Title: Evolution and Population Genetics
1Evolution and Population Genetics
- Evidence for evolutionary change
- Mechanics and
- Hardy-Weinberg Calculations
2Evidence for Evolution
- 1. Fossil record.
- Material imprinted in rock
- Law of superposition older fossils on bottom
- 2. Anatomical evidence
- Homologous structures similar bone structure but
different function. Ex bat wing, whale flipper,
human arm - Vestigial structures no longer functional but
retained in anatomy Ex appendix, wisdom teeth - Modified structures adapted for new function Ex
Pandas thumb wrist bones modified to strip
leaves from bamboo - Embryologic similarities
- 3. Molecular evidence
- Shared sequences of bases in DNA
3- Evidence for evolution (continued)
- Adaptive radiation
- Ancestral pioneer arrives at new habitat.
- New species evolve speciation
- By occupying different niches, they reduce
competition. - Example Darwins finches 13 different but
related species on the Galapagos Islands
4Fossils
Archaeopteryx (oldest known fossil bird)
5LAW OF SUPERPOSITION
6Why does a whale have a kneecap?
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10The Evolution of Populations
- Remember individual organisms do not evolve.
Individuals are selected, but it is populations
that evolve. - Because evolution occurs when gene pools change
from one generation to the next, understanding
evolution require us to understand population
genetics.
11Some terminology
- Population All the members of one species living
in single area. - Gene pool the collection of genes in a
population. It includes all the alleles of all
genes in the population.
12Some terminology
- If all individuals in a population all have the
same allele for a particular gene that allele is
said to be fixed in the population. - If there are 2 or more alleles for a given gene
in the population then individuals may be either
homozygous or heterozygous (i.e. have two copies
of one allele or have two different alleles)
13Detecting evolution in nature
- Evolution is defined as changes in the structure
of gene pools from one generation to the next. - How can we tell if the gene pool changes from one
generation to the next? - We can make use of a simple calculation called
the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
14Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
- In meiosis, individuals alleles are sorted into
gametes (sperm or egg) which may combine to form
a zygote. - A population of 100 organisms has a minimum of
200 alleles for each trait, one from each parent. - To determine probability of two independent
events (sorting of parental alleles), multiply
the probabilities of individual events. - If 80 of the alleles in a gene pool are A and
20 are a, what are the probabilities for each
genotype (AA, Aa, and aa)?
15Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
- If 80 of the alleles in the gene pool are A and
20 are a, we can predict the genotypes in the
next generation. - Basic probability To determine the probability
of two independent events both occurring, you
should multiply the probabilities of the
individual events together.
16Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
- Probability of an AA individual is 0.80.8 0.64
- Probability of an aa individual is 0.20.2 0.04
- Probability of an Aa individuals is 0.20.8
0.16, but there are two ways to produce an Aa
individual so 0.162 0.32. - Note the probabilities add up to 1 (100)
17General formulae
- Allele frequencies
- p q 1.
- Genotypic frequencies
- p2 2pq q2 1, where p is frequency
of one allele and q is frequency of the other
allele. NOTE p2 and q2 are homozygous and pq is
heterozygous
18Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
- Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can be used to
estimate allele frequencies from information
about phenotypes and genotypes.
19Hardy-Weinberg Conditions
- No gene flow movement of individuals to/from the
population - Random mating no significant preference when
choosing mate. Increases homozygote genotype. - Large population size reduce effect of small,
chance events (genetic drift bottleneck or
founder effect) - No natural selection which would otherwise select
for or against a particular genotype. - No mutations.
20Bottleneck Effect
- The bottleneck effect occurs when some disaster
causes a dramatic reduction in population size. - As a result, by chance certain alleles may be
overrepresented in the survivors, while others
are underrepresented or eliminated. Genetic
drift while the population is small may lead to
further loss or fixation of alleles. - Humans have been responsible for many bottlenecks
by driving species close to extinction.
21Bottleneck Effect
- The Northern Elephant seal population for example
was reduced to about 20 individuals in the
1890s. Population now gt30,000, but an
examination of 24 genes found no variation, i.e.
there was only one allele. Southern Elephant
Seals in contrast show lots of genetic variation.
2223.8
23Founder Effect
- Populations founded by only a few individuals
(ex island communities) - Gene pool is unlikely to be as diverse as the
source pool from which it was derived. - Example polydactylism (having extra fingers) is
common among the Amish - Founder effect coupled with inbreeding explains
the high incidences of certain recessive diseases
among humans in many isolated island communities.
24Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
- If a population is found to depart significantly
from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium this is strong
evidence that evolution is taking place.
25Natural Selection the primary mechanism of
adaptive evolution
- Primary mechanism of adaptive evolution
- survival of the fittest means individuals
reproduce thus contributing genes to the next
generation - May depend on differences in ability to gather
food, hide from predators, or tolerate extreme
temperatures, which all may enhance survival and
ultimately reproduction
26Natural Selection the primary mechanism of
adaptive evolution
- Three major forms of natural selection
- Directional
- Disruptive
- Stabilizing
-
27(No Transcript)
28Directional Selection
- Favors one extreme in the population
- Average value in population moves in that
direction - E.g. Selection for darker fur color in an area
where the background rocks are dark
29Disruptive selection
- Intermediate forms are selected against.
Extremes are favored - E.g. Pipilo dardanus butterflies. Different
forms of the species mimic the coloration of
different distasteful butterflies. - Crosses between forms are poor mimics and so are
selected against by being eaten by birds.
30Stabilizing Selection
- Most common
- Extreme forms are selected against
- Example Human birth weights. Highest survival
is at intermediate birth weights. - Babies that are too large cannot fit through the
birth canal, babies that are born too small are
not well developed enough to survive
31(No Transcript)