Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery

Description:

Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery Iman Mansourine November 18th,2003 Coalbed reservoirs characteristics Geologic sequestration of CO2 in coalbeds Enhanced Coalbed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:626
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: ImanMan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery


1
Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery
  • Iman Mansourine
  • November 18th,2003

2
Introduction
  • Coalbed methane is the natural gas that is both
    generated and
  • stored in coal seams
  • Coal is the most abundant energy source in the
    world, and it is a
  • major source of hydrocarbons particularly gas
  • - Methane represent more than 90-95 of the gas
    volume
  • Coalbed methane has become a significant
    component of U.S.
  • natural gas supplies, 7 of total US natural
    gas production
  • The injection of CO2 in coalbeds is the most
    attractive option
  • the CO2 is stored and at the same time the
    recovery of coalbed
  • methane is enhanced

3
Principal points of the presentation
  • Coalbeds reservoirs characteristics
  • - Geologic sequestration of CO2 in coalbed
    reservoirs

4
Coalbed reservoirs characteristics
5
Coalbed Reservoir Gas Content
  • Gas Storage Mechanisms
  • Free gas within natural fractures
  • Dissolved gas in water within natural fractures
  • Adsorbed gas within the coal matrix

Total gas Volume
Free Gas Volume
Dissolved Gas Volume

Adsorbed Gas Volume


Typically gt 95
6
Characteristics of Coalbed reservoirs
  • Coalbed are characterized by their dual porosity
  • Primary porosity micropores
  • Secondary porosity macropores ( fractures)

Source Van Der Meer
7
Coal flow mechanisms
Source Law
8
Characteristics of Coalbed reservoirs
  • The coalbed porosity and permeability changes as
  • reservoir pressure is lowered and gas
    production occurs.
  • The permeability of coal vary in two basic ways
  • 1- Phase-relative permeability effects
  • 2- Change in the effective stress within the
    seams
  • Coalbeds can hold 2-3 times as much gas as
    conventional
  • sandstone reservoirs.

Source ARI, 2002
9
Gas recovery conventional vs. coalbeds
Source ARI 2002
10
Productive stages of a coalbed methane well
Source ARI 2000
11
Characteristics of natural gas in coal
  • - The natural gas found in coal is "sweet" not
    "sour" as it does not
  • contain hydrogen sulphide
  • - It is generally pure methane with small amounts
    of carbon dioxide
  • and nitrogen
  • It is of near-pipeline quality when produced and
    requires
  • minimal processing and,
  • - It is generally produced at lower pressures
    than conventional
  • natural gas.

12
Geologic sequestration of CO2 in coalbeds
13
Why?
  • Coals have the ability to physically adsorb
    large volume
  • of CO2 in a highly concentrated state
  • Coals are frequently located near large point
    sources
  • of CO2 emissions
  • The injection of CO2 into coal seams enhances
    the
  • commercial methane recovery process

14
Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using Enhanced
Coalbed Methane (ECBM)
Source Gunter, 1998
15
Reservoir mechanisms
Gas Sorption Isotherm
Source ARI,2000
16
Reservoir mechanisms
Coalbed Adsorption Phenomenon
Source Reeves
17
Reservoir mechanisms
Source Reeves
18
Reservoir mechanisms
Source Reeves
19
CO2 sources
Three CO2 sources may be used within CO2-ECBM
recovery Operations 1- Natural High pressure
CO2 from underground reservoirs is likely to
be the lowest cost source 2- Potential
industrial CO2 sources including gas-fired plants
and other large industrial plants 3-
Anthropogenic sources that currently are being
vented to the atmosphere
20
Effects Coal Properties and Operational
Parameters ( SPE 78691)
  • Purpose Determine which operational parameters
    are
  • important to adjust for coals with different
    physical properties
  • in order to maximize the amount of CO2
    remaining in coalseams
  • How? Use of PSU-COALCOMP, a dual-porosity coalbed
  • methane simulator, to model primary and
    secondary production
  • of methane from coal, for a variety of coal
    properties and
  • operational parameters

