Agenda Notes

1
Agenda Notes on NREGA for Performance Review
Committee October 08-09, 2009
2
Structure

• National Overview for FY 2009-10 of States on key
  physical and financial parameters
• Detailed analysis of Statewise performance in FY
  2009-10 on following parameters
• unmet demand in FY 2009-10,
• districts with declining performance,
• works relatedcompletion rate wage-material
  ratio,
• notified wages average wages paid
• wage disbursement through accounts
• transparency accountability
• capacity building Personnel Recruited
  trainings
• State cell
• State fund
• MIS Operationalization as on FY 2009-10
• Social Audit
• Ombudsman
• Status of complaints forwarded by MORD VIP
  references

3
NREGA National Overview
4
OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Employment
Provided (In Lakhs)
Employment Provided 3.04 crore HHs
5
OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Employment
Provided (In Lakhs)
6
OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Persondays
Generated (in Crore)
Total Persondays Generated 118.54 crore HHs
7
OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August-09)Persondays
Generated (in Crore)
8
OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August, 09) Average
Personday per Household
National Average 39 Days Phase-I40
days Phase-II35 days Phase-III40 days
9
OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto August, 09) Average
Personday per Household
10
OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10) Women Participation
At least 1/3rd of the beneficiaries shall be
women who have registered and requested for work
under the Scheme (NREGA ACT, Schedule II,
Section 6) Year-2008-09
National Average 51
11
OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10) Major Share of SC/ST
Households in Employment
12
FINANCIAL OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto
August-09)Total Expenditure (in Crore)
Total Available Fund Rs. 26831.21 Crore Total
Expenditure Rs. 14398.64 Crore (54
utilization) Wage Expenditure Rs. 10476.67
Crore (73 of total expenditure)
13
FINANCIAL OUTCOMES (FY 2009-10 upto
August-09)Total Expenditure (in Crore)
14
State wise Analysis for FY 2009-10

• Detailed analysis of Statewise performance in FY
  2009-10 on following parameters
• unmet demand in FY 2009-10,
• districts with declining performance,
• works relatedcompletion rate wage-material
  ratio,
• notified wages average wages paid
• wage disbursement through accounts
• transparency accountability
• capacity building Personnel Recruited
  trainings
• State cell
• State fund

15
Andhra Pradesh
16
Andhra Pradesh

• Districts with high scale of employment
  persondays per households
• Cuddapah, Rangareddy, Kurnool, Vijaynagaram
• Concerns Krishna, W. Godavari, Guntoor
• Strengths
• Administrative structure in place
• High coverage for BPL as well as rural HHs
• 1.22 crore accounts opened strong MOU with Dept
  of Posts
• Social Audits rules formed for the State
• Intensive trainings held
• 100 wage disbursement through Accounts.
• State HR policy for accidental insurance
  medi-claim policy for 4000 dedicated NREGA
  personnel
• Issues in NREGA implementation in the State
• Decline in HH provided employment as compare to
  Aug, 08 Adilabad, Khammam, E. Godavari, Guntoor,
  Kurnool, Nellore and W. Godawari
• Average wage paid higher than Notified wage- most
  of the districts (State Average Rs. 89)
• Low work completion rate Work completion rate is
  only 18 in the state, even though MPR reports
  work of small scale with average 7 households
  and 321 persondays should have high completion
  rate
• AP to integrate state MIS with national MIS
  (NREGAsoft) or populate MIS modules

17
Assam
18
Assam
Strengths Districts with high scale of employment
persondays per households Kokhrajhar,
Concerns Decline in HH provided employment as
compare to Aug, 08 Goalpara, Karbi Anglong,
Darrang, Hailakandi, Marigaon and Nalbari No
works completed in Bogaigaon, N C Hills,
Golaghat, Kamrup (Metro), Karimganj, Nagaon,
Sivsagar, 6040 wage-material ratio not
maintained at district level in Dhemaji, Darrang,
Nalbari, Chirang, Kamrup, Sivsagar, Sonitpur and
Tinsukia Significant variation in avg wages paid
from Notified wage Karbi Anglong (Rs. 139),
Jorhat (Rs. 106), Karimganj (Rs.350), Kamrup
Metro (Rs. 11). No wage disbursement through
accounts in N.C. Hills, Goalpara and Kamrup
(Metro). no reports on MR used/verified N C
Hills GRS not appointed 10 districts State Cell
non constituted State Fund not operationalized
19
Arunachal Pradesh
20
Arunachal Pradesh

