Title: Global Logistics and Supply Chain Management
1Global Logistics and Supply Chain Management
- John Mangan
- Chandra Lalwani
- Tim Butcher
- ISBN 978-0-470-06634-8
2The Contents of the Books (Chapter 11)
Presented by Sean M Hsu Advisor Dr. Jr Jung Lyu
3Chapter 11
- Measuring and Managing Logistics Performance
4Learning objectives
- Understand basic forms of performance measurement
used in a logistics context such as tacho-graphs
(?????/?????) in road haulage (??) and space
utili-zation (????) in warehousing - Illustrate the trend towards measurement of a
wider array of activities and the eight driving
forces behind this trend - Explain why many LSPs (logical signal processor
???????) now routinely share key performance data
with customers - Understand the role of benchmarking in the
context of logistics performance management - Identify ?how many? and ?which KPIs? to track,
?how? they are embedded within the organization,
?how? they fit with wider company objectives,
?where? the requisite-data (
) will come from, and ?who? (at what
levels within the organization) should receive
the information generated by these KPIs - Understand in particular warehouse/inventory
metrics and total landed costs
5Basic measurement
- LSPs traditionally employed measures that were
either very basic from an operational viewpoint,
or imposed on them by law
6The tacho-graph
- Fitted to a truck to record its speed, distance
travelled and any breaks taken (?????/???) - Used by police forces to ensure that laws
relating to the maximum hours a truck driver can
work are observed - The rules are designed to limit continuous
driving time and detail minimum breaks and rest
periods
7Resource utilization measures
- At the broader company level the key inventory
measure - Inventory turnover (from a financial perspective)
???? - Warehouse utilization measures ?????
- Total number of pallet (??) or carton spaces
consumed vs. total available - Total space consumed within the warehouse
- Throughput (??????/???) , e.g. total number of
shipments received - Road transport utilization measures
- Total number of deliveries successfully completed
vs. dropped deliveries (i.e. failed deliveries)
8A contemporary viewpoint
- Todays 3PLs not only have to display expertise
in operational management, they must also keep
track of each transaction and ensure that they
and their customers and agents can have access to
information relating to this flow as and when it
is required - Such is the importance of monitoring this
information that many 3PLs now have dedicated
staff whos job it is to record data that can be
used in the development of metrics (?????????/??)
SCOR Model?Metrics(????) -
- ???? (metrics) Performance Metrics The
Measurement of Healthcare Delivery Performance
within a New Built Hospital - ????-USCERT??Security Scoring Standards of
USCERT US-CERT?metric value????????????,metric
value????0 ?180??????The Metric Value is used to
score a vulnerability by USCERT, and the range of
the metric value is from 0 to 180.
9Key performance indicators
- KPIs are shared with staff at all levels and in
all functions, with partners and agents, and most
importantly with customers - Most large customers now hold formal business
reviews with their 3PLs where the presentation of
KPIs is a key part of the meetings focus - Logistics businesses now see measurement of the
performance of all operational areas as a common
requirement from their customers
10????
????
????
?????????
?? ??
??????
??KPIs
?? (??????)
?? (??????)
??KPI???
?? ??
??????
?????????
?????????
?????????
????????
11?? KPI ????--SMART
- S Simple (or Specific ????)
- ??????????
- M Measurable (or Money ??????)
- ?????????????
- A Achievable (or Approachable ????)
- ????
- R Realistic (or Result-oriented ????)
- ??????? ??????
- T Timely (Timing ????????????)
- ???????????? (??????)
? ??????KPI ?????????????() - Money????????
12Fundamentals-?????????
- ??????????????????????????????????????
- ????NPV, ROI, EVA, BET (Break-Even Time ????)
- ???????????????
- ??????/???
- ???????????????
- ??????????????????
- ?????????????
- ??????????????????????,??????????
13Driving forces for performance measurement
- Increased reliance on ? contract manufacturers
- Strategic importance of LSPs to ? supply chain
success - Adoption of ? manufacturing management principles
- Impact on ? customer experience
- Increased ? competition
- ? Information technology improvements
- ? Empowerment practices
- ??? (??????????????????????????????????????)
