Title: Chapter 7: The Landscape of Memory: Mental Images, Maps, and Propositions
1Chapter 7 The Landscape of Memory Mental
Images, Maps, and Propositions
2Some Questions of Interest
- What are some of the major hypotheses regarding
how knowledge is represented in the mind? - What are some of the characteristics of mental
imagery? How does knowledge representation
benefit from both images and propositions? - How may conceptual knowledge and expectancies
influence the way we use images?
3- 3 ways the brain creates meaning
4Mental RepresentationsPictures vs. Words
- Pictures
- concrete and spatial information
- analogous to what they represent
- Words
- abstract and categorical information
- symbolic of what they represent
5Mental Imagery
- Internal representation of items that are not
currently being sensed - May involve any of the sensory modalities
- Imagine a taste, a sight, a touch
- Individual differences in creating and
manipulating mental images - Use of mental images can help to improve memory
6Dual-Code TheoryPaivio (1971)
- We use two codes to represent information
- Analogue (pictorial) codes
- Symbolic (verbal) codes
- Two codes are linked
7Visual Codes Processed Differently from Symbolic
Codes
- Each type of code is affected by different
manipulations - Visual interferes with spatial
- Verbal interfere with spoken
- Sequence matters more for words, not so much for
images
8Evidence for Dual-Code Theory
- Brooks (1968)
- One group saw a block diagram of a letter
- Memorized it
- Were asked to mentally travel the letter and
indicate if the corner was on the extreme top or
bottom
Start
9Evidence for Dual-Code Theory
- Brooks (1968)
- Second group saw a sentence
- Memorized it
- Were asked to classify each word as a noun by
indicating yes or no - Verbal task
A bird in the hand is not in the bush
10Evidence for Dual-Code Theory
- Brooks (1968)
- Participants were then asked to respond in one of
two ways - Say Yes or No
- Point to the answer Yes or No
- Why was this important?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
11Evidence for Dual-Code Theory Interference!
Task Verbal Pointing
Letter Diagrams 11.3 sec. 28.2 sec.
Sentences 13.8 sec. 9.8 sec.
For image task, RT was slower when pointing For
the symbolic task, RT was slower for the verbal
response Different pattern different processing
for different codes
12Evidence for Dual-Code Theory
- Participants answered questions about word or
picture pairs
Question Word Stimuli Picture Stimuli
Associated? Mouse-Cheese
Similar size? Thimble-Acorn
13Longer RT to answer the size question about the
word pairs.
14Propositional Theory
- Do not store in form of images
- Instead have a generic code that is called
propositional - Store the meaning of the concept
- Create a verbal or visual code by transforming
the propositional code
15Propositional Representations
16Limits of mental images
17Test Your Visual Imagery Ability!
18(No Transcript)
19Try Again with Another Design
20(No Transcript)
21Now try it with this figure
22Ambiguous figures
- People were unable to discover a second
interpretation from the image - Then drew the figure and could find the other
interpretation - A propositional code may override the imaginal
code
23Labels matter, too
Hourglass or table
Sun or ships wheel
24Results
- Participants were asked to draw items seen
- Participants distorted the images to fit the
labels - This pattern supports the idea that images may be
stored propositionally, not as original analog
image
25Mental Imagery Studies
- Functional-Equivalency Hypothesis
- Mental images are internal representations that
operate in a way that is analogous to the
functioning of the perception of physical objects
26Mental Imagery
- Shepard Metzler (1971)
- Participants had to decide whether displays had
two similar shapes - Some pairs were similar, but rotated to various
degrees
27Shepard Metzler (1971) ResultsUsing
single-cell recordings in the motor cortex, there
is physiological evidence that monkeys can do
mental rotations
28Neuroscience and Functional Equivalence
- Activation in the frontal and parietal regions
occurs when viewing or imagining an image - No overlap in the areas associated with vision
- Schizophrenics have difficulty differentiating
between internal images and perception of
external stimuli
29AI and Spatial Ability video
- What information is essential for navigating in
ones environment? - What form might this spatial information take?
- What information would a robot need to navigate
in an environment and would this differ from what
a human would need? - How do animals do it?
- rats, bees, and pigeons?
30Image Scaling
- Does the rabbit have whiskers?
- Does the rabbit have ears?
