Risk Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Risk Assessment

Description:

Risk Assessment Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Farr49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Risk Assessment


1
Risk Assessment
  • Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.

2
Session Objectives
  1. Discuss the role of risk assessment in the TQM
    process.
  2. Describe the five severity indices presented in
    the course.
  3. Compare and contrast the indices based on the
    sources of data used, scores produced, and
    accuracy of predictions.

3
Why measure severity?
  • One way to measure quality of health care is to
    compare outcomes for a group of patients to
    outcomes observed for other patients with similar
    severity of illness.
  • When we want to do so, it is important to
    separate the influence of the patients' severity
    of illness from the quality of care.

4
What is severity?
  • What is severity?
  • Severity is the progression of the disease when
    left untreated.
  • Severity is prognosis under ideal levels of care.
  • Some patients are further along in their illness
    than others.

5
How to measure severity?
  • Statistical analysis of outcomes of care
  • Sample may not be relevant
  • Expert opinions
  • Expert consensus maybe false
  • Patients self insight
  • Only felt symptoms affect self insight

6
Sources of Data
  • ICD9 codes
  • Readily available
  • Maybe gamed
  • Reflect whole visit
  • Key clinical findings
  • Requires chart review
  • Maybe masked by treatment
  • Reflects condition on admission

7
Disease Staging
  1. Stage 1 includes conditions with no complications
    and minimal risk for the patient.
  2. Stage 2 includes problems which are contained in
    one organ or system.
  3. Stage 3 includes problems in multiple sites and
    general systemic problems.
  4. Stage 4 is death

8
APACHE
  • Deviations from norm on 12 physiological
    variables like heart rate, blood oxygen level, or
    respiratory rate.
  • Age of the patient.
  • Chronic illness include coma.

9
Medisgroup
  • At level 0, there are no clinical findings.
  • At level 1, there are minimal abnormal findings.
  • At level 2, there are either acute findings or
    findings with an unclear potential for organ
    failure.
  • At level 3, there are clinical findings with high
    potential for imminent organ failure.
  • At level 4, organ failure is indicated.

10
Computerized Severity Index
  • ICD9 codes
  • Key clinical findings

11
Best Approach
  • Ease of use
  • Cost of gathering information
  • Accuracy
  • Face validity

12
Differences Among Indices
13
Accuracy of Predictions
14
What to do?
  • Rely on a combination
  • Rely on known indicators of prognosis
  • Rely on consensus of experts

15
Risk of Fall
  • The ability to ambulate
  • Steadiness of gait
  • Presence of certain chronic medical conditions
  • Number of medications
  • Mental status
  • History of falls

16
Analyze Data
  • At different time periods the risk for fall can
    be calculated for each patient
  • Now we can analyze whether the number of falls
    exceeds what could be expected from patient
    conditions
  • See example data at following address
    http//gunston.gmu.edu/708/RiskPChart.htm

17
Take Home Lesson
  • It is best to use multiple methods of measuring
    severity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com