Title: Contracts Contrary to Public Policy
1Contracts Contrary to Public Policy
- Unconscionable Contracts/Clauses.
- Exculpatory clauses.
- Case 13.3 Thibodeau v. Comcast Corp. (2006)
- Exhibit 13.1, page 269
- Other Contracts Contrary to Public Policy.
- Contracts that promise to discriminate.
- Contracts to Obstruct legal Process.
- Pre and Post Nuptial (Antenuptial) Agreements.
2Effect of Illegality
- Generally, the rule is that the contract is void.
- Exceptions
- Justifiable Ignorance of the Facts.
- Members of Protected Classes.
- Withdrawal from an Illegal Agreement.
- Contract Illegal through Fraud, Duress, or Undue
Influence. - Severable or Divisible Contracts.
3Introduction
- Contract may be unenforceable if the parties
have not genuinely assented to its terms by - Mistake.
- Misrepresentation.
- Undue Influence.
- Duress.
4Mistakes of Fact
- Only a Mistake of Material Fact allows a contract
to be canceled. - Bilateral (Mutual) Mistakes can be rescinded by
either party. - Materiality Important to the Financial
Consequences (or consideration) of the contract
To The Parties - Classic Case Raffles v. Wichelhaus (1864)
5Mistakes of Fact
- Unilateral Mistakes cannot be canceled unless
- If other party to the contract knows or should
have known that a mistake of fact was made.
SNATCHING UP - If mistake was due to mathematical mistake in
addition, summation, subtraction, division, or
multiplication and was made inadvertently and
without gross negligence. Show Work
6Mistakes of Value
- Generally, contract is enforceable by either
party. - Exception Mistake of value because of a mistake
of material fact. - Case 14.1 Roberts v. Century Contractors, Inc.
(2004). - Has one party assumed the risk?
- Was the risk allocated by the contract?
- Was the risk known to the parties, or was it
known that knowledge was limited? - Is risk to be allocated by the court based on
reasonableness?
7Fraud Misrepresentation
- Contract Voidable by Innocent Party.
- Fraud Tort Elements
- Duty Not to intentionally, by words or actions,
misrepresent a material fact. (but no duty to
disclose) - Breach Intentional Misrepresentation of Material
Fact. - Causation Reliance on Misrepresentation.
- Damages Injury to the Innocent Party, may
include punitive.
8Misrepresentation Has Occurred
- Misrepresentation can be express or implied.
- Concealment.
- Misrepresentation of future facts and statements
of opinion are not fraud, unless person professes
to be an expert. - Misrepresentation of Law is not fraud, unless
person has greater knowledge of the law. - Silence is not fraud, unless serious problem or
defect known or asked and person lied. - Case 14.2 Vokes v. Arthur Murray Inc. (1968).
9Intent to Deceive
- Scienter is an Intent to Deceive.
- Party knowledge that fact is not as stated.
- Party makes a reckless statement with disregard
of the truth. - Party implies that statement is based on personal
knowledge or investigation.
10Reliance on Misrepresentation
- Deceived party must have Justifiable Reliance.
- Depends on the knowledge and experience of the
party relying. - Case 14.3 Fogel v. Enterprise Leasing Co. of
Chicago (2004).
11Injury to the Innocent Party
- No proof of injury is required when the action is
to rescind contract. - Proof of injury is universally required to
recover damages.
12Three Types of Misrepresentation
- (Neg.) Misrepresentation. Same Elements of
Fraud without Scienter, but with Gross
Negligence. Remedy excludes punitive damages - Innocent Misrepresentation. Same Elements of
fraud, but with Duty including disclosure of all
known Materially adverse facts. Remedy merely
voidable contract. - Disclosure Statutes. Duty to disclose, remedy
repair or replace.
13Undue Influence
- Contract is Voidable.
- Confidential or Fiduciary Relationship.
- Relationship of dependence.
- Influence or Persuasion.
- Weak party talked into doing something not
beneficial to him or herself. - Presumption of Undue Influence. (Fiduciary
Duties)
14Duress
- Forcing a party to enter into a contract under
fear or threat makes the contract voidable. - Threatened act must be wrongful or illegal.
