Crohns Disease Revisited DDW 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Crohns Disease Revisited DDW 2005

Description:

Identifies patients at highest risk for worse. outcome and treat them with potent agents ... Clinical and lab assessment of activity in CD correlate poorly with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:246
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: lsge
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Crohns Disease Revisited DDW 2005


1
Crohns Disease RevisitedDDW 2005
  • Philippe Saniour, MD
  • St Joseph Hospital, Beirut

2
New Therapeutic Goals in Crohns Disease
  • Induction of rapid response and
  • maintenance of remission without steroids
  • Complete mucosal healing of all involved
  • segments and maintenance of healing
  • Complete and permanent closure of fistulas
  • Avoidance of complications, hospitalisations,
  • surgeries and mortality

3
What Factors Predict Individuals Prognosis
  • 1/Clinically Smoking, the need to use steroids
    within the first 6 months after diagnosis, and
    possibly ileal location, with colonic location
    having a better outcome
  • 2/Biologically Higher p-ANCA associated with a
    later age of onset and a UC-like behaviour, and
    high ASCA levels with earlier age of onset and a
    fibrostenoting behaviour
  • 3/Genetically NOD 2 status, with some mutations
  • (L1007FsinsC) leading to a higher risk of
    surgeries

4
Therapeutic StrategiesEpisodic
  • Symptoms based treatment (on flare)
  • Advantages minimize risk of adverse
  • drug effects and cost
  • Disadvantages repeated exposure to
  • steroids, impractical for immune modulators
  • with a slow onset, loss of response because
  • of antigenicity with the new biologic therapies

5
Therapeutic StrategiesStep up
  • Sequential escalation based upon symptoms,
    usually
  • starting with the safest medication but with the
    least
  • efficacy.
  • Most prevalent strategy
  • Advantages minimize risks of adverse drugs
    effects
  • Disadvantages risk of inadequate treatment, not
    targeting
  • the underlying process, i.e. the inflammation and
    the
  • potential complications

6
Therapeutic StrategiesStep on
  • Therapy with a potent agent since the beginning
  • Advantages strong suppression of inflammation
  • from diagnosis
  • Disadvantages Expensive, treats all patients as
    if
  • they have identical risk and lead to unnecessary
  • exposure to adverse drug effects

7
Therapeutic StrategiesStep down
  • Therapy with a potent agent at diagnosis and
    de-escalation
  • of therapy after initial response
  • Advantages robust initial suppression of disease
    and less
  • expensive than step up / step on
  • Disadvantages loss of response to biologics like
  • Infliximab when re-used, and safety concerns
  • about exposing all patients to potent agents

8
Therapeutic StrategiesRisk Stratified
  • Identifies patients at highest risk for worse
  • outcome and treat them with potent agents
  • Advantages appropriate treatment,
  • minimum cost and risk of drugs adverse
  • events
  • Disadvantages prognosis is imperfect

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Crohns Disease RevisitedSelected Abstracts
Diagnosis, Prognosis and Genetics

15
New Diagnostic Tools
  • Etat des lieux
  • Clinical and lab assessment of activity in CD
    correlate poorly with
  • endoscopic findings, thus the need for markers of
    intestinal
  • inflammation
  • Recently, fecal Calprotectin and Lactoferrin are
    being evaluated as
  • surrogate markers for neutrophil influx in the
    bowel lumen
  • Antimicrobial antibodies like ASCA (Anti
    Saccharomyces Cervisiiae
  • Antibodies) and Omp-C (E Coli protein) are also
    used as diagnostic
  • and prognostic indicators of disease activity and
    behaviour

16
New Diagnostic Tools
  • 1/ Gaya et al Fecal Calprotectin on a spot stool
    sample to
  • asses CD activity significant correlation with a
    White Cell
  • Scan with a FC level gt 100 mcg/g 80 sensitive
    and
  • 67 specific.
  • 2/ Sparow et al Fecal ASCA in CD
  • Serum ASCA is present in 50-60 of patients with
    CD.
  • In this study, 11/23 pts with active CD had
    stool ASCA
  • (by ELISA), and none of the 39 controls
  • ? High specificity of fecal ASCA