• Concerns
• No reporting Upper Subansari, Changlang, East
  Kameng, East Siang, Kurung Kumay, Lower Dibang,
  Lower Subansari, Papum Pare, Upper Dibang, Upper
  Siang and West Siang
• No wage expenditure in Lohit and Tawang.
• Significant variation in avg wages paid from
  Notified wage Tirap (Rs. 71) and West Kemang
  (Rs. 736)
• No wage disbursement through accounts across the
  state
• No reporting on transparency capacity building
  MPR except partial reporting from Tirap.
• No GRS appointment
• State Cell non constituted
• State Fund not operationalized

21
BIHAR
22
BIHAR
Strengths Districts with high persondays per
households Katihar, Supaul, Lakhisarai 100 Wage
disbursement through Accounts. Concerns More
than 10 decline in HH employed in Jamui,
Madhubani, Munger, Nalanda, Purnia, Rohtas,
Samastipur, Vaishali and Most of the Phase-II
districts. Districts with low persondays per
households (less than 14) Madhubani, Nawada,
Khagaria, Paschim Purbi Champaran and
Shiekhpura Low BPL coverage HH employed as BPL
households 19 at State level Low works
completion rate (less than 15) Sheohar,
Vaishali, Champaran, Sitamarhi. (State Average
30) 6040 wage-material ratio not maintained
Bhojpur, Munger, Muzaffarpur, Vaishali, Banka,
Bhagalpur, Gopalganj and Purbi Champaran. Signific
ant variation in avg wages Vaishali (Rs. 103),
Banka (Rs. 105), Khagaria (Rs. 185), Saran (Rs.
98) State Cell non constituted State Fund not
operationalized
23
CHHATTISGARH
24
CHHATTISGARH
Strengths More than 90 Wage Disbursment through
Accounts. Districts with high persondays per
households (more than 50) Bilaspur, Dantewada,
Dhamtari, Jaspur, Kanker, Kawardha, and
Durg Concerns Decline in HH employed
persondays generated in almost all phase I
districts except Rajnandgaon and
Surguja Districts with low persondays per
households (less than 30) Surguja and Baster Low
works completion rate (less than 20) Surguja
Mahasamand 6040 wage-material ratio not
maintained Bilaspur, Korea and Korba. Low wage
disbursement through accounts (Less than 50)
Raigarh, Dantewada and Jaspur Significant
variation in average wage Korea (Rs. 89) State
Fund not operationalized
25
MADHYA PRADESH
26
MADHYA PRADESH
Districts with high persondays per households
(Greater than 60) E. Nimar, Umaria, Anuppur,
Shajapur. Concerns More than 10 decline in HH
employed in over 31 districts out of 48 shows
decline . overall decline is 18 Districts with
low persondays per households (less than 20)
Datia and Hoshangabad Less than 25 coverage of
BPL households Ashok Nagar, Harda, Bhind
,Gwalior, Jabalpur, Neemuch, Raisen, Shajapur,
Ujjain Vidisha Low works completion rate (less
than 10) Sheoni, Sheopur, Ashok Nagar, Datia,
Bhind, Gwalior, Hoshangabad, Narsingpur, Sheohar
and Ujjain 6040 wage-material ratio not
maintained 23 districts out of 48
Districts Significant variation in avg wages
Jabalpur (Rs. 132), Mandsaur (Rs. 127), Neemuch
(Rs. 144), Raisen (Rs. 103)
27
MAHARASHTRA
28
MAHARASHTRA
Districts with high persondays per households
more than 55 Aurangabad, Bhandara, Nandurbar,
Yavatmal, Concerns Low coverage of BPL
households 9 at State level Districts with low
persondays per households (less than 14) Raigad,
Ratnagiri, Sangli, Jalgaon, Thane and Wardha No
work completed in Districts Bhandara, Beed,
Jalgaon, Latur and Pune expenditure on
contingency more than 6 Akola, Jalna, Kolhapur,
Parbhani, Raigad, Ratangiri, Sangli, Satara,
Sindhudurg and Solpur. Significant variation in
avg wages (more than Rs. Gondia, Buldhana,
Osmanabad, Thane, Wardha, Jalgaon, Latur, Nagpur,
Parbhani and Sagli No wage disbursement through
accounts It is only 15 in Phase-II and 45 in
Phase-III districts. GRS not appointed in Wardha,
Ratanagiri, Satara, Sindhudurg. No P.O.s in
Washim, Kohlpour, Nagpur, Pune, Satara,
Sindhudurg Poor quality reporting on MPR some of
the districts shows more than 100 days per HH
