Active and Passive Reflectance Sensor Comparison in Cotton - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Active and Passive Reflectance Sensor Comparison in Cotton

Description:

Previous work has shown that using spectral reflectance with well-fertilized ... and Cropscan spectroradiometers as in-season N status monitoring tools. Tr ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:147
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: kevinb98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Active and Passive Reflectance Sensor Comparison in Cotton


1
Active and Passive Reflectance Sensor Comparison
in Cotton
  • Kevin F. Bronson

Texas A M Univ. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn.,
Lubbock, TX
2
Introduction
  • Previous work has shown that using spectral
    reflectance with well-fertilized
    plots/sufficiency index approach can improve
    agronomic N use efficiency in LEPA and subsurface
    drip irrigated cotton
  • We hypothesized that reflectance based management
    can be used on long plots/stations with near
    daily N injection
  • We built a 16-station SDI system that we can
    inject N daily as farmers do (not 30 lb N/ac
    doses)

3
Study objectives
  • To assess lint yields and N fertilizer use
    efficiency of UAN (32-0-0) and 28-0-0-5S injected
    between 1st square and mid bloom and 1st square
    and peak bloom
  • To test the GreenSeeker and Cropscan
    spectroradiometers as in-season N status
    monitoring tools

4
Treatments
Tr
ea
t

N
Source

Termination

Other

a

1

32
-
0
-
0

Mid bloom

90
lb N
/ac

a
2

32
-
0
-
0

Peak bloom


90
lb N
/ac

a
3

28
-
0
-
0
-
5

Mid bloom


90
lb N
/ac

a
Peak bloom
4

28
-
0
-
0
-
5



90
lb N
/ac

5

32
-
0
-
0

Peak bloom

45

lb N
/ac
reflect

6

Zero
-
N


1 rep/stn only

a
Treatments 1
-
4

based on 150 lb N/ac

lb NO
-
N/ac in 0
-
24 in. soil

3
-

NO
-
N
in 12 inches of irrigation water
)

3

5
(No Transcript)
6
Plot/station layout (plots are 8, 40-in. rows X
600 ft)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Reflectance methods
  • Measured zero-N, reflectance-based (includes 30
    ft over-fertilized plots), and 32-0-0 to mid
    bloom weekly between 23 June and 9 August
  • Cropscan MSR 16 is a passive spectroradiometer.
    Has 16 upwards and downwards facing radiation
    tranducers/filters. Height of measurement was 48
    inches (24in. fov). Four spot measures (100
    per) per GPS point (4 per 600 foot plot).
  • GreenSeeker (Green) is an active
    spectroradiometer and calculated GNDVI and 1/GVI.
    Wavebands are 530 and 780 nm). Took 6 m of
    measurements (100) per GPS point at 34-36 in
    above canopy.

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Green vegetative index (r780/r530) from Cropscan
MSR16, 48 inches above canopy, Lubbock, TX,
2005
16
Green vegetative index (r780/r530) from
GreenSeeker, 36 inches above canopy, Lubbock, TX,
2005
17
Correlations of GVI from cropscan, GreenSeeker
and SPAD meter readings at early bloom, and peak
bloom, Lubbock, 2005
18
Summary/What next
  • Reflectance-based had 65 lb N/ac injected, we
    hope for same lint yield as soil-test based of 90
    lb N/ac.
  • N Source or timing did not affect GVI.
  • Will repeat study next year.
  • May abandon small well-fertilized plots.
  • Keep the same height above the ground for the
    GreenSeeker for all plots?
  • Or maintain the same height above the canopy for
    GreenSeeker?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com