17
New Diagnostic Tools
  • 3/ JH Boone et al Measurement of Fecal
    Lactoferrin, ASCA and ANCA
  • in non IBD patients and healthy controls ASCA
    100 specific
  • (previous studies ? 92).
  • Borderline elevation of Lactoferrin in lt 6 of
    non IBD and healthy
  • controls
  • 4/ Marceletti et al Antimicrobial antibodies as
    prognostic indicators
  • for CD course
  • 188 pts , using logistic regression analysis,
  • Significant correlation between ASCA (Ig G, IgA),
    Omp C
  • and small bowel localisation, fibrostenotic and
    fistulising disease,
  • as well as requirement for surgery

18
Imaging in Crohns Disease
  • CT Enterography
  • Solem et al Comparison of sensitivity,
    specificity and accuracy of
  • SBFT, Capsule Endoscopy, CT Enterography and
    Ileoscopy in the
  • diagnosis of small bowel CD
  • Ileoscopy and CT have the best accuracy of 85-87
  • Higgins et al CT enterography changed clinical
    management in 67
  • of studied patients (51 pts), regarding addition
    or withdrawal of steroids,
  • despite poor correlation with traditional
    radiology and clinical
  • presentation

19
Crohns Disease and Genetics
  • NOD 2 /CARD 15 gene (Chr 12) ?
  • Intracellular bacterial recognition
  • Toll-like Receptors (TLR 1?9) ?
  • Membrane bound receptors to microbial adjuvents
  • activating innate immune cells
  • Mutations in the NOD 2 / CARD 15 gene (3) more
  • common in CD and confer different phenotypes

20
Genetics
  • Brand et al The role of TLR 4 Asp299Gly
    Mutation and
  • NOD 2 / CARD 15 mutations in susceptibility and
    phenotyping of CD
  • 299 pts and 199 unrelated controls
  • Results
  • 1- TLR 4 mutation in CD v/s controls 14.2 v/s
    7.5
  • 2- TLR 4 mutation confer a stricturing phenotype
    34 v/s 17
  • 3- TLR 4 and NOD 2 - 47 strictures
  • 4- TLR 4 and NOD 2 71 fistulas
  • 5- NOD 2 28 ileal disease ( 15 if NOD 2 -)

21
Genetics
  • Hungarian Survey NOD 2 / CARD 15 Mutations and
    CD
  • Ileal involvement, stricturing behaviour, need
    for resection
  • and younger age of onset
  • European Cooperative IBD study
  • CARD 15 mutations and ASCA on longitudinal
    changes
  • in disease phenotypes
  • Associated with a change from inflammation to
    stricturing
  • and fistulizing (OR 3,2)
  • Conclusion both genetic factors and abnormal
    immune
  • response to bacterial stimuli may play a role in
    the
  • pathogenesis and the behaviour of Crohns Disease

22
Crohns Disease Revisited
  • Selected Abstracts
  • Treatment

23
Treatment Strategy
  • Management of recent onset Crohns disease a
    controlled randomized
  • trial comparing step up and top down therapy
    (Hommes et al)
  • 26 Belgian and Dutch centres, 129 pts with CDAI
    gt 200
  • Initial open label therapy with
  • 1- Infliximab 5 mg/kg on week 0, 2, 6 combined
    with azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg ( top down )
  • 2- Prednisone ( step up)
  • Study end points
  • a- Remission ( CDAI lt 150 ) at 6 and 12 months
  • b- Remission at 6 and 12 months AND no steroids
  • Disease recurrence
  • Td Re-treatment with Infliximab and/or
    Metothrexate
  • Su Re-treatment with steroids or start AZA or
    Methotrexate

24
Treatment StrategyRemission
25
Treatment Strategy
  • Top Down 0 steroids at 6 and 12 months,
  • 25 failed at 6 months and needed
  • additional Infliximab
  • Step up at 6 months, 52 failed and
  • needed more steroids, and at 12 months,
  • 62 were on Azathioprine or Metothrexate
  • Colonoscopy at 1 year (subgroup)
  • Td 75 complete mucosal healing
  • Su 21 complete mucosal healing

