Title: Experience Reinforced Decision Making
1Experience Reinforced Decision Making
2Experience Reinforced Decision Making
- Evolution of this Discussion/Presentation
- Define the term in context
- Explore its use in the emergency services
- Review some research theory of
- Naturalistic Decision Making
- and when not to use it
- Identify and discuss issues that make it
ineffective or less effective - Discuss ways to improve process and outcomes in
those situations - Comments, Questions, Open Forum
3Experience Reinforced Decision MakingEvolution
of this Discussion/Presentation
A PRESENTATION
- COVERING ISTIC DECISION-MAKING
4Experience Reinforced Decision Making Define the
term in context
Context Fire Emergency Incident
Command EMS Medics / Pre-hospital emergency
care
5Experience Reinforced Decision Making Define the
term in context
- The use of training, experience, and emotional
control to quickly make good operational
decisions by assessing the situation both
intuitively and rationally.
6Experience Reinforced Decision Making Define the
term in context
- Key components
- Training education
- Critiqued experience
- Emotional Control
7Experience Reinforced Decision Making ERD in
Emergency Services
- On-Scene Factors
- Vast quantity of sensory input to process
- Rapidly changing conditions
- Multiple complex operational options
- Significant stressors that can affect
decision-making - Time/Life/Safety..
8Experience Reinforced Decision Making ERD in
Emergency Services
- Factors that facilitate
- Single point entry
- Mentoring profession
- Training Focus
- Other models dont work well
- Significantly self-regulating
9Experience Reinforced Decision Making ERD in
Emergency Services
- Factors that debilitate
- Fewer fires
- Not true of medical runs
- Retention of experienced practitioners
-
- Significantly self-regulating
10Experience Reinforced Decision Making Research
Theory
- Naturalistic Decision Making
- Combines rational and intuitive models
- Experienced agents
- Complex conditions
- Personal consequences
- Situational awareness problem solving as part
of the decision making process
11Experience Reinforced Decision Making Research
Theory
- Recognition Primed Decision-Making
- RPD
- One model of Naturalistic Decision-Making
- Identified by Dr. Gary Klein
- Developed by studying experienced fire ground
commanders - First considered option is viable (key component)
12- Recognition Primed Decision-Making
- Three phases
- Original Two Phase Model
- Simple Match
- First considered action plan is implemented
- Evaluate a Course of Action
- Plan is evaluated for problems by mental
simulation - Added Phase
- Diagnose the Situation
- Situation is diagnosed via pattern matching
and/or story building
13Experience Reinforced Decision MakingWhen not to
use it
- When the experience does not fit the situation
- Knowledge Experience Expertise
- Stress tolerance has been exceeded
14Experience Reinforced Decision MakingWhen not to
use it
- When the experience does not fit
- The decision maker does not have broad enough
experience - The situation is not typical
- Very obvious
- Subtle
15Experience Reinforced Decision MakingWhen not to
use it
- Knowledge Experience Expertise
- Knowledge base not broad or up to date
- Experience not critiqued well
- On outcomes only
- Not enough perspectives
- Not objective
16Experience Reinforced Decision MakingWhen not to
use it
The decision makers stress tolerance has been
exceeded
17Experience Reinforced Decision MakingPrinciples
- Knowledge is easily attainable
- Experience is random (type) and ad-hoc
(frequency) - More experience is better than less
- Critiquing experience well is essential
- Knowledge and critiqued experience in some
proportion expertise
18Experience Reinforced Decision MakingPrinciples
- There is a stress threshold above which stress
has a negative effect on decision making - Knowledge and experience raise the stress
tolerance - We use the ERD methodology automatically when we
gain enough experience to reinforce our knowledge
base
19Experience Reinforced Decision MakingImproving
the process
- Increase knowledge
- Critique experience on
- Process (Operations)
- Outcomes
- Critique experience by
- Self
- Peer
- Mentors
- Supervisors
20Experience Reinforced Decision MakingImproving
the process
- Use simulations in training
- Use decision making games in training
- Understand the stress threshold and practice
emotional control - Steal experience from peers
- Use experience as a factor in assignments of
future leaders
21Experience Reinforced Decision MakingSummary
- There is a synergy between knowledge, critiqued
experience, and emotional control that allows
on-scene decision makers to make effective
decisions more quickly and more intuitively than
traditional rational models. - We do it naturally, but we can improve our use of
the method. - Understanding when not to trust it implicitly may
improve operations and outcomes.
22Experience Reinforced Decision Making
Thank You