Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Prevention and Treatment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 115
About This Presentation
Title:

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Prevention and Treatment

Description:

Subjectively unpleasant sensation associated with the awareness of ... Routine: habitual or mechanical (i.e., mindless) performance of an established procedure ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:433
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 116
Provided by: pscu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Prevention and Treatment


1
Postoperative Nausea and VomitingPrevention and
Treatment
  • Phillip E. Scuderi, M.D.
  • Department of Anesthesiology
  • Wake Forest University School of Medicine
  • Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009

2
Postoperative Nausea and VomitingPrevention and
Treatment
  • http//www.wfubmc.edu/anesthesia
  • pscuderi_at_wfubmc.edu

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Historical Perspective on PONV
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Its Etiology,
Treatment, and Prevention Mehernoor F. Watcha and
Paul F. White Anesthesiology 199277162-184
8
Definitions
Nausea
Subjectively unpleasant sensation associated with
the awareness of the urge to vomit
Retching
Labored, spasmodic, rhythmic contractions of the
respiratory muscles without expulsion of gastric
contents
Vomiting
Forceful expulsion of gastric contents from the
mouth
9
Definitions
Complete Response
No vomiting and no requirement for rescue
antiemetics
Total Response
No vomiting and no nausea
10
Topics
  • Risk factors
  • Pharmacologic approaches to management
  • Adjuvants (nonpharmacologic)
  • Efficacy versus outcome
  • Prevention versus treatment
  • Postdischarge nausea and vomiting
  • Multimodal management

11
Risk Factors
Reasons For Identifying Risk Factors
  • Economics of anesthetic agents
  • Side effects of antiemetic drugs
  • Lacked of increased patient satisfaction

Eberhart LH et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000
44480-488
12
Risk Factors
  • Non-anesthetic factors
  • Anesthetic related factors
  • Postoperative factors

13
Risk Factors
Non-anesthetic Factors
  • Age
  • Gender
  • Body habitus
  • Hx motion sickness
  • Hx PONV
  • Anxiety
  • Concomitant disease
  • Operative procedure
  • Duration of surgery

14
Risk Factors
Anesthetic Related Factors
  • Preanesthetic medication
  • Gastric distension
  • Gastric suctioning
  • Anesthetic technique
  • Anesthetic agents

15
Risk Factors
Postoperative Factors
  • Pain
  • Dizziness
  • Ambulation
  • Oral intake
  • Opioids

16
Postoperative Nausea and VomitingAnesthetic
Related Factors
  • Nitrous oxide
  • NMB reversal
  • Propofol

17
Risk FactorsNitrous Oxide and PONV
18
Risk FactorsNitrous Oxide and PONV
Omitting nitrous oxide from general anesthesia
  • Decreases POV significantly only if the baseline
    risk is high
  • Does not affect nausea or complete control of
    emesis
  • Increases the incidence of intraoperative
    awareness

Tramer et al. BJA 199676186-193
19
Risk Factors Reversal of Neuromuscular Block
  • Omitting neostigmine may have a clinically
    relevant antiemetic effect when high doses are
    used
  • Omitting NMB antagonism introduces a
    non-negligent risk of residual paralysis even
    when short acting NMB agents are used

Tramer MR, Fuchs-Buder T. BJA 199982379-386
20
Risk Factors Propofol and PONV
Analysis by NNT
21
Risk Factors Antiemetic Effects of Propofol
22
Risk Factors
Logistic Regression
Palazzo M, Evans R. Logistic regression analysis
of fixed patient factors for postoperative
sickness a model for risk assessment. Br J
Anaesth 199370135-40.
Koivuranta M, Läärä E, Snåre L, Alahuhta S. A
survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Anaesthesia 199752443-49.
Apfel CC, Greim CA, Haubitz I, et al. A risk
score to predict the probability of postoperative
vomiting in adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
199842495-501.
23
Risk Factors
Logistic Regression
  • Younger age
  • Nonsmoking history
  • Female
  • Hx of motion sickness
  • Hx of PONV
  • Increased duration of operation

