Medical/Legal Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Medical/Legal Issues

Description:

Medical/Legal Issues & Professional Ethics Rad Tech A Week 14 The Importance of a Professional Ethic Ethics: the systematic study of rightness and wrongness of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:727
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: elcaminoE
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Medical/Legal Issues


1
Medical/Legal Issues Professional Ethics
  • Rad Tech A Week 14

2
The Importance of a Professional Ethic
  • Ethics the systematic study of rightness and
    wrongness of human conduct and character as know
    by natural reason
  • Professional Ethic the ethical conduct of a
    profession

3
Definitions
  • Ethics The systematic study of rightness and
    wrongness of human conduct and character as known
    by natural reason.
  • Morals Generally accepted customs, principles,
    or habits of right living and conduct in a
    society and the individuals practice in relation
    to these.
  • Values Ideals customs of a society toward
    which the members of a group have an affective
    regard a value may be a quality desirable as an
    end in itself.

4
Professional Ethics
  • Internal controls of a profession based on human
    values or moral principles.
  • Standards of conduct beyond mere conformity to
    law.
  • Professionals may encounter conflicting values or
    belief systems that can compromise patient care.

5
ARRT Code of Ethics
  • A guide by which RTs and Candidates may evaluate
    their professional conduct as it relates to
    patients, health care consumers, employers,
    colleagues, other members of the health care
    team.
  • Comprised of 10 principles

6
ARRT Code of EthicsAppendix D pg. 435
  1. Professional manner, respond to pt needs, support
    colleagues
  2. Provide services to humanity w/ full respect for
    mankind
  3. Delivers pt care without discrimination
  4. Practices uses equipment appropriately
  5. Acts in the best interest of the pt.

7
ARRT Code of Ethics
  • 6. Obtains pertinent info for physician
  • 7. Practices in accordance with accepted
    standards, minimizes radiation exposure
  • 8. Practices ethical conduct
  • 9. Respects confidences and pt right to privacy
  • 10. Strives to improve knowledge skills by
    participating in C.E.

8
Ethical Dilemma
  • Situation requiring moral judgment between two or
    more equally right alternatives. There are two
    or more competing norms.
  • Four components to solve an ethical dilemma
  • 1. Identify the problem
  • 2. Develop alternative solutions
  • 3. Select the best solution
  • 4. Defend your selection

9
I Think Dr. Jones Misread the Film
  • You have just finished a routine radiologic
    procedure on Mrs. Green. As you develop the
    film, it becomes clear that Mrs. Green is
    probably suffering from a rare form of bone
    disease. Dr. Jones, a young resident, glances at
    the film and smiles. I didnt think Mrs. Green
    had anything to worry about, he says. That
    joint pain she was complaining about must be all
    in her head. Later, you see Dr. Jones talking
    to Mrs. Greens family. He is smiling and joking
    with them as he signs Mrs. Greens discharge
    papers. Shaken, you mutter to yourself, I think
    Dr. Jones misread the film. What should you do

10
Ethical Theories
  • Consequentialism Evaluates the rightness or
    wrongness of ethical decisions by assessing the
    consequences on the pt.
  • Nonconsequentialism Belief that actions
    themselves, rather than consequences, determine
    the worth of actions actions are right or wrong
    according to the morality of the acts. Ex Lying
    to a pt if the lie might ultimately benefit the pt

11
Moral Principles
  • Beneficence Bringing about good
  • Nonmaleficence Preventing harm, to do no harm
  • Autonomy Self-reliance, independence, liberty
    rights, individual choice, freedom of will
  • Veracity Telling the truth
  • Fidelity Being faithful
  • Justice Acting with fairness or equity

12
Medical/Legal Issues
  • The liability of the technologist is not the same
    as the radiologist involved, but the liability is
    potentially real.
  • Although the law is often a mirror image of the
    failures of medicine, it is also a book of
    lessons from which we can learn.

13
Causes of Legal Action
  • Approx 10 of all medical negligence claims are
    somehow related to diagnostic imaging.
  • Medical Negligence failure to use such care as
    a reasonably prudent health care professional
    would use in similar circumstances.

14
Schloendorf v. Society of New York Hospital
  • Basic principle of law and lays a foundation for
    the relation between patients and health care
    practitioners.
  • Every human being of adult years and sound mind
    has a right to determine what shall be done with
    his own body, and a surgeon who performs an
    operation without his patients consent commits
    an assault, for which he is liable in damages.

15
Doctrine Serves 6 Functions
  1. Protects individual autonomy
  2. Protects pt status as a human being
  3. Avoids fraud and duress
  4. Encourages health care practitioners to consider
    their decisions carefully
  5. Fosters rational decision making by the pt
  6. Involves the public in medicine

16
Standard of Care
  • Degree of skill (proficiency), knowledge, and
    care ordinarily possessed employed by members
    in good standing within a profession.
  • To test whether the standard of care has been
    met, one must determine what a reasonable,
    prudent practitioner would have done under
    similar circumstances.

17
Practice Standards for Radiography Appendix A pg.
411
  • Developed by a group of medical imaging
    professionals adopted by ASRT
  • Outline the practice of medical imaging in three
    areas of Performance Standards
  • 1. Clinical Performance Standards
  • 2. Quality Performance Standards
  • 3. Professional Performance Standards

18
Causes of Legal Action
  • Approx 10 of all medical negligence claims are
    somehow related to diagnostic imaging.
  • Medical Negligence failure to use such care as
    a reasonably prudent health care professional
    would use in similar circumstances.