- ? Employee motivation
14Selecting the best measures
- measure results, not activities
- it is all too easy to focus on simply
assimilating data (????/??) without necessarily
understanding how this data may be used ?only
Focus on KPI? - When setting KPIs, focus on what benefit one
hopes to gain as a result of having these
measures in place ?to be in proportion? - Dont focus on what data may be easily available
15Quantitative vs. qualitative KPIs
- The majority of measures should be focused on
quantitative results (??) - Measures based on raw data can often be better
for accurately comparing performance over time,
and indeed for predicting future results - Quantitative results are more reliable when
comparing over time, as long as the data used to
generate them can be replicated without error
(Forecasting Predicting) - Forecasting ????????,????????????,???????????????
??,???????,????????? - Predicting ??????????,?????????(??)?????????????
,????????????,????????????,????????? - Some qualitative measures can also be useful (??)
16Benchmarking
- Companies should always look to emulate/e/ best
in class - This is the role of benchmarking
- Logistics companies rely on referrals /
/ from not just customers, but also from
competing firms - The referring company may not have the required
capacity but wants to fulfil their customers
requirement - It is therefore important that some benchmarking
of performance can first take place
17Benchmarking
- To benchmark against the industry, the company
needs to use a similar set of measures in order
to map performance against the companies being
benchmarked - The time to first consider benchmarking is when a
company is initially putting together a set of
performance measures - It should be seen as a continuous process, and
not as a once off project - Todays logistics industry is very dynamic and
benchmark levels of performance can constantly
change
18Figure 11.1 Category of metric reporting
Top-down Bottom-up Strategy vs. KPI
? OTD is on-time delivery FTE is full-time
equivalent, i.e. the equivalent of one employee
19Figure 11.2 Goals and Metrics for use in a
typical balanced scorecard. Source based on
Kaplan, R. Norton, D. (1992) The balanced
scorecard measures that drive performance,
Harvard Business Review, JanuaryFebruary
20??????????
To succeed financially, how should we appear to
our share-holders?
Measures
Targets
Initiatives
Objectives
??
To satisfy our shareholders and customers, what
business processes must we excel at?
To achieve our vision, how should we appear to
our customers?
Objectives
Measures
Targets
Initiatives
Objectives
Measures
Targets
Initiatives
????
??
To achieve our vision, how will we sustain our
ability to change and improve?
Objectives
Measures
Targets
Initiatives
?????
Source The Balanced Scorecard Collaborative
21??????
22??????????????
- ?????????????????????
- (Core-Tech, Top-down, and Strategic Matrix)
- ??????? (???????)
- ??????????
- ???????, ?? OLAP Reports
- On-Line Analytical Processing
- ??????????
- ?????????
- ?????????????????
- ????????
- ? ERP, BI (Business intelligence, BI), ISO 9000,
6s - ???????BI?????????????????,???????????????????????
?????????????????????????BI (????/????)??? - ????????
23??????????
????? ????
???????
????
????
????????
KPI??????
?????
????????
???????
??????
????????
????????
????
????????
??????
????
???KPI
????????
???? ?????
????????
KPI ??
24?????
25Balanced Scorecard Causal Relationships
- Strategy
- Internal Customer
Financial - Process T1
T2 - T0
- Learning
- T3
26Inventory / warehouserelated metrics - receiving
- Generally the first to be recorded, because
receipt of product is often the most important
transaction - If the receiving process is well thought out and
implemented, then stock accuracy and product
in/tegrity should also be well managed - If product is received into the correct location,
and in the correct quantity, then the subsequent
picking process too has a good chance of being
problem free - Receiving metrics
- Receiving time
- Receiving On-Time Delivery
- Delivery paperwork detail is correct
- Part numbers, lot numbers and purchase order
numbers match that on the paperwork and as
against the ASN - Product is physically inspected with unit /
carton or pallet count completed, product
inspected for any signs of in-transit damage,
repackaging, etc
27Inventory / warehouserelated metrics - put-away
- Put-away metric (?...???? )
- Number of pallets, cartons or units put-away
- Compared against the resource available to
produce a productivity measure - Percentage of product put-away within a stated
time - Many warehouses might have good receiving
metrics, but have product sitting on the floor
yet to be put away (?? / ????)
28Inventory / warehouserelated metrics - inventory
accuracy
- Inventory metrics act as a measure of operational
performance, and reflect the ad/herence to
processes, rather than the performance of the
inventory team who conduct cycle counts - Cycle-counting of product is an activity that
customers usually take a keen interest in because
the material being counted generally sits on
their balance sheet rather than the 3PLs balance
sheet - Cycle-counting measures the length of time that
inventory is sitting in the warehouse - An aged stock report, detailing the number of
weeks product is in stock is easiest to report - An overall view of stock movements within the
warehouse can be given with a report outlining
the number of inventory turns
29Figure 11.3 Total landed costs
30Logistics costs performance
- A purchasing decision should consider all related
costs - Freight (??)