24
Risk Factors
Simplified Scoring System
  • Female
  • Nonsmoking history
  • Hx of motion sickness or PONV
  • Use of postoperative opioids

Incidence of PONV
Apfel CC et al. Anesthesiology 199991693-700.
25
Management of PONVPharmacological Approaches
  • Medications
  • Dose response
  • Comparative efficacy
  • Combination therapy
  • Timing of administration

26
Currently Available Medications
  • 5HT3 (serotonin) antagonists - ondansetron
  • Butyrophenones - droperidol
  • Benzamides - metoclopramide
  • Antihistamines - promethazine, dimenhydrinate
  • Steroids - dexamethasone
  • Phenothiazines- promethazine, prochlorperazine
  • Anticholinergics - scopolamine

27
5HT3 Antagonists and PONV
Approved for PONV indication
28
Prevention of PONVOndansetron Versus Placebo
All patients, 0 - 24 hrs



p 0.010 p lt 0.001
McKenzie et al. Anesthesiology 19937821-28
29
Treatment of PONVOndansetron Versus Placebo






p lt 0.001
Scuderi et al. Anesthesiology 1993782-5 Hantler
et al. Anesthesiology 199277A16
30
Ondansetron Dose ResponsePrevention
Numbers Needed to be Treated
  • Only 4 mg and 8 mg were significantly different
    than placebo
  • No further improvement with doses gt8 mg

Tramer et al. Anesthesiology 1997871277-1289
31
Ondansetron Dose ResponseTreatment
Numbers Needed to be Treated
  • All three doses significantly different than
    placebo
  • No significant difference in antiemetic efficacy
    between the three doses of ondansetron

Tramer et al. BMJ 19973141088-1092
32
Breakthrough PONVRepeat Dosing With Ondansetron
p 0.074 p 0.342


Kovac et al. J. Clin Anesth 199911453-459
33
Prevention of PONVDolasetron Versus Placebo









p lt 0.0003 compared to placebo
Graczyk et al. Anesth Analg 199784325-330
34
Treatment of PONVDolasetron Versus Placebo








p lt 0.001 compared to placebo
Kovac et al. Anesth Analg 199785546-552
35
Prevention of PONVOndansetron Versus Dolasetron




p lt 0.05 versus placebo and dolasetron 25 mg
p lt 0.05 versus placebo only
Korttila K et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
199741914-922
36
Prevention of PONVOndansetron Versus Dolasetron
Postoperative Vomiting
No statistically significant differences among
the groups
Zarate E, et al. Anesth Analg 2000901352-1358
37
Prevention of PONVOndansetron Versus Dolasetron
Postoperative Nausea
No statistically significant differences among
the groups
Zarate E, et al. Anesth Analg 2000901352-1358
38
Prevention of PONVOndansetron Versus Droperidol
Complete Response








p lt 0 .05 compared to placebo p lt 0.05
compared to ondansetron 4 mg p ,lt0.05 compared
to droperidol 0.625 mg
Fortney et al. Anesth Analg 199886731-738
39
Prevention of PONVOndansetron Versus Droperidol
No Nausea
p lt 0 .05 compared to placebo p lt 0.05
compared to droperidol 0.625 mg and
ondansetron 4 mg
?

?
?
Fortney et al. Anesth Analg 199886731-738
40
Prevention of PONVOndansetron, Granisetron,
Tropisetron, Metoclopramide

p 0.02 compared to placebo, metoclopramide
Naguib et al. Can J Anesth 199643226-231
41
NK-1 AntagonistsPrevention
Gesztesi Z, Scuderi PE, DAngelo R, et al.
Anesthesiology 200093931-937
42
Prevention of PONVMetoclopramide
  • In summary, metoclopramide, although used as an
    antiemetic for almost 40 years in the prevention
    of PONV, has no clinically relevant antiemetic
    effect . . . it is very likely that the doses
    used in daily clinical practice are too low.