like Akola, Wasim and Hingoli.
29
MANIPUR
30
MANIPUR
Strengths HHs employed as of BPL HH 190
Concerns Districts with low persondays per
households (less than 20) Ukhrul, Thoubal and
Tamenlong No report from Vishnupur and Imphal
East No works reported completed in Tamenlong,
Chandel and Churachandpur (only 21 works
completed in the State) Significant variation in
avg wagesTamnelong(Rs. 158), Ukhrool(Rs 3099) No
wage disbursement through accounts in Imphal
West,Tamenlng and Senapati No GRS reported as
appointed in Tamenlong and Thoubal No P.O
reported as appointed in Tamenlong State Fund
not operationalized State Cell not constituted
31
MEGHALAYA
32
MEGHALAYA
Strengths 87 increase in Phase II districts in
employment provided Women participation rate
42 Concerns 29 decline in HHs provided
employment in West Garo Hills Districts with low
persondays per households (less than 20) West
Garo Hills, East Khasi Hills, Jaintia Hills and
all Phase III districts Low coverage of BPL
households 21 in West Khasi Hills, 37 in East
Khasi Hills Low works completion rate less than
20 Jaintia Hill(18) 6040 wage-material ratio
not maintained Jaintai (hills (58) and Phase II
districts (58) No report regarding accounts
West Garo Hills Jaintia Hills and West Khasi
Hills State Cell non constituted State Fund not
operationalized
33
MIZORAM
34
MIZORAM
BPL Coverage 477 Districts with high persondays
per households Champai (49 ) Lawngtlai (46) GRS
appointed in almost all Gram Panchayats Concerns
Districts with low persondays per households
Lunglei (7 days) Low works completion rate No
works completed in Lunglei and Kolasib Significan
t variation in avg wages in all districts
Lawndtlei (Rs. 79) State Averages for wage
disbursement through accounts is only 29 State
Cell non constituted State Fund not
operationalized
35
NAGALAND
36
NAGALAND
Strengths 196 BPL coverage High persondays of
employment provided (gt50) Mokochung (53), Paren
(70), Zunheboto (57) Concerns No works
completed in Wokha, Dimapur, Lawngleg, Zunheboto
6040 wage-material ratio not maintained in
Dimapur (56), Kiphire(56) Significant
variation in average wages Mon (Rs. 330),Phase
III districts (Rs. 48), Phase II( Rs. 74) Low
wage disbursement through accounts in Kohima
(26) No P.Os reported as appointed in
Phek State Cell non constituted State Fund not
operationalized
37
ORISSA
38
ORISSA
Strengths 94 wage disbursement through
accounts 100 MIS operationalization Concerns Ov
erall declines in HHs provided employment
23 Districts with low persondays per households
(less than 20) All Phase III districts (average
19), Anugul (19), Sundergarh (16), Kalahandi
(19) Low work completion rate Only 2 for the
State 6040 wage-material ratio not maintained
Jharsuguda (34), Navarangpur (49), Nuapara
(39), Sambalpur (49), Bhadrak (48) Avg wages
paid higher than Notified wage State Average is
Rs. 92 Less than 50 wage disbursement through
accounts Kandhamal (49), Malkangiri (11),
Khordha (0) P.Os not reported as appointed in
Puri Only 43 accountants are in place
39
GUJARAT
40
GUJARAT
Strengths 80 increase in employment provided
from FY 2008-09 to FY 2009-10 (upto Aug) Full ICT
infrastructure upto the level of the Gram
Panchayat Districts with high persondays per
households Amreli (52), Junagarh (57), Mahisana
(55), Porbandhar (51), Rajkot (61) 100 wage
disbursement through accounts in the
state Concerns Decline in HHs provided
employment Banaskantha(40), Narmada (53),
Navsari (26), Mahisana (27), Surat
(22) Districts with low persondays per
households (less than 14)Tapi (9), Surat
(11) Low BPL coverage- HH employed as of BPL
less than 25 in Dang (19), Bahruch (20),
Valsad (9), Anand (9), Mahisana (6), Surat
(17) Low works completion rate (less than 10)
Banaskantha (4), Dohad (6), Navsari (3),
Valsad (.4), Surendranagar (4) State Cell non
constituted State Fund not operationalized
41
HARYANA

