Replenishable but Depletable Resources: Water - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Replenishable but Depletable Resources: Water

Description:

Replenishable but Depletable Resources: Water You will never miss water, till your taps get dry. Our renewable supply of water is controlled by the hydrologic cycle ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:438
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: filebankV
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Replenishable but Depletable Resources: Water


1
Replenishable but Depletable Resources Water
  • You will never miss water, till your taps get dry.

2
Supply of water
  • Our renewable supply of water is controlled by
    the hydrologic cycle only a fraction available
    for humans of which 2.2 is freshwater just
    0.01 available for us
  • Replace body fluids food sources depend on it
  • Current supply is 10 times more than consumption
    Surface water ground water
  • withdrawals in US in 2000 262 b gallons per
    day of which 83 b g from ground water
  • Worldwide 1.5 b depend on groundwater for
    drinking supplies (2002) agriculture largest
    consumer

3
Rain Clouds
Rain
Clouds formation
Evaporation
Vegetation
Surface run-off
Ground water
Soil
Ponds
Deep Percolation
Ocean
4
  • 1.5 billion people depend on ground water
  • Agriculture largest consumer
  • Water diversion is common (Tucson) but
    increasingly unavailable
  • Quality of water depletion contamination is a
    problem limits supply of potable water
  • Excessive withdrawal from aquifers ? sudden
    sinking of land
  • Groundwater bore wells difficult to replenish
  • Water shortage everywhere Mexico city/India
  • Is this allocation efficient?

5
Efficient allocation of Scarce Water
  • Efficiency depends on whether surface water
    ground water is trapped?
  • Surface water absence of storage competing
    users - supply by nature - future generations
    not affected by withdrawal practices today
  • Ground water withdrawal now affects future
    allocation over time is crucial

6
Surface Water Efficient Allocation
  • Many uses / users for efficient allocation
  • (1) Strike balance among a host of competing
    users (2) find an acceptable means of variable
    supply of surface water each year
  • Supply not constant changes in a year year to
    year ? allocated in the fashion when MNB is equal
    for all users
  • If MNB s are not equalised - transfer water from
    low MNB to high MNB

7
  • A B individual net benefit curves Supply So
    water available OQTo

S0
S1
Per unit
A
MNB1
B
Aggregate MNB
MNB0
0
QB0 QA1 QA0 QT0

Quantity of water
QT2
8
  • If supply of water changes to S1 then B use
    receives no water A gets it all
  • Why is allocation so radically different between
    S0 S1 ?
  • MNB curve of use A is above that of use B, shows
    that as supply falls the cost (forgone net
    benefits) of doing without water for A is higher
    than that of B
  • To minimise the cost more burden is on B than on
    A
  • Efficient allocation those who find substitutes
    or conserve receive smaller allocation as supply
    diminishes than those who have few alternatives

9
Groundwater
  • Depletable
  • Withdrawals gt recharge resource will be mined
    until
  • Supply gets exhausted or
  • MC of pumping additional water gets prohibitive
  • Substitute to groundwater proximity to surface
    water
  • Price rises over time until the point of
    exhaustion or until marginal pumping cost gets
    prohibitive or MC of pumping next least
    expensive source of water i.e. when MC of pumping
    price
  • If ground is porous groundwater withdrawals can
    affect surface water flows

10
The Current Allocation System
  • In US ( also in India) the means of allocating
    water differ from one geographic area to the
    other
  • Property rights - Riparian rights right to use
    water to one staying adjacent to water
  • Gold mining - demand for change in property
    rights structure - need for transferability
  • Evolution in mining camps became the forerunner
    of prior appropriate doctrine.
  • Shifting of water to more useful uses - from
    surplus to deficit areas - Irrigation system by
    private companies - agriculture flourished
  • Public ownership - usufructory rights

11
  • State control on rates of water transfer by
    private companies
  • Demand still high profits high large scale
    water diversion
  • Federal role originated in 1800s out of concern
    for countrys development economic growth -
    built network of inland waterways for
    transportation
  • 1902 Reclamation Act federal govt. built 700
    dams to provide water power to help settle the
    West
  • Subsidy for water supply

12
Inefficiency
  • Current system not efficient - due to
    restrictions on water transfers - MNB should be
    equal in all uses trading rights for water ?
    efficiency
  • Inefficiently low prices
  • Allocation inefficient - transfers from
    agriculture to municipality are common as it
    raises the marginal benefit
  • Subsidies - Rate structure prices both are at
    fault
  • Prices low as (i) historic ACs are used to
    determine rates (ii) marginal scarcity rent is
    rarely included
  • Efficient pricing should use MC not AC water
    utilities are capital intensive with large fixed
    costs in SR

13
  • S-Run AC will be falling ? MC falls below AC - ?
    Mc pricing will not generate enough revenue to
    cover costs
  • Low pricing ignoring marginal scarcity rent
    will promote excessive demand for water
  • 2001 conflict between off-stream in-stream
    users
  • Without formal recognition of in - stream flow
    rights, the value of species cannot be properly
    incorporated into allocation of decision

14
Common Property Problems
  • Open access resource depleted too rapidly
  • Users loose interest in conserving - marginal
    scarcity rent ignored
  • In an efficient market incentive to conserve
    groundwater is created by the desire
  • To prevent pumping costs from increasing too
    rapidly
  • To capitalise on increasing prices that would
    rise in future
  • Conserver no exclusive right to the water saved
  • People on the periphery of aquifer would be hit
    1st at center supply for longer time

15
  • For open access resources economic theory
    suggests several direct consequences
  • Pumping cost rises rapidly initially price low
  • Too much consumption by early users
  • Burden of this waste not shared uniformly
  • Aquifer bowl shaped centre supply water for
    longer time
  • Future users hit hard
  • For coastal aquifers salt water intrusion is an
    additional cost

16
Potential remedies
  • Reforms to promote efficiency of water use, while
    keeping in mind interests of future generations
  • Reduce number of restrictions on water transfers
    - use it or loose it extravagant use of water
  • Pricing practices for irrigation water Two part
    volumetric pricing, output pricing, block
    rates, input pricing, area pricing
  • Water free good charge only distribution cost-
    scarcity value should be charged

17
  • Various variable charges

Uniform rate structure
Declining block rate structure
Per Unit Cost
Inverted block rate structure
Peak
Seasonal peak rate structure
Non-peak
Usage
18
  • Role of Water Politics 1976 Tucson
  • Privatisation of water supply monopoly
    excessive rates when rights allocated fairly
    enforced consistently, privatisation of access
    rights can become beneficial for all users not
    only to the rich
  • Water scarcity is not merely a problem to be
    faced at some time in the distant future. In many
    parts of the world it is already a serious
    problem unless preventive measures are taken it
    will get worse . The problem is not insoluble,
    though to date the steps necessary to solve it
    have not yet to been taken.

19
To sum up
  • Water scarcity is already a serious problem
  • Current use of water exceeds replenishable
    supplies, implying that aquifers are being
    irreversibly drained.
  • Replenishable water should be allocated to
    equalise the MNB
  • Ground water requires that the user cost of be
    considered
  • Reforms are possible
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com