Henzi I, Walder B, and Tramer, MR. Metoclopramide
in the prevention of postoperative nausea and
vomiting a quantitative systematic review of
randomized, placebo-controlled studies. BJA
199983761-771
43
Prevention of PONVDexamethasone
  • In conclusion, in the surgical setting, a single
    prophylactic dose of dexamethasone is antiemetic
    compared with placebo without evidence of
    clinically relevant toxicity in otherwise healthy
    patients. Late efficacy (i.e., up to 24 hours)
    seems to be most pronounced.

Henzi I, Walder B, and Tramer, MR. Dexamethasone
for the prevention of postoperative nausea and
vomiting a quantitative systematic review.
Anesth Analg 200090186-194
Eberhart LH. Morin AM. Georgieff M. Dexamethasone
for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and
vomiting. A meta-analysis of randomized
controlled studies. Anaesthesist. 2000 49713-20
44
Prevention of PONVDexamethasone
  • Dose ranging
  • Major gynecological surgery

P lt0.05 compared with placebo and 1.25 mg
Liu K, et al. Anesth Analg 1999891316-1318
45
Prevention of PONVCombination Therapy
Ondansetron/Dexamethasone
  • McKenzie R, et al. Comparison of ondansetron with
    ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention
    of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth
    Analg 199479961-964
  • Lopez-Olaondo L, et al. Combination of
    ondansetron and dexamethasone in the prophylaxis
    of postoperative nausea and vomiting. BJA
    199676835-840
  • Eberhart LH. Morin AM. Georgieff M. Dexamethasone
    for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and
    vomiting. A meta-analysis of randomized
    controlled studies. Anaesthesist. 2000 49713-20

46
Prevention of PONVCombination Therapy
Ondansetron/Droperidol
  • Pueyo FJ, et al. Combination of ondansetron and
    droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative
    nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 199683117-122
  • McKenzie R, et al. Droperidol/ondansetron
    combination controls nausea and vomiting after
    tubal banding. Anesth Analg 1996831218-1222
  • Klockgether-Radke A, et al. Ondansetron,
    droperidol and their combination for the
    prevention of post-operative vomiting in
    children. Eur J Anesthesiology. 199714362-367
  • Eberhart LH. Morin AM. Bothner U. Georgieff M.
    Droperidol and 5-ht3-receptor antagonists, alone
    or in combination, for prophylaxis of
    postoperative nausea and vomiting. A
    meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.
    2000441252-7

47
Prevention of PONVTiming of Administration
Ondansetron
  • Sun et al. The effect of timing on ondansetron
    administration in outpatients undergoing
    otolaryngologic surgery. Anesth Analg
    199784331-336
  • Chen et al. The effect of timing of dolasetron
    administration on its efficacy as a prophylactic
    antiemetic in the ambulatory setting. Anesth
    Analg 200193906-911
  • Wang et al. The effect of timing of dexamethasone
    administration on its efficacy as a prophylactic
    antiemetic for postoperative nausea and vomiting.
    Anesth Analg 200091136-139

Dolasetron
Dexamethasone
48
Management of PONVAdjuvants (Nonpharmacologic)
  • P-6 acupuncture point stimulation
  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Aggressive perioperative rehydration
  • Preemptive analgesia

49
P-6 Acupuncture Point Stimulation
  • Zarate E, Mingus M, White PF, Chiu JW, Scuderi
    PE, et al. The use of transcutaneous acupoint
    electrical stimulation for preventing nausea and
    vomiting after laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg
    200192629-35.

50
Supplemental Oxygen
  • Greif R, Laciny S, Rapf B, et al. Supplemental
    oxygen reduces the incidence of postoperative
    nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology
    1999911246-52.
  • Goll V, Ozan A, Greif R, et al. Ondansetron is no
    more effective than supplemental intraoperative
    oxygen for prevention of postoperative nausea and
    vomiting. Anesth Analg 200192112-17.

51
Supplemental Oxygen
Greif et al. Anesthesiology 1999911246-1252
52
Supplemental Oxygen
Goll et al. Anesth Analg 200192112-117
53
Intravenous Fluid Therapy
Incidence of Postop Nausea

High Infusion 20 ml/kg Low Infusion 2 ml/kg
Yogendran S, et al. Anesth Analg 199580682-686
54
Pain and PONV
55
Efficacy Versus Outcome
Question
  • Is there evidence to support the hypothesis
    that the demonstrated efficacy of antiemetics in
    the prevention (or treatment) of postoperative
    nausea and vomiting actually results in
    improvement in objective measures of outcome?

