Monitoring performance and governance including maternity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Monitoring performance and governance including maternity

Description:

Recode using other published classification for deaths classified as unexplained such as RECODE, Await CEMACH PNM surveillance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:245
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: vaext
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Monitoring performance and governance including maternity


1
Monitoring performance and governance including
maternity dashboard
  • Helen Scholefield
  • Clinical Director Obstetrics
  • Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust
  • Edwin Chandraharan
  • Lead Clinician Labour Ward Clinical Governance
    in Obstetrics Gynaecology
  • St. Georges Healthcare NHS Trust

2
League Tables
  • Organisational performance
  • Annual Health Check
  • Health Care Commission Survey
  • CNST / NHSLA
  • Dr Foster
  • FT Benchmarking
  • CEMACH Perinatal Mortality figures
  • Individual performance in obstetrics
  • Cf cardiac surgeons

3
Clinical Governance in Practice Experience with
Maternity Performance and Governance Score Card
  • Edwin Chandraharan
  • Lead Clinician Labour Ward Lead for Clinical
    Governance in Obstetrics Gynaecology
  • St. Georges Healthcare NHS Trust

4
Background
  • Hypoxic-Ischaemic- Encephalopathy (HIE)
  • - Birth Asphyxia
  • - Short term long term sequelae
  • 6 cases / 2005 at St. Georges ? ?Excessive
  • - External Review Panel ( HIE Panel)

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Areas identified by the HIE Panel for action
  • Communication and Team Working
  • STAN Training
  • Staffing recruitment retention
  • Risk Management Process
  • Education and Training

8
Clinical Governance
  • Framework through which the NHS Organisations
    are responsible for safeguarding good clinical
    practice and continuously improving patient care
    by creating an environment, where clinical
    excellence would flourish
  • How do we assess and monitor the strategies for
    clinical governance on the ground in maternity
    services?
  • How to we effect changes in day-to-day practice?
  • Performance Governance Score Card

9
St. Georges Experience with Performance
Governance Score Card Maternity Dashboard
  • Designed by Prof. Arulkumaran Team Northwick
    Park
  • Recommended by CMOs Report
  • Looks at Activity, Staffing, Clinical Risk
    indicators, User feedback (e.g. complaints)

10
Can Robust and Effective Monitoring through the
Maternity Dashboard help improve Quality of
Patient Care?
11
(No Transcript)
12
Example of an Obstetric assurance presentation to
Board
  • Helen Scholefield
  • Clinical Director, Obstetrics
  • Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust

13
Obstetric Risk Management Strategy
  • Annual update August 07- Needs ratifying by CGC
  • Will be monitored through the Maternity Risk
    Management Group.
  • Associated reports and action plans will be
    monitored by the Risk Management Committee.
  • Risk related reports from the Directorate will be
    further monitored by the appropriate senior
    committee in the Trust.
  • Staff will be informed of the principles of this
    strategy and all associated policies at local
    induction, annual training and workshops
  • Adherence to the principles of the strategy will
    be monitored through associated reports, action
    plans, changes in practice and the PDR process

