Understanding and Using NAMCS and NHAMCS Data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Understanding and Using NAMCS and NHAMCS Data

Description:

Donald Cherry. Ambulatory and Hospital Care Statistics Branch. Division of Health Care Statistics ... Exercises using SAS Proc Surveyfreq/Proc Surveymeans, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:557
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: CDC2
Learn more at: https://www.cdc.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Understanding and Using NAMCS and NHAMCS Data


1
Understanding and Using NAMCS and NHAMCS Data
  • Data Tools and Basic Programming Techniques
  • Donald Cherry
  • Ambulatory and Hospital Care Statistics Branch
  • Division of Health Care Statistics

2
Overview
  • Some important features of NAMCS NHAMCS
  • File structure
  • SETS
  • Exercises using SAS Proc Surveyfreq/Proc
    Surveymeans, SUDAAN, STATA
  • Downloading data creating a SAS dataset
  • Simple frequencies with/without standard errors
  • Creating a new variable-Asthma
  • Visit rates for asthma-male/female
  • Total number of digestive write-in
  • procedures
  • Time spent with physician
  • Considerations
  • Summary

3
NAMCS and NHAMCS
  • National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS)
  • Visits to nonfederal, office-based physicians
  • CHCs sampled beginning in 2006
  • National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
    (NHAMCS)
  • Visits to hospital outpatient and emergency
    departments

4
NAMCS Sample Design
  • Three stage design
  • 112 PSUs
  • Physician practices within PSUs
  • Patient visits within practices
  • One-week reporting period
  • About 30 visits per doctor are typically sampled
  • For 20063,350 doctors sampled
  • 104 CHCs sampled physician visits included in
    sample
  • Total visits 29,392

5
Scope of the NAMCS
  • Basic unit of sampling is the physician-patient
    visit
  • In scope visits
  • Must occur in physicians office
  • Must be for medical purposes
  • Administrative visits not sampled
  • House calls, emails, phone calls not sampled

6
Scope of the NAMCS (cont.)
  • Physicians must be
  • Classified by AMA or AOA as primarily engaged in
    office-based patient care
  • nonfederally employed
  • not in anesthesiology, radiology, or pathology
  • 64 percent unweighted response rate in 2006
  • CHCs are Federally Qualified or look alike

7
NHAMCS Sample Design
  • Multistage probability design
  • First stage sample of 112 PSUs
  • Hospitals within PSUs
  • Clinics within OPDs, Emergency Service Area (ESA)
    within EDs
  • Patient visits within clinics, ESAs
  • 4-week reporting period
  • 382 hospitals sampled in 2006 35,849 ED visits
    and 35,105 OPD visits

8
Scope of the NHAMCS
  • Basic unit of sampling is patient visit
  • Emergency and outpatient departments of
    noninstitutional general and short-stay hospitals
  • Not Federal, military, or Veterans Administration
    facilities
  • Located in 50 states and D.C.

9
Sample Weight
  • Each NAMCS record contains a single weight, which
    we call Patient Visit Weight
  • Same is true for OPD records and ED records
  • This weight is used for both visits and
    drug/procedure mentions

10
Data Items
  • Patient characteristics
  • Age, sex, race, ethnicity
  • Visit characteristics
  • Source of payment, continuity of care, reason for
    visit, diagnosis, treatment
  • Provider characteristics
  • Physician specialty, hospital ownership
  • MULTUM drug characteristics added in 2006

11
Coding Systems Used
  • Reason for Visit Classification (NCHS)
  • ICD-9-CM for diagnoses, causes of injury and
    procedures
  • Drug Classification System-MULTUM

12
File Structure
  • Download data and layout from website
  • http//www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/ahcd/ahcd1.ht
    m
  • Flat ASCII files for each setting and year
  • NAMCS 1973-2006
  • NHAMCS 1992-2006
  • STATA files on Web
  • NAMCS 2003-2005
  • NHAMCS 2003-2005

13
Creating a usable STATA dataset
  • Two options
  • Use the self-extracting file in STATA folder to
    open a complete dataset for the 2003-2005 NAMCS,
    NHAMCS-ED, NHAMCS-OPD
  • Use the DO file (.do) and the dictionary file
    (.dct) along with the flat data file (.exe) to
    create a dataset
  • StatTransfer

14
Organizational structure-NAMCS data
15
SETS-Statistical Export and Tabulation System
16
Hands-on Exercises
  • STATA Users
  • Double-click My Computer\Local Disk C\DUC_08
  • Open STATA
  • In the command window type
  • Set mem 1000m
  • Set matsize 5000
  • Under the File icon-double-click namcs05.dta
  • Under New Do File Editor-double-click STATA
    exercises.do
  • SAS/SUDAAN Users
  • Double-click My Computer\Local Disk C\DUC_08
  • Double-click Final Exercises

17
Visit rate estimates
Female population800
New variable
Calculation
Phycode Sex Patwt (Patwt/Pop)100 Sexwt
1401 1 100 (100/800)100 12.5
1820 1 300 (300/800)100 37.5
1001 1 50 (50/800)100 6.25
500 1 120 (120/800)100 15
71.25 visits per 100 persons
Sample size4
Visits570
Note Rateest/popS patwt/pop1/popS patwt.
18
Calculating Total Number of Write-in Procedures
Record Proc1 Proc2 Proc3 Proc4 Proc5 Proc6 Proc7 Proc8 Totproc
1 1911 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1
2 2182 2186 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 2
3 5490 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1
4 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0
5 8192 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 8200 2
Note 0000No procedure recorded.
19
Data Considerations
20
NAMCS vs. NHAMCS
  • Consider what types of settings are best for a
    particular analysis
  • Persons of color are more likely to visit OPDs
    and EDs than physician offices
  • Persons in some age groups make
    disproportionately larger shares of visits to
    EDs than offices and OPDs

21
Procedures
Program Categorical Variables Continuous Variables
SAS PROC SURVEYFREQ PROC SURVEYMEANS
STATA SVY TAB SVY MEAN
SUDAAN PROC CROSSTAB PROC DESCRIPT
22
How Good are the Estimates?
  • Depends In general, OPD estimates tend to be
    somewhat less reliable than NAMCS and ED.
  • Since 1999, our Advance Data reports include
    standard errors in every table so it is easy to
    compute confidence intervals around the
    estimates.

23
RSE improves incrementally with the number of
years combined
  • RSE SE/x
  • RSE for percent of visits by persons less than 21
    years of age with diabetes
  • 1999 RSE .08/.18 .44 (44)
  • 1998 1999 RSE .06/.18 .33 (33)
  • 1998, 1999, 2000 RSE .05/.21 .24 (24)

24
Some User Considerations
  • NAMCS/NHAMCS sample visits, not patients
  • No estimates of incidence or prevalence
  • No state-level estimates
  • May capture different types of care for solo vs.
    group practice physicians
  • Data is only as good as what is documented in the
    medical record

25
If nothing else, rememberThe Public Use Data
File Documentation is YOUR FRIEND!
  • Each booklet includes
  • A description of the survey
  • Record format
  • Marginal data (summaries)
  • Various definitions
  • Reason for Visit classification codes
  • Medication generic names
  • Therapeutic classes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com