56
Surrogate End PointsAre They Meaningful
  • Appropriate end points
  • Duration of PACU stay
  • Incidence of unplanned admissions
  • Patient satisfaction

Fisher. Anesthesiology 199481795-796
57
Measures of Outcome
  • Mortality
  • Morbidity
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Cost

58
Risk of Mortality and Adverse Outcome in a
Tertiary Care Population
Patient Safety in Anesthesia Practice. Morel and
Eichorn (ed)
59
Complications of PONV
  • Electrolyte imbalance
  • Tension on sutures, evisceration
  • Venous hypertension, bleeding
  • Aspiration
  • Delayed discharge (outpatients)
  • Dehydration
  • Unanticipated admission

60
Unanticipated Admissions
Overall Admission Rate 0.01 PONV Admission Rate
0.002
Gold et al. JAMA 19892623008-3010
61
Cost Savings From the Management of PONV
  • Analysis of strategies to decrease
    postanesthesia care unit costs
  • 1. Supplies and medications account for 2 of
    PACU charges
  • 2. Personnel account for almost all PACU
    charges
  • 3. PACU staffing is determined by peak PACU
    patient load
  • 4. Peak PACU patient load is determined by OR
    scheduling
  • 5. Elimination of PONV would decrease PACU stay
    by less than 4.8 which would not be
    sufficient to decrease the level of PACU
    staffing

Dexter et al. Anesthesiology 19958294-101
62
Subject Preference Following Surgery
Preoperative
Orkin FK. Anesth Analg 199274S225
63
Patient Preference Following Surgery
Preoperative
Macario et al. Anesth Analg, 199989652-658
64
Patient Satisfaction With Outpatient Surgery
Postoperative
Tarazi and Philip. Am J Anesthesiology
199825154-157
65
Efficacy Versus Outcome
Question
  • Is there evidence to support the hypothesis
    that the demonstrated efficacy of antiemetics in
    the prevention (or treatment) of postoperative
    nausea and vomiting actually results in
    improvement in objective measures of outcome?

Answer
Other than improvement in patient satisfaction,
it is difficult to demonstrate improvement in
other objective measures of outcome
66
Prevention Versus Treatment
Question
  • Does routine administration of prophylactic
    antiemetics improve outcome when compared to
    rapid symptomatic treatment of postoperative
    nausea and/or vomiting?

Routine habitual or mechanical (i.e., mindless)
performance of an established procedure
67
Hypothesis
  • No improvement in objective measures of outcome
    result from the routine administration of
    prophylactic antiemetics when compared to rapid
    symptomatic treatment of symptoms should they
    occur postoperatively.

68
Efficacy Endpoints
  • Incidence of vomiting
  • Predischarge
  • Postdischarge
  • Rescue antiemetics
  • Nausea
  • PACU entry
  • Time of discharge

69
Outcome Endpoints
  • Time to discharge
  • Rate of unanticipated admission
  • Patient satisfaction with control of PONV
  • Patient satisfaction with outpatient experience
  • Time required for patient to return to normal
    daily activity

70
Methods
  • Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled for
    both prophylaxis and treatment
  • IRB approved, informed consent
  • Patients stratified by risk factors
  • Adults (18 - 65 yrs) undergoing outpatient
    surgery under general anesthesia
  • Anesthetic regimen not controlled
  • Ondansetron used for prophylaxis and treatment
  • Droperidol as rescue

