Molecular weight determination of ClpB by analytical centrifugation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Molecular weight determination of ClpB by analytical centrifugation

Description:

ClpB is a member of the AAA family of ATPases. ... In the centrifuge the heavier protein molecules (r ~ 1,35 g/cm3) goes outwards ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:411
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: unigrei
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Molecular weight determination of ClpB by analytical centrifugation


1
  • Molecular weight determination of ClpB by
    analytical centrifugation

2
  • Molecular weight determination of ClpB by
    analytical centrifugation
  • Biochemistry, 2003, 42, 14242-48, Kedzierska et
    al.
  • ClpB is a member of the AAA family of ATPases.
    Many other members form 7-membered rings, but
    ClpB seems to form monomers (the tested
    conditions). This was tested with analytical
    centrifugation.

3
  • Molecular weight determination of ClpB by
    analytical centrifugation

4
  • Molecular weight determination of ClpB by
    analytical centrifugation
  • In the centrifuge the heavier protein molecules
    (r 1,35 g/cm3) goes outwards where their
    potential energy is lower
  • But not all protein can go to the bottom of the
    tube because diffusion will push it back to the
    lower concentration (G RTln(c))

5
  • Potential energy
  • w angular velocity (Winkelgeschw., 1 rpm
    2p/60 s-1)
  • v specific volume (1/rP)
  • can be calculated from amino acid
    composition
  • rS density of the solvent
  • Chemical potential

6
  • The total energy of the protein is constant
  • Equilibrium (the difference of the chemical
    potential at r2 and r1 is the same for potential
    and chemical energy)
  • Use r1 as the reference radius r0 and r2 as a
    general radius r and resolve

7
  • Fit to the radius dependent absorption
    (concentration) curve

8
  • Fit to the radius dependent absorption
    (concentration) curve
  • s 2.02 and 2.47 M 20300 and 24900 g/mol

9
  • Fitting to the original data (Abs) is better than
    fitting to the linearized form ln(c(r2)/c(r1)),
    because the relative error for the absorption at
    small radii is larger
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com