- Carrying Costs (????)
- Duty (?)
- Packaging (??)
- Warehousing (??)
- Locali/zation (??????)
313PL cost models
- Cost plus margin (?? ??)
- Often the preferred model for 3PLs
- Advantages (??)
- It provides complete trans/parency for all
parties involved - Risk is reduced for both parties
- Disadvantages (??)
- Often a reluctance for the 3PL to drive
continuous improvement - Resources may be fixed at a level that meets the
peak season demand - Resources employed may not be adequate to meet
business requirements - Little opportunity for 3PLs to make high profits
323PL cost models
- Transactional Pricing
- 3PLs will use all their available resources
across multiple customers and quote a unit rate
for standard warehouse activities - Advantages
- Resources are generally not fixed by the customer
- The 3PL will be highly motivated to drive
efficiency at all stages of their process as any
savings made will result in higher profits - Disadvantages
- The customer may not always get the customer
service that they require - The 3PL needs to ensure that special requests are
charged separately - The customer does not have transparency (?????)
33Service level agreements
- A mutually agreed and understood agreement put in
place between both the company buying the service
and the company providing the service - To include
- Roll-out and duration of the service or process
being purchased - Scope of services
- Areas of responsibility (i.e. who is responsible
for what) -PIC - Performance metrics
34Supplementary Matter (Chapter 11)
Some Additional Remarks
35(No Transcript)
36The Cultivating for Quality (??)
Top Down
- Top-Management
- Division Managing
- Dept. Managing
- TQM (Total Quality Management)
- Policy Deployment
TQM
- QMU (Quality Management for Unit)
- SPC/ SQC Training Problem-solving
- Manufacturing Consulting
- Dept. Managing
- Unit Managing
- Engineer Managing
SQC
- Engineer Operating
- Operator Operating
- QCC Training
- Work Training
Bottom Up
QCC
37??????
38????????????????
????? --???? ???? (COP-SOP-MOP)
????
????? ????? ???? ? ? ? ???? ??? ????
????? ????? ???? ? ? ? ???? ??? ????
? ? ? ? ?
?????
QMU
39Matrix Organization TQM
40????
- BSC Balanced Scorecard ?????
- CPM Corporate Performance Management ??????
- KPI Key Performance Indicator ??????
- ERP Enterprise Resource Planning ??????
41(No Transcript)
42????????,??????,????????
- ????????????????????,?????
- ???????????????????,??????????????????????
43????????/?????????????
- ???????????????
- ???????????????????
- ?????????????????
- ?????????
- ????????????????????????
- ??????????
- ??????????????????KPI
44?????????????????
- ??.?? (David Norton)???.???(Robert
Kaplan)?????????????????????????????????,?1992????
??????(Balanced Scorecard, BSC)???????????????????
??
???? (Deployment Framework)
?????????
??????????
?????????????
??????????????
?????????????????
??????????
??????????????
??????????????
45?????(Balanced Scorecard)?????
??
???????,?????????????
?????
????
?????
??????????????,???????????????
???????,???????????,????????????
??
??????????????,??????????????
46???????????
?? (Characters)
?? (Benefit)
47?????????????(???)(?)
??????,?????????, ???????????????,???????
???
???
?????
??????
????
????
????/??
????
????
????? ????
??????
??????????????
?? EPS
??????? ????????? ????/??
????
??????
?? ?????
??????
???/??? ?????
????
???/??????? ???????????
???????????
??????
??????
??????
????
48?????????????(?)
KPI
???
???
????
KPI
???
???
??
????
??
??? EPS ???? ???/??? ?? ????? ?????????? ?????
????? ???/??????? ?????? ???????????
KPI
???
???
??
????
KPI
???
???
??
????
?????? ???? ????
?????????? ??????????? ????????? ????/??
49Gartner Research?CPM/BSC????
50???????
51???? (Strategy Map)
52?????????????
53Scorecard Builder Architecture
Scorecard Presentation
- Deploy your scorecards
- Customize your views
- Sharepoint Portal Server
- BSC-specific web parts
Source Systems
ETL
54Next Step?
?? Technology
?? Process
?? Strategy
??
E R P
? ? ? ?
O L A P
??
????
Data Mining
????