42
HARYANA
Strengths 100 wage disbursement through
accounts High SC participation (59) Concerns Lo
w outreach Only 9 of the HHs as of BPL
provided employment Decline in HHs provided
employment Sirsa(6), Mewat(39), Gurgaon(27),
Jhajhar(23), Rohtak(23), Sonepat
(10) Districts with low persondays per
households (less than 20) Faridabad (10),
Gurgaon (16), Palwal (14) Low works completion
rate for the State 21 No work completed in
Gurgaon, Kurukshetra and Yamunagar Administrative
exp more than 6 in Faridabad, Panchkula,
Panipat, Sonepat Significant variation in avg
wages Jind(Rs. 221), Kaithal (Rs. 165),
Karnal(Rs. 155), Rewari (Rs. 22) GRS not
appointed in Bhiwani, Hissar, Kaithal,
Karnal State Fund not operationalized
43
HIMACHAL PRADESH
44
HIMACHAL PRADESH
Strengths Increase in employment provided and
persondays generated in FY 2008-09 as compared to
FY 2009-10 100 wage disbursements through
accounts State Fund operationalized State Cell
constituted Concerns Decline in employment
provided Hamirpur(15), Kullu (9) 6040
wage-material ratio not maintained Overall
58 Administrative Expenditure more than 6
Lahaul Spiti (7) Significant variation in avg
wages Kinnaur (Rs. 133), Lahul Spiti (Rs.
123) Works completed less than 20 Kinnaur
(17), Lahaul Spiti (17)
45
JAMMU KASHMIR
46
JAMMU KASHMIR
Strengths High persondays of employment Kupwara
(50), Poonch (51), Kishtwar (66) 100 wage
disbursement through accounts in Jammu, Kupwara,
Baramulla, Kathua, Kargil, Pulwana,
Samba Concerns Low Outreach Only 13 HHs as
of total BPL provided employment Decline in HHs
provided employed Poonch (38), Samba
(48) Districts with low persondays per
households (less than 20)Baramulla(9) Kathua
(15) No reporting from Leh, Rajouri, Reasi Only
3 woman participation in the State No work
completed in Bandipore, Baramulla, Kargil,
Udhampur 6040 wage-material ratio not
maintained Kupwara (56), Jammu (42), Kargil
(42) Significant variation in avg wages Kargil
(Rs. 101), Baramulla (93) No GRS reported as
appointed Jammu, Budgam, Kargil, Kulgam,
Rajouri, Srinagar State Fund not operationalized
47
JHARKHAND
48
JHARKHAND
Strengths More than 60 persondays per households
Latehar (89) 97 wage disbursement in 12
districts Lok Adalats held with help of
NALSA 100 reporting of Social Audits on
MIS Concerns Decline in HHs provided
employment 11 Phase I districts (out of 20) (9
decline) Districts with low persondays per
households (less than 20) Khutni (13) Low BPL
coverage Only 34 of total BPL HHs provided
employment Low works completion rate (less than
10) Giridih, (4), Jamatara (7), Ranchi
(0.1), Deogarh (4) 6040 wage-material ratio
not maintained Hazaribagh (50), Jamtara(56),
Ranchi (57), West Singhbhum (56), East
Singhbhum (52), Khunti (52), Ramgarh
(46) Less than 50 wage disbursement through
accounts Latehar (17) State Fund not
operationalized
49
KARNATAKA
50
KARNATAKA
Strengths High Average Persondays/HH
Bellary(56), Kolar (50) 91 wage disbursement
through wages in the State State Fund
operationalized State Cell constituted Full MIS
operationalization Concerns Decline in HH
employed Bellary, Bidar, Chitradurg, Devangere,
Raichur Low BPL coverage 34 HH employed as
of BPL HHs at the State Level Low completion of
works Only 2 at State level No works completed
in 12 districts 6040 wage-material ratio not
maintained Dharwar (58), Ramnagara(55), Uttar
Kannada (54) Significant variation in avg
wages Overall avg. wage Rs. 92 (Phase I Rs.
119) No GRS appointed in Bidar, Ramnagar, Udupi
and Uttar Kannada
51
KERALA
52
KERALA
Strengths 85 women workforce participation in
the State 66 work completion rate in the State
Ernakulum(86), Kannur (84) Pathanamthitta
(90) 100 wage disbursement through wages State
Cell constituted Concerns Decline in HHs
provided employment Phase II districts (9
decline) Districts with low persondays per
households (less than 20) All Phase III
districts High contingency expenditure All
phase III districts (avg. 12), State Average
(9) Significant variation in avg wages
Wayanad(Rs. 135), Ernakulum(Rs.204), Malappuram
(Rs.138), Tiruvananthapuram(Rs.149), Thrissur(Rs.
141) Inadequate computer assistants in all
districts except Idukki State Fund not
operationalized
53
RAJASTHAN
54
RAJASTHAN
Strengths Households employed as of BPL
households 297 Women workforce participation
69 at the State level High persondays of
employment per Household State Average 53
days State Cell constituted State Fund
operationalized Concerns Decline in HHs
provided employment Sirohi (18), Chittorgarh
(21), Tonk(13), Awlar(11), Baran(18),
Bikaner(41), Chruru(14), Dholpur(13),Jodhpur(10
) Low work completion rate State average
16 No works completed in Tonk, Bikaner 6040
wage-material ratio not maintained Karauli
(58) Less than 50 wage disbursement through
accounts Jhalwar, Barmer, Sawai Madhopur, Tonk,
Bharatpur, Bundi, Hanumangarh, Jaipur, Rajsamand
No P.O.s reported as appointed in any of the
districts except Dausa
55
TAMIL NADU
56
TAMIL NADU
Strengths Districts with high persondays per
households Nagapattinam(77), Ariyalur(60),
