Differentiated Product Marketing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Differentiated Product Marketing

Description:

Commodity v. Product ... traceback to enhance food safety Enhance consumer information about food safety and quality Protect consumers from fraud and producers from ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:259
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: JohnL215
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Differentiated Product Marketing


1
Differentiated Product Marketing
2
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Government-Mandated Traceability
  • Motivations
  • Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
    safety
  • Enhance consumer information about food safety
    and quality
  • Protect consumers from fraud and producers from
    unfair competition
  • Protect domestic producers
  • Voluntary Traceability
  • Motivations
  • Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
    undetectable quality attributes
  • Facilitate traceback for food safety and quality
  • Improve supply-side management

3
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Motivations for Voluntary Traceability
  • Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
    undetectable quality attributes
  • Credence attributes Characteristics that
    consumers cannot discern even after consumption
  • Content attributes Affect actual physical
    properties of product, but difficult for
    consumers to perceive
  • Process attributes Concerned with production
    process, usually cannot be detected even with
    specialized testing equipment

4
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Motivations for Voluntary Traceability
  • Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
    undetectable quality attributes
  • Firms sometimes resort to third-party entities to
    validate claims about quality attributes
  • Examples
  • Good Housekeeping Institute
  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI),
  • Underwriters Laboratories (UL)
  • Council of Better Business Bureaus
  • International Organization for Standardization
    (ISO)
  • Government inspectors

5
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Motivations for Voluntary Traceability
  • Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
    undetectable quality attributes
  • Facilitate traceback for food safety and quality
  • Traceability helps producers reduce time to
    identify and remove contaminated foods from
    production lines and/or from market, before food
    item reaches consumers

6
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Motivations for Voluntary Traceability
  • Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
    undetectable quality attributes
  • Facilitate traceback for food safety and quality
  • Improve supply-side management
  • Traceability helps manage product flows and track
    retail activity

7
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Motivations for Mandatory Traceability
  • Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
    safety
  • Mandatory traceability enables authorities to
    identify sources of food contamination/hazards
    and contain risks faster

8
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Motivations for Mandatory Traceability
  • Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
    safety
  • Enhance consumer information about food safety
    and quality
  • If producers are not providing as much
    information about safety/quality as consumers
    desire, mandated traceability may allow consumers
    to choose food products better matching their
    preferences

9
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Motivations of Mandatory Traceability
  • Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
    safety
  • Enhance consumer information about food safety
    and quality
  • Protect consumers from fraud and producers from
    unfair competition
  • By enforcing traceability, the government may
    assure consumers and competitors that firms
    claiming to sell products with credence
    attributes can substantiate their claims

10
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Motivations of Mandatory Traceability
  • Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
    safety
  • Enhance consumer information about food safety
    and quality
  • Protect consumers from fraud and producers from
    unfair competition
  • Protect domestic producers
  • Mandatory traceability to identify domestically
    produced vs. imported foods may allow domestic
    producers to command a premium

11
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Examples of Mandatory Traceability
  • Certified Organic
  • Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL)
  • Age verification for Japan
  • Grass-fed beef
  • Naturally raised livestock

12
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Examples of Mandatory Traceability
  • Certified Organic Products
  • Products grown and processed according to USDAs
    national organic standards and certified by
    USDA-accredited State and private certification
    organizations
  • Organic Foods Act of 1990 established national
    standards for organically produced commodities
  • Organic growers must have to be certified under
    USDAs National Organic Program
  • A person may sell or label an agricultural
    product as organically produced only if product
    has been produced and handled in accordance with
    National Organic Program

13
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Examples of Mandatory Traceability
  • Certified Organic Products

14
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Examples of Mandatory Traceability
  • Certified Organic Products

15
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL)
  • 2002 Farm Act
  • Retailers must ensure verifiable audit trail
  • COOL not required for foods that are ingredients
    of processed food items
  • Foodservice establishments exempt from COOL
  • Unknown origin label not allowed
  • 2002 Farm Act
  • Was to become mandatory Sept 30, 2004
  • Delayed until Sept 30, 2006
  • Delayed again until Sept 30, 2008

16
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL)
  • Disagreement on how to implement
  • Presumed US
  • Make importers label
  • Anything not labeled is presumed to be US
  • Verifiable audit trail
  • Move the product with a signed affidavit
  • Keep records to back up claim if audited
  • Regardless of cost at farm level there is a cost
    beyond the farm gate to segregate and document