14
Clinical Indicators
15
Clinical Indicators
16
Perinatal Mortality
  • Stillbirth
  • 2004
  • Neonatal Mortality

2005
2004
17
Comparison with other units with similar referral
patterns (2004)
Unit SB rate Regional rate
LWH 6.5 5.6
Sheffield 6.5 6.4
QCCH 8.3 6.7
St. Michaels Bristol 7.8 5.4
BWH 7.9 5.8
Stillbirth rates for Liverpool Women's Hospital
NHS Foundation Trust (LWH), although higher than
the National rate of 5.7/1000, are similar to
other tertiary referral centres.
18
Stillbirth rate corrected for women who
originally booked and delivered at LWH
Year No. of SB Referrals/ IUT No. originally booked to deliver at LWH Overall SB rate for LWH
2004 52 8 5.6/1000 6.5/1000
2005 47 4 5.3/1000 5.8/1000
2006 53 8 5.6/1000 6.6/1000
19
Can we do better?
2004 2005 2006 OVERALL
Normal care 33/52 (63) 32/47 (68) 37/53 (70) 67
Different management would not have altered outcome 4/52 (8) 2/47 (4) 5/53 (9) 7
Different management may have altered outcome 14/52 (27) 11/47 (23) 9/53 (17) 22
Different management would reasonably be expected to have altered outcome 1/52 (2) 2/47 (4) none 3
20
Themes
  • Themes
  • The major themes identified for were
  • Undetected intrauterine growth restriction/small
    for gestational age babies
  • Late bookers, unbooked women and women who did
    not attend antenatal visits
  • Late transfers for antenatal care from other
    areas
  • CTG misinterpretation
  • Other issues identified were
  • Failure of staff to recognise relevance of past
    obstetric history or complexity of current
    pregnancy
  • Fetal assessment in large women

21
Recommendations
Ensure consistent use of fetal growth charts Ensure robust referral system when suspicion of growth restriction Guidelines- for fetal growth assessment to be updated (to take into account women with BMI gt35 ) and consideration given to charts which are more likely to detect antenatal growth restriction
DNA policy should be robustly implemented. GPs, Community midwives, Health Visitors to be updated on policy. Unbooked women and late bookers to be prospectively discussed in ANC ACE reviews
Guidelines- Antenatal care of women who transfer late in pregnancy and have relevant obstetric history
CTG updates and K2 to include sessions on interpretation of computerised CTG for complex cases such as twins and large women, visual interpretation of computerised CTG which fails criteria and use of clinical context in management
Increase awareness of women re symptoms of obstetric cholestasis (using leaflets, maternity notes)
Continuous audit of stillbirths so themes can be identified
Recode using other published classification for deaths classified as unexplained such as RECODE, Await CEMACH PNM surveillance report 2005, which will aim to report on fetuses that were small for gestational age and the presence of fetal growth restriction
Continue to benchmark with similar Trusts
22
Conclusions
  • How do we improve the detection of the small for
    gestational age fetus at risk of stillbirth?
  • How we improve the stillbirth rate for obese
    women?
  • How do we improve antenatal CTG interpretation
    within the context of the complexity of the case?
  • How do we improve our services for vulnerable
    women, women who book late or transfer care late
    in pregnancy?
  • We need to look at the relationship between
    obstetric practice and high neonatal death rate

23
Adverse Clinical Events
24
Adverse Clinical Events
25
Adverse Clinical Events Themes Trends
Jan- Mar 07 Jan- Mar 07 Oct- Dec 06 Oct- Dec 06 Jul- Sept 06 Jul- Sept 06 April-June 06 April-June 06
Clinical Management 38 Medication 54 Medication 60 Medication 43
Medication 33 Communication 43 Clinical Management 47 Pt records / identification 37
Staffing levels 27 Pt records / identification 36 Admission / Discharge 45 Clinical Management 27
Communication 25 Clinical Management 34 Staffing levels 44 Admission / Discharge 24
Pt records / identification 24 Staffing levels 33 Pt records / identification 29 Communication 19
26
Changes in Practice and their impact
  • Profile and communication relating to anaesthetic
    cover for 24 hour Improved epidural provision
  • Improved relations communication between
    intrapartum areas and deployment of staff, -
    reduction in number of delayed IOL
  • Meditech facility relating to PCI identification
    subsequent care plans for vulnerable women and
    babies utilised - No further ACEs
  • Booking assessment sheet sent to CMW, reducing
    risks of DNA fewer incidents
  • Anti D policy change in procedure- No further
    ACEs
  • Formal record of identification at birth by 2
    individuals - reduction in number of babies
    identified incorrectly following
  • Transfer of management of TC to NICU - Admission
    and transfer improved
  • Medication errors decreased following individual
    feedback
  • TTO storage/ prep area identified -No further
    ACEs
  • Training of clerical staff - Improvement in
    patient record incidents and reduction in record
    unavailability

