Title: TREATMENT OF LATE RELAPSE
1TREATMENT OF LATE RELAPSE
- Aude Fléchon
- Centre Léon Bérard
- Lyon, France
- ESMO Symposium
- Munich 15-16 May 2008
2Definition
- Recurrence of disease more than 2 years after
completion of - first line treatment
3BUT (I)
- Definition of late relapse is widely variable.
Some series - restricted to testicular relapsing patients with
viable GCT other than teratoma after CR to
initial chemotherapy - (Ronnen et al J Clin Oncol 2005 23(28)
6999-7004) - included patients with PRm- after initial
treatment - (Gerl et al Ann Oncol, 1997841-47)
- included patients with prior early relapses
- (Baniel et al, J Clin Oncol, 1995 5 1170-1176
Gerl et al annals Oncol, 1997841-47 George
et al,,J Clin Oncol, 2003 21 113-122)
4BUT (II)
- included seminoma pts with clinical stage I
- (Dieckmann et al ,J Urol, 2005 173 824-825
Oldenburg et al Brit J Cancer, 2006 94 820-827,
shahidi et al, Cancer 200219520-525) - included non seminoma pts with clinical stage I
- (Baniel et al, J Clin Oncol, 1995, George et
al,J Clin Oncol, 2003 21 113-122, Oldenburg et
al Brit J Cancer, 2006 94 820-827, Shahidi et
al, Cancer 200219520-525) - included extragonadal GCT
- (Gerl et al annals Oncol, 1997841-47,
Oldenburg et al Brit J Cancer, 200694 820-827) - excluded extragonadal GCT
- (Dieckmann et al ,J Urol, 2005 173 824-825,
Shahidi etal, Cancer 200219520-525) - Definition must be clarified
5Incidence
- Rate of late relapse 2-4
- Incidence is rare
- 3.1 per 1000 person-years of follow-up in non
seminoma - (Ronnen et al J Clin Oncol 2005 23(28)
6999-7004) - 1.4 per 1000 person-years of follow-up in
seminoma - (Oldenburg J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24 5003-11)
- Time interval to relapse 2-32 years
- Median time to relapse 7-10 years
- (Ronnen et al J Clin Oncol 2005 23(28)
6999-7004 George et al J Clin Oncol 200321
113-22)
6Detection of late relapse
- Symptoms 60-72 of cases
- 28-40 of cases elevated serum tumor markers
- AFP 49
- hCG 24
- Radiographic abnormalities
- (Ronnen et al J Clin Oncol 2005 23(28)
6999-7004. George et al J Clin Oncol 200321
113-22) - FDG PET scan
- (De santis, 2004 World J Urol)
- Negative for teratoma
- Risk of negative exam in case of slow progression
disease - Might be useful for patients with normal CT scan
and increased level serum tumor marker
7Major sites of late relapse(Oldenburg J Clin
Oncol, 2006, 24 5003-11)
- Retroperitoneal lymph nodes and retrocrural
involvement 52 - Lung 15
- Mediastinum 11
- Neck and supraclavicular lymph nodes 7
- Pelvis 4
- Other lt 5
8Pathology of late relapse in non seminoma
patientsMichael et al, Am J Sur Path,
200024(2) 257-273
- Active GCT disease 60
- Yolk sac 58
- Glandular
- Clear cell
- hepatoid
- Other GCT 20
- Embryonal Carcinoma 72
- Choriocarcinoma 18
- GCT teratoma 13
- GCT transformed teratoma 9
- Growing Teratoma 22
- Transformed teratoma 18
- Sarcoma 37
- Carcinoma 63 (adenocarcinoma, small cell)
- 60 of the patients have a teratoma component
9Molecular and cytogenetic analysis of late
relapse
- Over-expression of KIT
- (Madani et al, Ann Oncol, 200314873-80)
- Positive EGFR staining
- in the majority of late relapse (more often yolk
sac tumors) - in half of the patients with malignant
transformation of teratoma. - (Madani et al, Ann Oncol, 200314873-80)
- Microarray technology with gene expression
profiling over expression of a small nuclear
ribonucleoprotein 70kD polypeptide gene - in late relapse yolk sac tumor
- not in early relapse
- (Sugimura et al Clin Cancer Res, 200410 2368-78)
10Treatment of late relapsein naive
cisplatin-chemotherapy patients
- Stage I seminoma (surveillance)
- Cisplatin-based chemotherapy, RTE, surgery (warde
et el J Urol 1997, 157 1705-9) - Stage I Seminoma (adjuvant RTE, carboplatin)
- Stage IIA seminoma (RTE)
- Stage I Non seminoma (RPLND or surveillance)
(Baniel et al, J Clin Oncol, 1995) - Stage II nonseminoma RPLND without adjuvant
chemotherapy (George et al J Clin Oncol 200321
113-22) - Cisplatin based chemotherapy and surgery of
residual disease - cisplatin-based
chemotherapy
11Treatment of marker-only late relapse (Gerl et
al annals Oncol, 1997841-47)
- FDG PET scan to identify the site of evolution
- in a minority of patients
- Detection by CT scan in the majority of patients
- Withhold any treatment until the site of
evolution is demonstrated and manageable by
surgical excision - Surgery
12Treatment of late relapse in advanced disease
patients
- Growing teratoma and transformed teratoma
surgery - Viable GCT disease
- Chemotherapy (Baniel et al, J Clin Oncol 1995
131170-76) - Unresectable disease
- Multiple localization
- Chemo VeIP alone 26 CR
- Durable response with chemotherapy alone 3 NED
- Chemo surgery 38 NED
- Which chemotherapy ? (Ronnen et al J Clin Oncol
2005 23(28) 6999-7004) - VeIP ?
- TIP 7 CR and 8 NED / 14 patients
- Surgery when feasible (George et al,,J Clin
Oncol, 2003 21 113-122) - Surgery only 46 NED
- No chemotherapy if the resection is complete and
serum tumor markers have normalized after surgery
13CONCLUSION
- Late relapse is rare
- More frequent in advanced non seminoma
- Importance of post-chemotherapy exeresis of
residual disease - Risk of growing teratoma
- Risk of transformed teratoma
- More often yolk sac tumor
- Resistant to chemotherapy except for chemo-naive
patients - Importance of salvage surgery
- Management in reference center
- Long term follow-up
14 The best definition of late relapse
- Initial diagnosis of advanced seminomatous or non
seminomatous GCT. - Recurrence of disease more than 2 years after
initial treatment (cisplatin-based chemotherapy
/- surgery). - No clinical evidence of second primary tumor at
late relapse (either contolateral testis tumor or
extragonadal tumor). - Recurrence of GCT established by biopsy, serum
tumor marker elevation or progression of
previously stable residual masses.