- Improper Threat.
- Threat to exercise legal rights (criminal or
civil suit). - Economic or physical.
- Relationship to Blackmail
15Adhesion Contracts and Unconscionability
- Standard-Form (Adhesion) Contracts.
- Preprinted contract in which the adhering party
has no opportunity to negotiate the terms of the
contract. - Take-it-or-leave-it adhesion contracts.
- Unconscionability.
- One sided bargains in which one party has
substantially superior bargaining power and can
dictate the terms of the contract.
16Origins of the Statute of Frauds
- 1677 England passed the law An Act for the
Prevention of Frauds and Abuses. - Certain types of contracts must be in writing and
signed by the party against whom enforcement is
sought to be enforceable. (Has little or nothing
to do with Fraud, per se) - Today, almost every state has a Statute of Frauds
and even if they dont it has become a common law
doctrine applicable to all states. However, this
is almost never the case internationally.
17Contracts That Fall within The Statute of Frauds
- To be enforceable, the following types of
contracts must be in writing and signed - Contracts involving interest in land.
- Contracts which cannot be completed within a year
One-Year Rule. - Collateral or Secondary Contracts.
- Promise made in consideration of marriage.
- Contracts for the sale of goods priced at 500 /
5000 or more.
18Contracts Involving Interests in Land
- Land includes all physical objects that are
permanently attached to the soil buildings,
fences, trees, and the soil itself. - All contracts for the transfer of other interest
in land mortgages and leases. - Exception, leases and licenses for a stated
duration of 1 year or less.
19The One-Year Rule
- A contract that cannot, by its own terms, be
performed within one year from the date it was
formed must be in writing to be enforceable. - One-year period begins to run the day after the
contract is made. - Test Whether performance is possible
(although unlikely) within one year Case 15.1
Sawyer V. Mills
20Collateral Promises
- Primary v. Secondary Obligations.
- Primary Obligation is to the party who receives
the benefit. - Secondary Obligation is to anyone else (exhibit
15-2) - Co-Signors as primary obligors?
- Main Purpose Rule Exception .
- If Secondary Obligation derives as its main
purpose the accomplishment of the purpose of the
third party it is a Primary Obligation in fact.
21Promises Made in Consideration of Marriage
- Prenuptial and Antenuptual agreements must be in
writing and signed to be enforceable. - Contracts must be supported by some consideration
to be enforceable. Marriage alone is insufficient
consideration ie love and affection. - The contracts incidental to marriage are not
within the statute of frauds.
22Contracts for the Sale of Goods
- UCC requires a writing or memorandum for the sale
of goods priced at 500 / 5000 or more. - In a mixed labor / goods contract, look to the
main purpose of the contract. - Total Contract price / not individual item price
- More detail in Chapter 20
23Sufficiency of the Writing
- The Statue of Frauds is satisfied by a writing
that in and of itself is sufficiently definite to
be an offer, recall - Identification of the parties.
- Object or subject matter of the contract.
- Consideration to be paid.
- Time of payment, Delivery, or Performance.
- Multiple Writings can be linked if there is a
factual written basis to do so. - Signature is any mark that provides proof of
authenticity and assent
24Exceptions to S/F
- Judicial Admission If a party judicially admits
the contract, it is enforceable to the extent
admitted. (most states) - Partial Performance If
- a buyer has taken partial possession of property,
and - paid that part of the contract price, and
- if the parties cannot be returned to their
pre-contractual positions
25Statute of Frauds Does Not Apply
- Promissory estoppel
- Unjust Enrichment ( a.k.a. quasi contract,
implied at law)
26The Parol Evidence Rule
- Bars the introduction of evidence of prior or
contemporaneous Oral Statements AND prior Written
Statements to contradict or change an Integrated
Written Contract. - Integrated Contracts. A Contract is integrated if
it is objectively intended by the parties to be
the final and exclusive agreement of the parties. - Integration Clauses
27Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule
- Contracts subsequently modified.
- Voidable or Void contracts.