Dharmapuri(64), Thiruvallur(65) 98 expenditure
on wages GRS appointed in all GPs P.O.s in all
Blocks Concerns Decline in HHs provided
employment Thanjavur(15), Turunelveli(13),
Tiruvarur(21), decline in 10 districts out of 20
Phase III districts (avg. 10 decline) Districts
with low persondays per households
Ramanathapuram(13) 2 districts reporting more
than 100 days/HH Kanchipuram(162),
Pudukkottai(134) Low coverage of BPL households
(lt25) Dharmapuri(23), Kanchipuram(20),
Perambalur(24), Nilgiri(10) Low works
completion rate 17 State Average No work
completed in Cuddalore, Sivagangai, Dharmapuri,
Erode No wage disbursement through accounts at
the State Level State Fund not operationalized
57
PUNJAB
58
PUNJAB
Strengths High SC participation 75 More than
80 wage disbursement through accounts
Concerns Low persondays per households State
Average 19 days, Phase II-25 days, Phase III-17
days Low BPL HHs employed as of BPL HHs State
average 27, Phase II-29, Phase III-23 Low
women workforce participation 26 at the State
level 17 works completion rate at the State
level No works completed in Amritsar,
Nawanshahar, Barnala, Fatehgarhsahib, SAS
Nagar 6040 wage-material ratio not maintained
Amritsar, Barnala, Gurdaspur, Moga, Sangrur, Tara
Taaran More than 6 administrative expenditure
Amritsar, Jullundhur, Gurdaspur,k, Sangrur No
wage disbursement through accounts Moga, Taran
Taran GRS not appointed in Faridkot, Kapurthala,
Ludhiana, Mansa, Moga, Rupnagar, SAS Nagar, Taran
Taaran State Cell non constituted State Fund not
operationalized
59
SIKKIM
60
SIKKIM
Strengths Districts with high persondays per
households South district (49 days) 100
deployment of GRS Concerns No work completed in
East District, only 20 works completed in North
District More than 6 contingency expenditure in
North District (16) Significant variation in
avg wages North District (Rs.37), West District
(Rs. 129) Less than 50 wage disbursement
through accounts West District P.O.s not
appointed in any district State Cell non
constituted State Fund not operationalized
61
TRIPURA
62
TRIPURA
Strengths 53 women workforce participation in
State 77 works completion rate in State Almost
100 MIS operationalization Concerns Decline in
HHs provided employment Phase II districts(84
decline) Low persondays per HH Dhalai (7),
South Tripura(7) West Tripura reporting 147
average persondays per HH 6040 wage-material
ratio not maintained South Tripura (55) Less
than 50 wage disbursement through accounts in
all Phase I and Phase II districts Low work
completion rate in South Tripura(23), North
Tripura(33) State Cell non constituted State
Fund not operationalized
63
UTTAR PRADESH
64
UTTAR PRADESH
Strengths Districts with high persondays per
households (gt60) Chandauli(71), Kaushambi(67),
Jhansi(61), Allahabad(62), Mainpuri(81),
Varanasi(60) 100 wage disbursement through
accounts High SC participation54 State Fund
operationalized Concerns Decline in HH employed
in 26 districts Districts with low persondays
per households (less than 20) Ghaziabad (19),
Meerut (16) Low coverage of BPL households 25
at State level Women participation is only 18
in the State Low works completion rate (less than
10) Chitrakoot(4), Kaushambi(6), Bahgpat
(5), Kashiram Nagar(3) No work reported from
Lucknow, Saharanpur 6040 wage-material ratio
not maintained in 19 districts GRS not appointed
Faizabad, G.B Nagar, Mahamayanage, Meerut
65
UTTARAKHAND
66
UTTARAKHAND
Strengths Districts with high persondays per
households Tehri Garhwal(56), Naintal(49) 37
women participation rate at State level More than
99 wage disbursement through accounts in all
districts Concerns Decline in HHs provided
employment Chamoli(8), Nainital(51) Districts
with low persondays per households (less than
20) Almora(11), pauri Garhwal(16),
Uttarkashi(17) Less than 25 BPL HHs provided
employment all Phase II districts, Dehradun,
Naintaal, Rudraprayag Women participation less
than 1/3 Champawat, all Phase II and III
districts Low works completion rate (less than
20)Haridwar(11), Dehradun(13) 6040
wage-material ratio not maintained Champawat
(56), Uttar Kashi(53) More than 6 contingency
expenditure Almora(9), Pauri Garhwal(10),
Rudraprayag (10) GRS not appointed in
Bageshwar, Dehradun, Rudraprayag State Cell non
constituted State Fund not operationalized
67
WEST BENGAL
68
WEST BENGAL
Strengths Overall 37 increase in employment
provided as compared to last FY 2008-09 88 wage
disbursement through accounts State Cell
constituted State Fund operationalized Concerns
Decline in HHs provided employment Cooch
Bihar(19), Hooghly(7) Low avg. persondays per
HH State Average-19 days, Phase I-20 days, Phase
II-18 days, Phase III-11 days 71 coverage of
BPL households at State level 6040
wage-material ratio not maintained Howarah
(50) Significant variation in avg wage State
Avg- Rs. 84 Wage disbursement less than 50 24
Parganas South GRS deployment less than 50
Dinajpur Dakshin, Cooch Bihar, Purbi Medinipur,
Siliguri Mahakuma Parishad
69
MIS-Issues for Discussion