17
NAIS is NOT COOL
  • COOL is an amendment to the 1946 Agricultural
    Marketing Act
  • Retailers inform all consumers
  • Sec of Ag cannot implement traceback
  • NAIS (National Animal Identification System)
  • Animal health surveillance
  • Confidential system, only federal veterinarians

18
The Proposed NAIS System
19
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • ISO, Greek for equal
  • International standard for quality systems
  • In a nutshell
  • Say what you do
  • Do what you say
  • Document it with records

20
SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
  • Age verification for Japan
  • Japan will accept 20 months or less
  • Two methods to confirm age
  • Physiological maturity A40
  • Production records
  • Need records to export variety meat
  • Based on ISO principles

21
Age verification for Japan
  • Signed affidavits alone are not sufficient to
    qualify cattle for the EV Program for Japan.
  • Cattle must be approved either through an
    approved USDA Process Verified Program or QSA
    Program. These Programs require supplier
    evaluations and re-evaluations.

22
Age verification for JapanQuality Management
System
  • A written management system that must address
  • Documentation Requirements
  • Management Responsibility
  • Resource Management
  • Production of Product
  • Measurement, Analysis and Improvement
  • Record Requirements

23
Age verification for JapanProducer Requirements
  • Records to validate age
  • Procedures Farm or Ranch Plan
  • Written management plan
  • Records to validate activities
  • Must be repeatable
  • Producer is evaluated by company and/or USDA to
    verify conformance.

24
Age verification for JapanManagement Plan
  • Describe operation/farm
  • Define practice
  • What is done
  • Who does it and how are they trained
  • How is it recorded
  • Where are the records

25
(No Transcript)
26
Product v. Process Certification
  • Tighter product specification
  • Sorted by processor
  • Process specification
  • How it is produced
  • Role of and return to producer????

27
Commodity v. Product
  • Commodity
  • Undifferentiated
  • Perfectly competitive markets
  • Products
  • Differentiated
  • Monopoly - Workable competition
  • Niche Market, branded, labeled, etc

28
Motivation
  • Commodity market
  • Price takers
  • Cost driven
  • Long-run Pminimum ATC
  • Product markets
  • Price makers
  • Costs not as important
  • Potential for sustained higher profit margins

29
Commodity system
  • Extremely efficient
  • Challenges
  • Co-mingling from many sources
  • Consumers signals not transmitted
  • Little incentive to improve because benefits not
    passed through to producer
  • Expand to capture economies of size

30
Product system
  • How to differentiate?
  • Managed supply chain
  • Allows traceback to producer
  • Restricts production
  • Focus on quality

31
Procedures
  • Why is the product different?
  • How it is produced
  • Where it is produced
  • What is produced
  • What it includes
  • What it doesnt include
  • Develop marketing around the difference

32
Procedures
  • Limit production and access to control supply
  • Cant look like price fixing to regulators
  • Geographical restrictions
  • Swiss cheese
  • Champaign
  • Trade secret
  • Emphasis on quality
  • Traceability to verify

33
Farmer-Owned BrandsHayes and Lence
  • Parma Ham
  • Restricts area where ham can be cured
  • Claim unique climate and winds
  • Restricts breeds and regions where hogs can be
    produced
  • Italian hog prices averaged 7.44 more than
    German hogs 1999-2001

34
Farmer-Owned BrandsHayes and Lence
  • Vidalia Onions
  • Selected region in south Georgia
  • Used existing state law to restrict area
  • State-owned trademark
  • Premiums of .30-.34 per pound
  • First spring sales are 30-50 higher

35
Iowa 80 Beef
  • Minimum Certification Requirements
  • Verified to be sired by a 100 Angus bull.
  • Source verified to the farm of birth using an
    identification system
  • Fed in an Iowa feedlot for a minimum of 180 days.
  • Fed a high-concentrate ration that totals at
    least 75 percent corn or corn co-products over
    the feeding period.
  • Age verified and processed at 18 months of age or
    less.
  • USDA grades upper one-third Choice or Prime.

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Commodity v. Product
  • Commodity
  • Minimum requirements
  • Anonymous
  • No product or price differentiation
  • Profits tied to low cost of production
  • Product
  • Product specifications
  • Traceback and accountable
  • Product and price differentiation
  • Profit tied to costs and ability to protect
    higher prices
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com