Direct Methanol Fuel Cell - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Direct Methanol Fuel Cell

Description:

Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Study on anode and cathode catalysts Direct methanol fuel cells Major problems facing DMFCs Introduction Study on the anode ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2250
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: dc8495
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Direct Methanol Fuel Cell


1
Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Study on anode and
cathode catalysts
???
2
Introduction
  • Direct methanol fuel cells
  • Major problems facing DMFCs

Study on the anode electrocatalyst(Pt-Ruad)
Study on the cathode electrocatalyst(Ru/Se)
Acknowledgements
3
Direct Methanol Fuel Cell
e-
Load

-
O2 (air)
e-
CH3OH H2O
H
e-
O2
CO2
H2O
H2O CH3OH
PEM
Anode
Cathode
Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA)
E -0.02V
E 1.23V
E 1.21V
4
  • Power vehicles
  • More efficient than ICE
  • (97 vs. 40).
  • Lower emission(no NOx).
  • Quite.
  • Power portable
  • electronic devices
  • Last longer than batteries.
  • Easy to refill.

5
Key Issues Hindering the Development of
Practical DMFCs
Ecel l E?cell - ( ??a? ??c? ) Ecell /
E?cell ltlt 100
?--???
  • Develop active methanol electrooxidation
    catalysts.
  • Overcome methanol crossover issue.

6
What I have done on the study of
anode (University of Alberta, Canada)
7
Best catalyst for CH3OH electrooxidation PtRu
nanoparticles
  • What is the optimum surface composition?
  • Best PtRu ratio?
  • ? Hard to measure surf. comp.
  • of nanoparticle PtRu.
  • ? 1050 Ru was reported.

8
H
K2S2O8 in 4.0 M KOH
of surf. Pt atom was measured by cyclic
voltammetry(CV)
Inductively Coupled Plasma- Atomic Emission
Spectrometry (ICP-AES)
of Ru atom
9
of Deposition (n) 1 2 3 5 7
Surf. Equiv. Ruad 0.18 0.38 0.57 0.85 1.31
(Surf. Equiv. Ruad)/n 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.19
Ru Surf. Coverage 0.18 0.33 0.45 0.63 0.75
1) Ruad form a submonolayer on the substrate at
each deposition. 2) Ruad were deposited onto
Ptsurf and Ruad at similar probabilities.
Cao, D. X. Bergens, S. H. Electrochimica Acta,
2003, 48, 4021-4031.
10
?Ru 0.33 0.45 0.18 0.63 0.75 Pt
1 M CH3OH 1 M H2SO4
?Ru 0.33 0.45 0.63 0.75 0.18 Pt
PtRu 6733
11
Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA)
Anode Pt-Ruad
Cathode Pt black
Nanoparticle catalysts
Nafion? ionomer
Nafion?-117
12
Nafion?-117 Membrane
CF22
CF22
CF22
CF22
SO3-
SO3-
SO3-
SO3-
H2O
H
H
H2O
CH3OH
H
H2O
H
CH3OH
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H
H2O
CH3OH
H
13
Hot-Pressing (125oC, 1500psig)
Ink Preparation (sonication)
Painting
Steel plate
Paint brush
Catalyst layer
Nafion-117 membrane
Teflon tape
Teflon decal
Catalyst / Water / Nafion
Fuel Cell Hardware
Membrane Electrode Assembly
14
(No Transcript)
15
CVs for fresh Pt-Ruad
16
CVs measured in fuel cells
H2O (Ar)
17
Is Pt-Ruad stable? (Ruad might come off)
Fuel Cell Stability Test
18
What I have done on the study of
cathode (University of Illinois, USA)
19
Problems
Methanol crossover causes a mixed potential at
cathode, increases the cathode overpotential,
decreases fuel cell voltage, thereby efficiency.
Solutions
  • Methanol impermeable
  • membrane.
  • Methanol tolerant ORR
  • electrocatalysts.

20
Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Activity Comparison
Ru/Se
????
Methanol Tolerance
21
Acknowledgements
  • People

Dr. Steve Bergens
Dr. Andrzej Wieckowski
  • Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
of Canada.
US Army Research Office (MURI grant
DAAD19-03-1-0169) .
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com