71
Frequency of PACU Treatment by Risk Factors and
Group
Scuderi et al. Anesthesiology. 199990360-371
72
Efficacy of Prophylaxis Overall
Scuderi et al. Anesthesiology. 199990360-371
73
Efficacy of Prophylaxis - Group E
Scuderi et al. Anesthesiology. 199990360-371
74
Outcomes - Treatment vs Prophylaxis Patient
Satisfaction, Time to Discharge
Scuderi et al. Anesthesiology. 199990360-371
75
Outcomes - Treatment Vs ProphylaxisActivities of
Daily Living
Geometric mean - time in hr
Scuderi et al. Anesthesiology. 199990360-371
76
Outcomes - Treatment Vs ProphylaxisActivities of
Daily Living
Survival analysis of indices of normal daily
activity showing fraction of patients not able to
perform one or more of the activities which could
be performed before surgery
Ondansetron prophylaxis
1.0
0.9
Placebo prophylaxis
0.8
0.7
Fraction of patients
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Time from PACU Discharge (hours)
Scuderi et al. Anesthesiology. 199990360-371
77
Prevention Versus Treatment
Question
  • Does routine administration of prophylactic
    antiemetics routine administration of
    prophylactic antiemetics improve outcome when
    compared to rapid symptomatic treatment of
    postoperative nausea and/or vomiting?

Answer
Routine administration of prophylactic
antiemetics does reduce the incidence of emesis
both before and after discharge however, it does
not improve objective measures of outcome
following outpatient surgery except in patients
at the highest risk for symptoms
78
Post Discharge Nausea and Vomiting
  • Incidence
  • Severity
  • Contributing factors
  • Prevention
  • Treatment

79
Strabismus SurgeryPostdischarge Vomiting
Significantly different from metoclopramide
(p0.003) and placebo (p0.025)
Scuderi PE, et al. JCA 19979551-558
80
68
Scuderi PE, et al. JCA 19979551-558
81
Post Discharge Nausea and Vomiting
  • Scuderi PE, Weaver RG, Mims GR III, James RL.
    Ondansetron for the prevention of postdischarge
    vomiting following outpatient strabismus surgery
    in children. Anesthesiology 200093A37
  • Gan TJ, Franiak R, Reeves J, Hartle AJ.
    Ondansetron disintegrating tablets (ODT) reduces
    post-discharge emesis and increases patient
    satisfaction. Anesthesiology 200093A34

82
Postdischarge VomitingOndansetron versus Placebo
Scuderi PE, et al. Anesthesiology 200093A37
83
Postdischarge VomitingOndansetron versus Placebo
Gan TJ, et al. Anesthesiology 200093A34
84
Multimodal Management of PONVHypothesis
  • A multi-modal approach to the management of PONV
    can result in a zero incidence of vomiting (and
    perhaps nausea) in the immediate postoperative
    period (i.e., PACU)

Scuderi at al. Anesth Analg 200091408-414
85
Multimodal Management of PONVExperimental Model
  • Female patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopy
  • ASA I, II, or III
  • Less than 150 of ideal body weight
  • Design Randomized, placebo controlled, single
    blind
  • Interventions Multimodal management, single dose
    ondansetron, placebo

Scuderi at al. Anesth Analg 200091408-414
86
Multimodal Management of PONVAlgorithm for
Management
  • Anxiolysis
  • Aggressive rehydration
  • Propofol-based anesthetic
  • Avoid known triggering agents
  • Multiple antiemetics
  • Preemptive analgesia