• Full MIS Operationalization
• MIS operationalization status
• Unemployment Allowance
• Delayed Payments
• Asset Created
• Work execution level
• Updation of the Job cards for information on
  small and Marginal farmers, RSBY, Bank post
  Office Account details, Photos on the Job Card.
• ICT infrastructure at Block penetration of ICT
  infrastructure at GP level.
• Strengthening of the GPs (ICT infrastructure
  Manpower).
• Technical Secretariat at State / District level.

70
Job Cards Muster Rolls in Public Domain
(http//nrega.nic.in)

• Daily 40-50 thousand Muster Rolls are uploaded
  on the website by the States.

71
STATUS OF MIS OPERATIONLIZATION FY 2009-10
72
STATUS OF MIS OPERATIONLIZATION FY 2009-10
73
MIS OPERATIONALIZATION

• MIS Fully Operationalised
• States like Orissa, Karnataka, A.P.
• M.P has declared phase-II III to start
  reporting on MIS from Sep,09 onwards.
• REASONs States have adequate number of GRS at GP
  Level, Computer Assistant ICT infrastructure at
  Block Level.
• States Which have been requested to switch to
  full MIS reporting from Oct, 09.
• States like Tripura, Kerala, Jharkhand, Haryana
  and M.P. (Phase-I).
• GRS Tripura (75), Kerala (98), Jharkhand (93)
  and Haryana (68)
• Computer Assistant at Block Level Tripura (98)
  ,Kerala (100), Jharkhand (61) and Haryana
  (93).
• Computers at Block Level 100 computers in
  Tripura and Kerala.
• AVERAGA PERFORMING STATES ON MIS
• Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Nagaland, West Bengal,
  Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Sikkim, Maharashtra.
• STATES NOT PERFORMING ON MIS (Expenditure less
  than 20)
• Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya,
  Punjab, Mizoram, Bihar, Uttranchal, JK, Manipur,
  Arunachal Pradesh.

