Title: Several mammalian neuropeptide genes are readthrough candidates
 1150 fly genes appear to undergo stop codon 
readthrough
We searched for regions showing clear 
evolutionary signatures of protein-coding 
sequences immediately downstream of D. 
melanogaster stop codons.
We identified 150 strong candidates, where we 
believe translational readthrough is the best 
inference from the available evidence.
- We took steps to eliminate obvious alternative 
 explanations
-  We eliminated recent nonsense mutations (stop 
 codon in D. melanogaster only)
-  We searched for high-scoring splice acceptor 
 sites in the readthrough regions. Canonical
 splicing mechanisms may explain only a few of the
 observed examples.
- Other properties of the group suggest a conserved 
 mechanism
- 95 of the putative readthrough stop codons are 
 perfectly conserved across all aligned species,
 while it is common for normal stop codons to
 wobble or move around
-  The readthrough stop codons are enriched for 
 conserved RNA structures in the vicinity, as
 predicted by EvoFold (J.S. Pedersen)
- The readthrough genes do not appear to be 
 selenoproteins
-  We found no convincing examples of SECIS 
 elements governing selenocysteine recoding
-  Most (68) of the putative readthrough stop 
 codons are TGA, but 32 are not
- The readthrough genes are enriched for nervous 
 system function
-  Enriched Gene Ontology terms 
-  neurogenesis (p1.8e-8) 
-  transmission of nerve impulse (p4.8e-6) 
-  Enriched tissues (from ImaGO in situ data) 
-  ventral nerve cord (p1.6e-5) 
-  central nervous system (p4.2e-5)
We hypothesize A?I editing as a possible 
causative mechanism, based on tissue and RNA 
structure enrichment.
Translation of the potassium channel CG12904 
appears to bypass two stop codons
Several mammalian neuropeptide genes are 
readthrough candidates
OPRK1 (Kappa-type opioid receptor) 
The fly likely has many more polycistronic 
transcripts than currently known
Polycistronic transcripts are single processed 
transcripts containing several disjoint ORFs that 
are each translated into separate polypeptides.
We searched for candidate polycistronic 
transcripts by identifying high-scoring ORFs 
within annotated UTRs of existing transcripts.
Evidence for several programmed translational 
frameshifts
We rediscovered 85 of 115 annotated dicistronic 
transcripts (73) and predict an additional 135 
ORFs in 123 genes.
We searched for candidate translational 
frameshifts by looking for adjacent windows that 
score highly in different reading frames. We 
found four examples where a programmed 
frameshift appears to be the best explanation 
based on available data.
A candidate translational frameshift has a 
striking association with a highly conserved RNA 
structure