HER-2 detection FISH vs CISH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

HER-2 detection FISH vs CISH

Description:

Tests to detect HER ( human epidermal growth factor receptor ) positivity in breast cancer ... Barcelona Spain. Article Breast ( 2006 ) 15, 519-527. study ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:640
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: pri5180
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HER-2 detection FISH vs CISH


1
HER-2 detection FISH vs CISH
  • Mentor Dr David Thomson

2
What is
  • Tests to detect HER ( human epidermal growth
    factor receptor ) positivity in breast cancer
  • FISH -fluroscence in situ hybridisation
  • CISH - chromogenic in situ hybridisation

3
.
  • Since October 1st ,2006
  • (trastuzumab) Herceptin is available on the PBS
    for early breast cancer
  • Treatment cost A 60,000 a year
  • 20 of breast cancers are HER2 ve
  • 13,000 breast cancers diagnosed each year

4
HER-2 testing process
5
Specificity of IHC
  • 2- 5 of HER 2 negative( IHC 0/ 1 ) may be FISH
    positive
  • 5 of ( 3 IHC ) FISH negative
  • 2 results unpredictable

6
protocol
7
How effective
  • Herceptin reduced cancer recurrence by 50 when
    compared to chaemotherapy alone in HER2ve
    patients
  • HER 2 positivity detected by FISH gave the best
    correlation of tumour response to Herceptin

8
FISH -disadvantages
  • Modern expensive fluroscence microscope with
    filters
  • ( St Vincents only centre in NSW )
  • Fluroscence fades quickly (photographic
    record required )
  • Morpological features difficult to visualise

9
CISH
  • Bright field microscope used
  • Permanent record
  • Histological analysis similar to
    immunohistochemistry

10
Study comparing FISH CISH
  • Department of Pathology (UDIAT centre )
  • Barcelona Spain
  • Article Breast ( 2006 ) 15, 519-527

11
study
  • 200 cases of invasive breast cancer
    retrospectively selected
  • IHC ( immunohistochemistry )
  • 2 43
  • 3 62
  • 0/1 95

12
.
  • Microchops treated
  • FISH and CISH technique as per the manufacture
    guidelines
  • Slides were examined by 2 different breast
    pathologists

13
results
  • 174 tumours analysed
  • 39 positive for FISH and CISH
  • 126 negative for FISH and CISH
  • 1 FISH negative CISH positive
  • 8 CISH positive FISH negative
  • Concordance 94.8

14
.
  • 7 cases of FISH ve ( CISH -ve)was due to Cr 17
    polysomy, one case of CISH showed low amplication
  • Negative FISH ( CISH ) revaluation showed low
    amplication FISH

15
results
  • 26 cases were not assessable
  • 16 had inadequate tumour sample
  • 10 cases no hybridisation signals

16
Drawback of study
  • Retrospective analysis of cases in one institute
  • Both Pathologists were from same institute

17
Herceptin protocol for Early breast cancer
  • HER 2 positivity established by ISH test
  • Patient should also have received chaemotherapy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com