- Does the rabbit have a beak?
- Reaction time to answer is measured
31Results
- It took longer to respond to rabbits paired with
elephants than to rabbits paired with flies
32Image scaling
- Asked college students and fourth-graders simple
questions about animals - Does a cat have claws?
- Does a cat have a head?
- Varied the type of instructions
- Imagery vs no imagery
33Results
- In imagery condition
- questions were answered faster if the attribute
was larger - In no imagery condition
- questions were answered faster based on
distinctiveness of characteristic for the animal,
no impact of size
34Size Judgments
- Which is larger, moose or roach?
- Which is larger, wolf or lion?
- The closer in size, the longer the reaction time
35Map drawing activity
- West acres mall
- Red river zoo
- Island park
- City of Fargo
- City of Moorhead
- State of North Dakota
- State of Minnesota
36Image Scanning
- Kosslyn (1983)
- Memorize map
- Later asked to scan image
- Manipulate distance between items in scan
- Hut to grasses
- Lake to hut
- Measure reaction time
37Results
- support for functional-equivalence hypothesis
- Linear relationship between the distance to scan
and actual reaction time of participants - Mental images are internal representations that
operate in a way that is analogous to the
functioning of the perception of physical objects
38Demand Characteristics
- Major criticisms of Kosslyns research
- Pylyshyn
- Only one code, propositional
- Results due to task demands
- Instructions imply some necessary relationship
between the physical distance and time required
39Demand Characteristics Mental Scanning
- Participants give the experimenters the pattern
they expect - Intons-Peterson replicated research but misled
experimenters - If experimenter expectations are part of demand
characteristics, then leading participants to
believe that longer distances would lead to
faster responses should alter the results - Evidence supported demand characteristics idea
40Demand Characteristics Mental Scanning
- Jolicoeur Kosslyn (1985)
- Created a false demand characteristic for a
U-shaped function for participants - Proposed that Gestalt principle of proximity
makes close points hard, and distant points
would also take longer - No experimental expectancy effect found
- Supported idea that image is being used
41Johnson-Laird (1983)
- Proposed there are three types of mental
representations - Propositional representations are pieces of
information resembling natural language - Mental imagery are perceptual models from a
particular point of view - Mental models are structural analogies of the
world
42Characteristics of a Mental Model
- A representation of a described situation rather
than a representation of a text itself or the
propositions conveyed by a text - The structure corresponds to the functional
relations among entities as they would exist in
the world - A simulation of events in the world, either real
or imaginary
43Evidence for Mental Models
- Kerr (1983)
- Studied participants who were blind
- Created a tactile Kosslyn map study equivalent
- Participants had to study the island, given a
physical map to touch - Asked the same scanning questions
- Found the same pattern of resultslonger
distances, longer reaction times
44Visual Imagery Spatial Imagery
- Visual imagery (images are visual)
- Seeing colors
- Comparing shapes
- Spatial imagery (analog spatial format)
- Rotating objects
- Aiming and shooting at a target
45Neuroscience Evidence
- Farah (1988)
- Brain injury case study (L.H.)
- Gave some visual tasks
- Color identification, object naming
- Gave some imagery tasks
- Mental rotation, mental scanning
- Poor visual image skill
- Normal spatial image skill
- Thus, both types of imagery must exist
46In Sum, Researchers Have Proposed
- Evidence for analog codes
- Evidence for propositional codes
- Evidence for mental models
- Evidence for mental imagery that is spatial
- Evidence for mental imagery that is visual
47Cognitive Maps
- Historically
- Tolman rats
- von Frisch bees
- Thorndyke humans
- Gain increased spatial knowledge
- Using three types of knowledge
- Landmark (special buildings)
- Route-road (procedures to get to one place from
another) - Survey (global map-like view)
48Heuristics Affecting Cognitive Maps
- Right-angle bias
- Streets are drawn at 90-degree angles
- Symmetry heuristic
- Irregular geographic boundaries are made regular
- Rotation heuristic
- Tend to regularize tilted landmarks to
appropriate E-W or N-S axis - Alignment heuristic
- represent landmarks and boundaries as better
aligned than they really are - Relative-position heuristic
- Relative positions of landmarks and boundaries
are distorted in ways consistent with conceptual
knowledge