penalty risks executing an
    innocent person. The straw person response might
    be youre suggesting we open the doors of our
    prisons and let everyone out to avoid wrongfully
    convicting anyone.
  • Straw Person

9
Irrelevant Reason
  • George W. Bush announced that the congress got
    two bills and theyll pass one of it. One is to
    ban cyclists across the nation the other is to
    launch the war in Iraq. A journalist asked why
    he wanted to ban cyclists. George responded
    See, nobody cares Iraq. So well pass the second
    motion.
  • Red Herring

10
Irrelevant ReasonAdditional Fallacies
  • Robert is an American. We cant expect him to
    help Chinese debate education.
  • Poisoning the well
  • How can you possibly expect Pei Lei to help with
    debate teaching in China. After all, she works
    for Robert!
  • Guilt by Association

11
Irrelevant ReasonAdditional Fallacies
  • attempting to take the focus off the argument by
    shifting the focus solely on the basis of fear.
    If you vote for my opponent, we should all build
    bomb shelters because we will be attacked.
  • Appeal to fear

12
Irrelevant ReasonAdditional Fallacies
  • All the nations in the world are taking actions
    towards CO2 emission. So should China.
  • Appeal to popularity Using the popularity of
    someone or something to justify a favorable
    evaluation.

13
Irrelevant ReasonAdditional Fallacies
  • The Chinese has been using fireworks for
    hundreds of years so we should continue to do so
    in the future.
  • Appeal to tradition

14
Basic Fallacy 3Hasty Conclusion
  • Hasty generalization
  • Fallacious slippery slope arguments
  • Two wrongs fallacy
  • Improper appeal to practice
  • Fallacy of composition
  • Fallacy of division
  • Post hoc fallacy
  • Faulty analogy

15
Hasty Conclusions
  • I have five students in my class from Xian and
    they are all failing. I suppose Xian does not
    produce good students.
  • Hasty Generalization

16
Hasty Conclusions
  • If the university bans electric ovens in
    dormitory. They will also ban TV. Then computer.
    Then our smartphones will also be banned. Even
    an iwatch will not be allowed. We will have no
    appliance or any electronic products at all.
    Because they produce heat and probably cause
    fire!
  • Fallacious Slippery Slope Arguments

17
Hasty Conclusions
  • As a college teacher, you shouldnt complain
    about your salary, because college teachers are
    supposed to devote(sometimes sacrifice)
    themselves and ask for no return.
  • Two Wrongs Fallacy

18
Hasty ConclusionsAdditional Fallacies
  • Why should government set a quota for woman in
    the office? Other businesses have more men than
    women.
  • Improper appeal to practice

19
Hasty ConclusionsAdditional Fallacies
  • Tim Howard, the keeper for Manchester United, is
    a superb keeper. Therefore, Manchester United is
    one of the best football teams in Europe.
  • Fallacy of composition

20
Hasty ConclusionsAdditional Fallacies
  • Harvard is an excellent university, therefore
    Law Professor Lawrence Tribe must be an excellent
    Professor.
  • Fallacy of division The evidence is drawn from
    the whole, but the conclusion is about the part.

21
Hasty ConclusionsAdditional Fallacies
  • the assumption that because one thing precedes
    another, the first must have caused the first.
    After Barak Obama was elected, the U.S. economy
    went into recession. Therefore Obama was the
    cause of the recession.
  • Post hoc fallacy

22
Hasty ConclusionsAdditional Fallacies
  • Abortion practices are just like Hitlers murder
    of six million Jews.
  • Faulty analogy this fallacy occurs when two
    events are compared to each other but are not
    similar in terms of the comparison.

23
FallaciesSome Concluding Thoughts
  • Fallacies are about the quality of an arguments
    construction, not its truth.
  • An argument free of fallacies is not necessarily
    a true argument.
  • An argument is not necessarily false just because
    it contains a fallacy.
  • Arguments are not either categorically good or
    bad. They exist on a continuum from more
    -or-less good to more-or-less bad.

24
THANK YOU! ??
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com