CHAPTER 12 CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND REALITY OF CONSENT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

CHAPTER 12 CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND REALITY OF CONSENT

Description:

CHAPTER 12. CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND. REALITY OF CONSENT. DAVIDSON, ... 2004 West Legal Studies in Business. A Division of ... mentally infirm or deranged. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:186
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: JAZ1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CHAPTER 12 CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND REALITY OF CONSENT


1
CHAPTER 12 CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND REALITY OF
CONSENT
DAVIDSON, KNOWLES FORSYTHE Business Law Cases
and Principles in the Legal Environment (8th Ed.)
2
LEGAL CAPACITY
  • For a contract to be considered valid and
    enforceable, the parties must have the legal
    ability to bind themselves to the agreement.
  • Incapacity is the exception, not the rule.
  • Burden of proof regarding incapacity falls on the
    party raising it as a defense to enforce the
    contract or as basis for rescission of the
    contract.

3
LEGAL CAPACITY
  • Law determines contractual capacity by looking at
    the relative bargain power of the parties.
  • Issues of contractual capacity can arise if
    contract involves minors, persons lacking mental
    capacity, aliens, convicts, and in some
    states-married women.
  • Contracts made by these people may be absolutely
    void, voidable (the insane), or valid (if lucid
    when contract was formed).

4
MINORS
  • Most states no longer use common law but instead
    use statutory law.
  • Common Law anyone under the age of 21.
  • Statutory Law in most states those under the
    age of 18.
  • Some states allow for termination of infancy
    status upon marriage or emancipation.
  • Emancipation free from the control or power of
    another.

5
MINORS
  • Disaffirmance/Recission
  • To protect minors in dealing with adults, the law
    allows minors to disaffirm (avoid) their
    contract.
  • Except in certain specialized cases.
  • Necessaries.
  • Disaffirms contract, action results in a voidable
    contract.
  • The right to disaffirm is absolute and personal
    to the minor.

6
MINORS
  • Disaffirmance must be in total to be effective.
  • Minor can disaffirm either expressly (verbal or
    written) or implied by course of conduct.
  • For disaffirmance to be effective, minor must
    objectively manifest intent not to be bound by
    the contract.
  • Duty of Restoration the minor must return to
    the adult the property or other consideration
    that was the object of the contract.

7
MINORS
  • Rescission ability to have the contract set
    aside.
  • Parent or other adult co-sign the contract.
  • Misrepresentation of Age.
  • Minor intentionally misrepresents age.
  • The contract can be voided anytime during age of
    minority or a reasonable time upon reaching the
    age of majority.
  • Power of disaffirmance, whether contract is
    executory or executed.

8
MINORS
  • Ratification.
  • Minor has indicated approval of the contract.
  • Minor has indicated an intention to be bound by
    the provisions of the contract.
  • Takes two separate forms
  • Express or
  • Implied.

9
MINORS
  • Necessaries.
  • Things that directly foster the minors
    well-being.
  • Even is absence of ratification a minor will
    still be liable for transactions if the adult
    provided the necessaries.
  • Rule applied subjectively.

10
MINORS
  • Special Statutes.
  • State Legislatures make minors liable in a
    variety of circumstances according to special
    statutes.
  • Torts and Crimes.
  • Law protects adults interest when an adult has
    suffered losses owing to minors torts and
    crimes.
  • Cannot disaffirm unless minor is of tender years
    (too young to understand the consequences of
    his/her actions).

11
INSANE PERSONS
  • Lack the capacity to make a binding contract.
  • Person must be so mentally infirm or deranged.
  • Lunacy, mental retardation, senility, alcohol or
    drug abuse are irrelevant.

12
INSANE PERSONS
  • Effects of Transactions by Insane Persons.
  • Guardian has the legal capacity to contract.
  • To disaffirm a contract, person must prove
    insanity at the time of contracting.
  • To determine if transaction is void, voidable or
    enforceable depends on facts.
  • Contract is absolutely void if court judges
    insanity.
  • Insane person regains sanity the person may
    ratify contract made during period of insanity.

13
INSANE PERSONS
  • Necessaries.
  • Law makes insane persons liable for necessaries
    in quasi contract.
  • Fewer controversies arise regarding whether
    medical or legal services are necessaries.

14
INTOXICATED PERSONS
  • Validity of a contract depends on the degree of
    intoxication.
  • If intoxication limits mental capacity of the
    individual, contract is voidable at the option of
    the intoxicated person. If mental capacity is
    not affected, contract is valid and enforceable.

15
ALIENS
  • Citizens of a foreign country.
  • Depends on treaties between countries and legal
    and illegal alien designations.
  • Enemy aliens are countries we are officially at
    war, and cannot enforce contracts.

16
CONVICTS
  • Person convicted of a felony or treason has
    certain contractual disabilities, in many states.
  • Disabilities applicable only during imprisonment.

17
MARRIED WOMEN
  • Under early common law, married womens contracts
    were void.
  • Law viewed women as their husbands property.
  • Reflected in Married Womens Property Acts.
  • Almost eliminated by all states by statute or
    judicial decision.

18
THE REQUIREMENT OF REALITY OF CONSENT
  • Law has to ascertain whether consent given by
    parties is real or whether the facts differ from
    those to which the parties have agreed.
  • Law requires reality of consent as a prerequisite
    to form a contract.

19
FRAUD
  • Deliberate misrepresentation of a material fact
    with the intent to induce another person to enter
    into a contract that will be injurious to that
    person.

20
FRAUD
  • Elements of Fraud.
  • Misrepresentation of a fact.
  • Materiality of the fact.
  • Defendant commits scienter.
  • Intent to deceive.
  • Plaintiff relied on the deception.
  • Injury or detriment.

21
FRAUD
  • Silence.
  • At common law mere silence was not fraud.
  • Fraud necessitates some sort of overt
    communication.
  • Cannot be liable for fraud unless said or done
    something.
  • Modern trend is to reject this idea.

22
MISREPRESENTATION
  • Lacks the element of scienter and intent to
    deceive.

23
MISTAKE
  • Occurs when the parties are wrong about the
    existence or absence of a past or present fact
    that is material to their transaction.
  • Parties must be wrong about material facts.
  • Legal mistake not synonymous with ignorance,
    inability or inaccurate judgements relating to
    value or quality.

24
MISTAKE
  • Unilateral Mistake.
  • Only one party is mistaken about a material fact.
  • Bilateral Mistake.
  • Both parties are in error about the essence of
    the agreement.
  • Reformation.
  • Rewrite the contract to reflect the parties
    actual intentions.

25
DURESS
  • Other party has forced one into the contract
    against ones will.
  • Coercion must be extreme that the victim has lost
    all ability to assent freely and voluntarily to
    the transaction.
  • Evidence of physical threats.
  • Threats that cause intense mental anguish.

26
UNDUE INFLUENCE
  • Use of relationship of trust and confidence to
    extract contractual advantages.

27
UNCONSCIONABILITY
  • May signal a lack of meaningful assent to a
    contract.
  • May justify a courts subsequent intervention on
    behalf of the injured party.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com