19
Patient Fall in Radiology DeptNEGLIGENCE
  • Favalora v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.
  • Pt. admitted to hospital for general checkup GI
    series.
  • Pt complaint Stomach pains, general fatigue,
    and fainting.
  • While undergoing x-ray exam, pt fainted, fell,
    and fxd her neck femur requiring surgery.
  • Surgery caused a pulmonary embolism
  • Radiologist was negligent for not securing
    medical hx prior to exam, pt won lawsuit.

20
Four Elements to Prove Negligence
  1. Must establish a duty to the patient by the
    health care provider
  2. Breach of this duty by an act or by failing to
    perform some act.
  3. A compensable injury
  4. A causal relation between the injury and the
    breach of duty.

21
Cause of Legal Action
  • Tort Civil wrong committed by one individual
    against another. May be classified as either
    intentional or unintentional. This type of claim
    arises from a breach of duty.
  • Assault Any willful attempt or threat to
    inflict injury on the person and any intentional
    display of force that would give the victim
    reason to fear or expect immediate bodily harm.

22
Cause of Legal Action
  • Battery An unlawful touching of another that is
    without justification or excuse.
  • False Imprisonment Conscious restraint of
    another without proper authorization, privilege,
    or consent.
  • Defamation Holding up a person to ridicule,
    scorn, or contempt in a respectable
    considerable part of the community.

23
Patient Rights Responsibilities
  • Patient rights informs the pt of the right to be
    well informed, to participate in treatment
    decisions, and to communicate openly with the
    physicians.
  • Patient also has the responsibility to provide
    accurate medical history, to ask questions, and
    inform if pt is unable to follow treatment.
  • Hospitals may (and do) list other very specific
    responsibilities.

24
Res Ipsa Loquitur
  • The thing speaks for itself
  • Burden of proof shifts from the plaintiff to the
    defendant.
  • Must have 3 elements
  • 1. Type of injury did not occur except for
    negligence.
  • 2. Activity was under complete control of
    defendant.
  • 3. Plaintiff did not contribute to his own
    injury

25
Res Ipsa Loquitur
  • Franklin v. Collins Chapel Correctional Hospital
  • 82 yr. senile female wrongful death after
    sustaining 3rd degree water burns while bathing
  • Res Ipsa Loquitur - Injuries suffered by the
    resident do not occur in a nursing facility in
    the absence of negligence, and the deceased was
    in the defendants sole care custody control.

26
Respondeat Superior
  • The master speaks for the servant the master is
    liable in certain cases for the wrongful acts of
    his or her servants. Deep Pockets approach.
  • If a radiographer is sued, the hospital and
    physician would also be named as defendants.
    Well established theory that the physician or
    health care facility is responsible for the
    negligent acts of its employees.

27
Corporate Liability
  • Requires the hospital or health care entity to be
    responsible for the quality of care delivered to
    consumers.
  • Health care corp. must assess evaluate the
    quality of care delivered must be prepared to
    make changes as needed.
  • The corp. may be required to intervene if
    suboptimal care is being provided by one of its
    independent contractors.

28
Informed Consent
  • A persons agreement to allow something to happen
    (i.e surgery) that is based on full disclosure of
    the facts knowledge of benefits, risks, and
    alternatives to the procedure.
  • Required when a patient is subjected to any type
    of invasive procedure.
  • If the pt consents to a procedure then revokes
    the consent, the doctor must stop the procedure.

29
Documentation
  • In court, if you testify that you properly
    assessed the patients medical risk and obtained
    consent from the patient verbally prior to the
    examination will that serve as meeting the
    Technologist Standard of Practice?

30
HIPAA
  • The Health Insurance Portability and
    Accountability Act of 1996 mandates that federal
    laws or regulations ensure the confidentiality of
    medical records.
  • Patients or representatives should have access to
    all records except in the event the provider
    feels that it is not in the best interest of the
    patients health to have access or if the
    knowledge of the health care information could
    cause danger to the life or safety of any person.

31
HIPAA
  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
    Act
  • Privacy of records and confidentiality
  • Confidentiality standards establish guidelines
    for the storage, access, and transmission of
    individual health information.
  • Patients must authorize the release of health
    information.

32
HIPAA
  • Within radiology
  • Technologists are sometimes asked by patients if
    they can examine their records while in transit,
    waiting for a procedure or undergoing an
    examination. The record information should not
    be shred with the patient in this fashion as this
    may lead to misinterpretation of information.

33
HIPAA Video Must be viewed prior to observing at
our affiliated hospitals.
  • Be careful .. the walls sometimes have ears
  • Schedule for video

34
Case Study Life or Death, the right to choose
  • Pt. Vega her husband (Jehovas Witnesses)
    signed a release requesting that no blood or
    blood products be administered to her during her
    hospital stay to deliver a baby. Following her
    delivery, she began to bleed heavily. Her doctor
    ordered a DC which she agreed to but refused a
    blood transfusion. She continued to bleed and
    was eventually transferred to the ICU. Her
    doctors told her that she would die if she did
    not receive the blood transfusion. Both her and
    her husband continued to refuse the blood
    transfusion. Because her doctor and the hospital
    felt that it was essential for her to receive the
    blood, they filed a complaint requesting that the
    court issue an injunction that would permit the
    hospital to administer the blood transfusion.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com