- Contracts containing ambiguous terms. (i.e.
mistake, fraud, or misrepresentation) - Prior dealing, course of performance, or usage of
trade.
28Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule
- Contracts subject to orally agreed-on conditions
to the existence of the contract (conditions
precedent). - Contracts with an obvious or gross clerical error
that clearly would not represent the agreement of
the parties.
29Introduction
- Typically Only the Parties to a contract have
rights and liabilities under the contract.
(Privity Group) - Exceptions
- Sub-Contractors
- Assignment
- Delegation.
- Third party beneficiaries.
30Assignments and Delegations
- Transfer of contractual rights is an Assignment.
- Transfer of contractual duties is a Delegation.
- A transfer of all rights and duties is generally
known as an Assignment of All Rights
31Assignments
- Transfer of rights in a bilateral contract to a
third party.
32Notice of Assignment
- Once a valid assignment of rights has been made,
the assignee should notify the obligor of the
assignment. - The assignment is effective immediately, whether
or not the assignee gives notice to the obligor. - However, until the obligor receives notice of the
assignment, he may satisfy his contractual
obligations by performance to the assignor even
if the assignor has already assigned her rights
to the assignee.
33Restrictions on Assignments
- As a general rule, all contract rights may be
assigned, except where - (1) the assignment is prohibited by statute
- (2) the contract to be assigned is for personal
services, - (3) the assignment would materially increase the
risk or alter the duties of the obligor or - (4) the contract specifically forbids assignment.
34Exceptions to Restrictions on Assignments
- But if assignment is restricted pursuant to 2 or
4 above, nevertheless it may be assigned if it
is only - (a) the right to receive money,
- (b) rights in, or the alienation of, real
property, - (c) negotiable instruments, or
- (d) the right to recover damages for breach of
contract or for payment of an account under the
UCC.
35Delegations
- Contractual duties in a bilateral contract that
are delegated to a third party.
New Contract?
36Restrictions on Delegation
- As a general rule, all contract rights may be
assigned, except where - When special trust has been placed on the
obligor. - When performance requires personal skill or
talents. - When performance will vary materially from
obligee expectations. - When the contract expressly prohibits delegation.
37Effect of a Delegation
- If the delegation is enforceable, the obligee
must accept performance by the delegatee - However, unless Obligee agrees to the delegation
as a substitution of parties, the Delegator
remains liable.
38Third Party Beneficiaries
- Original parties (Privity Group) to the
contract intend at the time of contracting that
the contract performance directly benefits a
third person. - Intended Beneficiary A third party for whose
benefit a contract is formed. (Has Rights in
Contract) - Incidental Beneficiary A third party who
benefits from the performance of a contract, but
whose benefit was not the reason the contract was
formed. (Has no Rights in Contract)
39Intended v. IncidentalBeneficiaries
- Intended
- Promisee intended to confer on the beneficiary
the right to bring suit to enforce the contract. - Factors
- Performance is rendered directly to 3rd party.
- 3rd partys right to control contract details.
- 3rd party expressly designated as beneficiary.
40Types of Intended Beneficiaries
- Creditor Beneficiary A third party who benefits
from a contract in which the promisor promises to
pay a debt owed by the promisee to the
third-party beneficiary. (Can Sue to Enforce
Contract) - Donee Beneficiary A third party for whose
benefit a contract was made whereby the promisor
promised the promisee to make a gift to the
third-party beneficiary. (Cannot Sue )
41Third Party Beneficiaries
- Party 1 contracts with Party 2 for benefit to
Third Party Beneficiary
performance/ benefit given
42The Vesting of an Intended Beneficiarys Rights
- For third party beneficiary contract to be
effective, rights under the contract must vest - Third partys manifesting assent to the contract.
- Third partys materially altering position in
detrimental reliance on the contract. - Condition of vesting (i.e. life insurance)
43Assignments
- Transfer of rights in a bilateral contract to a
third party.
44Delegations
- Contractual duties in a bilateral contract that
are delegated to a third party.
New Contract?
45Third Party Beneficiaries
- Party 1 contracts with Party 2 for benefit to
Third Party Beneficiary
performance/ benefit given