Scuderi at al. Anesth Analg 200091408-414
87
Multimodal Management of PONVAlgorithm for
Management
I. PREOPERATIVE A. Anxiolysis - 10-30 mcg/kg
midazolam B. Fluid - 10 ml/kg minimum II.
INDUCTION A. PreO2 B. Droperidol 10
mcg/kg C. Decadron 8 mg D. Propofol - 2 mg/kg
200 mcg/kg/min E. Remifentanil - 1 mcg/kg 1
mcg/kg/min F. Intubate 90-120 seconds G.
Gastric decompression
Scuderi at al. Anesth Analg 200091408-414
88
Multimodal Management of PONVAlgorithm for
Management
III. MAINTENANCE A. Propofol 200
mcg/kg/min x 5 min, then 150 mcg/kg/min x 5 min,
then 100 mcg/kg/min x 5 min, then 75 mcg/kg/min
until 10 minutes prior to end of surgery, then
D/C B. Remifentanil 1 mcg/kg/min until
intubated, then 0.5 mcg/kg/min until trocar,
then 0.25 mcg/ kg/min titrated to effect or
BIS D/C 2-3 minutes prior to end of surgery
C. Ketorolac 30 mg IV after induction D.
Ondansetron 1 mg at end of surgery E.
Fentanyl 25 mcg IV 10 minutes prior to end of
surgery
Scuderi at al. Anesth Analg 200091408-414
89
Multimodal Management of PONVAlgorithm for
Management
IV. PACU A. PONV rescue Dramamine 25 mg
IV B. Pain rescue Fentanyl 25 mcg prn C.
Fluids 25 ml/kg total for OSC stay
Scuderi at al. Anesth Analg 200091408-414
90
Multimodal Management of PONVResults
Group I vs II Group I vs III Group II vs III
Scuderi at al. Anesth Analg 200091408-414
91
Multimodal Management of PONVSummary
  • 60 patients, no emesis in PACU
  • 3 patients with nausea score gt0 (mean 3.5)
  • 1 rescue for nausea (nausea score 3)
  • Time to discharge ready improved
  • No difference in unscheduled day hospital
    admissions
  • 7 patients with emesis after discharge
  • All patients were satisfied with control of PONV

Scuderi at al. Anesth Analg 200091408-414
92
Multimodal Management of PONVSimplified
Algorithm
  • I. INDUCTION
  • A. PreO2
  • B. Propofol 2 - 4 mg/kg
  • C. Opioid prn
  • D. Neuromuscular blockade prn
  • C. Droperidol 10 mcg/kg
  • D. Decadron 8 mg
  • II. MAINTENANCE
  • A. Propofol 50 mcg/kg/min
  • B. Potent inhalation agent
  • C. Nitrous oxide prn
  • E. NMB reversal prn
  • III. EMERGENCE
  • A. Ondansetron 1 mg IV
  • B. Suction oropharynx
  • C. Extubate when awake

93
Multimodal Management of PONVSimplified
Algorithm
Cost Analysis
94
Multimodal Management of PONVConclusions
  • Elimination of PONV in outpatients is possible
    with multi-modal management
  • Algorithm may be institution and/or procedure
    specific
  • Identification of the optimal management
    algorithm may require several iterations
  • Elimination of PONV may not improve objective
    measures of outcome

95
General Recommendations
  • Use generic drugs for routine prophylaxis
  • For high risk patients use combination
    prophylaxis
  • Consider propofol infusion as part of anesthetic
  • Prevent and control pain
  • Treat breakthrough symptoms with 5HT3 antagonists
  • Dont repeat dose with 5HT3 antagonists
  • Treat with different classes of antiemetics

96


97
(No Transcript)
98
Nitrous Oxide and PONV
99
Reversal of Neuromuscular Block
  • Joshi GP et al. The effects of antagonizing
    residual neuromuscular blockade by neostigmine
    and glycopyrrolate on nausea and vomiting after
    ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1999 89628-31
  • Chhibber AK et al. Effects of anticholinergics on
    postoperative vomiting, recovery, and hospital
    stay in children undergoing tonsillectomy with or
    without adenoidectomy. Anesthesiology 1999
    90697-700
  • Hovorka J et al. Reversal of neuromuscular
    blockade with neostigmine has no effect on the
    incidence or severity of postoperative nausea and
    vomiting. Anesth Analg 1997 851359-61
  • Tang J et al. Comparison of rocuronium and
    mivacurium to succinylcholine during outpatient
    laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 1996 82994-8
  • Watcha et al. Effect of antagonism of
    mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block on
    postoperative emesis in children. Anesth Analg
    1995 80713-717
  • Ding et al. Use of mivacurium during laparoscopic
    surgery effect of reversal drugs on
    postoperative recovery. Anesth Analg 1994
    78450-454
  • King MJ et al. Influence of neostigmine on
    postoperative vomiting. BJA 1988 61403-6