26
Infliximab and Immunosuppressors
  • Assess the clinical benefit of continuing
  • immunosuppressive treatment concomitant to
  • Infliximab. (Van Assche)
  • Previous studies have demonstrated the benefit
  • of concomitant therapy in order to decrease
  • immunogenicity and improve outcome.
  • Alternative approach, discontinue
  • immunosuppressant after induction of early
  • immune tolerance to Infliximab over 6 months

27
Infliximab and Immunosuppressors
  • 57 patients
  • Group I 30 pts continued on AZA or Metothrexate
  • Group II 27 pts discontinued treatment
  • All were maintained on Infliximab Q 8 weeks
  • Endpoint flare before next scheduled injection
  • Results 6/29 (Gr I) and 10/27 (Gr II) had a
    flare
  • (P .24 NS) after a mean follow up of 7 months
  • Results suggest that continuing immunosuppressors
  • with Infliximab beyond 6 months may not add any
    benefit

28
Safety of Crohns Therapy
  • TREAT registry data Study the long term safety
    of
  • treatment in CD
  • Patients prospectively followed since 8/2004
  • 6290 pts with more than 10 000 pts year f/u
  • 3179received Infliximab, 87 2 infusions
  • INFX patients had more mod-severe disease (30.8
    v/s
  • 10.3) and more sev-fulminant disease (2.5 v/s
    0.6)

29
Safety of Crohns Therapy
  • Results
  • Mortality INFX v/s others ? .53 py v/s .43 py
  • Incidence of neoplasms including lymphoma .43 py
    v/s .51
  • Serious infection 1.33 py v/s .70 py ( inc.)
  • Multivariable regression analysis, increase in
    relation
  • with severity of disease and prednisone use
  • INFX injection reaction 4.6 of 20309 inj. ,
  • severe reaction in 0.12
  • Conclusion INFX has a similar safety profile to
    other CD
  • therapies despite its use in more severe cases

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
CLASSIC II Open Label CohortConclusion
  • Clinical remission and response increased
  • with long term Adalimumab treatment
  • At 6 months, 71 (156/220 pts) were still
  • taking the treatment with 2/3 of them (98)
  • on Qow schedule
  • Long term administration of Adalimumab
  • is well tolerated with no new safety concerns

37
Natalizumab
  • Humanised monoclonal IgG4 antibody
  • to a4 integrin
  • Phase II study (Ghosh et al, NEJM 2003)
  • Phase III study ENACT-1 (Sandborn et al, AGA
    2004)
  • ENACT-2 (Sandborn et al, AGA 2004, abstract)
  • Followup on ENACT-2 and subgroup analysis
  • (Sandborn et al, AGA 2005)

38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
NatalizumabENACT-2
  • A comparison of
  • sustained v/s point-in
  • time response and
  • remission rates
  • following 12 months of
  • infusions

42
NatalizumabENACT-2
  • Subgroup analysis
  • 1/ Previous exposure to INFX
  • (108 pts 48 Nat, 60 Pla) 48 v/s 10 CR
  • 2/ Failure to INFX (57 pts 24 Nat, 33 Pla)
  • 42 v/s 18 CR
  • 3/ Pts on steroids (143 pts, 67 Nat, 76 Pla)
  • 45 Cr off steroids v/s 17
  • 4/ Pts on Immunosupressors (122pts 62 Nat, 60
    Pla)
  • 52 v/s 23 CR

43
(No Transcript)
44
Interleukin-10
  • IL-10 is a cytokine that down-regulates
  • TH1 Inflammatory response
  • When administered as an infusion, it failed
  • to work
  • Postulation it might act locally and need to
  • be delivered locally in high concentrations

45
(No Transcript)
46
Interleukin-10
  • Braat et al (Amsterdam)
  • Lactococcus Lactis genetically modified to
    produce IL-10,
  • administered orally to 10 pts with active CD for
    7 consecutive days
  • Bacteria present in feces during administration
  • and was absent within 2 days of terminating the
    treatment
  • No dissemination of the transgene observed in
    other bacteria
  • CDAI score decreased by an average of 72
  • during the 1 week treatment

  • ?
  • Lactococcus Lactis IL-10
    Super Probiotic
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com