Electricity capacity planning and Independent Power Producers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Electricity capacity planning and Independent Power Producers

Description:

... Power Producers and lessons learned. Single Buyer Model ... For example, nothing stops the City of Cape Town to buy electricity from Darling Wind Farm ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:410
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: miner4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Electricity capacity planning and Independent Power Producers


1
Electricity capacity planning and Independent
Power Producers
SAWEP WORKSHOP12 March 2007
  • Koena Moholola
  • Director Electricity Supply
  • Koena.moholola_at_dme.gov.za

2
Presentation Outline
  • History of Planning
  • Questions and Answers
  • Energy White Paper of 1998
  • Independent Power Producers and lessons learned
  • Single Buyer Model
  • Conclusion

3
History of Planning
  • the NER introduced the development of a National
    Integrated Resource Plan (NIRP) as an independent
    information source to stakeholders and
    decision-makers for insuring security of the
    supply. The first National IRP (NIRP1) was
    completed and published in March
  • At the beginning of the year 2003, the NER
    established an IRP Advisory and Review Committee
    (ARC) to provide wide stakeholders' contribution
    to the NIRP process.
  • The main functions of the ARC are to approve the
    primary assumptions (technical, economical,
    environmental and social), evaluate the supply-
    and demand options for inclusion in the plan and
    oversee the development process.

4
History of Planning
  • In 2004, NIRP2 was concluded under the guidance
    and approval of the NER NIRP Advisory and Review
    Committee (ARC) by a NIRP team comprising Eskom
    Resources and Strategy Group, Energy Research
    Institute of UCT and the NER
  • Parallel to the NIRP process, Eskom continued to
    develop their own internal plan called Integrated
    System Energy Plan (ISEP)
  • In 2007, the DME introduced the Electricity
    Master Plan which was endorsed by Cabinet
  • Currently, NERSA is finalising NIRP3 while Eskom
    is continuing to update the ISEP

5
Questions and Answers
  • Questions
  • Why is Electricity planning fragmented?
  • Who is responsible for the development of the
    countrys plan?
  • What is the role of key stakeholders in the
    planning process i.e. Government, Eskom, NERSA,
    etc
  • Answers
  • There is a need for a single plan for the country
    to be used for investment decisions
  • In terms of the Electricity Regulation Act, the
    Minister of Minerals and Energy is responsible
    for the electricity plan
  • Government must take the lead in developing the
    electricity plan and work closely with Eskom,
    NERSA and other key stakeholders. It make sense
    to utilise the resources that are already
    available.

6
Independent Power Producers (IPPs)
7
Energy White Paper Position
  • The Energy White Paper (EWP) of 1998 clearly
    stipulates Governments intention regarding the
    introduction of Independent Power Producers
    (IPPs) in the South African electricity market.
  • Stimulating economic development
  • Government will encourage competition within
    energy markets.
  • Government will adjust electricity market
    structures to achieve effective forms of
    competition
  • Securing supply through diversity
  • introducing competition into the industry,
    especially the generation sector
  • permitting open, non-discriminatory access to the
    transmission system

8
Energy White Paper Position cont
  • Electricity market structure
  • Government will initiate a comprehensive study on
    future market structures for the South African
    electricity supply industry.
  • The introduction of Independent Power Producers
    (IPP) will be allowed in the South African
    electricity market.
  • Mechanisms will be put in place to ensure that
    equity and environmental goals are achieved, and
    possibly even accelerated, throughout the market
    restructuring process and thereafter.

9
Policy Principles and Assumptions.
  • Some of the benefits identified by the EWP with
    regard to the introduction of competition and
    private sector participation include
  • increased opportunities to exploit cheaper and
    environmentally benign generation options
  • the potential to increase the level of supply
    security, at a lower cost, through a regionally
    integrated and diversified supply base
  • the potential for efficiency improvements and
  • the potential for downward pressure on
    electricity prices.

10
What has changed?
  • Government decided to re-think its policy
    position regarding competitive electricity
    markets following events around the world
    affecting the electricity industry, the
    California Crisis, the Black out in North America
    and Western Europe, Enron all of these events
    suggested that the state has to put security of
    supply above all and above competition
    especially.
  • In line with the government strategy to reduce
    the cost of doing business in South Africa,
    Government focused on improving the governance of
    the electricity sector.
  • This was done through the development of the
    electricity regulation regime and by modernising
    the existing Electricity Act. The new
    legislation will created an enabling environment
    for new Independent Power Producers (IPP's) and
    improve governance of the electricity suppliers.

11
What has been achieved?
  • In December 2003, Government nominated the
    Department of Minerals and Energy (DME) to
    promote the establishment of new, privately-owned
    power generation projects in South Africa.
  • Government also required the DME to enhance the
    energy sector by promoting fuel diversity
    private sector competition in financing,
    construction and operation Black Economic
    Empowerment through investment and services
    production of least-cost electricity information
    to guide policy on private versus public sector
    procurement.
  • After a rigorous tendering process, the DME has
    appointed a consortium lead by AES as the
    preferred bidder for two peaking power plants.
    It is envisaged that financial closed will be
    reached by the end of the year and the power
    plants will be operational by the last quarter of
    2009.

12
Leasons leaned on the IPP process
  • Due to the fact that the DME IPP was the first
    green field IPP in the country, there was an
    intention to get it right first time.
  • The following parameters were specified upfront
    giving bidders no room to be innovative
  • The location/site of the power plant
  • The plant specification
  • The fuel type
  • Suites of agreements (Power Purchase Agreement,
    Implementation Agreement, Transmission Agreement
    etc)
  • The longer time you take in the procurement
    process, the more costly it becomes. The supply
    chain situation is very tight (EPC contractors
    and equipment manufacturers are smiling all the
    way to the bank)

13
Single Buyer Model
  • Cabinet decided that Eskom must be the single
    buyer of all the power produced by IPPs.
  • There is a task team that is working on the
    mechanisms (including the rules) of the single
    buyer model as mooted by Cabinet
  • However, there is a general consensus that the
    single buyer model is only applicable to large
    scale IPPs. For example, nothing stops the City
    of Cape Town to buy electricity from Darling Wind
    Farm
  • DME position is that the procuring entity must be
    separated from the other operations of Eskom

14
Conclusions
  • DME to provide strategies that inform the country
    plan. Strategies include
  • Nuclear strategy
  • Renewables strategy
  • Imports strategy
  • Climate change strategy
  • Percentage of investment by IPPs and Eskom
  • A critical component of the country plan is
    setting the assumptions. The assumptions
    include
  • Plant availability
  • Load forecast
  • Choice of reserve margin
  • Criteria for deciding on projects such on least
    cost basis
  • Outlook on independent power producers
  • The process of arriving at assumptions must be
    transparent

15
Conclusions
  • It is evident that the IPPs are needed in the
    South African power generation sector to augment
    Eskoms capacity in meeting the growing energy
    demand. Eskom is currently embarking on a R150
    billion infrastructure roll-out programme.
  • With the participation of IPPs in the power
    generation sector, Eskom will have an opportunity
    to pass some of its risks to the private sector
    (IPPs).
  • The IPPs are the only vehicles at the disposal
    Government to ensure meaningful BEE participation
    with regard to equity ownership in the power
    generation sector.
  • Experience has shown that there is sufficient
    market appetite for private sector participation
    in the power generation sector.

16
END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com