100
Propofol and PONV
Analysis by NNT
101
Management of PONVEfficacy
  • Medications
  • Dose response
  • Combination therapy
  • Comparative efficacy
  • Timing of administration
  • Anesthetic related factors
  • Nonpharmacologic approaches
  • Breakthrough PONV
  • Efficacy versus outcome
  • Prevention versus treatment
  • Multimodal management

102
Postop P.O. Intake Requirement
  • Schreiner,M.S. Nicolson,S.C. Martin,T.
    Whitney,L. Should children drink before discharge
    from day surgery? Anesthesiology 199276528-533

103
Costs of Care
104
Cost Savings From the Management of PONV
105
Postoperative SatisfactionEffect of PONV
Postoperative
Cause of dissatisfaction
nausea and vomiting 71
Madej et al. BJA 198658884-887
106
Postoperative Patient Satisfaction
107
Prevention Versus Treatment
The Safety and Efficacy of Prophylactic
Ondansetron in Patients Undergoing Modified
Radical Mastectomy
Sadhasivam S, Saxena A, Kathirvel S, Kannan TR,
Yrikha A, Mohan V. Anesth Analg 1999 891340-1345
  • Randomized, prospective, double blind
  • 54 Female patients undergoing modified radical
    mastectomy
  • Standard anesthetic - thiopental, vecuronium
  • Ondansetron 4 mg or placebo at end of surgery

108
Prevention Versus Treatment
Routine Prophylaxis
  • Does reduce the incidence of emesis both before
    and after discharge
  • Does not improve objective measures of outcome
    following outpatient surgery except in patients
    at the highest risk for symptoms

109
Prevention Versus Treatment
Scoring System
  • 0 no nausea or vomiting
  • 1 nausea alone
  • 2 vomiting once
  • 3 vomiting 2 or more times in 30 min

Treatment
A score of 3 or persistent nausea (gt2 hr)
required Treatment initially with metoclopramide
150 mcg/kg
Sadhasivam S, et al. Anesth Analg 1999
891340-1345
110
Postdischarge VomitingOndansetron versus Placebo
111

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prevention and
Treatment
Phillip E. Scuderi, M.D.
Department of Anesthesiology Wake Forest
University School of Medicine Winston-Salem,
North Carolina pscuderi_at_wfubmc.edu http//www.wfub
mc.edu/anesthesia
112
Editorial The Big Little Problem
Patricia A. Kapur, M.D. Section Editor
Ambulatory Anesthesia and Analgesia
Thus, although there is reason to be hopeful, it
is too early to tell whether ondansetron will
prove to be a significant improvement over extant
therapies for the vexing problem of perioperative
nausea and emesis.
Anesth Analg 199173243-245
113
Risk Factors Reversal of Neuromuscular Block
  • Joshi GP et al. The effects of antagonizing
    residual neuromuscular blockade by neostigmine
    and glycopyrrolate on nausea and vomiting after
    ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1999 89628-31
  • Chhibber AK et al. Effects of anticholinergics on
    postoperative vomiting, recovery, and hospital
    stay in children undergoing tonsillectomy with or
    without adenoidectomy. Anesthesiology 1999
    90697-700
  • Hovorka J et al. Reversal of neuromuscular
    blockade with neostigmine has no effect on the
    incidence or severity of postoperative nausea and
    vomiting. Anesth Analg 1997 851359-61
  • Tang J et al. Comparison of rocuronium and
    mivacurium to succinylcholine during outpatient
    laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 1996 82994-8
  • Watcha et al. Effect of antagonism of
    mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block on
    postoperative emesis in children. Anesth Analg
    1995 80713-717
  • Ding et al. Use of mivacurium during laparoscopic
    surgery effect of reversal drugs on
    postoperative recovery. Anesth Analg 1994
    78450-454
  • King MJ et al. Influence of neostigmine on
    postoperative vomiting. BJA 1988 61403-6

114
NK-1 Antagonists - Treatment
Complete Control of Emesis
Diemunsch et al. Anesth Analg 199886S436
115
NK-1 Antagonists - Treatment
Complete Control of Nausea
Diemunsch et al. Anesth Analg 199886S436
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com