21
Effects Coal Properties and Operational
Parameters ( SPE 78691)
  • Three properties affect the performance of the
    sequestration
  • process
  • The sweep efficiency well geometry
  • The reservoir pressure level
  • The degree of departure from chemical
    equilibrium between the
  • gasses and the coal the sorption time constant

22
Effects Coal Properties and Operational
Parameters ( SPE 78691)
Results
  • For short time constants as injection pressure
    is increased
  • CO2 sequestrated and methane produced both
    increase,
  • regardless to the size of the injection wells
  • For large time constants
  • - Increasing injection pressure in the longer
    injectors decreases
  • performance
  • - For short injectors increasing injection
    pressure continues to
  • improve performance
  • The dependence of CO2 sequestrated on injector
    length is
  • minimal for the higher injection pressures

23
Worldwide ECBM (Sequestration) Projects
Source ARI 2002
24
Global Assessment of CO2-ECBM/ Sequestration
Resources/Capacity
Source ARI 1998
25
The potential for technically-recoverable CBM
Source ARI
26
Detailed Examination of US CO2-ECBM/Sequestration
Potential
Source DOE/ARI study (2003)
27
Largest Pilots to Date San Juan Basin
  • The worlds first experimental pure CO2-ECBM
    recovery pilot
  • The second field demonstration site

Source SPE 48881
Location of CO2/N2 pilots, San Juan Basin
28
Allison Unit Well Pattern
  • 4 CO2-injection wells.
  • 9 methane production
  • wells.

Source SPE 48881
29
Allison unit CO2 injection
  • - The Allison pilot utilizes approximately 3
    MMcfd of naturally
  • occurring CO2 produced from at McElmo Dome
    across the
  • San Juan basin
  • Bottom Hole pressure of about 1100 psi, safely
    below the
  • the formation fracture gradient
  • High purity (99)
  • - Essentially dry

30
Allison Unit Production
Source ARI, 2003
31
Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse
Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.)
  • To model CBM production processes, many features
    have to be
  • taken into account
  • Dual porosity nature of coalbeds
  • Darcy flows of gas and water in the natural
    fracture system
  • Diffusion of a single gas component at the coal
    surface
  • Coal matrix shrinkage due to gas desorption

32
Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse
Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.)
  • Five numerical simulators are being compared for
    their capability
  • to model CO2 storage project
  • Stars, Computer modeling group
  • GEM, Computer modeling group
  • Eclipse, Schlumberger Geoquest
  • GCOMP, BP-Amoco
  • SIMED II, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial
    Research
  • Organization
  • Only Stars and GCOMP are conventional oil and gas
    simulators

33
Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse
Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.)
  • The comparison is based on field test data of
    coalbed reservoir
  • in Alberta, Canada
  • Description of Test Problem Sets
  • - A single well test with pure CO2 injection
  • - CO2 injection/CBM production in an
    inverted five-spot
  • pattern

34
Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse
Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.)
Problem set 1 Single well CO2 injection test
  • - Cylindrical (r-?-z) grid system
  • 29 x 1 x 1
  • Operating conditions
  • 15-day CO2 injection period
  • 45-day shut-in period, pressure falloff
  • 60-day production period
  • 62.5-day shut-in period, pressure build up

35
Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse
Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.)
Problem set 2 5-Spot CO2 injection/ CH4
production process Rectangular (x-y-z) grid
system 11 x 11 x 1
Operating conditions 182.5-day injection
rate 182.5-day production rate
36
Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse
Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.)
37
Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse
Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.)
38
The benefits of ECBM
  • Sequestration of CO2 in coal is a promising
    market-based
  • environmental solution that can reduce
    greenhouse gas emissions
  • while increasing coalbed methane recovery
  • Increase in total reserves
  • Recovered methane can be used as fuel for
    electricity and
  • hydrogen generation

39
The benefits of ECBM
  • Alternatively, the record gas can be sold for
    profit, re-affirming
  • coal as the fuel of choice for power plants
  • Reduction of emitted CO2, a contributor to
    global warming and
  • long-term climate instability
  • The greatest impact of CBM may be in countries
    such as
  • Australia, China and India where coal is the
    primary energy
  • source and conventional natural gas are small

40
THE END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com