74
MIS OPERATIONALIZATION

• AVERAGA PERFORMING STATES ON MIS
• Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, West Bengal, Maharashtra
  , Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Nagaland.
• REASON-?
• Chhattisgarh
• Rajasthan
• West Bengal
• Maharashtra
• Gujarat
• Himachal Pradesh
• Sikkim
• Nagaland.

75
MIS OPERATIONALIZATION

• STATES NOT PERFORMING ON MIS (Expenditure less
  than 20)
• Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya,
  Punjab, Mizoram, Bihar, Uttranchal, JK, Manipur,
  Arunachal Pradesh.
• REASON-?

76
STATEs/DISTRICTs which have not started reporting
on MIS

• JAMMU AND KASHMIR (4) Ganderwal, Kargil, Leh
  (Ladakh), Srinagar
• ARUNACHAL PRADESH (14) Changlang, Lohit, Anjaw,
  East Kameng, East Siang, Kurung Kumey, Lower
  Dibang Valley, Lower Subansiri, Tawang, Tirap,
  Upper Dibang Valley, Upper Siang, West Kameng,
  West Siang.
• MANIPUR (1) Ukhrul
• PONDICHERRY(1) Karaikal
• ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR (1) NORTH AND MIDDLE
  ANDAMAN
• STATES/UTs DAMAN DIU, DADRA NAGAR HAVELI and
  CHANDIGARH

77
STATUS OF UNEMPLOYMENT ALLOWANCE FY 2009-10
78
STATUS OF DELAYED PAYMENT FY 2009-10
79
No. Of WORKS COMPLETED (Asset Created) FY
2009-10
Very few works have been reported completed in
the MIS as compared to the MPR
80
STATUS OF WORK EXECUTION LEVEL FY 2009-10
81
Status of Information on MIS BPL-Families
Registered, Applicants A/C No., HH Photos Uploaded
82
STATUS OF COMPUTERS AT GP LEVEL
83
STATUS OF ICT INFRASTRUCTURE at BLOCK LEVEL

• COMPUTER AT BLOCK LEVEL (92 at National Level)
• 24 States/ UTs have more than 80 of computers
  at the Block Level.
• 10 States / UTs have less than 80 of computers
  at the Block Level -
• Nagaland (65), Punjab (65), JK (41), Aru.
  Pradesh (19), Manipur (3) and States which have
  reported no Blocks with computers are Chandigarh,
  D NH, Lakshdeep and Pondicherry.
• INTERNET AT BLOCK OFFICE (57 at National Level)
• 14 states/UTs have internet connectivity greater
  than 50 at Block Level.
• 9 States/UTs have internet connectivity between
  50-20 at the Block level.
• 11 States/UTs have internet connectivity less
  than 20 are
• Meghalaya, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh,
  ANicobar, Goa, Manipur, Chandigarh, DNhaveli,
  Daman Diu, Lakshadweep and Pondicherry.

84
STATUS OF ICT INFRASTRUCTURE AT BLOCK LEVEL
85
SOCIAL AUDIT

• Social Audit as envisioned under NREGA
• An innovative feature of NREGA, included for the
  first time in the history of rural
• development in India is
• A tool to ensure transparency and accountability
  in all aspects of implementation of NREGA a
  medium to safeguard workers rights
• Gram Panchayats to conduct the Social Audits of
  all works undertaken in NREGA
• Amendment in the NREG Act
• Amendment in the Act on 31/12/08 for laying down
  the processes and procedures of Social Audit
• Social Audit under 100 days plan
• Social Audit included in the 100 days plan of the
  Presidents address
• Social Audits conducted in campaign mode from
  June, 2009 to September, 2009
• Coverage

86
SOCIAL AUDIT PERFORMANCE (June 2009
September 2009)

87
Ombudsman
88
(No Transcript)
89
(No Transcript)
90
(No Transcript)
91
(No Transcript)
92
(No Transcript)
93
(No Transcript)
94
(No Transcript)
95
(No Transcript)
96
Helpline and Greivance Redressal Rules