27
Risk Register
  • 60 on register
  • High risks none
  • Medium and low risk where significant e.g. trends
  • Medication Errors Medicines Management Working
    party
  • Patient Records Out of hours access to Aintree
    notes
  • Lone worker system
  • Poor ergonomics
  • Obstetric Secretaries
  • Specialist MW

28
RR- Changes in practice (controls) and impact of
changes
  • Discharge arrangements
  • Emergency call system on Jeffcoate/ MLU
  • Sinks replaced on Postnatal wards
  • Improved liaison and formal handover between
    Intrapartum areas
  • Improved provision of epidural - reduced number
    of patient complaints and incidents reported
  • Identified process for robust patient information
    review
  • All Obstetric Guidelines now accessible via Trust
    intranet
  • Development of Obstetric Risk Management
    Newsletter

29
Complaints
Jan- Mar 07 Oct- Dec 06
Upheld 7 4
Partially Upheld 1 4
Not Upheld 3 6
Total 11 14
  • Themes
  • Staff Attitude
  • Lack of support on PN ward
  • Assessment room
  • Wrong documentation

30
Clinical Audit
  • Audit programme on target to meet CNST NHSLA
    requirements

31
NICE Guidance
  • Guidelines
  • Compliant with
  • Antenatal Care
  • CS
  • AN PN Mental Health
  • PN Care
  • IPG
  • Compliant with
  • Amnioinfusion
  • Pleuro- amniotic shunt
  • Bladder shunt
  • Cell salvage
  • Other procedures with IPG not done

32
NSF
  • The Action plan has been reviewed regularly
    and updated and is now complete and the
    Directorate declared compliance with
    recommendations

33
Confidential Enquiries
  • Project 27/28. Joint action plan led by Neonatal
    Directorate developed in response to CESDI
    recommendations Action plan completed.
  • CEMACH . Action plan developed in Response to
    National Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and
    Child Health 2004 (2000-2002) Compliant
  • Non-compliance
  • Awaiting Action plan for CEMACH Diabetes Survey

34
HCC Northwick Park Reports
  • Action plan in place
  • Areas of partial compliance
  • Consultant Staffing
  • Hours of DS cover
  • Dedicated cover for CS lists
  • MW staffing shortage on DS
  • 24 Hour theatre cover
  • Interventional radiology

35
Infection Control
  • Concerns re compliance due to impact of key staff
    leaving.
  • Ward managers have been informed of where action
    plans are out of date and audits have not taken
    place.
  • They arranging these and liaising with their link
    midwives
  • Trial of use of PDA for area audits to improve
    timely feedback
  • Will utilize Theatres CC spread sheet which
    identifies when audits are due with hyper links
    into Winning Ways and Saving Lives when these
    assessments are also due
  • Action to take place
  • Complete audits
  • Develop action plans for any lack of improvement
    in practice identified, with additional controls
    put in place where neded.

36
Training
  • NHSLA General
  • Compliant Infection Control, Risk Management
    Incident Reporting, Health Safety training,
    Manual Handling, Blood Transfusion and Basic Life
    Support, corporate/ local induction.
  • Partial compliance
  • Conflict resolution
  • Being Open
  • Protecting Vulnerable adults
  • Safe Guarding Children
  • CNST Maternity
  • 76 of Midwifery staff completed obstetric
    emergency training
  • Expect to reach 90 target by Jan 08
  • Junior medical staff completed as part of
    induction
  • Consultants currently updating. No figures
    received from PG

37
  • NHSLA General Standards CNST Maternity
    Standards
  • All non- compliance noted in NHSLA and CNST
    action plans with identified individual
    responsibility and time frame for submission.
  • Anticipate compliance at level 3
  • Standards for Better Health
  • All non- compliance noted in Standards for Better
    Health action plan with identified individual
    responsibility and time frame for submission.
  • (see Risk Management Assurance Report-
    circulated)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com