55Managing Supply Chain Information at HBOS The
SRM (Supplier Relationship Management) initiative
(Chapter 11)
The case always generates much debate about the
objectives of the system. Taken at face value,
the system is very successful, but a deeper
analysis will reveal that are potential
difficulties with it. In particular Is the
strategy chosen su/stainable? Is it in the
long term interest of the bank to
institutionalize adversarial relationships
(????????????) with its suppliers via the
system? Is the architecture future-proof?
(???????)
with 3 Questions for the case
56Question 1
1. Which procurement decisions and activities
(Strategical, Tactical and Operational) and least
well supported by the new system?
?A general way of SRM in Taiwan is having a
series of Establishing Outsourcee Evaluation Item
Systems, including selection, counsel, guidance
and assistance, adopting QSA, QPA, etc. to do
Surveying and Auditing. The approval system, for
Suppliers, Outsourcees, Offshorers, and
Subcontractor is combined with Global Logistics
System and SCM, as one part of an integrated
operation system.?
? ?????????????????????????????
???????????????????????,??????
???,????????????? ? ?????????,??????,????????????,
??????????,????????????????? (???,?91)?
57Internal Business Process Measures the
Balanced Scorecard (Source Kaplan Norton, 1996)
- Model of Internal Business Process Logistics
Customer Need Identified
Innovation Process
Operations Process
Post-Sale Service Process
Customer Need Satisfied
Service to the Customer
Create Product
Build Product
Deliver Product
Identify Market
Relevant Metrics
58Strategic level (??) According to
Walters (2002) the logistics strategy of an
organization consists of all the strategic
decisions, policies, plans, culture relating to
the management of its supply chain.
Strategic decisions in purchasing will therefore
be concerned with determining the mission of the
purchasing function, decisions about principles
and decisions about implementation. HBOS
seems to have set out (begun) on a cost reduction
mission. The main strategic benefit of the system
is that it enhances HBOSs power over its
suppliers. Through the system, HBOS has
the ability to realize the combined purchasing
power of the 2 merged banks. Ultimately this
could lead to a cost advantage for HBOS.
Tactical level (??) The system aids analysis by
presenting information to the purchasing team in
a way that aids tactical decisions and explore
opportunities for saving. For instance, buyers
have more information available about suppliers
and their performance, which helps the
negotiation process. Again is can be useful to
add depth to the discussion here by asking
students how supplier performance seems to be
measured by HBOS at the moment. More insightful
answers would will recognize that supplier
performance only seem to be measured through
price at the moment. Tan et al. (2002) have shown
that is increasingly becoming unusual with
Quality levels, Service levels and on-time
delivery (QCD) ranked as the most important
supplier evaluation practices by the companies
they surveyed.
Operational level (????) At an operational
level, the system is of limited use in so far as
(???...????) no information exchange is currently
taking place with suppliers. More insightful
answers argued that other secondary operational
benefits are likely such as enhanced reporting
information.
59Question 2
2. Explain what is likely to have contributed to
the success of the project.
? DeLone and McLeans model (1992 2003) is
useful to explore system success.
60Question 3
3. What challenges are facing HBOS on the road
to true Supplier Relationship Management?
Ward and Griffiths (or McFarlans) Grid
show that the system is evolving, and the
objective is to expand its true SRM functionality
beyond the decision support functions that are
currently in use. Some people will have realized
that the system is seemingly designed to improve
HBOSs bargaining power. This is recognized by
Taylor when he argues Unless purchasing is
delivering significant savings, all its other
work is devaluated. There are no features
in the system that seem to support
relationships. The new move into eauctions
seems to confirm this strategy. We know for
instance that little or no electronic information
exchange takes place with suppliers. In moving to
true SRM, HBOS may realize that its suppliers are
demanding more of a win-win situation and they
are unlikely to relish collaborating with a
system designed solely to drive prices down. At
an architecture level, the data-warehousing
solution implemented is unlikely to be well
suited to supporting e-purchasing, and
information exchange with suppliers. It is
therefore likely that the move to true SRM would
require substantial additional investment.
61xRM defined
(Extended Relationship Management)
1. PRM - Partner Relationship 2. CRM - Customer
Relationship 3. ERM - Employee Relationship
4. SRM - Supplier Relationship 5. ChRM - Channel
Relationship
62Supplier Relationship Management - Objectives
(SRM)
Source JDEdwards.com
63System Success
Source DeLone, W. H. McLean, E. R. 2003
64Recent research opportunities and obstacles to
SRM
Increased customer service Increased
Switching costs Increased Geographical Reach
Be viewed as a technology leader Network and
System instabilities Integration Difficulties
Security Risks