Case Study: The River Little Stour - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Case Study: The River Little Stour

Description:

It has two main sources, the first lower Greensand and the ... q=cache:bz76moGMhMAJ:www.kmsp.org.uk/pdfs/KMSP-WP13.pdf Little stour pollut ion impacts&hl=en ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:130
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: GIS118
Category:
Tags: case | kmsp | river | stour | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Case Study: The River Little Stour


1
Case Study The River Little Stour By Gemma Parker
2
Introduction
  • The little river Stour is a low flow river in
    England.
  • It runs for 19 miles, it later joins the great
    Stour at Ashford.
  • It has two main sources, the first lower
    Greensand and the second chalk.
  • The little Stour river enters the sea at Pegwell
    Bay.
  • The Stour is 8 metres wide, but reduced to 1
    metre wide in the summer.

Water is extremely important as we require it for
survival. Pollution and therefore water quality
may have a number effects on biodiversity the
food supply, oxygen levels and suitability as
drinking water.
3
Quick reference to where the river passes through
  • Upstream of the little river Stour is in Ashford.
  • On reaching West Stourmouth there are two river
    courses.
  • One goes to Nicholas at Wade, and then to Hunters
    Forstal.
  • The main river flow goes to East Stourmouth,
    which then goes down
  • Stream to Pegwell Bay where it meets the sea.

4
Environmental Impacts down the river
Every river has environmental issues, some are
easier to be resolved than others.
  • Water abstraction for public use.
  • Demands of the domestic public
  • Toilet flushing 35
  • Baths, showers and wash basins 28
  • Kitchen sinks 15
  • Washing machine 12
  • Outdoor tap 6
  • Dishwashers 4
  • (Taken from anon, 2002 (Ashford Council))

5
More impacts
  • Other human caused impacts
  • The little river Stour has been manually changed
    course. It is prone to droughts.
  • In the change of course it has been made to power
    4 water mills.
  • Leading to loss of biodiversity, habitats and
    water leakages into chalk aquifers.
  • Upstream of the river it is in good state, but
    downstream fair state. This is because Pfizers
    pharmaceutical company releases their waste water
    effluent here.
  • Agriculture mainly surrounds the river Stour. It
    will be subject to leaching
  • of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers.
  • Metals can leak and contaminate organisms, and
    cause bioaccumulation build up which may lead to
    death.

6
Environmental Impacts Continued
  • Natural Causes
  • In summer the river is just 1 meter wide, this
    causes less habitat in water
  • but reed beds flourish around water edge. This
    caters for example dragonflies
  • and birds.
  • Siltation and drought is a common impact on
    little Stour and is thought
  • to be why the brown trout fish is declining.

7
What can be done?
  • Hydrology was investigated by Environmental
    Stimulations International Ltd
  • for Southern water company. A agreed benchmark
    of abstraction would be sought.
  • Channel re-lining and re-profiling.
  • Dredging keep river flowing freely.
  • River management plan and careful monitoring.
  • Environmentally friendly farming e.g. organic.
  • Fines for companies who dump their waste.

8
Eutrophication
  • Eutrophication is the leeching of fertilizer
    (nitrates, phosphates and potassium)
  • into the river.
  • Algae blooms form and block sunlight.
  • Death of macro plants no photosynthesis
  • Aerobic bacteria break down dead matter
  • Increase in biological oxygen of demand -
    depletion of oxygen
  • All organisms die accept anaerobic bacteria the
    death of a river.

9
Conclusion
  • Water should be protected as a valuable source
  • Recreation
  • Drinking
  • Habitat and biodiversity
  • Water pollution must be prevented or dealt with.
    By monitoring and
  • taking the necessary actions to resolve any
    contamination or natural object.
  • The environmental agency takes care of this in
    the UK.
  • Fines are given to the pollutants but are not big
    enough to prevent them
  • doing it again.
  • The UK however seem to be on track of having
    clean waters by2015 as outlined in
  • the water directive.
  • All river must be sustainable for the coming
    generations.

10
References
Anon, unknown,Kent and medway structure
accessed at http//216.239.59.104/search?qcache
bz76moGMhMAJwww.kmsp.org.uk/pdfs/KMSP-WP13.pdfLi
ttlestourpollutionimpactshlen Anon, 2002,
Ashford borough Council and partners Halcrow
group limited accessed at http//216.239.59.104/
search?qcache5ruGn3wi9IsJwww.southeast-ra.gov.u
k/our_work/planning/area_studies/ashford/environme
ntal_background_paper_(final_ed).pdfLittlestour
pollutionimpactshlen Ebbs, M., Anon,
'Environmental resources, accessed at
http//www.dover.gov.uk/local-plan/chapter06.asp F
razer, J, 2005, Little Stour, accessed
at http//www.environment-agency.gov.uk/subjects/
waters/564321/309477/ 309483/31017/?lang_ethemr
regionsubjectsearchforriverstour
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com